This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

BIKES Off the sidewalk! - Page 4 — Brooklynian

BIKES Off the sidewalk!

124»

Comments

  • I don't think bikes should be allowed on the sidewalk at all, unless they have to (bike lane blocked, avoiding accident, etc.)
  • vidro3 wrote: [quote=bobbybrummel]vidro3 - i think you might belong in an entirely different class. you seem to be the sort of cyclist who wants to move slowly amongst the pedestrians. i don't think your idea of cycling works for the class the rest of us are in, bicycles that want to move quickly and behave like cars. it might be fair to say you "ride" your bike, whereas we "drive" our bikes.

    i have a hard enough time dealing with pedestrians walking around the broadway bike path when i leave midtown, adds another 15 minutes to my commute. it would take me hours to get home if i had to navigate pedestrians the whole way home.

    so don't navigate pedestrians the whole way. I just think bikes should be allowed on the sidewalk in certain areas if they prefer it, obviously not on 7th ave and 34th st at 5pm.
    Even though it is illegal to bike on the street, for a lot of the stuff I do around park slope/windsor terrace I could easily bike on the sidewalk the whole way and encounter only a handful of pedestrians at most. In many ways it is a victimless crime.

    I'm a little afraid of dying while riding in traffic and would like nothing better than to ride on the sidewalk, but I don't do it. It just SUCKS for the pedestrians. Especially the peds with dogs (that's me!)

    It doesn't matter if you're riding slow or if it's a relatively quiet street. If you're an adult choosing to ride a bike, get off of it and walk if you need to get on the sidewalk for some reason.

    I wish NYC would get protected bike lanes like they have in Montreal and other cities. A curb, and parking lane between bikes and other vehicles. A curb between bikes and pedestrians.
  • MeredithB wrote: Truth be told, the police do so little enforcement of any vehicular laws that there's a fat chance that they will enforce the laws in regards to bicycling.

    Of course, IMO, most police have some type of grudge against bicyclists. Maybe it was the Critical Mass around the time of the republican convention that made the cops this way, I don't know.

    IMO, I'd say there is always some bigger crime/violation being committed out there that the police should be focusing on than worrying about bicyclists who really, aren't going to hurt anyone but themselves.
    Did u just read Parade Rest's post about bicyclists injuring pedestrians on the sidewalk right above this post u just made here???

    Ur whole 'cyclists are immune from blame' attitude is exactly why cops should clamp down harder on them (us?) when they act in ways that endanger others. That 'Critical Mass'/Times Up! crowd needs a reality check- they are no better than the people they lash out at, and often do more harm than good in regards to making headway in the arena of cyclists' rights.

    Yea, some of us live in the hood where drugs are sold and guns are shot. However, if someone gets clobbered by some self-entitled rogue messenger and gets hurt, for that person a biker is prob worse than 'the people cops should be out after'.
  • King without a crown wrote: These type of incidents happen every day in the City. Bicyclists often confront drivers and try to enforce VTL Laws on their own. (I've been the victim of this while driving through Prospect Park) The end result isoften road rage. I'm sure theres 2 sides to this story, however it sounds like the cyclist also committed a Crime. She should've went to the hospital if she was injured. Sounds like the Cop informed her that this was a cross-complaint situation and she would also be arrested.
    KWAC-- so i imagine your advice on encountering the driver in the bike lane is to just let it go, not get involved, don't initiate road rage. i know a lot of people were thinking the same about this incident. you gotta be zen about this stuff or you'll be stopping every 3 blocks to take another picture to post on mybikelane.com.

    but what would you, as a cop, advise someone to do in the case of the 9th ave "criminal mischief" incident? (http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/23/da-files-charge-against-cyclist-attacked-by-suv-driver-in-9th-ave-bike-lane/) bikers really have to be careful about touching cars, because the slightest finger oil smudge can cause thousands of dollars of damage (as drivers will later claim). but what can we do when contact with the vehicle or interaction with the driver is unavoidable? and in trying to save ourselves or merely stand up for ourselves we instigate violent road rage?

    are we just expected to have faith in the system? be litigious and methodical, let charges be pressed against you and just hope the right side wins?

    shouldn't there be some natural protection, even if it's just some sort of police discretion-- something to look out for the little guy, since we are often two tons lighter than these cars and the maniacs they have behind their wheels?

    the simplest question i want an answer to is why don't the cops in these situations ticket the driver after the incident for being in the bike lane in the first place? i've been ticketed and warned for riding on the sidewalk, obviously someone has time to enforce that law-- why aren't police out there enforcing the bike lane violations that have far more lethal risks involved?
  • bobbybrummel wrote: [quote=King without a crown]These type of incidents happen every day in the City. Bicyclists often confront drivers and try to enforce VTL Laws on their own. (I've been the victim of this while driving through Prospect Park) The end result isoften road rage. I'm sure theres 2 sides to this story, however it sounds like the cyclist also committed a Crime. She should've went to the hospital if she was injured. Sounds like the Cop informed her that this was a cross-complaint situation and she would also be arrested.
    KWAC-- so i imagine your advice on encountering the driver in the bike lane is to just let it go, not get involved, don't initiate road rage. i know a lot of people were thinking the same about this incident. you gotta be zen about this stuff or you'll be stopping every 3 blocks to take another picture to post on mybikelane.com.

    but what would you, as a cop, advise someone to do in the case of the 9th ave "criminal mischief" incident? (http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/23/da-files-charge-against-cyclist-attacked-by-suv-driver-in-9th-ave-bike-lane/) bikers really have to be careful about touching cars, because the slightest finger oil smudge can cause thousands of dollars of damage (as drivers will later claim). but what can we do when contact with the vehicle or interaction with the driver is unavoidable? and in trying to save ourselves or merely stand up for ourselves we instigate violent road rage?

    are we just expected to have faith in the system? be litigious and methodical, let charges be pressed against you and just hope the right side wins?

    shouldn't there be some natural protection, even if it's just some sort of police discretion-- something to look out for the little guy, since we are often two tons lighter than these cars and the maniacs they have behind their wheels?

    the simplest question i want an answer to is why don't the cops in these situations ticket the driver after the incident for being in the bike lane in the first place? i've been ticketed and warned for riding on the sidewalk, obviously someone has time to enforce that law-- why aren't police out there enforcing the bike lane violations that have far more lethal risks involved?

    Driver + 3500# car + possible gun >>> you + 20# bike + u-lock

    I prob would have beat the shit out of that Excursion driver though. I'm sure the case against the dude will be thrown out. In any case physics rule, no need to try your luck unnecessarily.
  • Cool The Kid wrote: Did u just read Parade Rest's post about bicyclists injuring pedestrians on the sidewalk right above this post u just made here???
    Um, no, are you seeing things? Or maybe I missed it, please enlighten me to this post.
    Cool The Kid wrote: Ur whole 'cyclists are immune from blame' attitude is exactly why cops should clamp down harder on them (us?) when they act in ways that endanger others.
    Um, now you are reading into my statements what you want to, but I never said that 'cyclists are immune from blame'.

    But I do believe that a 2 ton vehicle is more dangerous than a bicycle any day and that focus should be on VTL enforcement.
  • MeredithB wrote: [quote=Cool The Kid]Did u just read Parade Rest's post about bicyclists injuring pedestrians on the sidewalk right above this post u just made here???
    Um, no, are you seeing things? Or maybe I missed it, please enlighten me to this post.
    Cool The Kid wrote: Ur whole 'cyclists are immune from blame' attitude is exactly why cops should clamp down harder on them (us?) when they act in ways that endanger others.
    Um, now you are reading into my statements what you want to, but I never said that 'cyclists are immune from blame'.

    But I do believe that a 2 ton vehicle is more dangerous than a bicycle any day and that focus should be on VTL enforcement.

    Cops having a 'grudge' against bicyclists = policing bicyclists is only out of revenge. God forbid cops do the job we pay them to
  • Actually, now, you can not ride a bicycle anywhere in NYC or even on Long Island. Not on the street, not on the sidewalk, and not in the alley. In fact, just mere posession of a bicycle in New York City/Long Island, even in your house/apartment will get you locked up on Rikers Island.
  • This Zombie thread is dusted off in honor of the DOTs efforts to give bike restaurant delivery drivers a forum to discuss their complaints:

    http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/bicyclists/commercial-cyclists.shtml

Sign In or Register to comment.