How Big Is Too Big? Architects on the Honor System
The Sunday Times Real Estate section finally did some investigative reporting, about all the bloated developments going up that cheat the rules of sq footage etc by putting in "storage" areas that turn out to be bedrooms and baths. I didn't realize licensed architects were on the honor system with the city to approve their own plans . . .
:evil:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/realestate/16cov.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
http://brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2006/04/the_past_starts.html
:evil:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/realestate/16cov.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
http://brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2006/04/the_past_starts.html
Comments
-
i think they should force the buildings that are finish to be redone in the correct size. on the FAR. and force the guys current stuff that they are working on to stop till it it corrected. anyway they shouldnt award the cheaters!
-
armchair_warrior wrote: i think they should force the buildings that are finish to be redone in the correct size. on the FAR. and force the guys current stuff that they are working on to stop till it it corrected. anyway they shouldnt award the cheaters!
They should have to convert any overage square footage discovered after completion of the building into lower income housing and/or community centers at their own expense. -
Chances are all his projects will see the BSA (Board of Standards and Appeals) and with a few extra developers $$ the buildings will be built without any compromise. As for the Self-Certfication process, it's as analogous to a surgeon performing the art of dissecting without the DOH over their shoulder. Anyone with that authority has to be ethically and morally responsible. Obviously his authority was superseded by the developers $$. The developers are not as innocent as they will attempt to communicate to the public. It's like Ratner blaming Gehry for the oversided towers of shade
-
In the town where I grew up, according to my mother (a fairly reliable reporter of local scuttlebutt), some builders tried something similar--after being unable to get a variance to build several houses that were larger, in sq. ft., than the code allowed any dwelling to be, the builders just put up the houses that way anyway, apparently hoping no one would notice. The township found out and made them tear down parts of the houses until they were "small" enough to meet the code. Hilarious!
-
EmilyM wrote: In the town where I grew up, according to my mother (a fairly reliable reporter of local scuttlebutt), some builders tried something similar--after being unable to get a variance to build several houses that were larger, in sq. ft., than the code allowed any dwelling to be, the builders just put up the houses that way anyway, apparently hoping no one would notice. The township found out and made them tear down parts of the houses until they were "small" enough to meet the code. Hilarious!
i wish they enforce this here in nyc. would teach alot of those guys not to mess around with codes.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds




