This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Slope restaurants cited for underpaying workers - Page 4 — Brooklynian

Slope restaurants cited for underpaying workers

124

Comments

  • whynot_31 wrote: [quote=modsquad][quote=J0518]if you can't name a single concrete thing you've ever done in your life in the name of immigration reform in this country, you haven't got a single bit of ground to stand on here.
    .
    Agreed J0518, whenever possible I've voted for the candidate that supports stricter immigration laws in order to prevent these things from happening.

    So our wages remain far above the rest of the world, and we lose all ability to compete?

    We still have the biggest market in the world right in our own country. We just need to charge a premium (tariff) for other countries who want to undercut us in our own market by using sweatshop labor.
  • wingedearth wrote: to charge a premium (tariff) for other countries who want to undercut us in our own market by using sweatshop labor.
    Tariffs mean no more cheap socks at Walmart. People like cheap socks. More than they like social justice.
  • Not to excuse any wayward behavior by the restaurant owners, but if you've ever dealt with any federal, city or state agencies (think dept of revenue or dept of buildings, or the SEC "investigating" Bernie Madoff) you know how clueless they can be and how kafkaesque the process is, so I'd be wary of accepting the DOLs findings at face value.
  • Sadarami wrote: so I'd be wary of accepting the DOLs findings at face value.
    I'd usually agree with that. Unfortunately, when one of the named business owners stopped by and was asked if he'd care to present his side of the story, he responded by trolling the forum. Between that and the Aunt Suzie's interviews, I'm more inclined to believe the DOL.
  • Fitzroy Sq wrote: We've seen what happens when business is allowed to go unchecked under Bush and we're all paying for it now. The government is always more accountable than any private company.
    The idea that business was "unchecked" under Bush, or at any time in recent memory, is ludicrous. And your second statement is laughable.
  • Jimmy wrote: The idea that business was "unchecked" under Bush, or at any time in recent memory, is ludicrous. And your second statement is laughable.
    Um, no, you're pretty much just 100% wrong there. Perhaps if you made an attempt to back up your sweeping generalizations with specific examples you could enlighten us. But i guess we'll just have to stay in the dark.
  • I am never going to Aunt Suzie's again. The owner sounds like a first class lying Beeatch. I don't particulalry like any of the restaurants on the list anyhow. My fave spots are NaNa and Santa Fe, glad they weren't on the list :D
  • i remain quite sad about bogota. about the fact that they treat workers like crap, and about the fact that one of their owners came here and acted like an imbecile.

    need a new place for fish tacos
  • brooklynpotter wrote: i remain quite sad about bogota. about the fact that they treat workers like crap, and about the fact that one of their owners came here and acted like an imbecile.

    need a new place for fish tacos
    Yeah, I used to like them, but now I'll have to go to Queens for my Bandeja Paisa.
  • Fitzroy Sq wrote: [quote=Jimmy]The idea that business was "unchecked" under Bush, or at any time in recent memory, is ludicrous. And your second statement is laughable.
    Um, no, you're pretty much just 100% wrong there. Perhaps if you made an attempt to back up your sweeping generalizations with specific examples you could enlighten us. But i guess we'll just have to stay in the dark.

    Typical - you make a sweeping generalization without offering evidence or specific examples to back it up, and then expect me to do the opposite when I tell you you're wrong. How about you first offer evidence to back up your initial statements, and we'll take it from there.
  • Carnivore wrote: [quote=brooklynpotter]i remain quite sad about bogota. about the fact that they treat workers like crap, and about the fact that one of their owners came here and acted like an imbecile.

    need a new place for fish tacos
    Yeah, I used to like them, but now I'll have to go to Queens for my Bandeja Paisa.

    Do you really believe that was them!? It's really not the tone of voice of their Twitter feed. Sounds like an imposter to me.....they seemed as real as the Pavilion bedbugs.
  • That sweeping generalization was my point. Sorry Jimmy, I guess that was a little too subtle for you.
  • legalalien wrote: they seemed as real as the Pavilion bedbugs.
    Wait a sec. Are you saying there aren't bedbugs at the Pavilion?
  • brooklynpotter wrote: i remain quite sad about bogota. about the fact that they treat workers like crap, and about the fact that one of their owners came here and acted like an imbecile.

    need a new place for fish tacos
    You're taking yourself entirely too seriously, my friend. Really.

    No one here knows how Bogota treats their workers. Oh wait....someone does....I DO. Know why I do? Because the owners are my very good friends and I spend plenty of time talking to them and their employees.

    Let's just take the gloves off here for a second....

    From the very beginning, this thread had been about the most sad-sackest armchair quarterbacking i've seen in a long while on the net. You all found a list which was given as part of a press conference, took the bait, and went running with it. Where you all took it was ridiculous. You all made connections where they didn't belong and got on top of the same "holier than thou" podium you love to take down other blogs for. Slopemom ain't got nothing on this thread. In the end, though, all you have is a report with some names and, in this day and age where nothing is ever what it seems in the media, you all should know a hell of a lot better.

    This board could be so much more than it actually is if it wasn't for things like this. People could come here for actual information, and some of us actually try to utilize this board as such. This could be a more real-time version of what sites like Brownstoner try to do. Instead, it's some bizzare social network in which people define themselves by what they don't like, or where they won't go, and no one, in the end, seems to actually know a whole lot.

    So Farid came on here and riled you up. Maybe you shouldn't be so easy to rile up next time. I was laughing by butt off since I could totally see his sense of humor in it and how everyone else was just swinging and missing. They know they've never been the darlings of the blogosphere and, frankly, why do you need to be when you have a strong, loyal network of customers and friends who will continue to support you? Bogota treat their employees like crap? I beg to differ. Find me a restaurant in Park Slope with less employee turnover than theirs. Find me a place who put their delivery guy's name and face on a card put on every table there. Those are mostly the same faces that were there since the day they opened. They owe you an explanation? They're smart guys. They know who they owe explanations to. Brooklynian.com? Not at the top of that list. You think they're not worth your business? Fine....they can easily not be worth your business. From the looks of things, the rest of Park Slope, luckily, knows better, reserves judgement, and happens to disagree with you.

    My apologies to those on here who've stayed above all this and are reading this self-admitted rant, but I'm not going to allow some passerby to this site to read this garbage and not want to give a chance to one of the businesses that, to me, a ten-year resident of Park Slope, represents the absolute best of this community.
  • J0518 wrote: The owners are my very good friends.
    This hardly makes you an impartial observer, so pardon if your comment is taken with a mountain of salt. It would be nice to hear directly from the workers themselves, rather than have the restaurant owners or their buddies acting as a proxy for those who were allegedly shafted. But as this is an anonymous site, we really can't be certain that people are who they say they are.
  • legalalien wrote: Do you really believe that was them!? It's really not the tone of voice of their Twitter feed. Sounds like an imposter to me.....they seemed as real as the Pavilion bedbugs.
    So the fact that it was him is now confirmed by a friend of his.

    Honestly, Farid doesn't have to care what we think, and we don't have to patronize his restaurant. Seems pretty simple to me. :wink:
  • Who's asking for darlings of the blogosphere? I'd like to know I'm dealing with someone with a full deck. Never been and after reading that thread don't plan on it.
    The fact that you're the only one who got it while laughing your butt off should tell you something. In these times I wouldn't want to alienate one customer much less hundreds who might take offense to his comments.
  • Carnivore wrote:

    Honestly, Farid doesn't have to care what we think, and we don't have to patronize his restaurant. Seems pretty simple to me.
    Who's "we?" Speak for yourself, meathead.
  • Danny Hellman wrote: [quote=Carnivore]

    Honestly, Farid doesn't have to care what we think, and we don't have to patronize his restaurant. Seems pretty simple to me.
    Who's "we?" Speak for yourself, meathead.
    I think your nutritional deficiencies are undermining your thought process. "We" includes you. You also don't have to patronize his restaurant, although you of course may continue to if you care more about the rights of meat than about the workers exploited by these businesses.
  • Carnivore wrote:
    So the fact that it was him is now confirmed by a friend of his.

    Honestly, Farid doesn't have to care what we think, and we don't have to patronize his restaurant. Seems pretty simple to me. :wink:
    putting aside how i feel about the alleged mistreatment of workers, i'm quite appalled about the owner's comments.

    we've had any number of accusations about businesses fly around on this board, the ones that have stood out in my mind are the threads where the business owners themselves come to engage (or shill themselves) in the conversation--animal kind, that liquor store on PPW, elementi, the restaurant that can't be named.

    the former two were honest and cared enough to explain why they practiced business the way they did. the latter two were such shits that they did enough to make many of us avoid the places like the plague. readers have even been put off by the shills from athena. you think opinion here doesn't matter? don't kid yourself.

    make fun of ths board all you want--J0518, farid, etc., certainly *i've* had my issues with much of the attitude in the posts and i've been quite vocal about it--but at the end of the day a whole lot of people will read this thread and avoid bogota.
  • Carnivore wrote:
    I think your nutritional deficiencies are undermining your thought process. "We" includes you. You also don't have to patronize his restaurant, although you of course may continue to if you care more about the rights of meat than about the workers exploited by these businesses.
    Who's self-righteous now? Give this guy a few fortifying bites of bacon and he's a regular Joan of Arc!

    I've eaten a Bogota a bunch of times in the last few months, and the waitstaff always seem downright cheery to me. They're certainly not dragging their asses like a bunch of beaten-down slave laborers. And actually, yes, I do care a lot more about animals being killed on an industrial scale than I do about who's getting nickle-and-dimed on minimum wage. It seems that I, (henceforth referred to as "me") have different ethical priorities than you, (henceforth referred to as "we").

    I'm not saying the news about the underpaid restaurant workers isn't disappointing, it's just not surprising, and it certainly isn't unique to the Slope. The economy sucks, folks are eating out less, food prices have gone up, and commercial landlords are human scum. How do you expect these businesses to stay afloat? By all means, Carnivore, enjoy your message board boycott, but when all the restaurants have folded, where will you go for your perfectly-poured French 75?
  • Sorry, Danny, but you fail formal logic. You are still included in the "we" who have a choice about whether to patronize said restaurant.

    You also fail at recognizing parody. I was mocking your own self-righteous tone when you preach about meat.

    I haven't called for any boycott. I said I'm not going there, and I expect many others won't, especially (as BP said) when the owner came here and acted like such an ass. There are plenty of restaurants and bars that won't fold, whose owners know how to interact with the public, and I have no doubt that I'll be able to continue to eat and drink well in the neighborhood without supporting an individual like Farid.
  • Carnivore wrote: You also fail at recognizing parody. I was mocking your own self-righteous tone when you preach about meat.
    Oh, was that parody? I missed that somehow. Entirely my fault, please forgive me. One bit of advice: next time, you might consider adding an asterisk that says "parody," or I don't know, maybe try making it funny...?
    Carnivore wrote: I haven't called for any boycott. I said I'm not going there, and I expect many others won't, especially (as BP said) when the owner came here and acted like such an ass. There are plenty of restaurants and bars that won't fold, whose owners know how to interact with the public, and I have no doubt that I'll be able to continue to eat and drink well in the neighborhood without supporting an individual like Farid.
    It's true, you haven't actually typed the words "WE will now boycott Bogota." However, when you announce publicly that you will no longer dine at Bogota, and when you decry the tone of Farid's responses, your intent is to influence others, (other members of "WE") to skip dining at Bogota, yes? A de facto boycott?
  • Bogota is a tofu place :lol: If you look on menupages, the most recent comments all complain about poor service/attitude.
  • Danny Hellman wrote: [quote=Carnivore]You also fail at recognizing parody. I was mocking your own self-righteous tone when you preach about meat.
    Oh, was that parody? I missed that somehow. Entirely my fault, please forgive me. One bit of advice: next time, you might consider adding an asterisk that says "parody," or I don't know, maybe try making it funny...?
    Carnivore wrote: I haven't called for any boycott. I said I'm not going there, and I expect many others won't, especially (as BP said) when the owner came here and acted like such an ass. There are plenty of restaurants and bars that won't fold, whose owners know how to interact with the public, and I have no doubt that I'll be able to continue to eat and drink well in the neighborhood without supporting an individual like Farid.
    It's true, you haven't actually typed the words "WE will now boycott Bogota." However, when you announce publicly that you will no longer dine at Bogota, and when you decry the tone of Farid's responses, your intent is to influence others, (other members of "WE") to skip dining at Bogota, yes? A de facto boycott?[/quote]
    :roll:

    So Danny doesn't find it funny when he's being mocked... What a surprise. :roll:


    Now you're arguing semantics. My intent is to influence others inasmuch as anyone who says anything is influencing others. That is not the same as "calling for a boycott." Perhaps you'd like to argue over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin next.
  • Boy·cott: to engage in a concerted refusal to have dealings with (as a person, store, or organization) usually to express disapproval or to force acceptance of certain conditions
    A boycott requires an agreement among the boycotters. That has not happened here. If two or more people individually decide to refrain from eating at Bogota, that does not a boycott make.
  • What difference does it make if it's a boycott or not? Is there something wrong with boycotting something? Of course not. No one is going to say otherwise - unless they're a fascist.
  • Carnivore wrote:

    So Danny doesn't find it funny when he's being mocked... What a surprise.
    Nonsense. I'll be happy to laugh at one of your jokes in the event that I see one.
  • So, it has been confirmed that the person posting for Bogota with all those assinine comments was truly the owner of the place? The one who never really answered any questions?
  • brooklynpotter wrote: [quote=Carnivore]
    So the fact that it was him is now confirmed by a friend of his.

    Honestly, Farid doesn't have to care what we think, and we don't have to patronize his restaurant. Seems pretty simple to me. :wink:
    putting aside how i feel about the alleged mistreatment of workers, i'm quite appalled about the owner's comments.

    we've had any number of accusations about businesses fly around on this board, the ones that have stood out in my mind are the threads where the business owners themselves come to engage (or shill themselves) in the conversation--animal kind, that liquor store on PPW, elementi, the restaurant that can't be named.

    the former two were honest and cared enough to explain why they practiced business the way they did. the latter two were such shits that they did enough to make many of us avoid the places like the plague. readers have even been put off by the shills from athena. you think opinion here doesn't matter? don't kid yourself.

    make fun of ths board all you want--J0518, farid, etc., certainly *i've* had my issues with much of the attitude in the posts and i've been quite vocal about it--but at the end of the day a whole lot of people will read this thread and avoid bogota.

    Totally agreed!
Sign In or Register to comment.