This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Bedford Shelter to Possbily Grow — Brooklynian

Bedford Shelter to Possbily Grow

City to close homeless shelter
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/04/26/2008-04-26_city_to_close_homeless_shelter.html
BY TINA MOORE
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Saturday, April 26th 2008, 4:00 AM

The city plans to close its largest homeless shelter for men to make way for a hotel on Manhattan's East Side, the city Economic Development Corp. said.

The center, located in the former Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital building on First Ave. and 28th St., is the intake center for all the city's homeless men. About 600 stay there now.

The agency set a June 13 deadline for proposals to "redevelop the building as a hotel and conference center catering to the adjacent medical and bioscience-related communities."

The Department of Homeless Services will likely move the intake center to the Bedford-Atlantic Armory shelter in Brooklyn, one of the city's largest that has been the subject of frequent complaints.

Homeless Commissioner Rob Hess said the Bellevue closing would be good news, made possible because outreach teams have moved 500 people off the streets since September, allowing the intake center in Brooklyn to be smaller.

Patrick Markee, senior policy analyst for the Coalition for the Homeless, said moving the intake center out of Manhattan will make it more difficult for the street homeless to find shelter.

"Any attempt to move the intake center to the Bedford-Atlantic Armory in Brooklyn or another site far from midtown Manhattan, where most street homelessness is concentrated, will lead to more homeless people sleeping on our streets," Markee said.

Comments

  • No surprise that an outer Borough is once again sacrificed for the benefit of Manhattan

    Would I be crazy if I thought that making the Bedford Shelter the main INTAKE CENTER would bring greater supervison, and therefore LESS problems?
  • wirenut wrote: No surprise that an outer Borough is once again sacrificed for the benefit of Manhattan

    Would I be crazy if I thought that making the Bedford Shelter the main INTAKE CENTER would bring greater supervison, and therefore LESS problems?
    as cruel as it may sound the "problems" associated with the Bedford homeless isnt so much that they're ruining the innediate area on account because of their destructiveness or criminality, although no doubt there is a definite nusiance factor in having large groups of men hanging around one's home and block (smoking, littering, etc.)

    the problem with having already the large number of homeless around is that it affects one's comfort level in aving your kids run around the block or area unattended. It has very real impact on home values and neighborhood desirability, factors that lead to improving neighborhoods and better amenities and better schools. A nabe that hosts so many homeless and transient and people saddled with emotional, psychological and drug/alcohol dependency issues suffers real negative consequences because of their presence. To add hundreds more and make the already heavily saddled nabe the direct depository for all of the city's needy does the nabe harm.

    That's why in theory shelters and such relief agaencies are supposed to be distributed evenly across ALL CITY nabes, rich and poor - black and white. But obviously that's far from what the reality of what actually happens.

    Park Slope's shelter which held a measly 80 people is being renovated at the cost of millions into a state of the art recreation area. Because one thing wealthy Park Slope lacks are amenities and access to one of the world's largest, most beautiful and well kept public parks and numerous smaller playgrounds and fine public schools.
  • If this were to happen in wealthy Park Slope, its residents would not hesitate to call their council person, media and/or anyone who would listen. Why can't we do the same. Let's get proactive people!!!
  • There was a major meeting of the Crown Heights Revitalization Movement on Wednesday night at 830 Prospect Place. In attendance were Tish James, Councilperson for the area around the Armory, State Senator Eric Adams and representatives from Assemblymen Camara and Jefferies as well as representatives from the Coalition for the Homeless and the Legal Aid Society plus 30 community residents. Needless to say, the mood was NOT festive.
    CHRM is the group that got the Community Board to pass a moratorium on any additional social service beds in the community board after issuing a report showing that CB 8 had more such beds per acre of land than any community board in Brooklyn.
    Plans are afoot to offer an alternative to the offensive proposal by the Dept of Homeless Services. Stay tuned!
  • Is anyone talking petition drive yet? Should we be?
  • Big press conference on the steps of City Hall at 1 PM on Thursday about the proposed expansion of the Men's Shelter on Bedford Avenue. Come at 12:45 to the Security Booth on Park Row to get a press release and briefing from Crown Heights Revitalization Movement (CHaRM)members. Call 718-496-5139 for more information. Be there to stop this unwanted imposition on our community!
  • Whoa! Press conference was cancelled! Probably rescheduled to take place the Bedford Armory. Date and time to be announced.
  • I read something in the Post today about how the residents of the UES are also upset that the shelter is closing (wow, huh? pretty impressive coming from the well-heeled). It seems that the shelter doesn't provide complete services for them (ie- beds)- so while they do intake there, they ship them to another part of the city to sleep. They are attempting to intergrate the services in one place, rather than what's there now.
  • Here's a copy of the article mentioned above. I'm currently very unhappy about the shelter expansion, but if they're talking about replacing what's currently there with something that's better managed, and not bigger, I could be comfortable with it.


    E. SIDE SHELTER'S SURPRISE ALLIES
    By DOUGLAS MONTERO

    May 5, 2008 -- Plans to close a "drop-in" homeless shelter on a swanky Upper East Side block are creating an uproar from a most unlikely source - its well-heeled neighbors.

    Members of Community Board 8 have even sent a letter to city officials in support of the Neighborhood Center for Homeless People at 237 E. 77th St.

    "We're completely befuddled, dismayed, disappointed," said board Chairman David Liston.

    "It just doesn't make any sense. It's doing remarkably good work."

    The facility provides such daytime services as counseling, job training and medical treatment and helps the homeless find permanent housing. At night, its clients get bused to shelters with beds.

    Anne Teicher, the site's executive director, said the city wants to phase out drop-in centers to focus instead on "Safe Havens," where the homeless get both services and a bed.

    Neighbors fear that the center's closing will leave many displaced homeless people wandering the streets and hanging out in Central Park.

    The center, which serves 800 men and women a year, learned last month that the city Department of Homeless Services was cutting off its funding: an annual $1.2 million.

    The department wants the center, open since 1983, shut by June 30.

    Heather Janik, a department spokeswoman, defended the facility's closure as part of her agency's plan to provide 500 Safe Haven beds throughout the city, which currently has 208.

    "Safe Havens are better equipped to serve those individuals the community values with access to outreach serves," she said.

    Teicher plans to meet with department officials today in hopes of getting a one-year reprieve to phase out the shelter and give its 40 employees a chance to find other jobs, center spokeswoman Bonnie McEwan said.
  • it does seem a bit weird to close the UES one -- the idea of beds and services in the same place is great, but what about the homeless people on the UES? how do they get to these "safe havens" if there's no intake center where they are? seems to me they're more likely to just sleep out in the UES -- no wonder the neighbors are skeptical. too bad they can't just add beds to the center up there.
  • Here's the text from a flier produced by CHARM that is going up around our neighborhood. A lengthier press release has also been distributed. CHARM can be contacted at 347-365-1763 [email protected]


    Another Homeless Shelter Disaster at the Bedford-Atlantic Armory
    The city is closing the only Homeless Intake Center in Manhattan and moving this intake function FOR THE WHOLE CITY to the Bedford-Atlantic Shelter in Brooklyn.
    Your chance to protest this is now.
    There will be a demonstration & press conference on the steps of City Hall in Manhattan this Thursday (May 8th) at 1pm.

    The press conference is sponsored by elected officials, community leaders, and non-profit organizations who are strongly opposed to the city’s plan to require homeless men from Manhattan, Queens, Staten Island, and the Bronx to come to the already over stretched shelter at Bedford & Atlantic in Brooklyn.

    This is a disservice both to the homeless and to our community. How can the already badly run center at Bedford & Atlantic cope with this new function? How can our community cope with this change? Why should Brooklyn be the intake center for all five boroughs when 60% of the homeless men are in Manhattan?

    Add your support to the elected officials & others who oppose this disastrous plan by assembling at the security booth at the Park Row entrance to City Hall in Manhattan at 12:45pm on Thursday May 8th
  • Please let's not let this expansion happen. Call Council Member Al Vann's Legislative Office @ 212-788-7354 (ask for Dottie) as well as Letitia James' offices 718-260-9191 & 212-788-7081 and voice your opposition.
  • Crown Heights Revitalization Movement, a new group created in response to Crown Heights over-saturation with social service residences, has conducted a review of each of the Community Boards in Brooklyn. Based on the City's own records there are 1,170 social service residential beds in Community Board 8 - North Crown Heights.* For every 100 acres of land in the community board, there are 112 beds. This is the highest level for any community board in Brooklyn. By contrast, Park Slope (CB6) has 19 beds per acre, Bedford-Stuyvesant (CB3) has 42 beds per acre and Crown Heights South (CB9) has 51 beds per acre. And this is BEFORE any expansion at the Bedford Armory.
    Are there any other communities where the shelter system should expand into? How about just about any of them!
    *Based on a review of Department of City Planning: Community District Profiles and Department of City Planning: Selected Facilities and Program Sites.
Sign In or Register to comment.