Bike Lanes erased - Please help!
Comments
-
I can only tell you why I am personally offended by the Hasids' political (and, according to at least one poster above, physical) attacks on the bike lanes and their users: the attacks seem to be motivated less by safety considerations than by a determination to impose their own religious beliefs on everyone who enters their neighborhood. Do we want to allow Brooklyn to become like Jerusalem, where you can be stoned for driving in Orthodox neighborhoods on Sabbath, and where women are not allowed to approach the Wailing Wall with bare shoulders, because the Orthodox object?
I would find it similarly objectionable if local papers were unable to publish cartoons involving Muhammad (or Jesus or Moses, for that matter), for fear of legal or terrorist reprisals from offended members of a given religion.
I have no problem with religious observance, so long as it is purely voluntary and does not harm people or animals.
However, I do not believe that any religious observance should be permitted to adversely affect nonbelievers. -
booklaw wrote: However, I do not believe that any religious observance should be permitted to adversely affect nonbelievers.
I agree. And while I don’t think they’re imposing their beliefs on us non-believers, they’re trying to curtail a practical and completely reasonable -community- feature (bike lane on one of the most important bike thoroughfares in the borough), because of their personal religious views.
That’s not how inter-community issues should be decided in this city, which has every stripe of human living in very close proximity, or having to pass through each other’s proximity.
It is not reasonable to move important and heavily trafficked bike lanes because of a cultural belief that’s not shared by a vast majority of your fellow city dwellers. We're not talking about permitting incest or spousal abuse here. We're talking about bicycling.
Look, the Hasids haven't done anything illegal, they've focused community influence to get what they want. But that doesn't make it right, fair, or justified. -
rezist wrote: As a recent addition to this area ...
This is from a recent post of yours Rezit. What $%^& hypocrite. I'll post as I see fit you fascist. -
MOD NOTE: Cool yer jets, folks. Escalations and "he said..." grudge matches here do little to advance the conversation.
That said, speaking as just an observer I'd say it's hardly hypocritical for someone new to an area to give advice about being new to the area to someone else new the area.
On the contrary, it'd appear to be one subject where the new folks might be pretty well qualified to speak from their own experiences (...of being new here).
Still speaking as just an observer, can we please move on from the snips and barbs and get back to the issues?
Thanks all. -
there isn't enough bike riders in the area to out vote them any time soon. their political machine is the best. they vote in blocks. which politicians love!
-
armchair_warrior wrote: there isn't enough bike riders in the area to out vote them any time soon. their political machine is the best.!
But isn't this really just Hassidics in one neighborhood? I haven't heard anything about Borough Park bike lanes or any other area - has anyone else? So it's all NYC cyclists vs. The Hassids and secular car drivers (i.e. bass-playing hipsters) of Williamsburg. I think people are exaggerating a bit about the Hassidics power.
Booklaw, do you really think there's a remote possibility that all of Brooklyn will become like Jerusalem? No way. Sure, their neighborhood is like Jerusalem, but you think the Hassids would come to Park Slope and throw stones at the baby strollers on the Sabbath? You think the Hassids are a force? They ain't got nothing on these Yuppie Moms. -
Julius Orange wrote: [quote=armchair_warrior]there isn't enough bike riders in the area to out vote them any time soon. their political machine is the best.!
But isn't this really just Hassidics in one neighborhood? I haven't heard anything about Borough Park bike lanes or any other area - has anyone else? So it's all NYC cyclists vs. The Hassids and secular car drivers (i.e. bass-playing hipsters) of Williamsburg. I think people are exaggerating a bit about the Hassidics power.
Booklaw, do you really think there's a remote possibility that all of Brooklyn will become like Jerusalem? No way. Sure, their neighborhood is like Jerusalem, but you think the Hassids would come to Park Slope and throw stones at the baby strollers on the Sabbath? You think the Hassids are a force? They ain't got nothing on these Yuppie Moms.
parts of some communities have their roads close off to outside traffic already, and this is in brooklyn. like a street here and there.
there a few streets in borough park and gravesend and i think there is in williamsburg.
when i was growing up even none jewish stores were being pressure to close on the sabbath. this was close to borough park.
I do miss G and sons. only jewish store i would ever go shopping in
. anyone who grew up around borough park knows what i'm talking about lol. -
armchair_warrior wrote: there isn't enough bike riders in the area to out vote them any time soon. their political machine is the best. they vote in blocks. which politicians love!
It's not about voting blocs. It's about political pressure, demonstration, petition, etc.
There are plenty of bike rider groups. None that could take on the Hasidim outright, but certainly on an issue by issue basis. -
Julius Orange wrote: I think people are exaggerating a bit about the Hassidics power.
Some commenters may be exaggerating in certain instances, but the Bedford Avenue bike lane is unarguably dominated by Hasidim vs biker.
It's how every single community meeting on the subject played out. The Bedford bike lane was the number one topic that the group brought up when they got an audience with the deputy mayor.
The pro and con constituencies in this debate aren't remotely disputable. -
No, I do not for a minute think the Hasids will impose their views on Park Slope. I think they are most likely to concentrate on controlling what happens in their own neighborhoods.
But I do have an occasional moment of concern at the increasing frequency with which I see "black hats" in the Slope. -
booklaw wrote: But I do have an occasional moment of concern at the increasing frequency with which I see "black hats" in the Slope.
I bet there used to be more. There used to be a couple of shops in this area owned by Orthodox Jews (I remember a shoe repair place near the hospital and a Kosher restaurant where Hancos is now.) But they are all gone now. I'm assuming it's because they weren't open on Saturdays which is a huge consuming day in the Slope (kind of blows out that greedy Jew myth). -
booklaw wrote: But I do have an occasional moment of concern at the increasing frequency with which I see "black hats" in the Slope.
Let’s have some fun and replace "black hats" in the above sentence with (in no particular order):
a. Catholics
b. Muslims
c. atheists
d. blacks
e. Asians
f. poor people
g. gays
It amazes me that there are bigots living in Brooklyn. How do you survive seeing so many people different than you every day? -
Subject: Arrests Made In Brooklyn Bike Lane Divide
http://ny1.com/7-brooklyn-news-content/top_stories/110147/arrests-made-in-brooklyn-bike-lane-divide
Police have arrested two people for allegedly re-painting bike lanes on a street in Williamsburg where a battle has erupted between local bicycle enthusiasts and the area's Hasidic community.
Interesting. -
-
It amazes me that there are bigots living in Brooklyn. How do you survive seeing so many people different than you every day?
Unlike the various other ethnic groups you mentioned, and unlike Reformed, Conservative, Reconstructionist and Modern Orthodox Jews, Chassids tend to move en masse into a given neighborhood, and thus to change the basic nature of the neighborhood. Examples: Monsey, Crown Heights, the Five Towns, Fleischmanns, Kiryas Joel, etc.
I would like Park Slope to remain essentially the very diverse community it is today... except perhaps more people of color than we see today.
I do not wish it to become the next Borough Park. -
booklaw wrote:
What are you so afraid of, black hats,big families, spiritual guidance? This is about a roadway. The people of a community are saying cars are safer than bicycles. NY1 link shows a guy saying it. On that logic it will be reversed with a little hipster out cry. There is nothing anti-Torah/Jewish about a bike path. If somebody feels so, let them explain and their argument will unravel at first use. If it's really about safety on both sides them fearing bicycles and cycles fearing cars. At a second glance DOT or politicians will have to explain their position. Yes the people of this community are in danger because of bicycles and their paths or bicycles are in danger because of the auto traffic and the lack of defined roadways. Herpes,and fear will get everybody into your I am afraid....well because of the invasion of Park Slope.I am afraid because look at what "they"did in the 5 Towns or Crown Heights. Are you serious? What is wrong with Borough Park ? All Jews are allowed not just the 'kinds" you like. Keep your eye(s) on the prize the restoration of a safe through way from Borough to Borough,and compromise by a group that wants to isolate itself from it's fellow citizens. I don't like any A-hole walking out in front of me while I am jammin' down the road regardless or creed,color or religion. Go get yourself a 6 of Hebrew and some knishes from Yonah Schimmel and learn to love . If you can't make that, head to Franklin Pk for the candle lighting people are harder to hate when you are looking at them,if you leave there full of fear..well give up. Click on the Rabbi's video links here those are not scary people.It amazes me that there are bigots living in Brooklyn. How do you survive seeing so many people different than you every day?
Unlike the various other ethnic groups you mentioned, and unlike Reformed, Conservative, Reconstructionist and Modern Orthodox Jews, Chassids tend to move en mass into a given neighborhood, and thus to change the basic nature of the neighborhood. Examples: Monsey, Crown Heights, the Five Towns, etc.
I would like Park Slope to remain essentially the very diverse community it is today... except perhaps more people of color than we see today.
I do not wish it to become the next Borough Park. -
I hate no ethnic group. I merely choose to live in a diverse community. If that community were to include a sprinkling of Chassids, that would be fine.
Ask the old Italian immigrant families who were displaced by the hippies and yuppies moving into Carroll Gardens and Park Slope 25-35 years ago (as I did) how they felt about the change in their neighborhoods. Chances are they'd tell you they wished things could have remained the same.
That's the same emotion I am expressing... I would like things to remain more or less as they are, i.e. ethnically and racially diverse. -
Jamzer wrote: [quote=booklaw]But I do have an occasional moment of concern at the increasing frequency with which I see "black hats" in the Slope.
Let’s have some fun and replace "black hats" in the above sentence with (in no particular order):
a. Catholics
b. Muslims
c. atheists
d. blacks
e. Asians
f. poor people
g. gays
It amazes me that there are bigots living in Brooklyn. How do you survive seeing so many people different than you every day?
No, the Black Hats are not like those groups. They are a self contained, social, political and economic group. The only reason they come to Park Slope would be to proselytize.
Replace the Black Hats with
- The Amish
- Moonies
- The followers of Jim Jones.
- That crazy family from Kansas -
catwalkertexasranger wrote: There is nothing anti-Torah/Jewish about a bike path. If somebody feels so, let them explain and their argument will unravel at first use. If it's really about safety on both sides them fearing bicycles and cycles fearing cars.
This is wrong. The Hasidim have explicitly stated that their #1 objection to the bike lane is the indecency of the bikers, women especially. -
I don't know if Booklaw is Jewish or not (hmmm lawyer? Yeah, like I don’t know), but to be fair, harshing on the Hasids is a bit different if you're Jewish. It's more like infighting than bigotry. They’re not terribly fond of us either. I have Orthodox relatives who look down on me because I’m not Jewie enough for them. It's insulting and I can understand why a lot of Jews don't like them.
However, clearly some dislike them a lot more intensely than others. It doesn't really affect me personally, so I don't care too much, nor do I worry about them taking over my neighborhood or doing anything sinister. If anything, I find them pretty fascinating because they’re still part of my culture.
But who cares if they find cycling clothes indecent? It drives me crazy that with all the tailors among them, they insist on wearing ill-fitted suits. So they have their opinion, and I have mine. That’s life. Besides, it’s hard to argue with them because most cycling-specific garb is just ghastly - who does finds spandex decent anyway?
But if you really want to test that theory, and make a statement, you should get a bunch of cyclists to ride in line through the neighborhood, dressed up in Hassidics clothing - hat and all. Then they couldn’t complain about decency. Plus it would be a real hoot. -
Julius Orange wrote: But who cares if they find cycling clothes indecent?
I couldn't care less what they think, the problem is that this is the reason they advocated and got removal of one of the most important bike lanes in the borough. -
-
and
Is removing the bike lane gonna result in less bikers or just a more dangerous road for everyone? -
winstonsmith wrote: and
Very good point.
Is removing the bike lane gonna result in less bikers or just a more dangerous road for everyone?
I'd love a study on # of bikers before and after.
It's the longest bike lane in the city. Goes all the way to Sheepshead Bay. People are going to be biking on it from very far away, they're not going to get to that part of Bedford Avenue and detour for 12 blocks. They're going to go right on through. -
Boygabriel wrote: People are going to be biking on it from very far away, they're not going to get to that part of Bedford Avenue and detour for 12 blocks. They're going to go right on through.
And hopefully they'll be nude, (weather permitting). -
Boygabriel wrote: [quote=Julius Orange]But who cares if they find cycling clothes indecent?
I couldn't care less what they think, the problem is that this is the reason they advocated and got removal of one of the most important bike lanes in the borough.
What reason would you find acceptable then? My point is that don't think there's any good reason to remove the lanes. So whatever reason they give for not wanting it is irrelevant. I wasn't saying I don't care about the removal of the lanes, just that I don't care about whatever selfish reason was given for its removal. I'm hoping a backlash will get them back - officially and legally.
Besides, as it has been pointed out, erasing the lines won't stop the cyclists. We don't live in a world of Road Runner physics where you can erase a tunnel and force a coyote to smash into the side of a mountain. Cyclists will not get sucked into an alternate dimensional void once the lines disappear ... though sometimes that neighborhood can feel make you feel like you have been. -
Julius Orange wrote: [quote=Boygabriel][quote=Julius Orange]But who cares if they find cycling clothes indecent?
I couldn't care less what they think, the problem is that this is the reason they advocated and got removal of one of the most important bike lanes in the borough.
What reason would you find acceptable then? My point is that don't think there's any good reason to remove the lanes. So whatever reason they give for not wanting it is irrelevant. I wasn't saying I don't care about the removal of the lanes, just that I don't care about whatever selfish reason was given for its removal. I'm hoping a backlash will get them back - officially and legally.
Besides, as it has been pointed out, erasing the lines won't stop the cyclists. We don't live in a world of Road Runner physics where you can erase a tunnel and force a coyote to smash into the side of a mountain. Cyclists will not get sucked into an alternate dimensional void once the lines disappear ... though sometimes that neighborhood can feel make you feel like you have been.
So cartoon logic is..logical? Why not de-energize traffic lights at underused intersections? No need to pay to maintain and power the traffic signal it will save lots of cash,plus light won't be visible on Friday nights all the way thru Saturday for religious reasons. -
winstonsmith wrote: [quote=Jamzer][quote=booklaw]But I do have an occasional moment of concern at the increasing frequency with which I see "black hats" in the Slope.
Let’s have some fun and replace "black hats" in the above sentence with (in no particular order):
a. Catholics
b. Muslims
c. atheists
d. blacks
e. Asians
f. poor people
g. gays
It amazes me that there are bigots living in Brooklyn. How do you survive seeing so many people different than you every day?
No, the Black Hats are not like those groups. They are a self contained, social, political and economic group. The only reason they come to Park Slope would be to proselytize.
Replace the Black Hats with
- The Amish
- Moonies
- The followers of Jim Jones.
- That crazy family from Kansas
You betray your bigotry by equating orthodox Jews with these miscreants.
Fearing a group of people because they are different is bigotry any way you slice it.
*** edited to clarify that I don't consider the Amish (or Moonies for that matter) miscreants. Just the other two**** -
Julius Orange wrote: What reason would you find acceptable then? My point is that don't think there's any good reason to remove the lanes. So whatever reason they give for not wanting it is irrelevant. I wasn't saying I don't care about the removal of the lanes, just that I don't care about whatever selfish reason was given for its removal. I'm hoping a backlash will get them back - officially and legally.
Ah, I see your point. To a certain extent I agree, the reasoning doesn't matter. -
catwalkertexasranger wrote: So cartoon logic is..logical? Why not de-energize traffic lights at underused intersections? No need to pay to maintain and power the traffic signal it will save lots of cash,plus light won't be visible on Friday nights all the way thru Saturday for religious reasons.
I have to honestly say I can't understand a word of what this is saying. I know all the words, but their order makes no sense to me.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds










