This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Parties Clash as Albany Edges Closer to Shutdown — Brooklynian

Parties Clash as Albany Edges Closer to Shutdown

whynot_31
edited November -1 in Brooklyn Politics
I dislike NYS government as much as anyone, but if your drivers license is about to expire or you need to re-activate you Medicaid, the time to do it is now ...before this debacle.


Parties Clash as Albany Edges Closer to Shutdown
By Nicholas Confessore New York Times June 9, 2010

ALBANY — State officials began preparing on Wednesday for what they said would be the first government shutdown in New York history as prospects for the passage of another emergency budget bill grew cloudy.

Democratic and Republican legislative leaders engaged in an acrimonious public meeting in the Capitol with Gov. David A. Paterson. Republicans charged that they had been shut out of negotiations, and Democrats insisted that the Republicans shoulder some responsibility for averting a shutdown.

With no agreement yet reached on a budget for the fiscal year that began April 1, the state has been relying on a series of emergency bills to stay in operation. But Republicans have voted uniformly against the last three bills. After the last vote, two Democratic senators said they would oppose the next emergency bill, suggesting that Senate leaders might not be able to muster enough votes to pass it.

As a result, administration officials have started huddling with their counterparts at the state comptroller’s office to work through the consequences of a shutdown, warning that if the Legislature fails to approve the next emergency budget bill, due on Monday, the state would face unprecedented chaos.

“We don’t have an answer to many of these questions because we’ve never shut down the government before,” said Robert L. Megna, the state budget director.

Without the ability to pay workers or even guarantee their salaries in the future, officials said, they could be forced to close down state agencies immediately after the last emergency bill expires on Monday. Administration officials said they were still searching for a legal mechanism to continue financing essential public safety services, like prisons and the State Police.

But courtrooms, parks, highway rest stops and even the state terrorism hot line could all close. A shutdown could also affect some county and local workers, like those who administer Medicaid benefits. Though such workers are employed by the counties, they must gain access to state computer systems to process claims.

Since the last budget expired on March 31, the State Senate and the Assembly, both controlled by Democrats, have not come close to reaching a budget deal with Mr. Paterson.

On Monday, with negotiations seemingly at an impasse, Mr. Paterson inserted sweeping cuts to health care spending in the latest emergency bill, essentially forcing lawmakers to accept a portion of his budget proposal.

Republicans in the Senate voted uniformly against the bill, even though they had publicly favored Medicaid cuts, saying that Mr. Paterson’s cuts did not go far enough. On the other side of the aisle, two Democratic state senators — Rubén Díaz Sr. and Pedro Espada Jr., both of the Bronx — said they would not vote for any more emergency bills that included major budget cuts.

That move raised the prospect of a shutdown, since without Republican votes, Senate Democrats, who have a 32-to-30 majority in the chamber, must act unanimously to pass legislation.

At the leaders’ meeting, Mr. Paterson said he would not give in to “thug activity,” which some took as a reference to the two Democratic senators. After the meeting, the governor criticized Dean G. Skelos, the Senate Republican leader, and blamed him for forcing the state to the brink of catastrophe.

“I’m shocked, and I’m appalled,” Mr. Paterson said. “Senator Skelos has told us that he and the Republican senators are going to shut down the government, and they would shut down the government over something about meetings they haven’t been invited to and process issues.”

Pressed on whether his conference would provide any votes to pass the emergency bill, Mr. Skelos insisted that Democratic lawmakers who control both chambers would be to blame for any shutdown. “This is a failure of Democrat leadership in the state,” Mr. Skelos said. Regarding a shutdown, he said: “It’s an unfortunate way to go, but we are not going to just automatically vote for something because they have failed, as leaders, to put something together.”

Mr. Skelos softened his tone later in the day after a private meeting with Mr. Paterson, suggesting that some Republicans might vote for the next emergency bill if the governor included some of the Republicans’ proposals to further cut Medicaid and other spending.

But Mr. Díaz did not appear inclined to relent.

“The governor called me a thug,” he said. “When I pick a fight, I don’t go back. Let’s see what a thug can do.”

Comments

  • Subject: Re: Parties Clash as Albany Edges Closer to Shutdown

    whynot_31 wrote: I dislike NYS government as much as anyone, but if your drivers license is about to expire or you need to re-activate you Medicaid the time to do it is now ...before this debacle.
    Yeah, so let's see what's in danger of being shut down here, adding to what you and the article mention...

    DMV
    Medicaid
    Prisons
    State Police

    (what else...)

    Unemployment Insurance or any other Dep't of Labor stuff (maybe funemployment folks won't get paid starting next week during the gov't shutdown, if no one's there to administer?)

    All the mid/late June special ed and services administration and annual parent meetings, approvals and other benefits allocation decision-making etc. for the next school year by the Dept of Education and the Dep't of Health http://planaheadnewyork.com/community/infants_children/early_intervention/

    Speaking of Dep't of Health...perhaps administration of the Family Health Plus and Child Health Plus affordable Health Insurance programs would also be affected.

    Just to name a few. Yeesh.
  • And I am so sick of Espada's b.s. .

    Every time Albany Dems are at a critical minimum on something he threatens to withdraw his vote and throw it all into disarray. What an ego. Whatanass.
  • if NY was to have a viable 3rd party (on the left or the right), we might function better. There would certainly be less room for the Espadas and Monserrates to act up.

    California's recent referendum to radically change their primary system should be interesting to watch....

    http://losangeles.bizjournals.com/losangeles/stories/2010/06/07/daily11.html

    ...once I see if it works in CA, I'll render an opinion on whether I would like it for NY. Until then I must keep my readers in suspense :)
  • Borrowing Re-Emerges as a Budget Fix

    With Time Ticking and a State Shutdown Looming, There's a Growing Sense in Albany That Bond Sales Will Be Needed

    By Jacob Gershman Wall Street Journal June 11, 2010



    As shutdown of state government looms over budget negotiations between Gov. David Paterson and lawmakers, expectations are growing that Albany will have to borrow money to close a gaping deficit.

    Negotiations between Mr. Paterson and legislators have stirred back to life after months of impasse because of the threat of a shutdown. But the prospects of closing a budget gap without borrowing hundreds of millions of dollars have dimmed, despite this week's passage of a bill that trimmed Medicaid spending.

    While neither lawmakers nor the governor have yet to put the idea of borrowing back at the center of negotiations, there is a growing sense among legislators that it is inevitable.

    Mr. Paterson and lawmakers still must find a way to plug a hole estimated at $8.5 billion, an amount that's far greater than any of the cuts and taxes that the two sides have proposed.

    Even if lawmakers concede ground on the governor's steepest budget cuts—including a $1.4 billion reduction in aid to public schools—the spending plan that is gradually emerging would still be billions out of balance.

    Complicating matters is the more than two-month delay in completing the budget, a period during which many of revenue assumptions contained in the governor's original plan from January have unraveled.

    To fill the gap, the Paterson administration's budget office has assumed the state will get $1 billion in extra federal Medicaid money, which has yet to materialize in Washington.

    It's also counting on $650 million from higher taxes on sugary beverages and cigarettes. But those figures assumed the budget would be passed by April and that the higher taxes would be in place by now.

    Mr. Paterson's financial plan also incorporated $250 million in unspecified work-force savings that have yet to be agreed upon by the state's major government-employee unions.

    It also counted on $300 million in franchise fees from developing lottery terminals at Aqueduct Racetrack in Ozone Park, Queens. That money is doubtful, as Albany for years has failed to agree on which company should be awarded the contract to operate the terminals.

    Mr. Paterson, who has resisted a borrowing plan, including one proposed by his lieutenant governor, Richard Ravitch, sounded a different note this week. Asked if selling bonds was off the table, the governor on Tuesday told reporters in Albany: "I haven't ruled out borrowing. What bothered me is that it became the focus of the discussion."

    Lawmakers interviewed say they are hesitant to talk about the idea publicly, but conceded that it would likely emerge at a late point in the negotiations.

    Assembly Democrats have indicated support for Mr. Ravitch's plan, which proposed a combination of deficit borrowing and stricter fiscal controls. Senate Democrats have said they favor the refinancing of bonds it issued against expected revenue from a settlement with tobacco companies, which would produce an estimated $700 million.

    "In the past, when we end up needing something to close, we have done things we've sworn we wouldn't do, including borrowing," said an individual involved in the budget negotiations

    "There will have to be either borrowing or taxes because we have a multi-billion dollar hole," said a Democratic legislator.

    "It is increasingly feels like a re-run of last year, only later, complete with tax hikes and an over-reliance on temporary federal aid. The added twist seems likely to be some form of deficit borrowing, using the Ravitch plan as a partial fig leaf," said E.J. McMahon, a fiscal analyst at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative-leaning think tank.
Sign In or Register to comment.