This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Prospective Park Place Pawnshop! - Near Franklin Avenue. - Page 9 — Brooklynian

Prospective Park Place Pawnshop! - Near Franklin Avenue.

1679111217

Comments

  • so you're biased by personal experience...

    I am biased not only by my own experience but from the comments I received from the detective as well hearing things from other neighbors and friends after this experience.

  • it's not rational in the context of the greater problems this neighborhood faces (look down the street, at a business that actually has a track record). plus the fact that MHA doesn't know the person running this business, nor does anyone else.. he saw a sign and freaked out. and now he has people believing that he is protecting them, in his neighborhood, that he watches over like batman. it's laughable.

  • Thats a different story, Stacey. But you have no evidence that this store owner is corrupt. Now, though, he doesn't have to provide any information about the seller, since its not a pawn shop. This is all thanks to the protest efforts of people like MHA. Booklaw, as far as I know, chop shops are illegal. Pawn shops are not. Neither are jewelry stores. MHA can call for a boycott of whatever he wants, I'm just expressing that I think its misdirected. And that all of the efforts to get this store closed have actually been counter-productive and have made things worse for the community. At what point do you count your losses and admit defeat?

  • I am biased not only by my own experience but from the comments I received from the detective as well hearing things from other neighbors and friends after this experience.

    i don't see how it's relevant unless you were dealing with the person that runs this particular business. maybe the cop was just talking about that one place...? i don't see how it's fair to assume that this new guy is a willing accomplice to criminals. that's pre-judging, and not very nice!

  • let's stay on topic

    stacey wrote: Whynot - I totally agree that there are much bigger things to worry about but why knock someone who feels so strong about an issue. Many of the people who are protesting/boycotting these stores are also involved in other community activism. Many of them attend the community meetings.

    I am not knocking anyone for their opinion and I respect those who disagree - I just think that any time people try to stop community activism because it does not fit into what "they" think is important is wrong.

    Yes, I'm aware of the players involved (CHCA, About Time, MHA etc) and have a lot of respect for the work they do in the community.

    Backstory: I know who they are, they know who I am. I'd like to think the respect was mutual.

    Of course, they are free to fight this fight. But thier energy is not unlimited. ....As assets to the community, I sort of think of them (us?) as little soldiers who go out and fight the good fight.

    But there are way to fight a good war:

    Fight the battles you can win.

    Only go to war if you have an army.

    In this example, I think we are all against the culture that glorifies ghetto bling, and $ as being the measure of one's success, and we are also against crime. (right?)

    Continuing my war analogy, the guys who run screaming at the enemy, only to be mowed down by machine gun fire could have been far more productive had they channeled thier energy elsewhere.

    I see those behind the effort to close the jewelry store as being likely to fail. And I fear that their defeat will make the enemy (as defined above) seem unstoppable; it isn't.

    Let's focus on bringing good businesses in. Let's make Franklin thrive, and fill everystore front.

    Let's create a merchant association. ...they are likely to be far more successful at getting rid of a business that brings the block down than a few people eating thai and doing their laundry elsewhere.

  • i don't see how it's relevant unless you were dealing with the person that runs this particular business. maybe the cop was just talking about that one place...? i don't see how it's fair to assume that this new guy is a willing accomplice to criminals. that's pre-judging, and not very nice!

    I have a problem with a pawn shop - not a jewelry store and if the owner really wants to be a part of the community he would try to understand the feelings of it. I am sure the owner is probably a good person but that doesn't mean that I have to like his business. I like going to bars but I don't like bars that are 18 to get in and 21 to drink.

    Spoolie you are right that it could have been just this one place but from some of the stories I heard many of these little pawn shops buy the items and "lose" the paperwork. Instead of them getting in trouble they give this stuff up right away with a "here I don't want any trouble, take it". I can say that I do not know what actions the police or City do after that.

  • Stacey, Its not a pawn shop. He scrapped plans to make it a pawn shop. Its a jewelry store now. So you're basically saying that you have no problem with this business. Glad we agree.

  • Whynot - I agree that there are bigger battles but if this small one even opens up some dialogue between the owner and community is that not a small win?

  • I have a problem with a pawn shop - not a jewelry store...

    okay...

  • From what I've seen, it has not opened much dialogue. The owner of the store listened to the concerns of the neighborhood and decided that a pawn shop is a bad idea. Now that its a jewelry store, the protesters are still unsatisfied. They decided to attack the owner further and to focus on the mural that was painted. I'm all about a dialogue, but it doesn't seem like they will be happy until the store is shut down.

  • Stacey, Its not a pawn shop. He scrapped plans to make it a pawn shop. Its a jewelry store now. So you're basically saying that you have no problem with this business. Glad we agree.

    Then I concede we do (on this issue). I still have an issue with the art work :)

  • What is your problem with the artwork? The artist(Jamie Hef) is very talented. Your interpretation of the artwork may not be what the artist intended. Do you think that perhaps your opinion of the artwork might be governed by your emotions concerning the entire issue? As stated here previously, the artist is a big fan of Leyendecker. If you knew Leyendecker's work, you would be able to see the influence there. Don't let your own interpretations of the artwork anger you. It is not the artist that made angry, its your interpretation of his art. You can't make assumptions on the meaning of the art and then get offended by them.

  • stacey wrote: Whynot - I agree that there are bigger battles but if this small one even opens up some dialogue between the owner and community is that not a small win?

    This owner does not depend on the business of the do gooders protesting it, and does not appear to value their opinion.(on this CHCA, MHA, About Time and I all seem to agree)

    ...from there we differ.

    I believe that having tried to work him and having been rejected, they should now move on to something winable.

    They believe they should teach him a lesson about who owns or runs the community.

    I understand why they are pissed off, but that's not the best time to fight. Don't use your media contacts, your energy, your copy paper trying unsuccessfully to defeat your enemies.

    Instead, build the merchant association. Grow the CHCA. Plant the flowers. Start the neighborhood watch. ...and teach people that the "stop Snitching" culture gets them no where.

    PS The Pawnshop was in violation of the zoning, hence we got a we buy gold and electronics jewelry store. ....this way likely in response to people doing their homework about the zoning regs ....but they are now fighting what is (like it or not) a legal business.

  • Spoolie - I happen to think that this artist has lots of talent I think that if it was hanging in a gallery or museum I would appreciate it more but being where it is in a neighborhood that is struggling with keeping positive images out there for our youth is a little like a slap in the face to this community. I guess you can say I am a little more hurt than angry. I would never destroy or maim someone's artwork but it has made me think slightly less of the artist as a person.

  • Wow - I had a couple great laughs here. Being called Batman was incredibly funny! I made an error and misspelled Splooie's name. I honestly meant no offense. Splooie, my comment about a jewelry store like the one on Park Place not existing in the Diamond District was said to imply that there are no stores down there with Leyendecker-inspired brown-eyed babies spray painted on the wall; and there never will be. THEY have a regard for their customers, and their community. This guy on Park Place does not.

    My call for boycotting the laundromat and the adjoining businesses is similar to my refusal to go into the two bodegas at the opposite corners of Franklin Avenue and Lincoln place. As many familiar to the neighborhood know both of these establishments have been a nexus for a great deal of criminal activity. Similarly, I anticipate that this up and coming 'jewelry' store will also be a nexus for similar activity. I am NOT Batman. I am a consumer, and the power I have is with the money I choose to spend, and I choose to support businesses that employ people I like, make/sell products I like, and aid in the betterment of my community.

    Splooie, I have more to lose here than you. You are the proverbial crow cawing, floating above the hill doing nothing. I am the crow living on the hill doing something. Maybe you get some sort of vicarious thrill engaging in discourse with people who live around here and have to deal with the hazards of living around here. This business offends people around here, and it is my hope that people do not remain passive, but instead decide not to support businesses which offend them. It's as simple as that. That's as free market as it gets. That's capitalism at its finest.

    Splooie's argument trumpets the free market, but says nothing about the law. What of the illegal construction that went on in that space? The proprietor had work done and did not seek the proper permits to do this work. The city was called to investigate, and unfortunately they have been listless in dealing with this situation. It is my understanding that they did not respond promptly, and now all of the construction is complete. I went to investigate the place when the construction was just starting, and I went into the laundromat. The worker in the laundromat told me that I could go through their space to access the then pawnshop if I wanted to sell jewelry. The proprietors are in cahoots.

    Splooie's argument fails to realize that the mural came AFTER the pawnshop/jewelry store. People are now protesting the mural because it's fairly recent. For him to suggest that there is a newfound shift to protest the mural, as if those who don't want either establishment there are switching there point of protest, this totally misses the point. This guy splooie is neither in the forest nor even on its periphery. He is indulging in debate and he doesn't even understand the issues. He doesn't live here.

    Mr. Met scoffs at the idea of my one person boycott. He is free to do that. It would be great if the laundromat imploded on itself because I chose to no longer support the business, but like the two aforementioned bodegas, they will probably continue to do business. So what? It's not about them, it's about ME. It's about how I define myself -- by my actions. I wrote earlier that my decision not to use the laundromat at that corner might be like spittle in an otherwise empty bucket, but that is what I am going to do. The Whynots of the world, the Mr. Mets of the world, and the Spoolies of the world are the reason giants like Mandela was imprisoned for so long; they stood on the sideline -- detractors one and all -- cawing about the free market, cawing about the need to support the South African economy and probably like the Afrikaners themselves calling Mandela and the ANC terrorists. They are detractors cawing on the sidelines while other people change the world.

    Whynot,let me ask you, have you ever used the laundromat at the corner of Park Place and Franklin? I get the impression that this is an issue that you are viewing abstractly because it's akin to the tree falling in the forest; you aren't even affected either way. You don't have to make the decision to use or not use that laundromat. You probably got one of those uber-smooth fancy machines in your home, and there is no need for you to even think about this issue. Just like the time when you brought up your free market spiel about Nairobi's Knapsack -- and you never even went in the store! You didn't even know where it was! This isn't affecting you. You are acting like the fat guy on the couch beer in hand enjoying other people box, or play football; watching other people live! Your moral agnosticism here is as ineffectual as Mr. Met's cynicism, and as empty as Splooie's cheerleading.

  • It doesn't take much extra effort for supporters of this boycott to call another thai place for delivery or to walk the extra block(s) to use another laundromat. All said, it's a really easy way to act on one's convictions. Everyone should feel free to add to this list, so that we have a comprehensive and convenient list for people to refer to.

    Thai Restaurants (that include delivery):

    UDOM THAI

    (718) 622-8424

    661 Washington Ave.

    SUSHI TATSU

    (718) 398-8828

    609 Franklin Ave.

    Other options for east asian food include:

    - Bristens Eatery

    - the new Pine Tree market

    Laundromats (in/out service):

    LAUNDROMAT

    Franklin Ave

    (between St. John's & Lincoln)

    LAUNDRY CITY LAUNDROMAT

    718-622-3939

    632 Grand Ave (@ Prospect Place)

    *24 hours*

    ISLAND BUBBLES

    (718) 622-0353

    88 Rogers Ave

    (between Prospect Pl & Park Pl)

  • FYI. The artist has released an official statement.

    I really really wanted to like him since it looks like he has evolved from graffiti pieces to legal art (which is something near and dear to my heart) but his statement comes off as a little condescending.

  • Mr. Met scoffs at the idea of my one person boycott. He is free to do that. It would be great if the laundromat imploded on itself because I chose to no longer support the business, but like the two aforementioned bodegas, they will probably continue to do business.

    i'd gladly take part in an organized boycott of the bodega near the police tower. it is/was a haven for drug traffickers and i've heard they sell guns. why doesn't the community association focus on that rather than a business that hasn't done anything wrong?

    The Whynots of the world, the Mr. Mets of the world, and the Spoolies of the world are the reason giants like Mandela was imprisoned for so long

    it's comments like this that make you so hard to tolerate. please don't invoke nelson mandela in a discussion about a jewelry store and a mural of a baby sitting on money. it's cheap.

  • shockingly, i don't think the artist's statement is condescending at all.

  • The artist lied. He told me he was doing it as per the proprietor's request.

    Mr. Met, the last thing I need is another white man thinking he is so great that he can afford to tolerate me. I don't need your tolerance dude. Seriously, thank you for your 'tolerance', but I neither want it, need it, or respect it.

  • Yeah, all he said was that people are misinterpreting his art. I think that as the artist, he has every right to be upset about that. And I hardly think that this store being open is akin to Nelson Mandela being imprisoned unjustly. I'm actually offended that you would make the comparison.

  • We can agree to disagree. To assume someone does not like his artwork because they want to further another "agenda" is silly to me.

  • How 'bout mine? Please, please, please - I want you to want, need and respect my tolerance!

    BTW, Mr Met, I don't think that it makes him hard to tolerate, I think that it makes him hard to take seriously.

  • MHA wrote: Whynot,let me ask you, have you ever used the laundromat at the corner of Park Place and Franklin? I get the impression that this is an issue that you are viewing abstractly because it's akin to the tree falling in the forest; you aren't even affected either way. You don't have to make the decision to use or not use that laundromat. You probably got one of those uber-smooth fancy machines in your home, and there is no need for you to even think about this issue. Just like the time when you brought up your free market spiel about Nairobi's Knapsack -- and you never even went in the store! You didn't even know where it was! This isn't affecting you. You are acting like the fat guy on the couch beer in hand enjoying other people box, or play football; watching other people live! Your moral agnosticism here is as ineffectual as Mr. Met's cynicism, and as empty as Splooie's cheerleading.

    True, I have never used laundrymat in question

    False, I went to Nairobi's. However, it lacked the popup books required to get my nephew to like me, so off the the Brooklyn Museum I went. Sushi sounds good though.

    ....but how small are you going to draw your circle?

    For a brief moment, let's assume that closing the jewelry store is a good goal and forget the other issues that affect life on Franklin Avenue. (stay with me...)

    Don't you want to include as many people in your boycott as possible? ...Even those with home laundry machines, laundry machines in shared basements, or those who use laundry mats outside of the immediate intersection?

    ...can it really be assumed that we do not care about the welfare of those living on Franklin simply because we don't live right there?

    Is it really wise to dismiss those who disagree with your latest mission as being out of touch because we don't live on the block?

    Isn't your ultimate goal to reduce crime on Franklin? Isn't our advice on how to go about it in a more effective manner valuable?

    ....the smaller you make your movement, the more likely it will be to fail.

    Forget the Jewelery store battle and move on to win-able battles.

    ....on the otherhand, keep up the bodega battle. Make sure that everyone you know, everyone that reads ILFA, everyone that reads Nostrand Park, everyone goes to About Time, everyone that particpates in CHCA goes into those bodegas and tells them messages in this thread over and over: http://www.brooklynian.com/forums/topic/police-pod-gone-1

    You want change ....that will create change. Get those bodegas off the fence. Show them all of that new $ in the neighborhood, and let them know that they can get more of it.

    ....They could sell the type of merchandise that Tony Fisher used to sell, before he decided remodel his store and go upscale.

  • Well, to be fair, it does seem like people are using their own interpretations of his work to raise more of a controversy around the store.

  • whyfi wrote: How 'bout mine? Please, please, please - I want you to want, need and respect my tolerance!

    BTW, Mr Met, I don't think that it makes him hard to tolerate, I think that it makes him hard to take seriously.

    This

  • LOL! I can actually see the merit of that Whyfi! Glad to see you're still here.

    Thank you for your tolerance Whyfi!

    Thank you for allowing me to live, breathe,

    And express myself, thank you for being tolerant

    Of my subversiveness, my Blackness, and my politics.

    Thank you for being SO tolerant, of my very existence!

    Thank you so much.....

    I mean, what and where would I be without you, or people like you, Hmmmm?

  • A jewelry store would either manufacture its own goods or buy its' stock from a wholesale source to sell at retail. Any shop that buys electronics and jewelry from the public who can walk in off the street is a Pawn Shop, I don't care what your awning says splooie.

  • LOL! I can actually see the merit of that Whyfi! Glad to see you're still here.
    :) good to see you, too. You comin' out for a couple drinks on Friday? I think I'll be there a little early, as I've got an open day.

Sign In or Register to comment.