No he can't (just read it on the net, old news :p)
Subject: No he can't (just read it on the net, old news
)
No He Can't By Anne Wortham
Fellow Americans,
Please know: I am black; I grew up in the segregated South. I did not vote for Barack Obama; I wrote in Ron Paul's name as my choice for president. Most importantly, I am not race conscious. I do not require a black president to know that I am a person of worth, and that life is worth living. I do not require a black president to love the ideal of America .
I cannot join you in your celebration. I feel no elation. There is no smile on my face. I am not jumping with joy. There are no tears of triumph in my eyes. For such emotions and behavior to come from me, I would have to deny all that I know about the requirements of human flourishing and survival - all that I know about the history of the United States of America , all that I know about American race relations, and all that I know about Barack Obama as a politician. I would have to deny the nature of the "change" that Obama asserts has come to America . Most importantly, I would have to abnegate my certain understanding that you have chosen to sprint down the road to serfdom that we have been on for over a century. I would have to pretend that individual liberty has no value for the success of a human life. I would have to evade your rejection of the slender reed of capitalism on which your success and mine depend. I would have to think it somehow rational that 94 percent of the 12 million blacks in this country voted for a man because he looks like them (that blacks are permitted to play the race card), and that they were joined by self-declared "progressive" whites who voted for him because he doesn't look like them. I would have to be wipe my mind clean of all that I know about the kind of people who have advised and taught Barack Obama and will fill posts in his administration - political intellectuals like my former colleagues at the Harvard University 's Kennedy School of Government.
I would have to believe that "fairness" is the equivalent of justice. I would have to believe that man who asks me to "go forward in a new spirit of service, in a new service of sacrifice" is speaking in my interest. I would have to accept the premise of a man that economic prosperity comes from the "bottom up," and who arrogantly believes that he can will it into existence by the use of government force. I would have to admire a man who thinks the standard of living of the masses can be improved by destroying the most productive and the generators of wealth.
Finally, Americans, I would have to erase from my consciousness the scene of 125,000 screaming, crying, cheering people in Grant Park, Chicago irrationally chanting "Yes We Can!" Finally, I would have to wipe all memory of all the times I have heard politicians, pundits, journalists, editorialists, bloggers and intellectuals declare that capitalism is dead - and no one, including especially Alan Greenspan, objected to their assumption that the particular version of the anti-capitalistic mentality that they want to replace with their own version of anti-capitalism is anything remotely equivalent to capitalism.
So you have made history, Americans. You and your children have elected a black man to the office of the president of the United States , the wounded giant of the world. The battle between John Wayne and Jane Fonda is over - and that Fonda won. Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern must be very happy men. Jimmie Carter, too. And the Kennedys have at last gotten their Kennedy look-a-like. The self-righteous welfare statists in the suburbs can feel warm moments of satisfaction for having elected a black person. So, toast yourselves: 60s countercultural radicals, 80s yuppies and 90s bourgeois bohemians. Toast yourselves, Black America. Shout your glee Harvard, Princeton , Yale, Duke, Stanford, and Berkeley. You have elected not an individual who is qualified to be president, but a black man who, like the pragmatist Franklin Roosevelt, promises to - Do Something! You now have someone who has picked up the baton of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. But you have also foolishly traded your freedom and mine - what little there is left - for the chance to feel good. There is nothing in me that can share your happy obliviousness.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/awortham.asp
Comments
-
Except now he's president and he's achieving things in his very short time in office and unless you're rightwing and you hate any Democratic agenda, Obama has established himself beyond reasonable doubt at least competent for office, whether you agree with his policies or not.
In other words, sadly, this entire diatribe has been proven false.
Shed a tear for obsessive, narrow-minded libertarians. -
I'm pragmatic, not stuck with dogma like the right or left is lol. problem is people are too buried into their parties they don't look at the whole picture and long term picture.
-
I didn't mean you literally, I meant someone, anyone.
At any rate, you posted an article that actual events have made irrelevant.
The idea that Obama doesn't support capitalism is moronic. -
actually events like him doing the bidding of big companies and unions? not much difference from bush. expanding the wars, bring the troops home my ass.
talk and substance is two different things. change only in name is no change at all. perception of change is only those who can't see the illusions that been perpetuated by the two party system. -
This has nothing to do with the thesis of the article you posted. The article is about how Obama is A) unqualified and
actually events like him doing the bidding of big companies and unions? not much difference from bush. expanding the wars, bring the troops home my ass.
talk and substance is two different things. change only in name is no change at all. perception of change is only those who can't see the illusions that been perpetuated by the two party system.
anti-capitalist
Neither of which are remotely true. -
I'm pragmatic, not stuck with dogma like the right or left is lol. problem is people are too buried into their parties they don't look at the whole picture and long term picture.
My dog is pragmatic. It sees the cat's food, it eats it, doesn't care if the cat starves to death. My dog is not stuck with dogma like the right or left, just like you. Not sure he sees the whole picture or the long term one either.
Do you realize how many virtual trees you're destroying with your plagiarizing pasting of entire undated articles with no consent from the authors to do so? -
Armchair I'm waiting for you to defend the thesis of the original article, or explain why you found it interesting even though the article is no longer relevant or correct.
Obama is qualified to hold the office. Obama is not anti-capitalist. This article is just worthless generic libertarian boilerplate.
It could be written about any Democrat ever, and it would be wrong pretty much every time. -
didn't i already answer you, obama/bush or whom ever the two party system puts there, they support big companies and unions. they support crony capitalism. in a oligopoly nobody wins but the well connected big guys.
this is not about him as a democrat but as part of the problem of the two party system. she said she'll vote for ron paul. he might be a republican, but fox and others make fun of him. make him look like a fringe nut even most republicans wouldn't vote for. he is a favorite of the libertarian movement.
point is he is just an extension of bushes polices. it's a unofficial 3rd term.
same people running the wars now were running it during bushes term, same financial people who are responsible for this mess are now also running things.
nothing changes in washington. only the superficial to make the rank and file keep voting for the two party system. -
Then you don't agree with your own original article. It argued that electing Obama represents a move towards anti-capitalism.
-
Boygabriel wrote: Then you don't agree with your own original article. It argued that electing Obama represents a move towards anti-capitalism.
oligopoly is anti small business capitalism.
lets look at heathcare, small practices or insurance companies would be the first ones to go. big ones with large market share generally by virtue will survive if not they'll be bail out by big brother. i'm sure they'll get another layer of bureaucracy.
when the finical crises happen the big companies all got bailed out the small ones are left to the dust bin.
nothing on wallstreet changed or dc. just same old song with a different tune.
i don't get why people think obama is so dfferent from bush.
bush play the dumb guy obama play the smart guy. but both rely on the same people for their decisions. on war and money.
hell under obama now corporations are treated as people! i'm sure they can outspend individuals by so miles.
slowly but surely we are moving to different system where the establish elites are the only ones who be holding the same positions that their fathers etc.. held.
look at politics, almost all the same names half the time by the two party system. look at the affirmative action for rich kids, their daddies went to this school now they go to this elite school too. meritocracy is dead. -
oligopoly is anti small business capitalism.
The article didn't mention or hint at oligopoly once.
This article is anti-Obama from a libertarian perspective. It doesn't say anything about Bush, or how they're the "same". -
Boygabriel wrote:
off course the article didn't, those are my opinions of why libertarians are not liking him or bush.oligopoly is anti small business capitalism.
The article didn't mention or hint at oligopoly once.
This article is anti-Obama from a libertarian perspective. It doesn't say anything about Bush, or how they're the "same". -
You're being very generous by providing that article with actual arguments. All it did was make unsubstantiated claims and repeat libertarian talking points.
-
i just thought her voice was interesting. it seems to be been lost in all the hype of the man.
-
She didn't make any points though.
She just said, "he's anti capitalist" without explaining why.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds

