This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Two Robbers Killed on Nostrand ave - Page 2 — Brooklynian

Two Robbers Killed on Nostrand ave

2»

Comments

  • sorry, but i don't believe the nyt reporter who says he wrested the gun away.

    i agree with it, but i think the plot is to ensure youssoff drame does not face charges. and i support that.

    since when did the nyt start covering these types of stories?
  • worldwide trader wrote:

    Look modsquad, I now that with the more money you make the more vices you indulge in. Hell, the things I do in my spare time, would not be fit to print, but I worked like hell to make my life better than my parents and I am going to keep it that way.
    image
  • modsquad wrote: [quote=worldwide trader]

    Look modsquad, I now that with the more money you make the more vices you indulge in. Hell, the things I do in my spare time, would not be fit to print, but I worked like hell to make my life better than my parents and I am going to keep it that way.
    image

    And the white collar guys are the biggest gangsters!!! Who else could robb the Federal goverment like JP Morgan Chase, Goldman, Citi, etc... Who, but a a white collar crook to the tune of Billions. Yeah baby, "B" as in billions. No, corner store for these fellows, just tax dollars that our kids, kids, will be paying back.

    Naomi Klein: Bailout is ‘multi-trillion-dollar crime scene’

    David Edwards and Muriel Kane
    Raw Story
    Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008

    The Bush administration has already handed out almost half of the $700 billion in bank bailout money authorized by Congress but has not even filled the mandated oversight positions to review how it is being used.

    Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, has described the handling of the bailout as “borderline criminal” because of this and other problems. Klein spoke to Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! on Monday to explain her accusations.

    “We were all reassured that there was going to be transparency, accountability, legality,” Klein stated. “But now we’re finding out that, in fact, Henry Paulson has achieved his original goal by stealth, because there is no accountability, and lawmakers are very hesitant to challenge this. … Essentially, what the Bush administration has done is said, ‘We dare you to challenge us and be responsible for the Great Depression.’”

    Klein sees three areas of borderline illegality. The first is that rather than being used to get banks lending again, the bailout money “is instead going to bonuses, is instead going to dividends, going to salaries, going to mergers.”

    The second is that, without Congressional authorization, “the Treasury Department pushed through a tax windfall for the banks, a piece of legislation that allows the banks to save a huge amount of money when they merge with each other. And the estimate is that this represents a loss of $140 billion worth of tax revenue for the US government.”
  • worldwide trader wrote: And the white collar guys are the biggest gangsters!!! Who else could robb the Federal goverment like JP Morgan Chase, Goldman, Citi, etc...
    Well...GM, Chrysler and Ford, for starters...
    ...whose CEOs all flew in their usual private jets to DC to claim utter desperation and certain doom (DOOOOOM I SAY~!) and beg Congress for their own bailouts.

    ***edited to add:
    And they will get it, for they too are too big to fail.

    One can only hope that the fine folks in Congress will exact the appropriate pounds of flesh to offset the massive risk, expense and nose-holding involved, and get warrants and policy commitments at or above the same levels that Buffet demands when skinning distressed companies alive for fun and profit.

    But what are the odds of that happening.
  • Jack Krohn wrote: This article is missing three statements about the perpetrators that I've always thought were required in this type of story:

    (1) "He was looking for a job"
    (2) "He was planning/thinking of going back to school"
    (3) "His child was the most important thing in his life"

    Oh well, at least they quoted the inevitable "he was a good person" line.
    **************************************

    I'm waiting for their Communion photos to show up.

    .
  • It's going to be interesting to see if they had priors and are out on parole
  • Hamilton wrote: It's going to be interesting to see if they had priors and are out on parole
    I can't say it will matter to me. When you rob a store with a gun, sometimes does not go as planned. (sometimes you get caught, sometimes you only get $12) ...it seems that they had the misfortune of robbing the wrong guy, and "got dead".

    I'm ok with them being dead, even if they were perfect before this. Most robbers don't get the death penalty for robbing (and I'm not an advocate of the death penalty for robbery), but I have nothing against it being a risk.
  • The point being, lenient courts that continually put felons with prior arrest for possession of guns back on the street and who eventually kill someone
Sign In or Register to comment.