am I the only 'woman of color' in the Slope who's not...
Comments
-
A couple of whites have said things like, "Park Slope? But isn't that really expensive?"
I just say, "it sure is. And I have a nice big apartment too - most people probably couldn't afford the rent I pay. "
Obviously this sort of reply shuts people up and makes them stare at me like I'm an arrogant nutcase, but why should I give a f*** -
I'm coming in late to this, but my wife, who is a native of Barbados (I'm white) and who spent her high school and college years living in Bed-Sty, has lived in Park Slope for the last 6 years. When she first moved here she was fearful of what the reaction would be, and indeed over the years, she has had unbelievabne comments made to her by the super-rich Brownstone owners in our immediate 'hood. And despite Paul Auster and the NT Times touting PS has a bastion of liberal thought and inter racial harmony, as a black and white couple we have had more than our fair share of looks and comments when we walk on 7th Avenue - comments made by both black and white people by the way.
We laugh all the time about the number of white babies with black mothers in the area - and if you want a real commentary on why only West Indian women take nanny jobs and not African American women, sit down with my wife and she'll explain the nature of dealing with the baggage of slavery from both perspectives.
PS doesn't represent any special current consciousness on anything - it is simply a microcosm of the larger society in which we live. Oh sure, it may have more inter racial and gay couples than the average Brooklyn 'hood, but so what, acceptance and tolerance are measured by far more than real estate deals. -
Subject: Woman of color/Slope...
"if you want a real commentary on why only West Indian women take nanny jobs and not African American women, sit down with my wife and she'll explain the nature of dealing with the baggage of slavery from both perspectives. "
Actually, I'd love to hear that commentary; it would add a lot to the conversation. Seriously.
(I'm morbidly interested in this conversation since I'm a Caucasian ex-Park Sloper who bought into mostly black Flatbush 20 years ago...after spouse and I discovered that we were, economically, middle-class/working class blacks...and so now we have very amused/confused racial identity complexes , having been priced out of a white nabe and welcomed into a thoroughly integrated one... )
My own contribution to this thread: One day, walking near my daughter's school in Windsor Terrace, I saw a West Indian nanny pushing a little Chinese toddler girl in a stroller and thought, "Geez, this sure is a white neighborhood." Now, even for a paleoconservative who hates "race cards" with a passion, and who wouldn't say the words "cultural imperialism" except to save my life at gunpoint, I admit that thought gave me pause... -
Subject: Re: Woman of color/Slope...
Flatbush Brenda wrote: "if you want a real commentary on why only West Indian women take nanny jobs and not African American women, sit down with my wife and she'll explain the nature of dealing with the baggage of slavery from both perspectives. "
I too am interested. Our caregiver is from the Caribbean and I know i am supposed to have some white guilt but I don't for some reason. I thought I would but I pay a good wage (although not health insurance and social security but I freelance and don't get paid that either and well health insurance is crazy for all of us right now). I like our caregiver A LOT and know that this job is another stepping stone for her and her family to the middle class--her daughter will DEFINITELY be going to college and will not be a nanny. As I mentioned earlier, my grandfather came over and worked as a clothes presser in a factory and his kids went to college. I guess I was kind of seeing this situation through that light: The new immigrant path into middle class. It may not seem the fairest solution but it was how it worked. I would like to know more. And frankly the two white caregivers I happened to interview were flakey and not professional at all!
Actually, I'd love to hear that commentary; it would add a lot to the conversation. Seriously. -
Well, from a female African American perspective, this may be a good primer...
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/80/
My wife would say that West Indians do not carry this particular scar because slavery was visted upon the the West Indies in a different way (no less brutal, just different) - and the continuing history of the West Indies is eventual freedom and independence and the every day fact that the President, members of legislative bodeis, the doctors and lawyers were all black. In other words they ended up running the show and eventually were no longer subservient to white dominance. This is something still at issue in this country.
Once West Indian women migrated to the US to find more secure financial and/or educational futures they did not bring the horrible baggage of slavery US style with them. Thus, caring for a white woman's baby did not carry social or historical stignma and was nothing more and nothing less than a job. West Indian women do not generally here "How can you be "mammy" to a white baby" from their friends and family. -
Livetotravel wrote: Well, from a female African American perspective, this may be a good primer...
This is interesting. I come from a West African background and so my direct ancestors didn't go through slavery at all. That's a WHOLE other perspective. Even the West Indians are only IN the West Indies as a direct result of slavery. I was raised and schooled in Europe, born to African parents who met at college in England. So, basically I came to America because I CHOSE to. It's difficult to imagine how I'd feel about America if I was here as a result of my forefathers being forced into slavery. African-American friends tell me I don't seem to have much "baggage" - I assume everybody will like me and treat me fairly. I imagine if I was to stay in America for the rest of my life, my attitude would change dramatically....
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/80/
My wife would say that West Indians do not carry this particular scar because slavery was visted upon the the West Indies in a different way (no less brutal, just different) - and the continuing history of the West Indies is eventual freedom and independence and the every day fact that the President, members of legislative bodeis, the doctors and lawyers were all black. In other words they ended up running the show and eventually were no longer subservient to white dominance. This is something still at issue in this country.
Once West Indian women migrated to the US to find more secure financial and/or educational futures they did not bring the horrible baggage of slavery US style with them. Thus, caring for a white woman's baby did not carry social or historical stignma and was nothing more and nothing less than a job. West Indian women do not generally here "How can you be "mammy" to a white baby" from their friends and family. -
Interesting topic. I am a black man, who has lived in PS for over a decade. My wife (who is white) and who works from home has definately noticed the Carribean nanny trend. In fact, a couple who used to rent from us (yes, I actually own a big-ass brownstone, and yes it is in prime Slope thank you very much), had a Carribean nanny and the nanny would have some major nanny/stroller parties in the apt during the day. OMG, am I selling out by renting to white people who employ black nannies?. :shock: Should I only rent to blacks, or blacks who only employ white nannies, or whatever. I am so confused! Anyhow, it was fascinating to see what a huge social connection there is among these caregivers.
But, getting back to the topic at hand, my wife and I have frequently joked about Park Slope's so-called diversity, which we think is just a residual self-image from a by-gone era (the same way some people still think there is a sizable gay community actually residing within PS). Sometimes I think I sense a wave of relief when we walk into certain restaurants and bars, because we provide some (limited) reinforcement that diversity still lives in PS. Hey, at least an interracial couple is better than nothin.
We still like it here - after all it is still relatively diverse considering its current socio-economic status. I prefer PS to say the UWS/UES or many wealthy suburban communities. But I strongly suspect that most of the blacks we see in PS either work here, go to school here, or are local "tourists" from nearby nabes like PH, CH, Bed-Stuy, etc. I have met very few blacks, and even fewer black women that actually live here. So, its not hard to imagine that a black women, esp one of Carribean roots would get a lot of inappropriate comments from folks in PS.
BTW, whenever we get a potential tenant who is black, or interracial couple, or gay, we get all excited about the prospect of adding a little more diversity to our block. But, alas, I just don't think they're into Park Slope any more. -
According to the 2000 census data PS (census tracts 129.01;129.02;131;133;135;137;153;155;157;159;166) as defined by Flatbush to 9th - 4th ave to the Park)
is
63.5% White
11.1% Back
5.2% Asian
16.9% Hispanic
and 2.7% people with 2 or more races - non-hispanic
These statistics reflect a pretty diverse community.... -
friendlypitbull wrote: According to the 2000 census data PS (census tracts 129.01;129.02;131;133;135;137;153;155;157;159;166) as defined by Flatbush to 9th - 4th ave to the Park)
See, I don't think they reflect all that much diversity at all....
is
63.5% White
11.1% Back
5.2% Asian
16.9% Hispanic
and 2.7% people with 2 or more races - non-hispanic
These statistics reflect a pretty diverse community.... -
Not sure what you expect or want but it virtually mirrors the US Population at large in a 120sq Blocks
and I'd welcome you to find a more diverse neighborhood in this city -
http://gis.nyc.gov/dcp/pa/address.jsp
(please post statistics and census tracts so we can follow along) -
friendlypitbull wrote: Not sure what you expect or want but it virtually mirrors the US Population at large in a 120sq Blocks
What it doesn't show are the micro communities. For example, I would hazard a guess that most black and hispanic residents occupy the fringes of the area. It doesn't show how diverse the corridor above 7th Ave is for exampe. It doesn't show how many black families own bstones or co-op/condos in the area. It doesn't show how many go to public vs. private schools.
