Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 36 Location: Near Smiley's.
Mon Mar 19, 07 3:42 pm EST
Ninth Street traffic changes?
Does anyone know more about this? (I received an email today...)
Quote:
Ninth Street Residents and Businesses
The Mar. 29, 2007 meeting of the Transportation Committee of Community Bd 6 will discuss adding a painted centerlane (similar to Prospect Park SW) for left turns, AND bicycle lanes.
That will mean there will be only one lane for driving, and NO ability to stop your car to drop off/pick up at anytime because you will be blocking the bike lanes.
Please come out to the meeting to voice your opinion/opposition to these changes
Transportation Committee of
Community Board Six
Mar. 29, 2007
6:30 PM
Old First Reformed Church
729 Carroll Street
(Corner of 7th Avenue
Presentation and discussion of a proposal by the Department of Transportation for improvements designed to enhance pedestrian mobility, access and comfort at the Grand Army Plaza.
Presentation by the Department of Transportation of a plan to install Class III bicycle routes in Red Hook
(Note that this is addition to one way traffic changes on 6th & 7th Ave. that are will be discussed on the Mar. 15 meeting at the Methodist Hospital Auditorium at 6:30)
Username: * The Innominator
Joined: 15 Nov 2006 Posts: 85 Location: Prospect Avenue Station
Tue Mar 20, 07 12:23 pm EST
backtopsb wrote:
Quote:
...will discuss adding a painted centerlane (similar to Prospect Park SW) for left turns, AND bicycle lanes...
Holy crap. (That's my opinion.)
...Where are there bicycle lanes in Park Slope now? What would a lane on Ninth Street connect with?
backtopsb Newbie
Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 36 Location: Near Smiley's.
Tue Mar 20, 07 1:27 pm EST
This is what I've found on the CB6 website. I want to know more about this, if only because the B75 goes up the block, and would hold up traffic like none other.
Quote:
Mar 29 Transportation
Presentation and discussion of a proposal by the Department of Transportation for improvements designed to enhance pedestrian mobility, access and comfort at the Grand Army Plaza.
Presentation by the Department of Transportation of a plan to install two-way Class II bicycle lanes and roadway markings for left-turn turning lanes along 9th Street between 3rd Avenue and Prospect Park West.
Presentation by the Department of Transportation of a plan to install Class III bicycle routes in Red Hook
Old First Reformed Church
729 Carroll Street
(Corner of 7th Avenue)
6:30 PM
Oiseau Wacky Tobacconist
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 660 Location: Who wants to know?
Tue Mar 20, 07 2:53 pm EST
Painted bike lanes are a waste of taxpayer money. They become nothing more then double-parking lanes and the cops rarely give tickets to vehicles (especially trucks) who park in those lanes. Furthermore, 9th street is notorious for double-parking, especially between 6th and 4th avenues.
This is another insane idea.
pitu Fake Buddhist
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 6537 Location: Utopian Park Slope
Wed Mar 28, 07 6:54 am EST
so . . . this meeting changed to GAP redesign and bike lanes (here and in Red Hook) after the outcry over the one way ave plan in PS?
Brooklyn Community Board 6's Transportation Committee Meeting
Thursday, March 29th, 2007, 6:30 pm
Old First Reformed Church
729 Carroll St. (at Seventh Av.)
Brooklyn
linusvanpelt Jockin my Mercedes
Joined: 12 Oct 2005 Posts: 394 Location: Center Slope, between 4th and 5th Avenues
Wed Mar 28, 07 10:36 am EST
Username: * wrote:
backtopsb wrote:
Quote:
...will discuss adding a painted centerlane (similar to Prospect Park SW) for left turns, AND bicycle lanes...
Holy crap. (That's my opinion.)
...Where are there bicycle lanes in Park Slope now? What would a lane on Ninth Street connect with?
There are bike lanes on 5th Avenue, 3rd Avenue (Gowanus), plus Third Street, Dean and Bergen going east-west.
I'll agree with Oiseau that a lot of drivers and double parkers ignore painted bike lanes and there's no enforcement. But--I dunno if Oiseau bikes or not--in my experience riding in a bike lane is better than riding in no bike lane: at least some drivers observe them, and it's not as though people don't double park on avenues without bike lanes. You just have to remember, as a biker, that a painted line is not a force field.
Oiseau Wacky Tobacconist
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 660 Location: Who wants to know?
Wed Mar 28, 07 2:42 pm EST
I bike quite a bit, but I don't think, "Oh, there's a bike lane, best to go that way." I go the way that is the easiest and most convenient., and I think most bicyclists would agree. When heading down Flatbush ave, most don't turn down Bergen because it has a bike lane, they keep going down Flatbush, all the way to the bridges (I used to turn down bergen but with the badly timed lights and the double-parked cars in the bike lane and no enforcement, it was a joke.)
Third avenue is ridiculous, especially in the industrial area, having a bike lane there is a waste.
We need protected bike lanes!
naparstek Newbie
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 4
Thu Mar 29, 07 2:21 am EST
Many will recall the car that crashed through the front door of Dizzy’s Restaurant in the summer of 2005 after an ill-considered left-turn from 9th Street to 8th Avenue.
After that incident, a 9th Street resident named Konrad Kaletsch teamed up with Ben and Matheo, the owners of Dizzy’s, to launch a petition drive for safety improvements along 8th Avenue and 9th Street. They collected 1,187 signatures and even got Borough President Markowitz involved. One of the solutions the community requested at that time was left-turn lanes on 9th Street.
DOT appears to have gotten the message and appears to be responding to community concerns with this plan. That's good. It didn't used to happen all that often.
So, Thursday evening at Old First Church DOT is going to show CB6’s transportation committee plans for pedestrian improvements at Grand Army Plaza, new bike lanes in Red Hook and a new design for 9th Street. The Grand Army Plaza changes, supposedly, will include some of the improvements that the community has been advocating via the Grand Army Plaza Coalition. If true, that’s good news. The Red Hook bike lanes sound pretty straightforward. As for 9th Street, DOT wants to:
- Install two bike lanes heading in each direction.
- Stripe a median down the middle of the street with left-turn bays for cars at the intersections.
- Eliminate one travel lane in each direction.
I haven’t seen DOT’s actual proposal but from what I have gathered, it looks like a good plan with significant benefits for the residents of 9th Street in particular.
Very much unlike DOT’s March 15 one-way plan, this really isn’t being dropped on the comunity from completely out of nowhere. It has been in the cooker for a couple of years as part of the package of Greater Downtown Brooklyn Transportation Improvements that emerged from the Downtown Brooklyn Traffic Calming Project. The bike lanes are part of a comprehensive, long-term, citywide bicycle master plan which aims to install more than 200 miles of new bike lanes throughout the city in the next couple of years and create better connections to city parks, in particular. And, as I mentioned above, the plan appears to be a direct response to community concerns.
Here is what I know of DOT’s thinking behind the 9th Street changes:
DOT has found that 9th Street has “excess capacity,” especially up towards the Park. In other words, the street is much wider than is needed for the number of vehicles that use it. Overly wide streets often tend to encourage speeding and allow for reckless driving. We know that the left turns off of 9th Street across two lanes of traffic can be very dangerous for pedestrians (and for Dizzy's). The loss of one travel lane in each direction isn't likely to be a problem.
Vanderbilt Avenue in Prospect Heights had a very similar problem. So, in May 2006 DOT striped a 15-foot wide median with left-turn bays, reducing Vanderbilt to one travel lane in each direction (see before and after photos here: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/pdf/dwnbklyn.pdf).
Many in Prospect Heights will tell you that the Vanderbilt median has, to some degree, helped to calm traffic, make left-turns less dangerous, and foster a safer, more pleasant pedestrian environment. In the future DOT hopes to turn the striped median into a raised, planted area kind of like Park Avenue in Manhattan. DOT’s success on Vanderbilt is, I believe, the basis for the 9th Street proposal.
As for the bike lanes on 9th Street: 9th Street is an important bike route. South Slope cyclists use it to get to the Park. And 9th Street connects the Park and the neighborhoods north and east of the Park to the Slope and to Red Hook too. I know people who use it regularly to bike to the post office, the Y, the Red Hook pool, Fairway, and to take their kids to PS 107.
Though bike lanes are far from perfect, many cyclists appreciate them and believe they help cars and bikes better see how to share the road. There is some evidence that bike lanes make cyclists safer as well.
The rampant double-parking on the north side of 9th street in front of C-Town and the car service is going to be a challenge for the bike lane. One idea is to do what a lot of great biking cities do: Put the bike lane between the sidewalk and the parked cars. Or put both bike lanes together between the sidewalk and parked cars on the south side of 9th Street away from C-Town and the post office. Lots of cities have two-way, “on-street greenways” like that and they can be great.
Bottom line is that this looks like a pretty good plan. In many ways it is almost totally the opposite of the one-way plan DOT presented two weeks ago. I hope that Park Slopers will come out and support it.
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 660 Location: Who wants to know?
Thu Mar 29, 07 11:03 am EST
naparstek wrote:
- Eliminate one travel lane in each direction.
Is this city's population decreasing? I don't think so. WTF?
naparstek wrote:
DOT has found that 9th Street has “excess capacity,” especially up towards the Park. In other words, the street is much wider than is needed for the number of vehicles that use it. Overly wide streets often tend to encourage speeding and allow for reckless driving. We know that the left turns off of 9th Street across two lanes of traffic can be very dangerous for pedestrians (and for Dizzy's). The loss of one travel lane in each direction isn't likely to be a problem.
No it's not likely to be a problem between 6th Avenue and Prospect Park West, but from 6th down to 4th avenue it's constanly filled with double-parked cars.
naparstek wrote:
Vanderbilt Avenue in Prospect Heights had a very similar problem. So, in May 2006 DOT striped a 15-foot wide median with left-turn bays, reducing Vanderbilt to one travel lane in each direction
All I can say is that evening rush hour traffic on Vanderbilt was horrendous before they installed this one lane thing. I don't live in the area anymore, but I could only imagine that it has most likely become worse.
naparstek wrote:
The rampant double-parking on the north side of 9th street in front of C-Town and the car service is going to be a challenge for the bike lane. One idea is to do what a lot of great biking cities do: Put the bike lane between the sidewalk and the parked cars. Or put both bike lanes together between the sidewalk and parked cars on the south side of 9th Street away from C-Town and the post office. Lots of cities have two-way, “on-street greenways” like that and they can be great.
I'd almost bet this won't happen. Here's one solution, have the city install a permanent traffic cop on the north side of the street to ticket double-parked cars. Oh, but guess what, that won't happen either.
So if the bike lane is going to become a double-parking lane, why have it? If the median is going to become the travel lane due to all the double-parked cars, why have it? Maybe just doing something to the southside of the road would be a better idea, as the problems of the north side will never go away.
The sidewalks are plenty wide the whole length of 9th street, so what's the problem?
And all this because ONE driver lost control of his car and went into Dizzy's. Give me a break.
erikka Bruce Ratner's Love Child
Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Posts: 754
Thu Mar 29, 07 11:10 am EST
I would be pro if I thought bike lanes honestly worked but the above poster is right--the ones on Fifth Avenue are just double parking lanes for assholes in huge trucks (usually noncommerical, SUVS). When they're DP'd there I have to go around them, putting myself even further into traffic (and danger). The route I usually take is 6th Av, which is wide and free of bike lanes.
I am happy to report that yesterday I saw cops ticketing the motherfuck out of double parkers on 5th Av. It made my day a little happier.
Oiseau Wacky Tobacconist
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 660 Location: Who wants to know?
Thu Mar 29, 07 11:33 am EST
erikka wrote:
I am happy to report that yesterday I saw cops ticketing the motherfuck out of double parkers on 5th Av. It made my day a little happier.
yeah but the thing is, most likely they will be back double-parking sooner then the cops will be back writing tickets.
Joined: 09 Sep 2005 Posts: 1133 Location: No longer at 8th and Prez
Thu Mar 29, 07 7:08 pm EST
I, for one, actually DO use the bike lanes. I've used the 3rd Ave, 3rd St, and Bergen bike lanes w/o any problems. Never used Fifth Ave... that seems like a really crappy street for a bike lane. I'd rather see them take out a drive lane on Sixth Ave and turn it into a protected bike lane.
backtopsb Newbie
Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 36 Location: Near Smiley's.
Fri Mar 30, 07 10:32 am EST
Sounds like the plan to add bike lanes/left turn lanes to 9th street is a done deal. And it sounds like it has been a done deal for awhile. The DOT is planning to have the lines painted in May. It's just about April, and let's be honest--nothing moves through an agency that quickly.
I do support having safe bike lanes for people. I am concerned about putting them on such a busy street, though. Not only do you have normal traffic, but you also have the bus traffic. I see a lot of congestion being added to a street that doesn't need it. (I also see traffic spilling over to 8th and 10th--have fun with that, everyone!)
With the double parking, the search for parking spaces, and just the every day need to load/unload the car, I just see this plan being a pain for most people on 9th Street. We'll see how it actually works out.
Oiseau Wacky Tobacconist
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 660 Location: Who wants to know?
Fri Mar 30, 07 10:37 am EST
The thing about many bike lanes is they all of a suden just end and you're back to being on a street without a bike lane. Kind of ridiculous.
debya Newbie
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 Posts: 42
Fri Mar 30, 07 11:15 am EST
erikka wrote:
I am happy to report that yesterday I saw cops ticketing the motherfuck out of double parkers on 5th Av. It made my day a little happier.
Wow. I've never seen that! Between what streets were they ticketing?
erikka Bruce Ratner's Love Child
Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Posts: 754
Fri Mar 30, 07 11:24 am EST
Oiseau wrote:
The thing about many bike lanes is they all of a suden just end and you're back to being on a street without a bike lane. Kind of ridiculous.
Like on Fifth above Union--there's a PICTURE of a bike and barely enough clearance to ride without getting doored. DOT, puh-lease!
I do occasionally use bike lanes (more so in the city than in Brooklyn) but I still think they're useless if they're constantly blocked. The lane on third is great and I often use that but it's a one way and I don't feel comfortable riding on the other side with dumptrucks speeding past at fifty miles an hour. Bike lanes are the city's way of putting a band aid on a huge gaping wound -- they're not addressing the real problem of too many cars in too little space with too little traffic enforcement. The DOT has been doing a piss poor job of implenting projects they have promised andan even worse job maintaining those projects once they've been implemented (eg, repainting bike lanes when they are no longer clearly visible). I'd rather see them repair/maintain the lanes currently in effect rather than throwing down a new one.
I am happy to report that yesterday I saw cops ticketing the motherfuck out of double parkers on 5th Av. It made my day a little happier.
Wow. I've never seen that! Between what streets were they ticketing?
South Slope--around 16th. All the ticketees I saw were bitching and moaning. I wish there was a clause that would triple the cost of your ticket for being a huge fucking whiner double parked in a hummer blocking both the bike and regular traffic lanes.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum