Landlord of $896/mo SP apartment suddenly starts caring about no pets clause

joebrooklynian

“He’s known since Day One we had pets,” Kane said. “My little cats used to beg for treats from him when he would come in to do repairs.”

Tarnofsky also cited an ad for a $1,530 apartment in the same building that says cats and dogs are welcome.

A man who answered the phone at Hadzovic’s home said, “The lady signed a lease that said no pets allowed . . . They’re not allowed.’’

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/tenants_rip_pet_peeve_zxQESsYkQ4CdrIwKoI8s5J

bohuma

Yeah well as a NYC landlord he should have known that after 90 days of openly keeping a pet, the no pets clause is defunct for the life of that particular pet.

armchair_warrior

yeap landlord has no rights in nyc so he is basically has to accept cat after those 90 days.

tateinbk

The landlord had rights for the first 90 days to say no pets.