and I'd welcome you to find a more diverse neighborhood in this city -
http://gis.nyc.gov/dcp/pa/address.jsp
(please post statistics and census tracts so we can follow along)
I am not trying to imply some Park Slope conspiracy, these issues characterize many nabes. I'd just like to dispel this romantic notion that PS is "diverse". It may be diverse on a relative basis, but that is of limited comfort. -
friendlypitbull wrote: Not sure what you expect or want but it virtually mirrors the US Population at large in a 120sq Blocks
Also, if you think about it, the statement about mirroring the US pop is totally off base. We are in NYC, not Oklahoma. The stats you cited certainly do not mirror NYC's pop where whites are basically a minority.
and I'd welcome you to find a more diverse neighborhood in this city -
http://gis.nyc.gov/dcp/pa/address.jsp
(please post statistics and census tracts so we can follow along) -
friendlypitbull wrote: According to the 2000 census data PS (census tracts 129.01;129.02;131;133;135;137;153;155;157;159;166) as defined by Flatbush to 9th - 4th ave to the Park)
Hey 'friendlypitbull' -- remember, your 'diverse' data is from the 2000 census, which was SIX YEARS AGO. How much do you think those numbers have changed in the past SIX YEARS?
is
63.5% White
11.1% Back
5.2% Asian
16.9% Hispanic
and 2.7% people with 2 or more races - non-hispanic
These statistics reflect a pretty diverse community....
With those numbers, three out of four people in PS are white. That's diversity to you? To me, that's a white neighborhood with minorities 'peppered in'. -
Subject: Not The Only One
My partner & I are a Black lesbian couple living in Park Slope prime (name street, off 7th ave). I lived in the nabe b-4 she moved in, and I've had the nanny thing happen, but I've also been followed in stores, and gotten crappy treatment from a legendary shop owner.
Everyone has their experience of racism, and their perception of racism. The wife & I think of PS as a White nabe, and won't move because we like it, but mainly because we think our presence pisses off White pseudo-liberals who are closeted racists just enough to make us stay.
Besides, I like having the cops come when I call (and I won't hesitate to call when the Black wannabe rapper and his White entourage next door won't take their 2am conversation or weed smoking off their stoop), having a 24-hour supermarket around the corner, and train stations that don't smell like pee all the time. -
Subject: What an interesting topic
Hello folks,
I grew up in Park Slope. Went to PS 282 on 6th Ave. Wen to JHS 51 on 5th Ave. I am a Latina and now live in Buffalo. Went to school up here and just stayed.
When I grew up the minorities in the neighborhood were white. As a much younger girl, the neighborhood predominantly was Italians. Puerto Ricans began moving in and they moved out. I left before it changed for the worse and became better. Most of my family had to move out of the area due to the high rents and "co-ops". Most white's lived in the burbs. Long Island, Staten Island etc. I guess living closer to work became more appealling. I am so mixed about this. Glad the neighborhood didn't get lost...but... :roll:
I have a beautiful brick house which also has a carriage house. Lots of space, lots of grass and clean air. My mortgage in nyc would probably triple from what I pay here if I were in NYC. Honestly, why would someone pay those rents, when they can own?
I love my NYC. But Buffalo is easier to live in. (If you have a good job that is.)
Your post makes it sound like when one watches and old movie and see the nannys taking care of the kids.
Wow! -
I personally am laughing b/c it seems clear to me that many of the people here are simply hostile to people who (generally) make or have more wealth than them;
how to explain these posts attempting to characterize Park Slope as a virtual Birimingham Al circa 1950.
I mean not only is Park Slope not diverse, but apparently people are so insulated and protected in their racism that many of them feel comfortable making the most obnoxious and racist conclusions right to the face of minorities who are complete strangers are so "super-rich" as to be practically shocked by inter-racial couples and are so engrossed in "wall street" and making $ that they wont even feed hungry birds with a bird feeder.
Sorry but I think many people here ought to look at reality the statistics bear out.
