This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Ebbets Field Apartments get a make over - Page 3 — Brooklynian

Ebbets Field Apartments get a make over

1356

Comments

  • It is important to use your flushes wisely under such circumstances.

  • A plaque marking the former location of home plate was recently installed. 
  • whynot_31
    edited April 2016

    Their parents will enjoy seeing the plaque.  When Abba signs a contract with MySpace, the process will accelerate.

    Meanwhile, houses nearby on Sullivan St are asking $1.3M.  http://www.corleyre.com/listings/191-sullivan-place-townhouse-crown-heights-brooklyn-crg1085/

  • Photos of a very closed playground-park courtesy of F Richard Hurley


    1234567
  • A local tenant's right group, the Crown Heights Tenants' Union, hopes to draw attention to the plight of the long term tenants at a rally on the patio on May 26th.

    https://www.facebook.com/events/717629848374753/

    It is not yet clear to me that the managing agent, ABBA, has violated any laws.
  • whynot_31 said:
    A local tenant's right group, the Crown Heights Tenants' Union, hopes to draw attention to the plight of the long term tenants at a rally on the patio on May 26th. https://www.facebook.com/events/717629848374753/ It is not yet clear to me that the managing agent, ABBA, has violated any laws.
    FB link is broken.

    It sucks when half of the elevators in a high-rise building are not reliable.

  • Here's a link that should work:
    http://www.crownheightstenantunion.org
    In addition to being slow to fix the elevators, I expect mgt to cut back on cleaning.

    ...and increase enforcement of rules re: late payment and noise.

    This isn't going to be quick or pretty.
  • Interesting that there is a mention of preferential rent. 
  • whynot_31
    edited May 2016

    https://www.facebook.com/events/1045078115573246/

    My understanding is that the tenants union wishes to expand tenant rights, therefore they are protesting against a practice which (when properly implemented) is completely legal. Hence, I hope that the tenants who can not afford the Max Legal Rent have a plan that is more solid than chanting on the patio.

  • They are now billing the event as a Press Conference: https://www.facebook.com/events/134019483669442/
  • whynot_31 said:

    https://www.facebook.com/events/1045078115573246/

    My understanding is that the tenants union wishes to expand tenant rights, therefore they are protesting against a practice which (when properly implemented) is completely legal. Hence, I hope that the tenants who can not afford the Max Legal Rent have a plan that is more solid than chanting on the patio.

    Is it properly implemented though? [/devil's advocate]

    There may be an increase in those who can afford maximum legal rent, but is it helping to improve services (e.g. hot water that wavers in and out, wonky elevators)? 
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • I remember when the mayor and Speaker Heastie came to the complex. It'd be nice to have some sort of followup. 
    image
  • whynot_31 said:

    https://www.facebook.com/events/1045078115573246/

    My understanding is that the tenants union wishes to expand tenant rights, therefore they are protesting against a practice which (when properly implemented) is completely legal. Hence, I hope that the tenants who can not afford the Max Legal Rent have a plan that is more solid than chanting on the patio.

    This event is scheduled for tomorrow, 5/26/2016 at noon.      That strikes me as a time that will be most convenient to long term residents, who are retired.



  • whynot_31
    edited May 2016

    They don't like the "however" part:

    "Rent increase percentages for rent stabilized apartments and lofts are adjusted each year.

    For leases beginning between October 1, 2015, through September 30, 2016, the rent increase for rent stabilized apartment and loft renewals is:

    • 1-year lease: 0% for tenants paying the "legal regulated rent" for their apartment as established by the rent stabilization laws.
    • 2-year lease: 2%
    However, if a tenant is paying a "preferential rent," which an owner agrees to charge and is lower than the legal regulated rent that the owner could lawfully collect, the owner may be allowed to increase the rent up to the "legal regulated rent," even if the increase is greater than the rent increase guidelines that are in effect."

  • whynot_31
    edited May 2016
  • whynot_31
    edited May 2016

    local politicians are there.

    source:  https://twitter.com/Theirreverend1/status/735872391251955712


    poltish
  • I still don't get why someone would agree to signing a lease that involves preferential rent. 

    I remember when TPTB were still fighting in Albany about how and whether to extend/renew the rental regulation legislation, someone had posted a comment on Gothamist asking, "What about us (those who are paying preferential rent)?" I guess some felt like they weren't being included in the larger conversation.
  • On another note, progress is being made on the playground. I'll post pics when I get around to it.
  • whynot_31
    edited May 2016

    Tenants sign leases that state the rent they will be paying is lower than the max legal amount (aka "preferential") because if they don't sign it, they have to move.

    I'm glad progress is being made on the playground.

    ...I'd prefer to believe that NYC Parks is not involved in this process.  

    "There are currently 43 eviction proceedings taking place right now. There were rarely more than 5 at any given time before three years ago." 

    http://theqatparkside.blogspot.com/

     

  • @mugofmead111 because getting an apartment with preferential rent is generally cheaper than an apartment that's market rate. Rent stabilized are best, of course, but not always available. I'd rather pay preferential rent with the knowledge that it may change the following year, then having to pay more from the get go.

    A friend of mine is paying preferential rent in Crown Heights and he has an awesome deal. The management is great and hasn't been increasing the rents, while also renovating the apartment and building. His apartment could easily go for a few hundred more per month. Despite all of the shitty landlords out there, there are some good ones.
  • whynot_31
    edited May 2016
    While their individual reasons vary, in general, landlords charge tenants a preferential rent because they think there would be an "excessive" number of vacancies if they charged the higher, max legal rate.

    In the case of buildings like Ebbets, we can speculate that the market has now caught up to the max legal rate and/or that making large numbers of units vacant at once poses potential benefits to the landlord:

    1. The landlord can save money by purchasing new appliances, cabinets and labor in bulk.

    2. The landlord can use similar economies of scale to hire lawyers to pursue evictions.

    3. Tenants interested in the higher rent, newly renovated units can be recruited enmass to see a variety of units. This may allay any fears they have about being the only ones of their complexion or social class in the building.
  • whynot_31
    edited June 2016
    This site has been added to my list of sites that I believe will make a large impact on western Crown Heights:  http://www.brooklynian.com/discussion/47007/the-big-18-developments-the-whynot-31-wont-stop-talking-about?new=1
  • mugofmead111
    edited June 2016
    The rally made the front page of the local newspaper The Brooklyn Downtown Star. I picked up a copy on the Brooklyn Heights branch of the Brooklyn Public Library. (Yes, the entity which is going to have its site redeveloped.)

  • whynot_31 said:
    This site has been added to my list of sites that I believe will make a large impact on western Crown Heights:  http://www.brooklynian.com/discussion/47007/the-big-18-developments-the-whynot-31-wont-stop-talking-about?new=1



    In the next 10 - 15 years maybe. 
  • If the management company does not offer buyouts, I predict it will achieve a building wide turnover rate of 15% per year by simply eliminating Preferential Rents and aggressively evicting tenants who pay late or break the existing rules.

    That could result in most of the units in the building renting for more than $2200 in a mere 6 years.

  • whynot_31 said:

    If the management company does not offer buyouts, I predict it will achieve a building wide turnover rate of 15% per year by simply eliminating Preferential Rents and aggressively evicting tenants who pay late or break the existing rules.

    That could result in most of the units in the building renting for more than $2200 in a mere 6 years.

    Buyouts? Interesting. 
  • mugofmead111
    edited June 2016
    Progress is being made on the adjacent playground on McKeever Place. I don't have any pictures to post though.
Sign In or Register to comment.