I'm bringing the specter of race to park slope.
Comments
-
Subject: blognigger's post re: this thread
Just dropped by to see what you guys thought about blognigger's obsession with this thread and the % of you who have engaged in shameless asskissery within.
How do you plead?
In case you haven't read it, the post is at: http://www.blognigger.com/2008/06/mexicans-internet-pure-gold.html
come on over, we'd love to open a lively discussion with yall
-
Subject: Re: blognigger's post re: this thread
smashbrother wrote: Just dropped by to see what you guys thought about blognigger's obsession with this thread and the % of you who have engaged in shameless asskissery within.
....I only respond to troll bait when it at least TRIES to be subtle. No thanks.
How do you plead?
In case you haven't read it, the post is at: http://www.blognigger.com/2008/06/mexicans-internet-pure-gold.html
come on over, we'd love to open a lively discussion with yall -
Agreed, queencallipygos.
Appears to be just some race-baiting blogger wannabe trying to drive google ad revenue by provoking folks here with a garbage post. Totally violates personal attack policy here, so he had to post it on his own noob blog.
Not even worth the jump. Move along, folks...
<yawn> -
Agreed, queencallipygos.
Appears to be just some race-baiting blogger wannabe trying to drive google ad revenue by provoking folks here with a garbage post. Totally violates personal attack policy here, so he had to post it on his own noob blog.
Not even worth the jump. Move along, folks...
<yawn> -
Subject: denial?
Whatever, I have nothing to do with his blog, I'm just a reader.
He's a black guy, and yeah I'm white, but I don't have anything to do with the inflammatory name of his blog.
The fact is though, he's brought up some pretty interesting issues of race, class, and denial - and you're really only proving his point by being too closed-minded to discuss it.
The fact is, there are quite a lot of patronizing and condescending comments on your thread here, which suck up to the original poster, pretending that he's completely in the right and denying racial biases within yourselves. If you don't even want to look at bn's article that's up to you - don't want to support his blog? don't click on his damn ads - but don't you feel a tiny bit hypocritical and mcCarthyistic refusing to READ something critical of yourselves?
Like I said, you're proving his point already. -
Subject: denial?
Whatever, I have nothing to do with his blog, I'm just a reader.
He's a black guy, and yeah I'm white, but I don't have anything to do with the inflammatory name of his blog.
The fact is though, he's brought up some pretty interesting issues of race, class, and denial - and you're really only proving his point by being too closed-minded to discuss it.
The fact is, there are quite a lot of patronizing and condescending comments on your thread here, which suck up to the original poster, pretending that he's completely in the right and denying racial biases within yourselves. If you don't even want to look at bn's article that's up to you - don't want to support his blog? don't click on his damn ads - but don't you feel a tiny bit hypocritical and mcCarthyistic refusing to READ something critical of yourselves?
Like I said, you're proving his point already. -
btw, NOOB blog? lol. He was on freaking gawker last week you smug ignoramus:
http://gawker.com/tag/gentrification/?i=394761&t=a-black-park-slopers-thoughts-on-the-real-world-brooklyn -
btw, NOOB blog? lol. He was on freaking gawker last week you smug ignoramus:
http://gawker.com/tag/gentrification/?i=394761&t=a-black-park-slopers-thoughts-on-the-real-world-brooklyn -
smashbrother wrote: btw, NOOB blog? lol. He was on freaking gawker last week you smug ignoramus:
Eh. I _much_ prefer their scandalous exposé on Oscar De La Hoya: Not A Cross Dresser After All.
http://gawker.com/tag/gentrification/?i=394761&t=a-black-park-slopers-thoughts-on-the-real-world-brooklyn -
smashbrother wrote: btw, NOOB blog? lol. He was on freaking gawker last week you smug ignoramus:
Eh. I _much_ prefer their scandalous exposé on Oscar De La Hoya: Not A Cross Dresser After All.
http://gawker.com/tag/gentrification/?i=394761&t=a-black-park-slopers-thoughts-on-the-real-world-brooklyn -
Cause Gawker is something to be proud of!
Oh man, you're not doing this guy any favors -
Cause Gawker is something to be proud of!
Oh man, you're not doing this guy any favors -
Subject: Re: denial?
smashbrother wrote: The fact is, there are quite a lot of patronizing and condescending comments on your thread here, which suck up to the original poster, pretending that he's completely in the right and denying racial biases within yourselves. If you don't even want to look at bn's article that's up to you - don't want to support his blog? don't click on his damn ads - but don't you feel a tiny bit hypocritical and mcCarthyistic refusing to READ something critical of yourselves?
Honestly. We already have enough asshats here. Why should we travel to foreign shores to find new ones?
Like I said, you're proving his point already.blog in question wrote: Not one person on this thread is saying what we all know is true, which is: Jesus Christ - Okay, $5 is low, but what the fuck is wrong with seeing two mexicans shoveling snow in the yard next door and assuming they are going yard-to-yard? I mean, come fucking on - how many brownstones are owned by mexicans? And how the FUCK was this poor white dickhead supposed to know that they were the one mexican family who owned a brownstone?
Not worthy of comment here, and certainly not worthy of travel for comment. -
Subject: Re: denial?
smashbrother wrote: The fact is, there are quite a lot of patronizing and condescending comments on your thread here, which suck up to the original poster, pretending that he's completely in the right and denying racial biases within yourselves. If you don't even want to look at bn's article that's up to you - don't want to support his blog? don't click on his damn ads - but don't you feel a tiny bit hypocritical and mcCarthyistic refusing to READ something critical of yourselves?
Honestly. We already have enough asshats here. Why should we travel to foreign shores to find new ones?
Like I said, you're proving his point already.blog in question wrote: Not one person on this thread is saying what we all know is true, which is: Jesus Christ - Okay, $5 is low, but what the fuck is wrong with seeing two mexicans shoveling snow in the yard next door and assuming they are going yard-to-yard? I mean, come fucking on - how many brownstones are owned by mexicans? And how the FUCK was this poor white dickhead supposed to know that they were the one mexican family who owned a brownstone?
Not worthy of comment here, and certainly not worthy of travel for comment. -
Subject: Re: denial?
smashbrother wrote: Whatever, I have nothing to do with his blog, I'm just a reader.
Oh, I read it. Where you see "interesting issues of race, class, and denial..." I see "trite 'commentary' perpetuated by someone who just barely grew out of the idea that fart jokes are Pulitzer calibre".
He's a black guy, and yeah I'm white, but I don't have anything to do with the inflammatory name of his blog.
The fact is though, he's brought up some pretty interesting issues of race, class, and denial - and you're really only proving his point by being too closed-minded to discuss it.
The fact is, there are quite a lot of patronizing and condescending comments on your thread here, which suck up to the original poster, pretending that he's completely in the right and denying racial biases within yourselves. If you don't even want to look at bn's article that's up to you - don't want to support his blog? don't click on his damn ads - but don't you feel a tiny bit hypocritical and mcCarthyistic refusing to READ something critical of yourselves?
Like I said, you're proving his point already.
And I also read where he talked about how funny it would be to have someone in here post a link to see if we'd go over there all high and mighty.
Like I said, not subtle. The Ukranian judge is especially disappointed.
If you want attention that badly, you could always just try streaking. -
Subject: Re: denial?
smashbrother wrote: Whatever, I have nothing to do with his blog, I'm just a reader.
Oh, I read it. Where you see "interesting issues of race, class, and denial..." I see "trite 'commentary' perpetuated by someone who just barely grew out of the idea that fart jokes are Pulitzer calibre".
He's a black guy, and yeah I'm white, but I don't have anything to do with the inflammatory name of his blog.
The fact is though, he's brought up some pretty interesting issues of race, class, and denial - and you're really only proving his point by being too closed-minded to discuss it.
The fact is, there are quite a lot of patronizing and condescending comments on your thread here, which suck up to the original poster, pretending that he's completely in the right and denying racial biases within yourselves. If you don't even want to look at bn's article that's up to you - don't want to support his blog? don't click on his damn ads - but don't you feel a tiny bit hypocritical and mcCarthyistic refusing to READ something critical of yourselves?
Like I said, you're proving his point already.
And I also read where he talked about how funny it would be to have someone in here post a link to see if we'd go over there all high and mighty.
Like I said, not subtle. The Ukranian judge is especially disappointed.
If you want attention that badly, you could always just try streaking. -
Subject: Re: denial?
daver wrote: [quote=smashbrother]The fact is, there are quite a lot of patronizing and condescending comments on your thread here, which suck up to the original poster, pretending that he's completely in the right and denying racial biases within yourselves. If you don't even want to look at bn's article that's up to you - don't want to support his blog? don't click on his damn ads - but don't you feel a tiny bit hypocritical and mcCarthyistic refusing to READ something critical of yourselves?
Honestly. We already have enough asshats here. Why should we travel to foreign shores to find new ones?
Like I said, you're proving his point already.blog in question wrote: Not one person on this thread is saying what we all know is true, which is: Jesus Christ - Okay, $5 is low, but what the fuck is wrong with seeing two mexicans shoveling snow in the yard next door and assuming they are going yard-to-yard? I mean, come fucking on - how many brownstones are owned by mexicans? And how the FUCK was this poor white dickhead supposed to know that they were the one mexican family who owned a brownstone?
Not worthy of comment here, and certainly not worthy of travel for comment.
I wanna know how this guy knows AW's family is mexican? is he a psychic non-stalker? -
Subject: Re: denial?
daver wrote: [quote=smashbrother]The fact is, there are quite a lot of patronizing and condescending comments on your thread here, which suck up to the original poster, pretending that he's completely in the right and denying racial biases within yourselves. If you don't even want to look at bn's article that's up to you - don't want to support his blog? don't click on his damn ads - but don't you feel a tiny bit hypocritical and mcCarthyistic refusing to READ something critical of yourselves?
Honestly. We already have enough asshats here. Why should we travel to foreign shores to find new ones?
Like I said, you're proving his point already.blog in question wrote: Not one person on this thread is saying what we all know is true, which is: Jesus Christ - Okay, $5 is low, but what the fuck is wrong with seeing two mexicans shoveling snow in the yard next door and assuming they are going yard-to-yard? I mean, come fucking on - how many brownstones are owned by mexicans? And how the FUCK was this poor white dickhead supposed to know that they were the one mexican family who owned a brownstone?
Not worthy of comment here, and certainly not worthy of travel for comment.
I wanna know how this guy knows AW's family is mexican? is he a psychic non-stalker? -
smashbrother wrote: btw, NOOB blog? lol. He was on freaking gawker last week you smug ignoramus
His first blog post is April 27. Just reporting the facts... -
smashbrother wrote: btw, NOOB blog? lol. He was on freaking gawker last week you smug ignoramus
His first blog post is April 27. Just reporting the facts... -
I guess it's somewhat satisfyingly ironic that this "blognigger" guy, someone whose entire blog is centered around race, went all rantypants based on his completely incorrect assumption about someone else's race.
Still, I hope folks don't fall for this hamfisted attempt to pick a fight. Ugh, who needs that kind of drama? -
I guess it's somewhat satisfyingly ironic that this "blognigger" guy, someone whose entire blog is centered around race, went all rantypants based on his completely incorrect assumption about someone else's race.
Still, I hope folks don't fall for this hamfisted attempt to pick a fight. Ugh, who needs that kind of drama? -
smashbrother wrote: btw, NOOB blog? lol. He was on freaking gawker last week you smug ignoramus:
I'm not aware that being picked up by Gawker suddenly endows you with an amazing number of experience points. If the blog is new, it's new.
http://gawker.com/tag/gentrification/?i=394761&t=a-black-park-slopers-thoughts-on-the-real-world-brooklyn
I think there's a good chance that you're the guy behind that blog. If so, you can stop posting here in the third person (as if you're an impartial observer talking about a blog that does not belong to you).
--Update: After reviewing that blog, though, it is clear that an "Anonymous" commenter asked if someone else could go stir things up on Brooklynian.com. Hmm, I wonder who "Anonymous" might be.
Could somebody go back to that blog and wish them the best of luck in getting "internet attention" for their funny and "provocative" rants? -
smashbrother wrote: btw, NOOB blog? lol. He was on freaking gawker last week you smug ignoramus:
I'm not aware that being picked up by Gawker suddenly endows you with an amazing number of experience points. If the blog is new, it's new.
http://gawker.com/tag/gentrification/?i=394761&t=a-black-park-slopers-thoughts-on-the-real-world-brooklyn
I think there's a good chance that you're the guy behind that blog. If so, you can stop posting here in the third person (as if you're an impartial observer talking about a blog that does not belong to you).
--Update: After reviewing that blog, though, it is clear that an "Anonymous" commenter asked if someone else could go stir things up on Brooklynian.com. Hmm, I wonder who "Anonymous" might be.
Could somebody go back to that blog and wish them the best of luck in getting "internet attention" for their funny and "provocative" rants? -
dailyheights wrote: Could somebody go back to that blog and wish them the best of luck in getting "internet attention" for their funny and "provocative" rants?
:x Please don't. The mods have enough to deal with as it is, I'd say... -
dailyheights wrote: Could somebody go back to that blog and wish them the best of luck in getting "internet attention" for their funny and "provocative" rants?
:x Please don't. The mods have enough to deal with as it is, I'd say... -
queencallipygos wrote: [quote=dailyheights]Could somebody go back to that blog and wish them the best of luck in getting "internet attention" for their funny and "provocative" rants?
:x Please don't. The mods have enough to deal with as it is, I'd say...
Yeah, DH, I'm with the queen on this one. Unless YOU have the time over the next few days to keep an eye on this thread every three minutes.
-
queencallipygos wrote: [quote=dailyheights]Could somebody go back to that blog and wish them the best of luck in getting "internet attention" for their funny and "provocative" rants?
:x Please don't. The mods have enough to deal with as it is, I'd say...
Yeah, DH, I'm with the queen on this one. Unless YOU have the time over the next few days to keep an eye on this thread every three minutes. -
that was a joke, playing on the comment that...
never mind. -
that was a joke, playing on the comment that...
never mind.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds