Rep. Wilson calls Obama a liar -then shuts down his website
Comments
-
In case you missed it, the administration has now 'clarified' their position, and is now backing provisions to actually require proof of citizenship before participating in the new health care plan - unlike previously.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/11/2065287.aspx
For what it's worth, the AP fact checked Obama's speech:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090910/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_health_care_fact_check
I suppose he wasn't a liar... I guess he was just saying things that weren't true... -
bemis wrote: In case you missed it, the administration has now 'clarified' their position, and is now backing provisions to actually require proof of citizenship before participating in the new health care plan - unlike previously.
Wait, is anyone actually making the case that Obama tells the truth? Obama might be an amateur as President, but he is clearly a professional liar.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/11/2065287.aspx
For what it's worth, the AP fact checked Obama's speech:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090910/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_health_care_fact_check
I suppose he wasn't a liar... I guess he was just saying things that weren't true... -
Srsly, Carnivore, Throwing up someone's cartoon of some extreme behavior by ultra conservatives hardly advances any argument against Americans who have honest objections as to where this Country is going.
It does play to the snickering Brooklynian masses in need of soothing their liberal guilt however.
Oh, and it also gets me going in the morning too. -
modsquad wrote: Srsly, Carnivore, Throwing up someone's cartoon of some extreme behavior by ultra conservatives hardly advances any argument against Americans who have honest objections as to where this Country is going.
Sadly, those "extreme ultra conservatives" have become the voice of the mainstream Republican party since Obama was elected.
It does play to the snickering Brooklynian masses in need of soothing their liberal guilt however.
Oh, and it also gets me going in the morning too. -
modsquad wrote: Srsly, Carnivore, Throwing up someone's cartoon of some extreme behavior by ultra conservatives hardly advances any argument against Americans who have honest objections as to where this Country is going.
Mod,
It does play to the snickering Brooklynian masses in need of soothing their liberal guilt however.
Oh, and it also gets me going in the morning too.
This is exactly the point that many liberals don't see.
There are three lesbians in my family. They voted for Obama. They can't get married. They can't join the military. My cousin has a great job, she can't give her benefits to the girlfriend of five years because they can't get married. Putting up ultra right wing cartoons, talking about Fox News, etc. isn't changing the fact that Obama sells out the left, lies, doesn't take human rights seriously and treats gays and lesbians as inferior because his God tells him to.
President anti-wiretapping is now into wiretapping. President anti-war is digging in deep in Iraq and Afghanistan. And I don't necessarily disagree with any of that except he lied about it and he seems to be almost inept as Bush at getting support for these actions.His healthcare reform ideas have changed so much as to be as shadow of what what they once were. Liberal commentators like the ones from Slate heard Obama's health care speech and said, yeah, the guy can talk, but we still don't know what he wants for health care.
Say what you want about Bush, but you knew where he stood on issues. Obama swears up and down that America has to atone for torture, and then he changes his mind and says we don't release the torture photos. Again, I agree with that decision, which is why I voted for McCain because McCain said so all along.
Obama has a mandate to lead as president and is squandering his mandate. If he actually acted on some of those promises he made during his campaign, moderates like I might actually soften to him. -
Carnivore wrote: [quote=modsquad]Srsly, Carnivore, Throwing up someone's cartoon of some extreme behavior by ultra conservatives hardly advances any argument against Americans who have honest objections as to where this Country is going.
Sadly, those "extreme ultra conservatives" have become the voice of the mainstream Republican party since Obama was elected.
It does play to the snickering Brooklynian masses in need of soothing their liberal guilt however.
Oh, and it also gets me going in the morning too.
It is intellectually lazy to pick clowns like this to represent the right. There's no evidence that the 2 idiots that carried guns to an Obama rally represent anything other than their own peculiarities. The media attention on these people, like the Coney Island "Shoot the Freak" booth does allow liberals to fight the good fight however. -
agreed Pokersloper,
Brooklynian has been strangely quiet, dare I say boring since the election. The realization that Obama is following Bush's policies in the war except for some recent hand wringing over torture is a hard pill to swallow.
It's easy to ridicule conservatives over objections to gay marriage because "God says it's not right". It's harder to stomach the thought that Obama ignores it for his own self interests. -
I think that is the point. When you pretend that all conservative and moderate thought is extreme, you create a situation in which you don't have to consider how other people think. To simplify it, when a person paints the average conservative as a devil, then that person can cling more fully to the beliefs and ideas they are bringing with them.
A few months back I was at a dinner party and someone brought up torture. I mentioned that limited uses of torture in ticking bomb situations should be discussed. The college professor sitting across from me responded, "That is a fascist view." By calling me a fascist, he created a situation in which he no longer had to think. It feels like Carnivore just did a similar thing. She posts a cartoon that represents the devil view or extreme far right view of conservatives which probably allows her to block out and ignore thoughtful and challenging moderate and conservative positions. -
modsquad wrote: agreed Pokersloper,
Agreed. I judge people by actions, by what some refer to as "facts on the ground." Flowery and pretty talk is fine, but Obama has acted in a way that suggests he is a Bush Jr.
Brooklynian has been strangely quiet, dare I say boring since the election. The realization that Obama is following Bush's policies in the war except for some recent hand wringing over torture is a hard pill to swallow.
It's easy to ridicule conservatives over objections to gay marriage because "God says it's not right". It's harder to stomach the thought that Obama ignores it for his own self interests.
-war rages in Iraq
-war rages in Afghanistan
-gays can't serve in the military
-gays can't marry
-supports wiretapping
-hides torture evidence from public
The far right extreme wing of the Republican party can worry about distraction issues like birth records, I am looking at what Obama has done and hasn't done. -
pokersloper wrote: I think that is the point. When you pretend that all conservative and moderate thought is extreme, you create a situation in which you don't have to consider how other people think. To simplify it, when a person paints the average conservative as a devil, then that person can cling more fully to the beliefs and ideas they are bringing with them.
Again, I did not pick that face the Republican party- the Republicans themselves did. All of the prominent media figures within the party represent this extreme position, and although some of them have spoken out against Glenn Beck (the nutjob among nutjobs), the same can't be said of O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Scarborough, etc.
A few months back I was at a dinner party and someone brought up torture. I mentioned that limited uses of torture in ticking bomb situations should be discussed. The college professor sitting across from me responded, "That is a fascist view." By calling me a fascist, he created a situation in which he no longer had to think. It feels like Carnivore just did a similar thing. She posts a cartoon that represents the devil view or extreme far right view of conservatives which probably allows her to block out and ignore thoughtful and challenging moderate and conservative positions.
Liberals didn't create these caricatures, they created themselves, and are celebrated within the Republican party. -
eggcream wrote: yeah, not a good thing at all.
I missed the part of that speech where he interrupted Bush addressing Congress.
Democrat Pete Stark in October 2007, speaking in the very chamber where Joe Wilson lost his temper last night. He begins by calling President Bush a liar, but that doesn't even get him warmed up. His main allegation is that President Bush is sending young men to Iraq so that they will "get their heads blown off for the President's amusement.
Wilson should tell them to kiss his ass. -
What surprises me is that Americans continually express such high expectations of their presidents, like they have superpowers to change things, despite all evidence to the contrary. And then such disappointment when it's business as usual. The US system is democracy v.1.0.0 -- it was cutting edge in 1778, and many countries have copied aspects of it, but every other wealthy nation has since chosen a more parliamentary style with lower expectations on the one guy at the top and generally better chances of getting necessary reforms passed.
-
Carnivore wrote:
Contrary you what you've said above,
Again, I did not pick that face the Republican party- the Republicans themselves did. All of the prominent media figures within the party represent this extreme position, and although some of them have spoken out against Glenn Beck (the nutjob among nutjobs), the same can't be said of O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Scarborough, etc.
Liberals didn't create these caricatures, they created themselves, and are celebrated within the Republican party.
You posted the cartoon this morning above the gun freaks. You have chosen the face of the Republican Party you wish to fight. A bit like shooting fish is a barrel? -
Carnivore wrote: [quote=pokersloper]I think that is the point. When you pretend that all conservative and moderate thought is extreme, you create a situation in which you don't have to consider how other people think. To simplify it, when a person paints the average conservative as a devil, then that person can cling more fully to the beliefs and ideas they are bringing with them.
Again, I did not pick that face the Republican party- the Republicans themselves did. All of the prominent media figures within the party represent this extreme position, and although some of them have spoken out against Glenn Beck (the nutjob among nutjobs), the same can't be said of O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Scarborough, etc.
A few months back I was at a dinner party and someone brought up torture. I mentioned that limited uses of torture in ticking bomb situations should be discussed. The college professor sitting across from me responded, "That is a fascist view." By calling me a fascist, he created a situation in which he no longer had to think. It feels like Carnivore just did a similar thing. She posts a cartoon that represents the devil view or extreme far right view of conservatives which probably allows her to block out and ignore thoughtful and challenging moderate and conservative positions.
Liberals didn't create these caricatures, they created themselves, and are celebrated within the Republican party.
I vote Republican about 20% of the time and I don't know any of the commentators you mention. Sure, I know their names, but wouldn't know them if I passed them on the street. Do you actually know anyone who votes Republican? I do. We (they) don't fit your stereotype. There is a great big world outside of NYC. If I judged liberals by reporters who work at Salon and Mother Jones would I have a fair idea of what liberal thought was? No, I wouldn't. I would have an extreme left view of what liberal thought was. And it wouldn't be accurate of me to say "Mother Jones represents the left." Just wouldn't be true.
I think Carnivore, your stereotypes and generalizing does a great disservice towards open discussions about politics. -
modsquad wrote: You posted the cartoon this morning above the gun freaks. You have chosen the face of the Republican Party you wish to fight. A bit like shooting fish is a barrel?
No, you're the one who's deliberately mischaracterizing the mainstream of the two parties.
That cartoon is an accurate representation of the way the Republican party has been presenting themselves. Sorry if I'm not going to take the time to assemble video clips of prominent Repugs spouting exactly that kind of nonsense, but you know damned well they're out there. -
Carnivore wrote: [quote=modsquad]You posted the cartoon this morning above the gun freaks. You have chosen the face of the Republican Party you wish to fight. A bit like shooting fish is a barrel?
No, you're the one who's deliberately mischaracterizing the mainstream of the two parties.
That cartoon is an accurate representation of the way the Republican party has been presenting themselves. Sorry if I'm not going to take the time to assemble video clips of prominent Repugs spouting exactly that kind of nonsense, but you know damned well they're out there.
Carnivore,
Do you know any republicans at all? You think that cartoon you posted is really a fair representation of the American people who sometimes vote for republican party candidates? With all seriousness, have you ever known, I mean really known, conservatives or moderates? I didn't until I moved around the country a bit in my twenties. If you think the cartoon you posted represents conservatives, then it is time you turned off Fox News and went outside. -
pokersloper wrote: [quote=Carnivore][quote=modsquad]You posted the cartoon this morning above the gun freaks. You have chosen the face of the Republican Party you wish to fight. A bit like shooting fish is a barrel?
No, you're the one who's deliberately mischaracterizing the mainstream of the two parties.
That cartoon is an accurate representation of the way the Republican party has been presenting themselves. Sorry if I'm not going to take the time to assemble video clips of prominent Repugs spouting exactly that kind of nonsense, but you know damned well they're out there.
Carnivore,
Do you know any republicans at all? You think that cartoon you posted is really a fair representation of the American people who sometimes vote for republican party candidates. With all seriousness, have you ever known, I mean really known, conservatives or moderates? I didn't until I moved around the country a bit in my twenties. If you think the cartoon you posted represents conservatives, then it is time you turned off Fox News and went outside.
I know plenty of Republicans. I didn't say that the cartoon represented all Republicans. I said it represents the public/media face of the party. -
modsquad wrote: [quote=Carnivore]
Contrary you what you've said above,
Again, I did not pick that face the Republican party- the Republicans themselves did. All of the prominent media figures within the party represent this extreme position, and although some of them have spoken out against Glenn Beck (the nutjob among nutjobs), the same can't be said of O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Scarborough, etc.
Liberals didn't create these caricatures, they created themselves, and are celebrated within the Republican party.
You posted the cartoon this morning above the gun freaks. You have chosen the face of the Republican Party you wish to fight. A bit like shooting fish is a barrel?
Nail on the head Mod. -
Carnivore wrote: [quote=pokersloper][quote=Carnivore][quote=modsquad]You posted the cartoon this morning above the gun freaks. You have chosen the face of the Republican Party you wish to fight. A bit like shooting fish is a barrel?
No, you're the one who's deliberately mischaracterizing the mainstream of the two parties.
That cartoon is an accurate representation of the way the Republican party has been presenting themselves. Sorry if I'm not going to take the time to assemble video clips of prominent Repugs spouting exactly that kind of nonsense, but you know damned well they're out there.
Carnivore,
Do you know any republicans at all? You think that cartoon you posted is really a fair representation of the American people who sometimes vote for republican party candidates. With all seriousness, have you ever known, I mean really known, conservatives or moderates? I didn't until I moved around the country a bit in my twenties. If you think the cartoon you posted represents conservatives, then it is time you turned off Fox News and went outside.
I know plenty of Republicans. I didn't say that the cartoon represented all Republicans. I said it represents the public/media face of the party.
No Carnivore,
You have chosen the worst of the worst as your republican representation. The WSJ, the Weekly Standards, many NPR programs accurately represent the face of the republican party. You look for the worst and your found it - congratulations. For the record, I would never hold up the worst of the left (lets say Mother Jones) and say, "This is the face of liberalism." Carnivore, you are not interested in discussion, you are interested in stereotypes and rhetoric. -
pokersloper wrote: No Carnivore,
I disagree, since actual Congressional Republicans kowtow to the same Republican media figures I've mentioned, and ignore the more moderate Republicans you're talking about.
You have chosen the worst of the worst as your republican representation. The WSJ, the Weekly Standards, many NPR programs accurately represent the face of the republican party. You look for the worst and your found it - congratulations. For the record, I would never hold up the worst of the left (lets say Mother Jones) and say, "This is the face of liberalism." Carnivore, you are not interested in discussion, you are interested in stereotypes and rhetoric. -
Carnivore wrote: [quote=pokersloper]No Carnivore,
I disagree, since actual Congressional Republicans kowtow to the same Republican media figures I've mentioned, and ignore the more moderate Republicans you're talking about.
You have chosen the worst of the worst as your republican representation. The WSJ, the Weekly Standards, many NPR programs accurately represent the face of the republican party. You look for the worst and your found it - congratulations. For the record, I would never hold up the worst of the left (lets say Mother Jones) and say, "This is the face of liberalism." Carnivore, you are not interested in discussion, you are interested in stereotypes and rhetoric.
Carnivore,
As usual, you are wrong. The same way that Obama has been friendly with former terrorists, Rev. Wright and others on the loony left, certainly there are folks on the right who have been friendly with right wing scumbags.
If you tune in to WNYC, NPR, WSJ, etc you will find a long line of thoughtful (and unthoughtful) moderates and conservatives talking politics, You just choose to ignore it.
I worked with a teacher (now a principal) who refused to walk into a classroom teaching the holocaust because she felt the holocaust didn't happen. Her view was that discussing the holocaust was a way to ignore the plight of the Palestinians. She is a democrat. If I were Carnivore, I would say, "The face of the democratic party is this person." But no, I try and keep it fair. I try not to pick out the extreme left and present them as the face of the democratic party. What good could that possible due? -
pokersloper wrote: [quote=Carnivore][quote=pokersloper]No Carnivore,
I disagree, since actual Congressional Republicans kowtow to the same Republican media figures I've mentioned, and ignore the more moderate Republicans you're talking about.
You have chosen the worst of the worst as your republican representation. The WSJ, the Weekly Standards, many NPR programs accurately represent the face of the republican party. You look for the worst and your found it - congratulations. For the record, I would never hold up the worst of the left (lets say Mother Jones) and say, "This is the face of liberalism." Carnivore, you are not interested in discussion, you are interested in stereotypes and rhetoric.
Carnivore,
As usual, you are wrong. The same way that Obama has been friendly with former terrorists, Rev. Wright and others on the loony left, certainly there are folks on the right who have been friendly with right wing scumbags.
If you tune in to WNYC, NPR, WSJ, etc you will find a long line of thoughtful (and unthoughtful) moderates and conservatives talking politics, You just choose to ignore it.
And now by bringing up the phoney Rev Wright connection, you have proven my point for me. Thank you.
By the way, I do listen to NPR, and occasionally read the WSJ. However, WNYC is not the bastion of enlightened thought you claim it is. -
Carnivore, I can't imagine how you can lump Joe Scarborough in with Rush Limbaugh.
Better start thinking analog instead of digital. -
-
Carnivore wrote: [quote=pokersloper][quote=Carnivore][quote=pokersloper]No Carnivore,
I disagree, since actual Congressional Republicans kowtow to the same Republican media figures I've mentioned, and ignore the more moderate Republicans you're talking about.
You have chosen the worst of the worst as your republican representation. The WSJ, the Weekly Standards, many NPR programs accurately represent the face of the republican party. You look for the worst and your found it - congratulations. For the record, I would never hold up the worst of the left (lets say Mother Jones) and say, "This is the face of liberalism." Carnivore, you are not interested in discussion, you are interested in stereotypes and rhetoric.
Carnivore,
As usual, you are wrong. The same way that Obama has been friendly with former terrorists, Rev. Wright and others on the loony left, certainly there are folks on the right who have been friendly with right wing scumbags.
If you tune in to WNYC, NPR, WSJ, etc you will find a long line of thoughtful (and unthoughtful) moderates and conservatives talking politics, You just choose to ignore it.
And now by bringing up the phoney Rev Wright connection, you have proven my point for me. Thank you.
By the way, I do listen to NPR, and occasionally read the WSJ. However, WNYC is not the bastion of enlightened thought you claim it is.
And by missing my point completely Carnivore, you have proven how incapable you are of stepping back and considering your views. I brought up Wright to point out that stereotyping and looking for the "gotcha" moment doesn't get us very far. Instead, you see the name Wright written and just assume I talk politics the way you do - with stereotypes and misleading comments. You can discuss politics that way and refuse to consider fairly my views, clearly that is your style. -
pokersloper wrote: And by missing my point completely Carnivore, you have proven how incapable you are of stepping back and considering your views. I brought up Wright to point out that stereotyping and looking for the "gotcha" moment doesn't get us very far. Instead, you see the name Wright written and just assume I talk politics the way you do - with stereotypes and misleading comments. You can discuss politics that way and refuse to consider fairly my views, clearly that is your style.
pokersloper wrote: The same way that Obama has been friendly with former terrorists, Rev. Wright and others on the loony left, certainly there are folks on the right who have been friendly with right wing scumbags.
The fact that Obama's pastor has said things most Americans disagree with is hardly equivalent to prominent Republicans basing actual policy decisions on what right wing talking heads tell gullible Americans about what to believe. -
modsquad wrote: Carnivore, I can't imagine how you can lump Joe Scarborough in with Rush Limbaugh.
Mod,
Better start thinking analog instead of digital.
It is safer for Carnivore to stereotype then to discuss issues. Obama is leading very poorly, so Carnivore points to her stereotypes of what she thinks a republican is rather then discussing the daunting tasks, promises and needs that are before this country.
I have laid out lists of issues that Obama has not addressed or has addressed poorly, Carnivore talks about Limbaugh and republican stereotypes. That is all the proof you need that some libs are really worried and disappointed about Obama's performance. -
pokersloper wrote: I worked with a teacher (now a principal) who refused to walk into a classroom teaching the holocaust because she felt the holocaust didn't happen. Her view was that discussing the holocaust was a way to ignore the plight of the Palestinians. She is a democrat. If I were Carnivore, I would say, "The face of the democratic party is this person." But no, I try and keep it fair. I try not to pick out the extreme left and present them as the face of the democratic party. What good could that possible due?
To respond to your edit:
This hypothetical person you've brought up is not on tv for several hours a day, and I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a prominent Democrat defending those beliefs or actions. In contrast, prominent Republicans have spoken out in defense of every single one of the right wing caricatures in the comic I posted. -
Carnivore, A difference of opinion between Scarborough and Zbigniew Brzezinski paints forever Scarborough into a right wing loony bin?
Are you saying Arafat never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity? Zbigniew Brzezinski was part of the weakest representation of American government the world has ever seen. Many of our problems today can be laid at the Wimps feet.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds





