This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

private school interviews — Brooklynian

private school interviews

onalani1967
edited November -1 in Park Slope
Does anyone have feedback on what to expect from interviews for nursery, prek at the brooklyn private schools? like poly prep, berkely carroll, packer?

Comments

  • You should join Park Slope Parents group on Yahoo. They have lots of information on this topic.
  • How do you interview a kid for nursery school?!
  • It's Ridiculous
  • ridiculous it is, but necessary all the same. PP has an interview w/their admissions person. It's the parents, the kid and this woman in her office. She talks to the parents, watches the kid interact w/toys and stuff in her office, then interacts w/the kid for a while.

    BC is a playgroup format, I think.
  • That sounds stressful. I loved my Montessori experience, and I wonder if I had to be interviewed!
  • not so much stressful as a pain in the ass.
  • Just don't take your kid for anesthetized dental surgery beforehand and I'm sure you'll be okay.

    Or wait. On second thought, who knows. :wink:
  • Yeah it is ridiculous but I went to a private school in Brooklyn and this was in the 50's and there was an interview process that included IQ tests, "interviews" which were questions and observation of little me playing with toys. I am not so sure things have changed all that much.
  • Not so ridiculous, actually. Just practical and necessary.

    Consider that these schools get somewhere between 300 and 500 applications every year for just 20 or so spots.

    If you think about it, these interviews may represent one of the most organized and fair methods realistically possible (at those volumes, to be sure...) of getting to meet each applicant and their parents and take any notes that will help them remember and consider each child from among the pool of the 300-500 children applying for those limited few spots.

    And they aren't simply imposing some make-or-break, on-the-spot IQ litmus test during these interviews and play-based assessments. They are more likely just getting whatever limited sample they can of personality, interests, play styles, family environment and whatever they can reasonably note among perhaps a zillion other elements that some admissions person might consider important to the process of assembling a well-rounded overall class balance of various personality and family types, backgrounds, needs etc.

    I'm fairly certain the admissions folks are just doing their best to get some sense of each individual applicant in dealing with a huge volume where this information might otherwise be utterly lost or slipped through the cracks in the absence of meeting personally with each applicant and their parents.

    I'm also fairly certain that people would consider the alternative utterly undesirable -- that of judging applicants only by what's on paper, without providing opportunity to meet them in person to fill in more individual detail where possible.

    No?
  • Jeffrey.. yes... absolutely yes... and thanks for posting such a thoughtful consideration of what this process really is.

    It is the great U.S.A. and thankfully we provide public education that is available to all but in the private sector there is a "screening" of applicants. Isn't is very much the same as applying for a job and somehow YOU are the standout applicant and get the job but objectively on paper YOU were no more or less qualified than anyone else who did apply?

    Ironic that kindergarten is the interview for "life" but heck... there are just so many slots and more applicants than can be accepted and that is just the way it is.
  • My main concern about such a process is who they weed out. I work with children who are learning disabled and I teach them that they have endless opportunities and limitless potentials. I teach this because it is true. But would children with special needs be weeded out? If so, then folks like Albert Einstein and James Earl Jones would not make the cut. In addition, I believe that tolerance and understanding can be taught and one way to do so is by being around a wide range of people. I would hope that any interview process would appreciate this. I am not talking about affirmative action or quotas, I am talking about tolerance for those who have strengths outside of an IQ score. I work in the schools and I know that the students who are bright, who need little help and who sit quietly are usually the teacher’s favorites. While I understand why, potential comes from a wide range of backgrounds and experiences.

    image
  • I totally agree with

    image

    And I do think that most schools (at least here in Brooklyn, anyhoo) have sensitivity to these issues, follow the approach you mention and actually seek the exact sort of variety and diversity of backgrounds and needs that you (and I, above) mention.
  • Jeff.

    Would you believe that I have never seen the picture you posted? It made my day though!
  • done.

    image
    http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/3846/applepantstx9.jpg

    ***edited to add:

    Now available in applepants nano size
    (in case the above was too beeeeg)

    image
    http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/9089/applepantstypecf2.jpg
  • Thank you Jeff! I was actually going to fix the image size now on my lunch break, but you did it - awesome! You da man!
Sign In or Register to comment.