Yes bsloper NY as a whole is more diverse than PS but I kept the definition of PS pretty narrow (9th St) - considering there isnt a SINGLE fully integrated (matching the NYC statistics as a whole) neighborhood anywhere in the city your benchmark is not realistic.
Also remember the other demographics of Park Slope (as defined) - Median Household income is $62,000 w/ a 65% having college degrees and 33% havinh post-college degrees.
Again I challange you to find a neighborhood (ignoring income and educational stats) in NYC more diverse on racial lines and I DEFY you to find one including the income and educational diversity.
PHeights Girl - yes the data is 6yrs old and it may change a few % here or there but PS was expensive and gentrified in 2000 - -
I really dont get this "black nanny" thing as racist?
Are women not suppossed to work and have children? and if they do are they not suppossed to hire baby sitters outside their race?
Do you people know how much these "nanny's" make? -
Frendlypitbull, you're a jackass simply. "I gave you statistics and a lecture, so why are you guys still trying to say there's a problem?" Get over yourself really. Your opinions and experiences may be different, but they're really not any more valid. There is no argument to "win" and you're just being obnoxious and patronizing.
-
Nice..... name calling
No actually when someone says "PS is not diverse" - then the statistical evidence actually trumps an anecdotal account of what they see walking down 7th avenue.
If someone said "I dont see Black men on 7th Ave" - then the statistical evidence while relevant wouldnt necessarily address that observation and couldnt
and personally I think the attempt to GENERALIZE and portrey an entire neighborhood as a bunch of 'super-rich' white bigots with black nannies to be obnoxious (and false) -
Well no, statistical evidence from SIX YEARS AGO might not actually trump your perceived idea of ancedotal evidence from let's say yesterday. Because NYC after all has remained totally static in the past half decade of course. And last time I checked, the only person making any generalizations about bigots is you.
-
friendlypitbull wrote: I personally am laughing b/c it seems clear to me that many of the people here are simply hostile to people who (generally) make or have more wealth than them;
FPBl, I checked out the link you provided and when I query most of the tracts above 7th Ave, including my own I am getting % blacks ranging from 5% to 7%, certainly well below 10%. This bears out my personal observations as a black resident of PS. There ain't many blacks living in prime PS, period, end of story.
how to explain these posts attempting to characterize Park Slope as a virtual Birimingham Al circa 1950.
I mean not only is Park Slope not diverse, but apparently people are so insulated and protected in their racism that many of them feel comfortable making the most obnoxious and racist conclusions right to the face of minorities who are complete strangers are so "super-rich" as to be practically shocked by inter-racial couples and are so engrossed in "wall street" and making $ that they wont even feed hungry birds with a bird feeder.
Sorry but I think many people here ought to look at reality the statistics bear out.
Yes bsloper NY as a whole is more diverse than PS but I kept the definition of PS pretty narrow (9th St) - considering there isnt a SINGLE fully integrated (matching the NYC statistics as a whole) neighborhood anywhere in the city your benchmark is not realistic.
Also remember the other demographics of Park Slope (as defined) - Median Household income is $62,000 w/ a 65% having college degrees and 33% havinh post-college degrees.
Again I challange you to find a neighborhood (ignoring income and educational stats) in NYC more diverse on racial lines and I DEFY you to find one including the income and educational diversity.
PHeights Girl - yes the data is 6yrs old and it may change a few % here or there but PS was expensive and gentrified in 2000 -
So, don't go changing the issue. I did not say there were more diverse communities in NYC. I actually said PS is diverse on a relative scale, esp when considering income-wealth-factors but that doesn't say much now does it. That does not make PS some sort of diversity utopia. So, get over it.
Like other blacks have expressed, I do actually enjoy living in PS for all the reasons white folks do. And I do not hate people more wealthy than myself, as I haven't exactly done too badly myself. I'm not PS-bashing, I'm just calling it the way I see it. -
If you limit the search to the area east of 6th Ave the % of Blacks and Hispanics falls to 7.7% and 7.6% respectively obviously less diverse -
My point wasnt that PS is some sort of racial utopia, just that it is far from the Apartied town being potreyed here. -
I see a fair number of black women, less so black men. However, the fact that 35% of the people (according to that census data) that live in the area are non-white, sounds pretty diverse to me, particularly, when you factor in the still significant gay and lesbian population, and people's different nationalities.
The area where Park Slope is stagnant is in political discourse. Everyone assumes you think exactly the same thing as them on most subjects, dissent is barely tolerated and usually leads to reactionary attack. -
I looked up my Prospect Hgts nabe on that site and it came up as 31% white, 48% black/AA, 4% Asian, 12% Hispanic. That seems more diverse to me.
It's an interesting topic. I've often noticed my own uneasiness with all the black nannies and white kids, especially when my toddler became verbal. She would point to a kid who fell down and his black nanny comforting him saying, "He gets a kiss from his mommy." Or, "What's his mommy doing?" when it's most likely a nanny. I never feel comfortable correcting her saying it's the child's babysitter, not the mother. I grew up in a biracial family (Asian/White) and looked nothing like my mom (who is White) and remember people commenting on her "adopted" daughter. I always feel like even when I'm 99.9% certain the caregiver is not the mother, I'll err on the side of assuming she is rather than the other way around. -
Please post which census tracts make up your statistics
-
BSloper wrote: [quote=friendlypitbull]Not sure what you expect or want but it virtually mirrors the US Population at large in a 120sq Blocks
Also, if you think about it, the statement about mirroring the US pop is totally off base. We are in NYC, not Oklahoma. The stats you cited certainly do not mirror NYC's pop where whites are basically a minority.
and I'd welcome you to find a more diverse neighborhood in this city -
http://gis.nyc.gov/dcp/pa/address.jsp
(please post statistics and census tracts so we can follow along)
EXACTLY!
And I thought the overall black population in the US was meant to be around 17%?? And clearly way way higher in New York (but not in Park Slope). -
xueling wrote: I've often noticed my own uneasiness with all the black nannies and white kids, especially when my toddler became verbal.
As I mentioned earlier, we hired a babysitter/caretaker (nanny whatever, I hate that word)who is Caribbean and I thought I would have some white guilt. And as I mentioned I see this as a stepping stone job for her and her family into the middle class. Her daughter will be goign to college. In fact, I have gotten to know a lot of sitters through the person who works for me, and all of their children will be going to college. It is a much better job than many new immigrants get working in restaurants or day laborers. I am not justifying anything, we pay a good wage and we are sorry not to be wealthy enough to pay health insurance. So I am not sure about the uneasiness except when the ONLY people of color we see is in a service job. But over here in Kensington, that is not the case. I thinnk you can tell your toddler that the person is either the child's mother or caregiver. A caregiver is not a job to be ashamed of. It is a hard job and many of these women are extremely professional and take a lot of pride in the work they do. -
i don't find the black nanny thing racist, I just find it slightly odd. When I first moved here I actually assumed that there were just loads and loads of black women with very very fair skinned biracial sons and daughters.
-
a couple of points:
1) i happen to consider our neighborhood an amazing cultural mix, possibly the most unique in NYC.
2) you can be of color and not immediately look to be of color. i am a pretty light skinned latin person, but definitely could never identify with calling myself "white."
3) it deeply saddened me every time when, working with teens in public schools, they would refer to PS as "white people Brooklyn." -
xueling wrote: I looked up my Prospect Hgts nabe on that site and it came up as 31% white, 48% black/AA, 4% Asian, 12% Hispanic. That seems more diverse to me.
Using the generally recongnized borders of PH - Atlantic to Eastern Pkwy - Flatbush to Bedford(census tracts - 161,163,203,205,207,225,223,215,217,219,221) PH comes out like this:
White - 16.5%
Black - 63.6%
Asian - 3.3%
Hispanic - 12.8%law&disorder wrote: And I thought the overall black population in the US was meant to be around 17%?? And clearly way way higher in New York (but not in Park Slope).
No actually it is 12.3% for the US for points of reference 2000 census has - NYC
White - 44.7%
Black - 26.6%
Asian - 9.8%
Hispanic - 27.7%
New York State:
White - 67.9%
Black - 15.9%
Asian - 5.5%
Hispanic - 15.1%
and US:
White - 75.1%
Black - 12.3%
Asian - 3.6%
Hispanic - 12.5%
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds




