This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Gunfire on Sterling Place Near Franklin --Sterling Pl. Blues — Brooklynian

Gunfire on Sterling Place Near Franklin --Sterling Pl. Blues

Just before midnight tonight (Friday June 12) there was gunfire on Sterling Place near the corner of Franklin Avenue. I was in the Chinese takeout spot on St. Johns and Franklin looking out on to Franklin and I noticed the passers by all looking towards Sterling. I poked my head out of the door and heard hysterical screaming, and I saw a mass of people scrambling from Sterling Place on to Franklin. I asked what happened and someone said there was just gunfire on Sterling -- the area between Franklin and Classon. There were two cops in front of 95 South, a patrolman and a guy in one of those three wheeled vehicles. The patrolman walked down briskly while the cop in the vehicle made his way down to Sterling as well. There were suddenly sirens. 5 minutes later a few cops walked up on Franklin towards Eastern Parkway, I heard one say that he saw two groups of people, and he gave chase but they got away.

Some bohemian-looking dude came into the Chinese spot and looked me dead in the face and asked me if what JUST happened was gang-related, and I asked him if I looked like a anthropologist, and how would he expect me to know that. I asked him calmly; I really wanted to know how did he expect me to know that. He changed the subject and asked if I knew if the killing that happened 3 weeks ago on Lincoln was gang related, I sighed and I said yes, it was. He asked what gangs, and I said the Bloods and the Crips. Two brothers started talking about it; one of them said to the other, we've been killing each other before we got here, and now we're killing each other before we are moved out of here too. I raised a quizzical eyebrow because I didn't know what he meant. What immediately came to mind was a line from Biggie's 'Ready to Die' album where he boasts that he has been 'robbin' ni66a's since the slave ship.' What the guy meant was that before the Middle Passage, Africans were engaged in tribal warfare, and the conquering of the continent by Europeans was easily facilitated by this African on African violence; lo, I imagine he would say, with the advent of gentrification, amidsts being priced out, the violence continues. I got his point. He, me, and the third brother all shaked our heads from side to side and bid each other a good night. Bohemian dude asked me if I thought it was going to get worse. Oh yeah, I said, it's gonna get worse.
«134

Comments

  • What do you think is the cause for the upswing in crime? You would think the gentrification + increased police presence (which is debatable according to ParadeRest) would have made things a bit better
  • why do people assume gentrification makes a neighborhood safer? a selection of coffee shops will resolve whatever matters led to the gunfire last night? bohemians ordering chinese will impose order on turf wars or domestic disputes?

    was anybody hit?
  • After midnight there was a police helicopter hovering over Franklin & Dean supporting a slew of cops on Franklin and Pacific. Looked like a perp search.
  • Cool The Kid wrote: What do you think is the cause for the upswing in crime? You would think the gentrification + increased police presence (which is debatable according to ParadeRest) would have made things a bit better
    Having just passed my one year anniversary on Franklin, this doesn't seem like an upswing.
  • why do people assume gentrification makes a neighborhood safer?
    it's pretty simple. look at all of the other neighborhoods that have been gentrified, both in manhattan and brooklyn. are they safer now? yes.
  • is "bohemians" the word we're using now?
  • Czechoslovakians are gentrifying Crown Heights, now I've heard everything :shock:
  • They've already taken over northern Astoria.

    Behold, gentriKrušoviceconfrontation.

    :drunken:
  • Subject: Re: Gunfire on Sterling Place Near Franklin

    MHA wrote: What the guy meant was that before the Middle Passage, Africans were engaged in tribal warfare, and the conquering of the continent by Europeans was easily facilitated by this African on African violence; lo, I imagine he would say, with the advent of gentrification, amidsts being priced out, the violence continues. I got his point. He, me, and the third brother all shaked our heads from side to side and bid each other a good night. Bohemian dude asked me if I thought it was going to get worse. Oh yeah, I said, it's gonna get worse.
    Dood, your seriously overly mis-educated over thinking a simple statement.

    I would imagine he is refering to the 50s when the blacks were "given" approval to move into the area. Expunging the whites. The rich man poor man process began and the neighborhood was devalued through slumlord activity and reduction in services. Then the P-Funk was introduced and the drug culture took control. After the property was sufficiently devalued and passed through one or two generations of slumlords, the cogs in the machine were turned again. The undevelopment of the suburbs begins and the shift of masses once again ensued. Bring the whites back to the new brooklyn send the blacks to the aging suburbs.
    Slave ships and africa have nothing to do with this dawg. It's all about moving the money around. It's all about the paper at the expense of humanity. and your sanity
  • topics on this matter are subject to interpretation. While I won’t say that MHA is wrong. You cannot state that you are 100% correct. These are cycles of life from slavery to the movement of Germans into Poland. I could go on with so many comparisons on a micro and macro level. I don’t condone either.
    The point is this…..Gentrification (or Change) is in the eye of the beholder. Many of the youths are see the new people to the area as prey that did not exists 5 to 10 years ago. I personally prefer diversification. We meet and march while the laws of money dictate our interactions. We see these actions as race/class warfare. On the surface, we see the friction of various groups while the economic forces bring a higher standards of living to the community. We try to label and quantify why and when.

    Tips:
    Know your neighbors.
    Take some positive action with the youths.
    If you see something, then say something
    Meet with the police.
    Meet with the community boards.
    If you are renter, make sure you enforce your rights to a safe and respectful environment no matter where you live.
    Do not forget that we live in a highly congested city. Do not be scared to walk the street. Just pay attention.
  • Mantic,
    I wrote what I wrote because that is what the guy said. He referred to the inter- ethnic conflicts that were ongoing before and during European involvement on The Continent. I agreed with the analogy because the result is the same. While 'the others' are coming in and supplanting those who have lived here, the Black folks who have lived here are busily killing each other and engaging in conflict that ends up with no constructive resolution. Just like then.

    Case in point: Think of the gang conflicts that are loudly spoken of and acted upon in this neighborhood. Contrast that with the more affluent who sit in the neighborhood coffee shops and talk about real estate transactions involving great amounts of capital, and land. There is a huge difference. I am not a proponent for gangs, but to be pragmatic, illegal activity is going to occur. I understand why it occurs. What I don't understand is why Black men have no qualms about killing other Black men. I have the misfortune of living rather closely to a great deal of it, and take my word, the way conflicts are handled will run shivers (not the good kind) up and down your spine. I see a connection between conflicts Africans had prior to the Middle Passage and the conflicts the descendents of those Africans have today. You may think its reaching to go that far back, but it happened then, and its happening now. You may think -- as many would like to construe -- that this has nothing to do with race. To the extent that the violence is occuring amongst primarily Black and Latino men, then it has everything to do with race. There are no white bogeymen encouraging Black and brown people to kill each other. We are doing it to ourselves. There is cultural devolving occurring that has led to widespread violence as a means of dealing with conflict.

    I don't agree with you regarding the implicit powerlessness Black people have in your scenario. We are shooting ourselves in the foot, continually(and literally). We don't support Black businesses that will employ Black people; we don't trust each other enough to get together communally and buy property when we cannot afford to do so by ourselves; we have no respect for each other as a people. Our conflict resolution skills are wholly deficient; we call ourselves niggers, and 'dawgs' as if that's a good thing -- it's not. I'm telling it like it is... So to point a finger at 'them' and say what 'they' are doing to 'us' is wrong. It's what WE are doing to ourselves.

    I have no way of knowing this, but I will bet you any amount of money you care to wager -- whether you have it or not -- that the hand that held the gun that went off on Sterling Place was either Black -- or brown -- and the person at whom HE was shooting was the same. Why is that? What could possibly be SO important that would warrant killing another person for? The white man has absolutely nothing to do with that. That's self-hatred and self-contempt talking. And implicit in the act is this: The belief that there is LITTLE consequence - social, emotional,or spiritual, to killing another Black person. We believe that. About ourselves. I wish I could blame someone for that, but I can't. I can draw a connection from the past to this moment in time, but the act happens in the now, and the person who chooses to kill his brother is likely another Black man. Just like then.
  • I heard the shots from our place. It was 12:08AM on Saturday morning. 3-4 in quick succession, then a brief pause, then 3-4 more, all from the same weapon, probably a mid-caliber auto. Then some commotion as people ran past towards Classon. Then, nothing -- I didn't hear sirens or helicopters or anything for the rest of the night.

    Shifting gears, I don't see what the Middle Passage has to do with this event, but I've met enough ideologues of various stripes in my life s to know there's very little difference between them, regardless of what ideology they espouse.

    Contrary to what it may look like, it is not a dialogue, there's no hope of getting a point through, and ultimately any conversation turns into another regurgitation of the same tired lines from the ideologue.

    As a result, it is quite dreary to have to skim over these exchanges. May I suggest not feeding the MHA?
  • Hey now eastbloc, I think MHA's attempts to put things in a historical context might deepen everyone's understanding of the nature of the problems in CH. I don't see what the immediate value of said understanding might have with regard to solving said problems, but I imagine there is some value as it doesn't seem anyone in power has taken that effort. I have spoken with a lot of white people removed from the perils of places like CH who continually marginalize or outright deny the influence that history has had on black Americans socioeconomic problems, which to me seems absurd and seems to run counter to what makes sense. Nobody would try to make peace in Israel without making historical considerations- I don't understand why many of the disadvantaged groups in America don't get that privilege. It creates a barrier and seems to be part of why all the efforts of many outsiders trying to help the hood fail.....

    I agree that there are more pressing aspects of the problems that should be addressed first... but I think there is a lot of value in trying to understand the history of how things came to be in CH if you don't like how things are.
  • Cool The Kid wrote: Hey now eastbloc, I think MHA's attempts to put things in a historical context might deepen everyone's understanding of the nature of the problems in CH. I don't see what the immediate value of said understanding might have with regard to solving said problems, but I imagine there is some value as it doesn't seem anyone in power has taken that effort. I have spoken with a lot of white people removed from the perils of places like CH who continually marginalize or outright deny the influence that history has had on black Americans socioeconomic problems, which to me seems absurd and seems to run counter to what makes sense. Nobody would try to make peace in Israel without making historical considerations- I don't understand why many of the disadvantaged groups in America don't get that privilege. It creates a barrier and seems to be part of why all the efforts of many outsiders trying to help the hood fail.....

    I agree that there are more pressing aspects of the problems that should be addressed first... but I think there is a lot of value in trying to understand the history of how things came to be in CH if you don't like how things are.
    It actually does the opposite, I believe, by implicitly absolving any of the actors from individual responsibility. The "it's not my fault I'm an asshole, it's your great-grandfather's fault" act only goes so far, whether it's in Crown Heights or Palestine.

    Clearly, there are socioeconomic issues that contribute to overall trends in terms of crime and other forms of social blight. But human relations thankfully don't neatly reduce to that. And it makes for very boring conversation, unless you belong to that small group of people who sadly can't think about anything else.
  • CTK: "I have spoken with a lot of white people removed from the perils of places like CH who continually marginalize or outright deny the influence that history has had on black Americans socioeconomic problems, which to me seems absurd and seems to run counter to what makes sense. Nobody would try to make peace in Israel without making historical considerations- I don't understand why many of the disadvantaged groups in America don't get that privilege. It creates a barrier and seems to be part of why all the efforts of many outsiders trying to help the hood fail....."

    CTK, Brilliant! That's it exactly! Jesus, I wish I could be that concise.

    Eastbloc, I am not using history here to blame anyone, except us.. I am saying that historically, Black people have been so destructive towards each other, and believe it or not, it is common for 'us' when we emote about this to say essentially, we've been doin' this before 'they' brought us here, and that's why 'we' are still in the position that 'we' are...
  • mr. met wrote: is "bohemians" the word we're using now?

    .

    if he's black american, you can use brohemian.
  • Can we get back to more serious issues like tree branch breaking? sheeez
  • King without a crown wrote: Can we get back to more serious issues like tree branch breaking? sheeez
    How about a "pie crust workshop"?

    Seriously http://www.brooklynian.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=57993
  • eastbloc wrote: [quote=Cool The Kid]Hey now eastbloc, I think MHA's attempts to put things in a historical context might deepen everyone's understanding of the nature of the problems in CH. I don't see what the immediate value of said understanding might have with regard to solving said problems, but I imagine there is some value as it doesn't seem anyone in power has taken that effort. I have spoken with a lot of white people removed from the perils of places like CH who continually marginalize or outright deny the influence that history has had on black Americans socioeconomic problems, which to me seems absurd and seems to run counter to what makes sense. Nobody would try to make peace in Israel without making historical considerations- I don't understand why many of the disadvantaged groups in America don't get that privilege. It creates a barrier and seems to be part of why all the efforts of many outsiders trying to help the hood fail.....

    I agree that there are more pressing aspects of the problems that should be addressed first... but I think there is a lot of value in trying to understand the history of how things came to be in CH if you don't like how things are.

    It actually does the opposite, I believe, by implicitly absolving any of the actors from individual responsibility. The "it's not my fault I'm an asshole, it's your great-grandfather's fault" act only goes so far, whether it's in Crown Heights or Palestine.

    Clearly, there are socioeconomic issues that contribute to overall trends in terms of crime and other forms of social blight. But human relations thankfully don't neatly reduce to that. And it makes for very boring conversation, unless you belong to that small group of people who sadly can't think about anything else.

    I'm not saying to analyze stuff as far back as the middle passage... but I think a lot of people (including myself) are throwing out solutions without having a full understanding of the problem, and the history of the neighborhood plays a major part in that

  • Czechmate, Hamilton. You crack me up!
  • MHA wrote: Mantic,
    I wrote what I wrote because that is what the guy said. He referred to the inter- ethnic conflicts that were ongoing before and during European involvement on The Continent. I agreed with the analogy because the result is the same. While 'the others' are coming in and supplanting those who have lived here, the Black folks who have lived here are busily killing each other and engaging in conflict that ends up with no constructive resolution. Just like then.
    I stand corrected on that point of reference.
    The black folk who have lived here aren't killing each other. It's the transient black folk that are killing us all. Transient in the way that they either don't have roots here or are the youth that are lost to the system of misguidance and miseducation.

    Case in point: Think of the gang conflicts that are loudly spoken of and acted upon in this neighborhood. Contrast that with the more affluent who sit in the neighborhood coffee shops and talk about real estate transactions involving great amounts of capital, and land. There is a huge difference. I am not a proponent for gangs, but to be pragmatic, illegal activity is going to occur. I understand why it occurs. What I don't understand is why Black men have no qualms about killing other Black men. I have the misfortune of living rather closely to a great deal of it, and take my word, the way conflicts are handled will run shivers (not the good kind) up and down your spine. I see a connection between conflicts Africans had prior to the Middle Passage and the conflicts the descendents of those Africans have today. You may think its reaching to go that far back, but it happened then, and its happening now. You may think -- as many would like to construe -- that this has nothing to do with race. To the extent that the violence is occuring amongst primarily Black and Latino men, then it has everything to do with race. There are no white bogeymen encouraging Black and brown people to kill each other. We are doing it to ourselves. There is cultural devolving occurring that has led to widespread violence as a means of dealing with conflict.
    The "gang" problem is a "gang" problem because it is being made a "gang" problem. First, if the judicial system did it's job, there wouldn't be a problem. Put the people in jail who need to be in jail. The Rockerfeller Drug Laws devastated the generations the black community. Heroin of 60s, Crack of the 80s. Gangsta Rap of the 90s. We are still feeling the effects. The Movies, Television, Music. These were tools used against us. For Profit. If we as black people are so stupid, then how are we smart enough to have set up these Multi Billion Dollar Global Drug Empires? We are just the pawns in the chess game. Get one set and make them the dealers, everyone else is a victim. Get the money by hook or crook. Then they give us welfare and benefit cards. Keep us in a drug laden lazy stupor. The money comes in one hand via rubbermint hand outs and out the other hand to the drug dealers and stores that take benefit cards, selling substandard products. Keeping us sick so they can rake in that Medicaid money charging crazy fees. Just a way to bleed the people work hard and make keep the undesirables in check.

    I don't agree with you regarding the implicit powerlessness Black people have in your scenario. We are shooting ourselves in the foot, continually(and literally). We don't support Black businesses that will employ Black people; we don't trust each other enough to get together communally and buy property when we cannot afford to do so by ourselves; we have no respect for each other as a people. Our conflict resolution skills are wholly deficient; we call ourselves niggers, and 'dawgs' as if that's a good thing -- it's not. I'm telling it like it is... So to point a finger at 'them' and say what 'they' are doing to 'us' is wrong. It's what WE are doing to ourselves.
    If you can agree with me that some of us aren't the sharpest knives in the draw. That they are the product a vicious cycle. The others that do have the knowledge and ability. The first thing they do when the "make it" is leave the hood. Taking their knowledge and money with them. To the people in the hood who looked up to them, they feel abandoned by their own. Like they don't matter, so why should they care about them. What then gives them hope?

    I have no way of knowing this, but I will bet you any amount of money you care to wager -- whether you have it or not -- that the hand that held the gun that went off on Sterling Place was either Black -- or brown -- and the person at whom HE was shooting was the same. Why is that? What could possibly be SO important that would warrant killing another person for? The white man has absolutely nothing to do with that. That's self-hatred and self-contempt talking. And implicit in the act is this: The belief that there is LITTLE consequence - social, emotional,or spiritual, to killing another Black person. We believe that. About ourselves. I wish I could blame someone for that, but I can't. I can draw a connection from the past to this moment in time, but the act happens in the now, and the person who chooses to kill his brother is likely another Black man. Just like then.
    We are in black hood, so most likely it was a black on black thing. There is the same type of crime in all the ethnic hoods. It is just that we are the only ones who make it on the news.
    Where the blame lies, and fingers can be pointed, is much bigger and involved than can be put here. What has happened to my people has gone on for generations, hundreds of years. The whip is still at our backs.
    That however, to me is not the issue. When one comes of realization of things, they have to accept the responsibility of that knowledge, and can only blame themselves for any further issues on the subject. I have a view of the bigger picture. We are no longer the sole target. The spectrum has been broadened. The rest of you who venture out into these netherlands to those in middle america are beginning to feel the pain and the struggle, the disbelief and the horror, the injustice that we have been kicking and screaming about for since the time of Martin and Malcom.
    Now you are feeling the effects of drug addiction hitting home when you find your kids are gonzo poppin pills out the medicine cabinet. Wondering how the bank can just shoot you dead in the water. The people in charge have had plenty of practice. On us. Setting the status quo. I think I've said enuf for now.
  • Mantic,
    I respectfully disagree with you.Implicit in what you say is that there was no choice. That people somehow were forced to do things that are not in their interest, and that is not the case. I don't think the Rockefeller drug laws devastated the Black commnity. Those who did drugs devastated the Black community. I for one am glad thaqt those caught with crack cocaine got harsh sentencing. Mantic, I lived in Brownsville in the 80's. I heard gunshots everynight; EVERYNIGHT. I got mugged a couple of times and chased once by a bunch of brothers for no other reason than that I didn't fit in. The second time I got mugged, the dudes debated whether or not they would cap me. I was a cerebral, nerdy kid who just wanted to keep his head in the books. I HAD to leave Brownsville, or seriously, those brothers on the black would've killed me; I seriously believe that.


    And I have no doubt that those of us who get an education and get marketable skills and jobs as result leave 'the hood' because they recognize that to be professionally successful and to live amongst those who are not tempts fate. I will never forget my last day of graduate school. I was in a store talking to a guy who works there and he asked me when would I be finished. I told him that in fact that day was my last day of classes; that finally, I was finished. A friend of his, a Rastafarian brother looked at me triumphantly and said, 'Good, now you can go out and help poor people.' Uh, yeah. Helping anybody better their lives was the last thing on my mind, and it still is. If in the 21st century you can't help yourself, then brother/sister, make room for those who want to.

    I have seen true poverty. I have seen people who live in houses made of cow dung and grass. Their challenges by far dwarf mine, and yours, believe me. Many of our brothers and sisters in this country have no idea how lucky they are, and they desecrate their opportunities each and every day. It is hard to have sympathy for someone who has every advantage. If I feel this way, I can only imagine the contempt these white folks have. I at least have the understanding of the experience, and some knowlege of the history. These folks have, for the most part, neither.

    I just don't agree with your empowering the 'they'. The whole 'people in charge thing' rubs me the wrong way. I disagree with you brother. I do. Malcom and Marcus were about doing for self. Why can't we do that? 'They' prevent us?
  • As an addendum, Mantic, I don't know if you have seen the other posts that I've written and the response it has garnered, but the misperception is that I am always pointing a finger at whitefolks and trying to 'play the victim'. The irony is that I do no such thing. I point the finger -- but I am not playing victim. I've said it clearly: I am a Pan-Africanist generally, and a Black Nationalist specifically. I believe in Africa for the Africans, and I hold no shame in saying that. I am not asking whitefolks for anything. The problems that plague US are OUR problems, and we need to solve them, and we choose not to, generally. We are still waiting for Jesus, or Jehova or the gat-dang UFOs to come down and save us, and believe me, they ain't comin'. I am not saying that there isn't public policy that is premised upon our demise -- of course there is! It's not about what 'they do to 'us' if one can really say that, but, what are 'we' doing to empower ourselves? Why is it that we moralize our misfortune? Why do we expect someone to 'treat us fairly'? The world has never worked that way. If we are still thinking about 'They' or 'them' then implicit in that is this sense that 'they' are more powerful than we are, and I refuse to believe that. No one forces me to drink alcohol, or to smoke cigarettes, or to get diabetes or high blood pressure -- that's all under my control; no one forces me to sew artificial hair into my scalp -- so tightly that my hair follicles pop out, no one forces me to put chemicals in my hair or on my skin to approximate another racial aesthetic, no one forces me to call my brother or sister a nigger, or a dawg, or a bitch -- that's all us man. No one forces us to shoot each other. We do that.

    We are our own victims, and the only people to blame is ourselves.
  • We are reading from the same book. However, different chapters.
    There are social and economic forces that have been in place for quite along time. There is the media depictions. The things that we are given to follow, the leadership. Can we agree upon how such things affect the mindset? The minds of the impressionable. We do not control these things. Yet they have a major impact on how the minds are shaped. They give ideas of what to do. I will reference the story of a country called Bhutan. One of the last to allow television and internet, in 1999. Since then, things have gone downhill. The kids now glorify and smoke the marijuana that grows freely there. They never had interest in it before TV came.
    The true weapon of Mass Destruction. Through images and suggestion we have been taught to be submissive. The picture of us was painted in the foreum of public opinion and it has stuck. We carry it, generation after generation.
    I agree with you whole heartedly, it is time for us to realize what it is and get busy being who we are. We all secretly desire this. But we are scared. If our young brothers can't walk down the street without being harrassed 50% of the time by the police with scare tacticts like stop and frisks, maybe they would be a bit more responsive to standing out with thier voices.
    The Rocky laws, if you don't understand that they were a political target against minorities, please go back and study them and the case histories. The jails are filled with people caught for low level possesion. The End User. 10 to 1 and better ratio in sentences for crack (black) vs powder (white). Where are the major dealers in the game, were any of them caught? Every prisoner makes money. Set up laws to snare them, rack and stack em and collect the checks. Support the infrastructure. Kill a race. It's all related. Reference the Iran Contra thing, the guns and drugs to LA.
    The same way that we as black people do dumb shit like you mention with the fale this and the ebonics. Have you noticed, every culture suffers the same deficiencies. Just the names have been changed to confuse the innocent. Who know no better but to try and keep up with the status quo. Same game. Divide and conqure. That's what it's all about. Dividing us, the human population. First we put ourselve into competition with each other by using the classification "Race". As if there is to be a winner and losers. We are all as one living on a rock in the middle of nowhere. Fighting amongst ourselves over things that we inherently and collectively know better. Yet we en mass allow ourselves to be enslaved with all the petiness.
    Again, try and understand me when I say, we the blacks, hsipanic, those considered the ethnic minority at any point on the globe. It has all just been practice. The rest of you have been used to this end. As for when the shit hits the fan, if your reading this, you are not elite. You do not have the purity of blood that those truly in control require. We all, regardless of origin, are now all in the same pot.
    Look around you. What is happening is happening in plain site and you haven't a clue. You may have ideas, or inclings.
    In my life, my work once afforded me the opportunity to travel the world many times over. I have helped dozens of my peers establish prominent places. I have broken bread with the poorest of the poor and the richest of the rich. I have seen things that can only be imagined, yet there they were. I have learned things that I should never know. I left it all behind, fame, fortune, all. Once I learned what was really going down. The Plan. I could not be part of it. 20 years later, I have seen it come to fruition. Bro. It's a lot bigger than anything you could imagine. If we all collectively don't get our act together, we're doomed.
    Sooner than one thinks.

    Stay strong. I hope you all have enjoyed this debate and can read between the lines and get wise.
  • Read this thread with great interest. My grandfather owned a building and business on Sterling halfway between Franklin and Bedford. I was born in 1952 so I spent my childhood playing on Sterling. My mother grew up there and had wonderful memories of the neighborhood. It did change in the 50's and my grandfather was killed as a result of a robbery at his business. We moved my grandmother out and sold the building.
    We are going to Brooklyn this summer and was planning on checking out the old neighborhood.
    Bob
  • Wow. So sorry to here about your grandfather.
  • For those wanting of understanding of Black on Black violence, I offer this: powerlessness. There is so little consequence when the consequence of conflict between Black people leads to injury -- whether that injury be to person, psyche, or property. The main reason is not race, I think, but rather class. Poverty usually means that the person seeking redress and the person responsible for the grievance both have little resources to seek justice. The reason that most developed countries do not allow uninsured cars to traverse the streets is that in the event of car accidents, the uninsured will have no funds to to address the damage they have participated in. One of the the motivating factors of good driving is that a consequence of bad driving is a destruction of personal property. In essence, responsible drivers police themselves because the consequence is destruction of their property and higher insurance payments. In urban areas most people do not own property and as a result fell little incentive to take care of where they live; thus the laughable irony of the well-dressed person leaving their dilapidated home wearing expensive shoes, and clothes. The incentive to keep the neighborhood clean doesn't appeal to them because -- hey -- it ain't theirs, or so they think.

    I believe this sensibility also fosters ultimately a disrespect for life, tragically. If you don't own anything, then you are not important, in the eyes of the gazer, if you are not important then your life is worthless, and if your worthless life gets in the way of another who lives it, then there is little conscience in snuffing it out. Case in point, the young man who lost his life on Lincoln and Franklin on May 19th -- Malcolm X's birthday. I said on an earlier (now closed thread) that the police had someone in custody, but that was incorrect. They do not. The person who did that is still out there.....

    What needs to be confronted if this is to change is a confrontation of the the ethos that has been bred by poverty and by economic and cultural isolation. I had a conversation with a neighbor who watched me as I did my damn near daily cleanup of the crap that swirls around our homes. Brother man has at least two kids, and from what I can tell he hustles to take care of them. He questioned my sanity as I swept up the garbage, saying that it will only get dirty again. I just didn't understand his perspective, and no doubt he doesn't understand mine. I told him that I do it to show respect for my neighbors, and that his kids shouldn't have to play outside while garbage swirls about. He took a last pull from his Newport and nodded his head affirmatively and threw the butt down. He just didn't see the connection between what he did, and what I was saying. Man, it's so sad to see the end of days for our people.
  • A+, MHA.

    That analysis was spot on -- I'm almost ready to withdraw my previous statement.

    That said, I don't see how it's going to change on any appreciable level, at least, not without a fundamental change in our socioeconomic system (which carries its own trappings of course). I grew up in a socialist country where we didn't have these types of problems on this scale. (Sure, there were some recidivists here and there, but people are people everywhere, and there's a lot of factors involved. The 'have-nots' are more inclined to trash their neighborhoods and their neighbors, but the 'haves' do it, too.)

    But following the changes in Eastern Europe during the latter part of the 1980s, when socialist ideas were quickly going out of favor in deference to individualist ones, suddenly all of these scourges I had known only from American films came down on us. Unemployment and poverty quickly led to crime, drugs, homelessness, and the cold and hostile stares of strangers who were once your neighbors. As a (over)grown man I have more fear walking around the development where I had grown up now than I did as a small boy, when I would stay up long past curfew without a care in the world.

    I'm still inclined to acknowledge my neighbors, whether I know them or not, whether here in Brooklyn or back there. I say hello, sometimes I even smile. This used to be the norm "there", now most people of middle age or younger look at me like I have three heads when I make eye contact. The last time I was there, I had an exchange with an older woman who was pleasantly astonished that a young man in the street smiled and said hello. She seemed to have some recollection of a different time...

    This experience is part of is why I took a quiet umbrage at your previous statements in another thread where you cast these interactions which I consider fundamentally civil and human in strange, distorted, racial tones. It has far more to do with the values of a society, of a community, of a neighborhood, a building, or a block. For the same reason, I applaud you for doing your small part to sweep the street, sisyphean as though it may seem at times. To me, these small actions of individuals have more collective value than all the revolutions in the world.
  • Finally, we are back to social class and C Wright Mills.

    ....my god that was a long detour.

    http://www.infed.org/thinkers/wright_mills.htm

    let's re-discover "Anomie" and "alienation" next.

    ....I, for one, am glad we don't have to retype all this each time someone is shot.
  • Eastbloc, the point I was trying to make about smiling and Black culture is that there is an undercurrent of subservience linked to the notion of Black people smiling with white people. Just look at minstrelsy -- the Bojangles stuff. One of the most injurious depictions of Black men and women are of them smiling in ways garish. Believe it or not, the notion of smiling with people isn't something that I grew up doing -- or was taught to do by my Black elders. They would tell me if a white person smiles at you, nod your head to acknowledge them. That's what I was taught, and when I asked why, the subservience point was made to me. It makes sense. That's my history.

    Having worked in corporate America, what I found distressing was the almost unspoken notion that I am supposed to be joking and laughing and giving everyone high-fives. MHA doesn't operate that way. Have a candid conversation with a conscious Black man and he will tell you the deal. Now you might interpret that as unproductive, but yo, that's how I was raised my friend...

    I am not against acknowledging my neighbors, but I understand the reasons why your neighbors may not acknowledge you. Give a brother a terse nod, and believe me, he is more likely to respond in kind than if you were to smile in his face.
Sign In or Register to comment.