This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Cheap eyeglasses in Slope or nearby? — Brooklynian

Cheap eyeglasses in Slope or nearby?

camaysar
edited November -1 in Park Slope
I would like to graduate from 99-cent store magnifier reading glasses to prescription glasses. Trouble is, I now need 3 different magnifications: one for books, another for computer/piano, and another for television! The various glasses and duplicates are scattered all over the house, all mixed up.

My insurance will cover $120. I went to the new place on 7th Ave. between 8th and 9th (west side of 7th) only to find that frames start at around $120 and even more for the actual lenses (exam is free). That's at least a $120 co-pay for something there's a good chance I'll lose before too long anyway.

I don't need a "look", just want to see. Anyone know of a place I can get cheap new frames plus lenses for around $120 or less?

In fact, I already have my long-dead uncle's oddly-shaped nerdy frames from the '50's. Can opticians fit lenses to any frames, even if they are sort of oversized ovoid rhombus in shape?

Thanks for any suggestions!

Comments

  • Lens Crafters - they do cheap, and they don't suck
    and they do "progressives" which is what you're talking about with multi focal lengths

    they're all over the city, and on Court St

    and yeah, if your uncle's frames are in good shape (not dried out or something) you can prolly use them. Your prescription won't work with a curved lens for instance.
    the optician might warn you about "not responsible for damage"
  • In those blue Val-Pack coupon mailings I used to always see coupons for Sterling Optical. The prices were always really cheap, cheaper than I ever managed to get out of a lenscrafters for. Maybe like $99 for a pair, or buy one get one free or something. There's a Sterling in Fulton mall.

    Okay, they're currently doing a buy one get one free offer http://www.sterlingoptical.com/retailers/87

    I've never set foot inside the place so I can't vouch for...anything. But it does seem cheap.
  • Toadette wrote: In those blue Val-Pack coupon mailings I used to always see coupons for Sterling Optical
    Thanks Toadette, I called Sterling and my glasses will be free with my insurance (the 2-fer does not apply with insurance).

    Love the Fabulous Fanny's catalogue! LensCrafters and Costco do not take my insurance.

    I don't think I'll find progressives at any bargain price, and I understand there are issues with peripheral vision with progressives. If there are lenses with some decent field of vision, I'll be fine, even if I just reduce the necessary number of glasses from 3 to 2!

    The insurance may be able to reimburse out-of-pocket from elsewhere, but simple answer - Sterling. Many thanks to all!!
  • FWIW, I've been wearing progressives for many years, and have had no problems with peripheral vision.
  • FWIW, I've been wearing progressives for many years, and have had no problems with peripheral vision.
  • ditto what booklaw said - I have worn progressives for the last 5 years and now wear the most expensive variety - my insurance covered very little of the cost of the lenses - but I love them - can see everything all the time - reading, computer and distance. But you are right - they are not cheap.

    Here's a valuable hint - don't let the eyeglass company up-sell you on coatings - just get plain clear lenses - they'll last longer and won't get so scratched - it's the coating that ends up getting scratched, not the glass lenses.
  • ditto what booklaw said - I have worn progressives for the last 5 years and now wear the most expensive variety - my insurance covered very little of the cost of the lenses - but I love them - can see everything all the time - reading, computer and distance. But you are right - they are not cheap.

    Here's a valuable hint - don't let the eyeglass company up-sell you on coatings - just get plain clear lenses - they'll last longer and won't get so scratched - it's the coating that ends up getting scratched, not the glass lenses.
  • Thanks Livetotravel (can relate to that!) and booklaw for the further advice on coatings and progressive lenses. If progressives work so well, it might be worth it to invest in a pair, as that's clearly what I need. If they cost so much, maybe I won't lose them!
  • Thanks Livetotravel (can relate to that!) and booklaw for the further advice on coatings and progressive lenses. If progressives work so well, it might be worth it to invest in a pair, as that's clearly what I need. If they cost so much, maybe I won't lose them!
  • Costco is far and away cheaper than anything. My bifocal lenses, polycarbonate with AR coat. I'm not sure but you might not have to be a member to get glasses there, I know you don't to get prescriptions filled

    Polycarbonate is UV and scratch resistant without coatings and is thinner for the same prescription as regular CR-39

    RE Progressive lenses: If you are an eye mover and not a head mover, that is your eyes move instead of your whole head when you follow something you might prefer regular bifocals since the field of focus is so small
  • Costco is far and away cheaper than anything. My bifocal lenses, polycarbonate with AR coat. I'm not sure but you might not have to be a member to get glasses there, I know you don't to get prescriptions filled

    Polycarbonate is UV and scratch resistant without coatings and is thinner for the same prescription as regular CR-39

    RE Progressive lenses: If you are an eye mover and not a head mover, that is your eyes move instead of your whole head when you follow something you might prefer regular bifocals since the field of focus is so small
  • BrooklynJack wrote: RE Progressive lenses: If you are an eye mover and not a head mover, that is your eyes move instead of your whole head when you follow something you might prefer regular bifocals since the field of focus is so small
    This is exactly what I was referring to when I mentioned "peripheral" issues, as I now recall the salesperson telling me this in the store. It sounds like something the wearer must get used to. Since I mainly need glasses for reading and watching stationary objects that all fall within a range of 10 or so feet, it may not be a problem.

    The only time I want to look aside without moving my head is when I'm checking someone out on the subway :roll:

    I'll give Costco another call and ask about progressives. Thanks!
  • camaysar wrote: The only time I want to look aside without moving my head is when I'm checking someone out on the subway
    The head mover/eye mover thing is a matter of what you do naturally. We've all done that extreme glance to the side without moving our head. Have someone watch you as you read to see if you move your head or eyes. Unless you naturally move your head you'll probably have some some retraining to do. My wife tried progressives for the first time and switched to a standard flat top bifocal and much prefers them. I've been wearing bifocals for years, flat top 35mm, which is bigger than standard. My optician has always diswayed me from progressives.
  • The head mover/eye mover thing is a matter of what you do naturally.
    I'm definitely an eye mover when reading. Do people actually move their heads to get to the end of a line??
    I've been wearing bifocals for years, flat top 35mm, which is bigger than standard.
    I would hope that actual lenses, compared to magnifiers, have a greater depth of field. Otherwise I'd need trifocals! Anyway, still investigating...
  • camaysar wrote: I would hope that actual lenses, compared to magnifiers, have a greater depth of field. Otherwise I'd need trifocals! Anyway, still investigating...
    The only advantage to having a prescription ground over "drug strore" readers is if your eye are different enough or you have an astigmatism. Or if you feel you want something fancier

    The depth of field issue is as we become older are eyes loose the ability to focus more closely. Whether a pair of glasses has your prescription or is just an off the shelf 1.50 diopter magnification won't change the depth of field you perceive.

    Also going back a rereading your original post it seems silly to talk about bifocals since it seems as if you do not wear glasses normally for distance unless you are just looking for convenience. You could have "plano" glasses, that is no prescription, with a reading prescription in the bottom.. In fact my first pair of bifocals was like this, except the other way around. I am near sighted and wuld always talk off my glasses to read or do close work so I had a pair of bifocals made with my regular prescription but with planos in the reading part just so I didn't have to keep taking my glasses off and putting them back on just to read the label on a can of soup in the store.

    But for reading I want a regular pair of glasses with my reading prescription in them so I look straight ahead to read, not down through the bifocal. I did try having computer glasses made once, bifocals with intermediate in the top and near reading the bottom. I didn't find them worth the money. You should start by getting a thorough eye exam with either an Optometrist or Ophthalmologist and discussing with him or her your needs and concerns and if you need correction to warrant the expense of prescription lenses
  • BrooklynJack wrote:

    The only advantage to having a prescription ground over "drug strore" readers is if your eye are different enough or you have an astigmatism. Or if you feel you want something fancier. Whether a pair of glasses has your prescription or is just an off the shelf 1.50 diopter magnification won't change the depth of field you perceive.
    I was rather hoping I could find a pair that would cover all 3 distinct reading and watching ranges (book, computer/piano, tv). My impression is that progressives will do this, whatever their flaws. I'm tending towards trying them out and seeing if I can get used to them. This constant glasses-changing is just too much. You say there is no difference in the visibility range of mags and prescriptions. If this is true, people with vision similar to mine must have needed multiple pairs of reading/watching glasses before progressives came along! But I will ask the eye-guy, the one who surely knows best.
    Also going back a rereading your original post it seems silly to talk about bifocals since it seems as if you do not wear glasses normally for distance
    I thought perhaps they make bifocals strictly for a range of nearsightedness, that is to cover the distinct ranges just mentioned. But that's kinda dumb, as one normally "watches" one thing at a time... a book, tv, or the computer. So yes... bifocals probably are not called for.
    You could have "plano" glasses, that is no prescription, with a reading prescription in the bottom
    Interesting! Very convenient.
    You should start by getting a thorough eye exam with either an Optometrist or Ophthalmologist and discussing with him or her your needs and concerns and if you need correction to warrant the expense of prescription lenses
    Of course a preliminary eye exam is a given!

    The board (including yourself) has already supplied the kind of general info I was looking for, so I can make semi-informed choices... and thanks to all for that. I'm psyched!

    BTW, one must join Costco to use their optical services, but it's not much ($50 "plus tax")
Sign In or Register to comment.