Brooklynian » Forum » Crown Heights and Prospect Lefferts Gardens »

Police Activity at Bodega on Lincoln and Franklin

Share this!
 | 
    1. photogirl
      photogirl

      getting it
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 99

      There was police tape up at the bodega on Lincoln and Franklin and Lincoln was blocked off. Not more violence, I hope.
    2. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      http://gothamist.com/map/

      Shooting

      Franklin Ave

      Brooklyn, NY

      8/7/2010 4:41 a.m

      ....that is all I know. No address or intersection is provided, so I predict Gothamist just plopped a badge down on the avenue where it felt like it.
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    3. jack krohn
      Jack Krohn

      My Baby's Gone Shootin'
      Joined: Dec '05
      Posts: 1,062

      When I passed by this morning, I saw several upended cups, as though they had been placed there to mark the location of bullets. Then again, I imagine if there had been shots fired that someone would have posted about it.
    4. king without a crown
      King without a crown

      above average
      Joined: Sep '06
      Posts: 947

      I was sparing everyone, I'd rather chat about bike riders
    5. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      King without a crown » I was sparing everyone, I'd rather chat about bike riders

      there are some really good looking ones out and about this afternoon.
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    6. king without a crown
      King without a crown

      above average
      Joined: Sep '06
      Posts: 947

      Maybe MHA can share details of the shooting, he seems to be in the "know"
    7. mha
      MHA

      rocking it
      Joined: Feb '10
      Posts: 1,352

      MHA knows nothing about this one. I haven't heard anything.
    8. cccc
      cccc

      getting it
      Joined: Aug '08
      Posts: 204

      I don't have the details, but I know that at least one person was shot on Franklin
    9. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      He survived? ....or has a sidewalk shrine and candles appeared?
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    10. whyfi
      WhyFi

      I'm Urban - recognize!
      Joined: Jul '05
      Posts: 5,268

      whynot_31 » there are some really good looking ones out and about this afternoon.

      ...not that I'd ever notice - I'm married.
      ...not that there's anything wrong with that.
    11. photogirl
      photogirl

      getting it
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 99

    12. catwalkertexasranger
      catwalkertexasranger

      above average
      Joined: Jun '09
      Posts: 483

      Subject: Re: Police Activity at Bodega on Lincoln and Franklin

      photogirl » There was police tape up at the bodega on Lincoln and Franklin and Lincoln was blocked off. Not more violence, I hope.

      They were giving the owners of the Deli a community service award.. They give it out to the vendor that sells the most illegal smokes per week..the gunsfire is a to say thanks for the award
    13. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      So, here is my question: should the local neighborhood do gooders bother with their plea that the area remain under Project Impact?

      This most recent shooting shows (surprise?!) that there continues to be a lot of crime. Is Impact makin' a Impact?

      Maybe it is time to focus more on raids than bored cops driving around in vans. I envision something like the Nostrand raid, but only with more criminals than politicians.
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    14. User has not uploaded an avatar
      Enciem

      Mets Fan
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 1

      Yeah, there was definitely a shooting. My room mate heard the shots and went outside to investigate. He said he saw them wheeling someone into an ambulance.
    15. king without a crown
      King without a crown

      above average
      Joined: Sep '06
      Posts: 947

      Maybe the Community can get more involved and form a neighborhood watch group. Maybe we shouldn't patronize stores that provide safe havens and allow drug dealers to sell drugs in their store. Maybe we should educate youngins on the idiocy of the "No Snitchin" rule in da hood. Maybe neighborhood residents could cooperate and call 911 every time they see these miscreants selling drugs on the corner. Maybe after they call 911, they could cooperate with responding Police Officers rather than being vague and anonymous. Maybe more people should attend the Community meetings held at their local Precinct and see what they can do to help. Ok thats enough for now, its MHA's turn......
    16. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      Folks decide which is the more permanent, scarier presence: the police vs the criminal element.

      Lots of folks decide they should not bother either element.

      The remainder decide "if I'm going to piss someone off, it shouldn't be the criminals"

      in thier minds, they have made a thought out, logical choice that protects their well being.

      ....those out at 4 AM on Franklin are a known entity to all.
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    17. mha
      MHA

      rocking it
      Joined: Feb '10
      Posts: 1,352

      Well, I certainly don't patronize either of those corner stores. I used to buy coffee in one of them before I knew better, and occasionally use the ATM, now, I walk by. There is another directly across the street, and given the dilapidated state, I've never walked in it; It looks like a urinal with a counter. Can't the city step in and just cite building violations? I know that they have done so in the past.
    18. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      If they prepare food (breakfast sandwiches, etc) the DOH can apply a lot more regulations than if they just sell beer and toilet paper.

      The trick is proving the owner is involved, otherwise only the clerk is arrested.

      On nostrand, a lot of the stores remain closed but the initial charges were pretty thin.

      The mayor, police comissioner, Ms James and others tried to make it sound as if a few arrests, a handgun, a about a lb of weed justified all of the resources and hoopla.

      ....hopefully the police will become creative, it would be sad if DOH was the one to have to do something.

      The good people need help from the police
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    19. paraderest
      ParadeRest

      Town Sheriff
      Joined: Sep '06
      Posts: 590

      By the way...the 73rd Pct has been an "Impact" precinct for as long as there's been "Impact" and they still can't get the shootings under control. That place is getting shot up.
      And that's the way it is.
    20. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      ParadeRest » By the way...the 73rd Pct has been an "Impact" precinct for as long as there's been "Impact" and they still can't get the shootings under control. That place is getting shot up.

      I'd like to think that their problems are more entrenched than ours (my naïveté is what makes me so appealing). So should we conclude that the police camera towers are simply a nice thing to lean against? ....that the city removes once they get tagged by local graffiti "artists"?

      Whynot_31 in bubble letters would be awesome, btw
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    21. paraderest
      ParadeRest

      Town Sheriff
      Joined: Sep '06
      Posts: 590

      Those ridiculous Skywatch towers just move the activity to the next corner.
      And that's the way it is.
    22. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      ParadeRest » Those ridiculous Skywatch towers just move the activity to the next corner.

      I think you are giving Skywatch too much credit. I perceive them as merely providing shade to those dealing. They are a total joke.

      We've been part of Project Impact for how many years at this point? At some point we should change tactics. For the mere sake of variety, can we switch to buy and busts? Serve some old warrants?

      Surely the criminals, the police and the public are ready to do something different for a while. ....we can always do this again later.

      Did we get Cosgrove II?

      As the 'hood changes, the locals are slowly changing to folks who will work with the police more. Folks are slowly getting organized, but some creativity wouldn't hurt.... We all know where the businesses are that sell drugs. Neighborhood Watch and cooperating with the police isn't always what is lacking.

      ...otherwise, folks will just write this off as something that happens at 4 AM and has nothing to do with them, because they are already in bed.
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    23. mr. met
      mr. met

      rocking it
      Joined: Dec '07
      Posts: 1,407

      some kind of boycott on these drug dens is a GREAT idea.

      is it legal to print flyers detailing the illegal activity that goes on in these places and post them all over franklin ave? i bet that would get some people's attention. put the flyers right next to the offending stores.

      "THIS IS A DRUG DEN"

      "THIS BUSINESS SELLS ILLEGAL CIGS; DON'T SUPPORT IT!"

      etc.
    24. king without a crown
      King without a crown

      above average
      Joined: Sep '06
      Posts: 947

      Its not illegal, however it is unlawful to post signs. Its an Administrative Code violation to post signs. However you may give them out. People need to stand behind and work with their Police to make a difference. Communities that are actively involved in their Community and work with their Police rather than against them often thrive!
    25. User has not uploaded an avatar
      runciblespoon

      rookie newb
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 12

      788 Franklin Ave (Northwest corner of Franklin and Lincoln)

      Owner: 788 Franklin Realty LLC

      1164 53rd Street

      Brooklyn, NY 11219

      (or

      134 Broadway #77

      Brooklyn, NY 11211)

      801 Franklin Ave (Northeast corner of Franklin and Lincoln (Shorey's Deli))

      Owner: Glenisha Brown

      180 Midwood Street

      Brooklyn, NY 11225

      Former Owner (Deceased?):

      Linton D. Brown

      801 Franklin Ave

      Brooklyn, NY 11216

      Lessor: A.O.A. Management, LLC

      6704 Wooster Ave

      Los Angeles, CA 90056

      583 Lincoln Place (Former record store w/ ripped awning and broken roll-gate)

      Tax block/lot: 1252/29

      Current Joint Owners (inheritance):

      Bennie L. Beck (has power of attorney over estate)

      1046 Halsey Street

      Brooklyn, NY

      Lorraine Beck

      101 Pond Hill Road

      Great Neck, NY

      Jerome Younger

      101 Linden Street, Apt. 4F

      Brooklyn, NY

      Jeffrey Younger

      583 Lincoln Place

      Brooklyn, NY

      Former Owner: Ferris Malloy (deceased?)

      583 Lincoln Place

      Brooklyn, NY 11216
    26. mr. met
      mr. met

      rocking it
      Joined: Dec '07
      Posts: 1,407

      is it legal to hand out the flyers right in front of the bodegas? or to hand them to people walking into the bodegas?
    27. photogirl
      photogirl

      getting it
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 99

      There is no legal problem with handing out flyers, unless it poses a health and safety problem--for example, handing them out in the middle of the street. The content of the flyers, however, cannot be defamatory, or the owners of the stores could sue the authors/distributors for defamation. As long as the flyers state the truth, there is no problem. However, I have been thinking about another approach, namely going after the owners of the stores in civil court for nuisance. But, could someone explain to me exactly what the connection is between the violence and the bodegas. What exactly is the conduct of the bodega owners or workers that fosters the violence? Do they have an argument that they too are just victims of drug dealers who have chosen their corners? What proof is there that they are involved in it and what exactly is their involvement?
    28. User has not uploaded an avatar
      runciblespoon

      rookie newb
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 12

      More on the Current Tenants of 801 Franklin (aka Shorey's)

      From NYC ACRIS:

      A.O.A. Management, LLC

      6704 Wooster Ave

      Los Angeles, CA 90056

      From Califonia Secretary of State:

      Entity Name: AOA MANAGEMENT, LLC

      Entity Number: 200718410122

      Date Filed: 07/03/2007

      Status: ACTIVE

      Jurisdiction: CALIFORNIA

      Entity Address: 1875 CENTURY PARK EAST 6TH FL

      Entity City, State, Zip: LOS ANGELES CA 90067

      Agent for Service of Process: ADAEZENNAYA AGU

      Agent Address: 6704 WOOSTER AVE

      Agent City, State, Zip: LOS ANGELES CA 90056

      6704 Wooster is owned by Ukeje H Agu and Bridget N Agu

      Check out their Sweet LA digs: http://www.realtor.com/property-detail/6704-Wooster-Ave_Los-Angeles_CA_90056_f3d1dd01

      and their zero-asset, zero-income, zero-revenue 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt "Public Housing Facilities" Charity: http://www.taxexemptworld.com/organization.asp?tn=1264112

      and its 2007 IRS Form 990: http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2007/200/242/2007-200242830-03c6f37e-Z.pdf
    29. User has not uploaded an avatar
      spnder

      getting it
      Joined: May '09
      Posts: 130

      photogirl » But, could someone explain to me exactly what the connection is between the violence and the bodegas. What exactly is the conduct of the bodega owners or workers that fosters the violence? Do they have an argument that they too are just victims of drug dealers who have chosen their corners? What proof is there that they are involved in it and what exactly is their involvement?

      I'd like to hear more about this too.
    30. mr. met
      mr. met

      rocking it
      Joined: Dec '07
      Posts: 1,407

      if their were actual PROOF, i'd assume the cops would have busted the places by now. it's just kind of common knowledge.

      actually, i do know that they sell illegal cigs b/c my girlfriend buys them.

      i have no proof, and neither does anyone on this board. unless someone wants to speak up.
    31. photogirl
      photogirl

      getting it
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 99

      Does their sale of illegal cigarettes have a connection to the violence? If they were busted for that, or if that was the basis for a civil claim against them, is there any reason to think that this would reduce the violence on these corners. I am asking these questions because legally the owners of these properties do have a responsibility to the neighborhood and could be held liable for fostering an unsafe situation or failing to address one that they know about. But there needs to be a real connection between their conduct and the violence; not just that their location has been chosen by those committing the violence.
    32. boogieknight
      BoogieKnight

      above average
      Joined: Apr '07
      Posts: 264

      photogirl » Does their sale of illegal cigarettes have a connection to the violence? If they were busted for that, or if that was the basis for a civil claim against them, is there any reason to think that this would reduce the violence on these corners. I am asking these questions because legally the owners of these properties do have a responsibility to the neighborhood and could be held liable for fostering an unsafe situation or failing to address one that they know about. But there needs to be a real connection between their conduct and the violence; not just that their location has been chosen by those committing the violence.

      The main connection betw. the bodegas and the criminals is that they're both working 24 hrs a day. Sure the bodega gets plenty of dollars from regular schmoes going to and fro from work or the subway or a night out at Franklin park etc - but there every single day and night - buying cigs, eggs and cheeses, beers, soda, candy, rolling papers, etc. - are the shitload of local dealers and their cronies. The relationship quickly becomes symbiotic.

      Even the most innocent and law-abiding naif of a new bodega owner will soon learn that these seemingly unemployed young men account for a large percentage of their revenue and will tolerate a lot of hanging out nearby (w/ it's associated dealing) - the occasional shooting or stabbing outside their stores with it's attendant police activity and questions is just an occupational hazard.

      24hr police presence and Skywatch, etc. help to move the riff-raff to a less "hot" block - but this problem of dealing and its resulting violence won't go away until the spots where the dealers deal change hands.

      Perhaps mandatory video cameras on every store front - which the police would regularly review for any evidence of criminal activity - would help. But such a law would be offensive to a lot of people who value civil liberties.
    33. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      I agree with Boogieknight.

      ...and add that the stores will slowly change as the neighborhood changes.

      I guess I'm lobbying for the opposite approach:

      I think that avoiding a gross store will not cause them to change. ....it is not like they are dependent on -um- "customers concerned with quality".

      Instead, I would let them know how much money they could be earning if they improved their store. ....they could also work fewer hours.

      ....and perhaps avoid mutiple visits from DOH and other agencies re: the health violations, alcohol sales to minors and untaxed cigarettes.

      Please view the great transformation of the "DisAssociated" on Underhill and St. John's. It has gone from a store that primarily served people hanging out in front at all hours, to one that now serves folks who primarily shop during the day, and seems to prefer fresh fruits to untaxed cigarettes. It now closes at 10, is used to close much, much later (if at all).

      http://www.brooklynian.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=686290&sid=66cd12947f2bfb01ec16a13cece7308d
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    34. User has not uploaded an avatar
      runciblespoon

      rookie newb
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 12

      Here is a PDF of the current 801 Franklin/Shorey's Lease

      The owner (if she cares) might have a cause of action under section 4. But from the lease it sounds like she wants no part and is trying to get rid of the building. The Californians have a 650K purchase option that they can exercise anytime after 3/31/2012. It resets to a 750k strike price on 3/31/2017(see section 31).

      Them's the facts. Here's my take:

      The Californians' spread is already locked in and they have little incentive to micromanage a shift from cigarettes to fruit from way out on the west coast.

      Best case scenario: real estate is recovers a bit in the next 18 months, they exercise the option in March 2012 and try to flip it quickly. New owner.

      Worst, more shootings and continued DOB violations make the spread on 650K unattractive despite real estate market. They sit on their option until 2017.

      For the litigious, the owner is well indemnified (see section 14).

      ---

      Edit: wrong year for the exercise date. a bit of over-optimism on my part. sry
    35. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      so, forget the California owners and hit the present tenants where it hurts:

      Have "concerned mothers" call the authorities and state that their innocent 18 year olds are being corrupted by the bodega's sales to minors. They might send an inspector to make a buy and bust.

      http://www.abc.state.ny.us/handbook-for-retail-licenses

      and/or the bring the matter of the untaxed cigarettes to the attention of our tax starved city. They might send an inspector to look for tax stamps, then levy a fine.

      http://www.nyc.gov/html/dof/html/services/services_fraud_cigarettes.shtml

      Assuming they actually prepare food (like sandwiches), you can also contact the DOH about any unhealthful conditions and rodent/insect infestations that pose a hazard to public health. The tenants end up in a sitution where they have to prove the inspector didn't see a roach (good luck!)

      http://home2.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/rii/inspection.shtml

      ....by doing some or all of these things, you can leave the job of passing out flyers to folks running for office.
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    36. mr. met
      mr. met

      rocking it
      Joined: Dec '07
      Posts: 1,407

      Perhaps mandatory video cameras on every store front - which the police would regularly review for any evidence of criminal activity - would help.

      THIS

      But such a law would be offensive to a lot of people who value civil liberties.

      these people should analyze the situation...then shut the fuck up.
    37. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      mr. met » 
      Perhaps mandatory video cameras on every store front - which the police would regularly review for any evidence of criminal activity - would help.

      THIS

      But such a law would be offensive to a lot of people who value civil liberties.

      these people should analyze the situation...then shut the fuck up.

      ah, but we already have silly Skywatch. ....the police arguably get a constant video feed. Yet (at best) the activity moves to another block, and (at worst) the thing simply provides shade to those dealing, or something decorate with a Sharpie.

      For better or worse.... We are not Singapore. We lack cameras; they don't. We listen to our civil libertarians; they don't. We lack enforcement; they don't. We have large marginalized populations; they don't. yada yada yada
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    38. User has not uploaded an avatar
      Mr. Henry

      rookie newb
      Joined: Jul '10
      Posts: 18

      Subject: S.O.S. Crown Heights Shooting Response THIS WEDNESDAY

      FOUR PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SHOT ON THE CORNER OF FRANKLIN AVE. & LINCOLN PL. THIS YEAR. The latest victim was shot on August 7th at 3:30am.

      A shooting response is a peaceful community gathering where a shooting incident took place. The purpose of the response is to express our concern and make a statement that killing is not acceptable in our community.

      NEXT RESPONSE

      Location: Lincoln Place & Franklin Avenue

      Time: 6:30 PM

      Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010
    39. photogirl
      photogirl

      getting it
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 99

      The transformation of the bodega on Underhill and St.Johns is an interesting case. It changed after the construction of the Richard Meier building began and cops were stationed on that corner almost 24 hours a day for an entire summer. (And as far as I know, there was never a shooting there; whereas we've had three in four months!) If the apartment building on Franklin and Eastern Parkway gets built, it probably will help to change those corners. But, it seems that the change on Underhill and St. Johns occurred equally because the police targeted that corner and were a relentless presence. Seems to me that we ought to be pushing our local politicians, the police, and all relevant city agencies to target these corners and these businesses. This Impact Zone thing is fine, but these corners seem to be 90% of the problem. Any suggestions about how to get this organized? Tish James was very helpful with "Steve;" perhaps we ought to see if she has any suggestions.
    40. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      (there were many shootings on Underhill and St johns between 2003 and 2006).

      The neighborhood changed. Among other items, the building across the street got a new owner (Alma ...same as the hospital bldgs) and upped it's rents.

      I'd sit down with CH assn and SOS, and brain storm. ....yup, involve Tish too

      for extra points have the owners of St Johns Marketplace explain how life got better once they made the leap. "I did it and you can too"
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    41. krowonhill
      krowonhill

      getting it
      Joined: Jul '10
      Posts: 248

      NY ain’t the same, it’s OT playa/ You can go and cop coke from the corner bodega.

      –50 Cent, “Corner Bodega”

      Isn't this what you all are talking about? Drug dealing done directly out of CH's bodegas. Not illegal cigarettes. Personally, I'm not comfortable referring to specific sites.

      Sure, a transformation from dingy bodega to wholesome corner store selling $5 packages of gluten-free cookies may have worked on St. John's, but I'm sure the owners consciously choose to take advantage of the area's rampant gentrification. This solution may work when you have hordes of economically-privileged folks moving into an area. Perhaps, there are already enough of these folks moving into the Franklin Ave. area now that all the bodegas can happily convert, but I suspect that a lot are still holding onto their old business model for economic reasons. (Conversion takes investment dollars, for example.)

      Given that, what are some workable solutions? A boycott sounds good to me, except that I suspect most of their profits come from dealing. Probably, the community is going to have to wait for the cops to move on these fronts, just like what happened on Nostrand in April. Maybe whynot is right that it makes sense to move tax funds into making cases against bodegas owners and away from the Impact Zones. I'm not police, though, so I can't say with any authority.
      Very un- "sivilized".
    42. pulpandbean
      pulpandbean

      getting it
      Joined: Apr '10
      Posts: 54

      It was alot worse back in the 80s and 90s. We need the national guard to be stationed on all the corners with shoot to kill orders!! That's the only solution. Every thing else is a joke.
    43. pulpandbean
      pulpandbean

      getting it
      Joined: Apr '10
      Posts: 54

      Btw the corner stores are not the problem. It's the police and their neglect policy. Over the years they did nothing. They still don't do nothing. And the result is nothing.
    44. photogirl
      photogirl

      getting it
      Joined: May '10
      Posts: 99

      Everyone seems to agree that it takes a combination of market forces ( which we can't do much about except by boycotting these stores and supporting businesses on Franklin that have a positive impact), and police pressure--which maybe we can do something about. I like Whynot's suggestion of sitting down with CHA, SOS, Tish James, Eric Adams, and maybe the new precinct captain. And maybe there is some way to get the media interested in this--that seemed to get the ball rolling on Steve. Nothing like a little media attention to embarrass the cops into taking action. Maybe there are a lot of corners in NYC in the middle of an Impact Zone that have been the site for three shootings in four months, but I doubt it (and let's hope not). Seems like that angle would be of interest, i.e., is this the best way to spend tax dollars and protect NYers? Anybody with media contacts that might be interested in this?
    45. catwalkertexasranger
      catwalkertexasranger

      above average
      Joined: Jun '09
      Posts: 483

      spnder » [quote="photogirl"]But, could someone explain to me exactly what the connection is between the violence and the bodegas. What exactly is the conduct of the bodega owners or workers that fosters the violence? Do they have an argument that they too are just victims of drug dealers who have chosen their corners? What proof is there that they are involved in it and what exactly is their involvement?

      I'd like to hear more about this too.[/quote]

      The main connection I have seen is first money. The bodegas take welfare cards and convert them into cash directly or allow people in the know to buy alcohol and smokes with their own or somebody else's welfare/benefits card. It also gives them a place to park open container or beer or other alcohol right near the front of the store..they walk in take a sip or 2 two and head back out to work. There is also 3 or 4 women or all sizes that are selling something inside of cars or near the dumpster and then taking the cash to buy something from the drug dealers on Lincoln and Franklin. People are also able to get joints and loosies fired up by the clerks of the delis as a courtesy.why light up outdoors when you can do it inside and avoid the cost of a lighter and wind. The ability for teens and preteens to walk in and buy beer and tobacco products is also a huge benefit to area residents, why should a welfare mom be burdened with an in person purchase when 1 of her kids can do it for her...If Dutch Boy or Franklin Park took welfare cards the place would be crawling with people trying to redeem the card for a cocktail or 2..as of yet the card's status as legal tender for anything you want only applies at the delis.
    46. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      There is also 3 or 4 women or all sizes that are selling something inside of cars or near the dumpster and then taking the cash to buy something from the drug dealers on Lincoln and Franklin.

      This may be easier to address than you think. It is often much easier for the police to document charges against a car, and incarcerate it, than it is for them to do the same thing to a person. When a person is found to be doing illegal activities, they often get out of jail quickly. ....cars, on the otherhand, often end up impounded and then sold at auction.

      So, get the car convicted. Take a picture of the car. Record it's license plate. Record the type of activities it is engaging in. ...pass this information on to the police.

      If you are able to get the police involved they can cite it for not having a invalid registration, for having a broken tail light, for being parked in a no parking zone, etc.

      ...sometimes they get extra "presents" inside the car:

      * The always nearby, but often elusive, handgun.

      * The stash that supplies the dealers so they are are always carrying less than dealer weight, etc.

      Even the Newbies stuck working Impact have the skills to do this. [there is no need to have a precious Detective work inconvenient hours on a silly drug case].

      ....this is about creativity.

      Although some may feel that the "Battle of Underhill and St. John's" was an easy win, others remember years of struggle:

      a. Black tar was cleverly placed on a cable box where the kids sat and drank 40s all night.

      b. The owners of the store were convinced that their business was dropping off as the neighborhood changed, and people came into the store and purposely asked for high profit items they did not carry ...then left without buying anything.

      c. Permits to the St John's "block parties" that ended at 2 AM (occasionally in gun fire and/or murder) were finally denied when they were shown to actually be concerts promoted throughout Brooklyn.

      d. Locals called the police over and over on people hanging out drinking and selling drugs.

      e. etc, etc.

      .....Franklin Avenue has the same amount of work ahead of it. The transformation will not be quick or easy.

      P.S. I took the pictures of the store on St. John's because the transformation was so stark ....needless to say, a store could undergo a smaller transformation and still reflect its changing neighborhood. It could merely stock Minute Maid OJ, as opposed to Sunny Delight.
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    47. User has not uploaded an avatar
      Ishtar

      above average
      Joined: Jul '09
      Posts: 377

      Has anyone thought about approaching our representatives to change the laws regarding EBT cards? A useful change in policy would be something along the lines of bodegas not being allowed to accept EBT cards if a full service grocery store is within a certain distance (say 1/4 of a mile) of the bodega in question. On Franklin we already have 3 full service gorcery stores (Associated @ Carroll; Pioneer @ Union; Tony's place @ Lincoln). These stores have technology in place that automatically differentiate between EBT eligible purchases and if I'm not mistaken, they do not sell smokes, beer, or any other substances that contribute to "vice". I think exemptions could be provided for stores like Yoon's and that place at St. Johns.
    48. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      Ishtar » Has anyone thought about approaching our representatives to change the laws regarding EBT cards? A useful change in policy would be something along the lines of bodegas not being allowed to accept EBT cards if a full service grocery store is within a certain distance (say 1/4 of a mile) of the bodega in question. On Franklin we already have 3 full service gorcery stores (Associated @ Carroll; Pioneer @ Union; Tony's place @ Lincoln). These stores have technology in place that automatically differentiate between EBT eligible purchases and if I'm not mistaken, they do not sell smokes, beer, or any other substances that contribute to "vice". I think exemptions could be provided for stores like Yoon's and that place at St. Johns.

      this would take too long. Bodega's have lobbyists that would prevent this from occuring. ....besides, many Bodega's provide a convenient 24 hours service that grocery stores do not. ....not all of them are scummy. Most are even assets to the community.
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.
    49. User has not uploaded an avatar
      Ishtar

      above average
      Joined: Jul '09
      Posts: 377

      whynot_31 » this would take too long.

      If people really want sustained change, work has to be done on multiple fronts and that includes changes in public policy. Bodegas do NOT need to accept EBT cards if they do not have the proper technology in place to prevent illegal purchases like grocery stores do.
    50. whynot_31
      whynot_31

      Former Lurker
      Joined: Mar '06
      Posts: 16,048

      Ishtar » [quote="whynot_31"]this would take too long.

      If people really want sustained change, work has to be done on multiple fronts and that includes changes in public policy. Bodegas do NOT need to accept EBT cards if they do not have the proper technology in place to prevent illegal purchases like grocery stores do.[/quote]

      Good luck.

      The present effort by HRA and the nonprofits of NYC is to get as many people on Food Stamps as possible, because it is federal money.

      ....this involves convincing more stores to accept the benefits, so the recipients will see it as worth their while. .

      Please realize that most people are not selling their benefits for drugs and cigarettes, but -yes- there are some really visible ones who do. And really visible stores that make it happen. (as long as there are benefits to be sold, there will be people buying them and selling them).

      ....but NYC does go after the fraudalent stores pretty regularly. The feds get annoyed when they don't.....

      It usually isn't a question of technology: "I'll ring you up for $15 in food, but give you $10 worth of cigarettes. ....and we'll call it even ok?"
      For better or worse, the change on Nostrand is going to make the change on Franklin look minor.

    RSS feed for this topic

     Welcome! Please log in to post, or register a new account!

    Brooklynian » Neighborhood Message Boards » Crown Heights and Prospect Lefferts Gardens


    Members Online

    now :
    most recent : rainbowsloper, trendpotter, brit princess, newguy88, tateinbk, slopeduder, mishaps, ribbons, drano, epiclylaterd, foolio, eastbloc, vick5y, opossumqueen, ntfool, howncreights, housebroken, ehgee, ben, pyremetol, roux42, tsarina