This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Those Townhouses on Underhill and Dean — Brooklynian

Those Townhouses on Underhill and Dean

deanhouses2.JPGHey, guess who was just here in the neighborhood?

Brownstoner writes: "We were driving through Prospect Heights on Sunday when we noticed this development of townhouses on Underhill and Dean. They look to be of the same vintage as the ones Ratner built on Fulton in Fort Greene."

"Does anyone know how and when these came to be built? How about the quality of the interiors? Have any sold in recent memory?"

LINKS:
Wondering About Newish Townhouses on Underhill: Brownstoner.com
Outlook for Prospect Heights Circa 2002: Set Speed

Comments

  • The only thing I ever heard was that they were built on top of a scandal. The land was actually a failed housing development from the 1970's or thereabouts. There was some scandal that occured, not sure what. This is what I heard. Anyone know more?
  • I saw them being built on my weekly saturday morning walk to the farmers market and library. They were completed about 2 years ago and didn't seem particularly well made. The walls between the units looked pretty thin to me, I'd bet that noise carries easily from one unit to the other, but I've never been inside, so that's just a observation based on the building materials.
  • I happen to like the ones across the street better :wink::wink:
  • Do you mean the ones across the street from Tavern on Dean? Those look pretty fancy but kinda out of character for the neighborhood. I would hate to see the density of the neighborhood surpass the ability to deliver services like subways, supermarkets etc.
  • No Kevin I was making a joke because I live across the street (on Underhill) from those houses : :D:D
  • Oh! you're stumbling distance from tavern on dean - I'm jealous
  • And boy have I stumbled from there :)
  • stacey wrote: No Kevin I was making a joke because I live across the street (on Underhill) from those houses : :D:D
    Stacey: are you the place with the nice patio that had the moving pumpkin head dude for Halloween?
  • LOL no that is my uncle - he really gets a kick out of making it move when you least expect it :)

    I'm the green house a few doors down :) I was hoping to meet you last night too! I know we are practially next door neighbors.
  • stacey wrote: LOL no that is my uncle - he really gets a kick out of making it move when you least expect it :)

    I'm the green house a few doors down :) I was hoping to meet you last night too! I know we are practially next door neighbors.
    We are. I walk by your house every single morning and evening. I'm not stalking you or anything, I just....nevermind.

    Keep an eye out for me. I wear an eye patch and am usually riding a pony.

    I have yet to go to one of the socials...I need to.
  • You definately do
  • Hopefully I'll meet up with you when you pass by next - but if not try to come to the next Happy Hour
  • Subject: townhouses on underhill and dean

    As someone said for years the lot was just a big, abandoned construction site. I think at least since the early 80's just half-built foundations I've got mixed feelings about those townhouses--butt-ugly and shabby sure. More appropriate in some backwater section of Queens or Staten Island--definately. (Sorry Queens and S.I.) But...

    Every time I'm walking my dog at night to the bodega across the street to get some unhealthy munchies, my heart goes in my throat when I look across the street. Before that crap went up, when you'ld go to the bullet-proof, lazy-susan cube to get your Little Debbie's and 40 or whatever, and you looked towards Manhattan over that seeemingly bombed-out lot, you got the most uncanny view of the WTC towers. It was the abandoned construction site, and bang!, the Towers seen all the way from their bases, and pretty much no other building or anything else to give you scale. And to me, it was like the corridor effect; there was nothing to compare them to, so I would get the weird cognitive dissonant perception that they were close and not so big. With their twinkling lights, they seemed almost like toys. It was especially eerie on a cold, clear winter night, with the faint stars all around.

    Those townhouses ain't pretty, but their shells were up by the time the Towers went down. They spared me looking across that lot at that new view of nothing. Or smoke. I just went through a break-up. It's also the change of season. Don't bother psychoanalyzing me--I'll do it. I should be writing and thinking about buckets of puppies and rainbows. Alas.
  • Those townhouses are pre-fab. I used to live on St. Marks and one night when I had gotten home really late I saw them drive right by our apt. on wide-load trucks (I think it was about three years ago). There was a vacant lot, and then they were just all there. It was very surreal. They put the brick facades up and voila.
  • Many of them are occupied, and they look fine from the outside. Why make anyone feel bad about where they live? I saw a birthday party being held about a week ago behind one of them. Looked like a garage door was open, and an extended family of 30 or so was having a good time. Nothing wrong with that.
  • Hey- folks that live near Tavern on Dean- how is subway access over there? Just curious.
  • Will wrote: Hey- folks that live near Tavern on Dean- how is subway access over there? Just curious.
    The C is only a few blocks north...the 2/3 is only a few blocks west...and the Q is only a little further from the 2/3.
  • It takes me 15 minutes to walk to the 2/3 Bergen St. station. I'm wondering how long walking uphill to the Eastern Parkway station would take...
Sign In or Register to comment.