This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Would Walmart be good for Brooklyn? — Brooklynian

Would Walmart be good for Brooklyn?

krowonhill
edited November -1 in Brooklyn Politics

Walmart is currently in negotiations with developers to open at the Gateway II shopping center site near Jamaica Bay. A city council meeting is set for tomorrow 1/12 as part of the approval process. The company has some severe critics on the council.

Meanwhile, Walmart spokespeople have claimed through the Daily News that the large majority of Brooklynites (76%) think the store's a good thing for our borough (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/survey_says_walmart_good_fit_for_k3OKBoREWjLDsb53cp5U3H).

Is this true? Do you guys want Walmart here?

«13

Comments

  • Not I... but are we representative of the larger Brooklyn population?

  • That's really far for people who don't have cars

  • According to Mayor Bloomberg's Deputy Press Secretary, Andrew Brent:

    "People that live in this city are going outside the city to shop at Wal-Mart, so if they're going to shop at Wal-Mart they might as well live here. They might as well have the jobs here and the tax revenues here. The City does not have the right to say to one business, 'You can't come here,' and we're not going to do that."

    Given these realities, how could anyone be against Walmart? (Booklaw?)

  • maybe this is an over-obvious point, but Brooklyn is one of the last places in America where small business retail ("mom and pop shops") are still viable. So anything working against that would be a bad thing, in my opinion. The counter argument is OMG CHEAP STUFF!

  • Target has done a great job at locating their stores in areas that are near transit: Brooklyn College, Atlantic Center, etc. I think that is a key to their success b/c a lot of New Yorkers don't have a car.

    ...newspapers consistently point out that Atlantic Center's Target is among the highest grossing in the country, despite having no parking lot. (it is also a mess and often out of stock of items, but that may be due to its inability to keep up with demand).

    I jabber about Target b/c, as a result of their locations, I see them as much more of a threat to the small businesses than a Walmart at Gateway.

    Target has been in the city for something like 10 years.

    Other than that, I see very little difference between Target and Walmart. ....at least not enough difference to trek to the Gateway Mall to save a few dollars over what I would have spent at Target.

    But as Booklaw points out, I doubt I am the market Walmart will thrive on.

    Summary: Although I probably won't go there, I am confident that Walmart will come and that it will thrive. Yup, some more small stores will go under. ....but there are some many things against those little stores (the internet, friends with cars and access to the suburbs, target, etc)....

  • I'm not a fan of big box stores or the affect they can have on communities or the environment. However there are already many of these stores in nyc, Costco, Kmart, BJ's, Target, and more. It's another case of capitalistic cannibalism. It's impossible for smaller shops to compete with places like Walmart in terms of pricing on most products. Many people can't afford to support local when toilet paper is twice the price at the corner store or supermarket.

    I'm sure they'll give the go-ahead to build, but I certainly won't be shopping there.

  • Visit Costco in Sunset Park some Sunday afternoon... It will be so crowded you can't bend over or turn around. It will be full of huge Hispanic and Hasidic families buying enormous quantities of everything imaginable.

    Walmart doesn't specialize in mass quantities like Costco; its forte is cheap... Everything is less expensive there than almost anywhere else. There are many, many people in Brooklyn and Queens who desperately need cheap. They will be happy to have a Walmart to shop at.

    I don't like Walmart, or anyplace that pushes price over quality. I especially don't like a store that pays its employees the legal minimum (and, in the case of female employees, allegedly less than the legal minimum), in order to keep its prices low and its stock price high.

    But I can afford the luxury of despising Walmart... Many others cannot, and I do not begrudge them the right to save money by shopping there.

  • Have any of you guys been to Gateway? Its got a BJ's, a Staples, a Super Target, a Home Depot, a Famous Footwear, a Marshall's, a Circuit City, Old Navy and Kids R'Us. Walmart would not steal business away from local stores if it locates at Gateway, its going to cannibalize business from another big chain stores. Gateway is probably the best location to assure that small mom and pop stores don't get affected. The problem comes when Walmart uses their success at Gateway as a reason to open a second store in downtown Brooklyn.

  • alot of people drive to target just park underground :p.

    also people who shop at like walmart and people who use some of the smaller shops are two different demographics. they can live happily next to each other.

    btw if you try to talk about real brooklyn politics and local politicians would be doa. but walmart or bikes or something wouldn't be doa.

  • been to gateway since it open, beats the costco in brooklyn cause its alot less people :p at the bj's(well almost as bad, but easier to find a shopping cart slightly).

  • Funny, I just finished reading Nickle and Dimed (very good read), where the author spent time trying to see if she could live on Walmart minimum wage (answer: basically no).

    Walmart is good for poorer people because it affords them cheap goods. But Walmart's stuff is kept cheap b/c they, like most other minimum wage employers, don't pay their employees a livable wage. (Also Walmart's supposed health insurance is too expensive for many minimum wage employees.)

    As the book says, Walmart and similar stores are able to offer artificially cheap goods because they can find employees who are willing to work for unlivable wages while sacrificing their time and health so we can buy $3 tube socks.

    Walmart is bad for American society.

    Is this one store bad for Brooklyn? who the hell knows

  • the poll showing that brooklyn wants wal-mart was commissioned by wal-mart. i would take it's results with a grain of salt and a margarita underneath.

  • I dont think putting a Walmart at Gateway is taking away from the mom and pop stores. I jut dont understand. If you dont want to shop at Walmart than dammit...dont. If you still want to patronize mom and pop stores then dammit do.Why cant they both exist?Not even close in proximity to one another to be a problem. I hope they put a super walmart in brooklyn to save me a trip upstate.

  • I confess to Costco runs for dog food, cat food and paper products. I confess to Mom & Pop runs for munchies, veggies and "last minute damn I forgot" items. Would I buy anything at Wal-Mart? Not sure - pretty much have it covered under options A & B. Do not buy toiletries at Costco or local mom & pop stores (drug store by work) and would never buy clothing at any of the above.

    As for arguments on wages paid, exactly how many employees do mom & pop stores have and what average wage do those employees earn? Were the bodegas annihilated by the larger supermarkets in certain areas? Not as I can see. The debate on whether whether Wal-Mart will annihilate the local mom & pop store or bodega seems pretty much the same.

  • A report published under the auspices of Hunter College's Center for Community Planning and Development does indeed substantiate that Wal-Mart's encroachment into an area will likely result in the subsequent failure of small, locally-owned businesses. From the report, http://pubadvocate.nyc.gov/files/Walmart.pdf:

    • Wal-Mart’s entry into a new market has a strongly negative effect on existing retailers. Supermarkets and discount variety stores are the most adversely affected sectors, suffering sales declines of 10 to 40% after Wal-Mart moves in.

    • Stores near a new Wal-Mart are at increased risk of going out of business. After a single Wal-Mart opened in Chicago in September 2006, 82 of the 306 small businesses in the surrounding neighborhood had gone out of business by March 2008.

    The report concluded that the entry of even a single Wal-Mart store in New York City could have a snowball effect and result in a negative long-term cumulative impact on the city’s economy and continued decline of the middle class. A single small Wal-Mart, or a single superstore, could mean the demise of existing food retailers, end local retail, and hurt working families. I recommend it if you're interested in this discussion.

  • I think most of us agree that Walmart puts small businesses who directly compete with it out of business. ...I find it kind of sad that NYC and Hunter spent money to create a report to tell us what we already knew: Never fight someone larger than yourself.

    Assuming the effect on small business and wages aren't disputed, the job of those opposed to Walmart's entry is to show why we should prevent one specific company from entering the NYC market, how under current law such an action would be legal or enforceable.

    [I have yet to hear this argrument from Walmart's detractors]

    To the contrary, banning Walmart to protect the owners and employees of small businesses might be a valid technique if we were on an island and they were the only predator of our endangered species, but we are not on an island. Such protectionism and isolationism won't work as a result.

    There are already many things currently against the small business owner; Things far larger than even Walmart, as huge as it is.....

    Like small towns in America, small businesses are destined to gradually disappear unless they can find a way to effectively compete and adapt.

    Wait.

    Are we supposed to rescue small towns as well? I hear they have quaint ways of life, and friendly diners. I hear you can have a backyard, basement, garage and a driveway.

    Over the past 30 years, many treasurers of small towns learned that the only thing worse than having a Walmart locate in their town, was having a Walmart locate in the town beside them.

    The government of NYC faces this same choice.

    Although you may hate the trends toward lower paying jobs and corporatization that Walmart champions, the longer that NYC fails to adapt the longer the cost of living in NYC is inflated relative to places that have have one.

    Every time a tax dollar leaves NYC I cry. Target has helped the city government and its residents tremendously.

    If small business owners and their employees can't adapt and compete, they will disappear. Like it or not, there isn't much you, I or anyone else can do about it.

  • If Walmart was forced to pay its employees living wages and treat them with more respect and realistic living conditions, its financial and structural advantages over mom and pop stores would significantly lessen.

    As for arguments on wages paid, exactly how many employees do mom & pop stores have and what average wage do those employees earn?

    the power to abuse and under-pay employees is significantly less with mom and pop stores. At one point (and maybe still) Walmart was the biggest private employer in the world. How much disproportionate power do you think they wield when it comes to lobbyists, political donations, and labor practices?

    It's the same as how McDonald's pretty much dictates the practices of one of the most abusive and destructive industries in America today (beef production & processing) due to their massive market share.

    Companies like Walmart and McDonald's have little sense of social contract or loyalty to what's good for a majority of the American people, especially with regards to the poor or minimum wage workers. In other words, the most vulnerable.

    Walmart is not good for American people (and perhaps worldwide too) and is able to perpetrate destructive practices on a very wide scale with little oversight or social responsibility.

  • Although you may hate the trends toward lower paying jobs and corporatization that Walmart champions, the longer that NYC fails to adapt the longer the cost of living in NYC is inflated relative to places that have have one.

    are you defining cost of living mostly by how much things cost at delis vs walmarts?

    Walmart doesn't pay people livable wages or provide them with affordable health care.

    This creates great strain on the NYC population both in income, budgets and quality of life.

  • BG, we agree on every point except "what do we do about it?"

    ....My argument is that we (the good people of NYC) are not in charge.

    To fight Walmart to protect a former way of life is futile.

    There are too many other corporations that will simply step in to Walmart's void.

    Globalization comes to Brooklyn, like it or not.

    This isn't a question of whether it is "good for us".

    I'd love to live in a world where everyone made a living wage and got health insurance. Walmart is coming.

    For those unable to adapt, it will suck. The NYC Government is foolish to fight something that is larger than it.

    Walmart is the LESSER evil than trying remain as we are.

  • If WalMart wants to come to Brooklyn I would require Walmart to be unionized and to put a ten-foot tall picture of Jared Loughner in the front of the store with the caption "Walmart sells large amounts of bullets to people like this."

  • I don't think small shops will go under

    Jamaica Bay? Is that beyond the reach of the subway? That alone will knock it dead.

    Plus no matter what, dollar store shit is cheaper than even Walmart's tripe, and the shopping experience at dollar stores is just nicer. Walmart can be overwhelming and cold

    So I think it will do alright, but it won't be the town killing behemoth it is in small areas. This is Brooklyn, after all

  • :yawn: @ the wild anti Walmart brigade.

    I know people who work in those mom and pop shops. The majority of them are immigrants who have little to no rights and are in no way being paid a living wage. The idea that these mom and pop shops are some worker's utopia is laughable; if anything they might be WORSE for workers than Walmart. Walmart workers at least have protection through minimum wage, child labor and other laws, and the volume of workers to possibly unionize. Mom & Pop shop workers have none of that, as it's all cash.

    And Walmart didn't shoot those people, that crazy kid did. If it were up to ppl like Walkathon, we'd all be in straight jackets and rubber rooms under the caring & all knowing watch of the American government. No thanks, the whole point of America is freedom, even if it comes with some uncertainty and danger

  • I wish a reputable organization would a study on Target's impact on NYC.

    ...it would detail how much tax money and employment now remains within its borders, as well as its impact on the smaller stores.

    Target seems to focus on local shoppers, while Walmart is trying to be a destination.

    IKEA is a destination

    I once read that Walmart hopes to open smaller, local stores in the city as well. They'll probably pursue that strategy later.

  • When I go to Target, I see a lot of good things for the local economy. I see people earning a living, I see a paying tenant in a key piece of real estate, I see people gaining access to relatively affordable goods of some measurable quality. I see a lot of local tax revenue being generated (through the protocols & scrutiny of legal business practices; as opposed to the all-cash operations of the mom and pop shop), yadda yadda. Now is it perfect? Of course not. But if there were no Target, what would those employees' alternative be? Someone has to work retail, and IMO it's better for everyone involved when said retailer is a transparent tax paying law abiding corporation like Target, as opposed to a mom & pop shop, which could be great + fair or a total slum.

  • So far, no one has mentioned in this thread that Walmart wouldn't be able to pay wages and benefits as low as it does if its competition paid more.... Basically, it's villianized for buying a product (in this case labor) for the going rate.

    This is why I think placement at Gateway is a good thing. The Starett City, Pink Houses,etc. folks are already being employeed at the 10 or so other large businesses out there, some of which do provide things like health care for their employees. So, Walmart's going to pay less and have worse benefits. Sure it may have less expensive goods, but its also going to get a lower quality of employee, and I think that its going to result in that store being a hot ass mess of ridiculous proportions. Walmart's usual MO is to hire elderly and disabled employees, but really the demographics of that particular neighborhood are such that there aren't a lot of elderly folks so they are much more likely to get the underemployed teens and young adults as staff. Not your normal Walmart staff and not the normal situation. I'm just waiting for some guy from corporate to tell one of those kids that they can't go to the bathroom or have to stand in one spot for four hours without a break.

  • Good points.

    ....yes.

    At the moment, NYC has lower unemployment rates than the national average, and (as a result of the competition for employees) the service sector has to strive much harder to fill its ranks with qualified, polite employees in NYC.

    If Walmart finds that it is only able to attract the city's most unskilled, it may very well raise its wages in order to provide its customers with a satisfactory shopping experience.

    ....it's not like the managers at Walmart are somehow more "evil" than those at Lowe's or Target. If those places could pay their employees less and still run good stores, they would. ...they don't pay more, or provide better working conditions out of some "generousity" or "responsibility" to their employees.

    Given the "quality" of potential Walmart employees at minimum wage, it will be interesting to see if they can run a store that is as organized and "customer friendly" as their suburban ones. In my view, the Target at Atlantic Center has never managed to get up to the level of its less urban locations:

    http://sites.target.com/site/en/spot/state_results.jsp?state=NY

    The Atlantic Center Target is often (as homeowner puts it) and as we write frequently on this board: "a hot ass mess of ridiculous proportions".

  • If Walmart finds that it is only able to attract the city's most unskilled, it may very well raise its wages in order to provide its customers with a satisfactory shopping experience.

    I have trouble stomaching this much benefit of the doubt to Walmart or any other national retail corporation.

  • BG, they wouldn't do it to be nice to their customers. They would do it because we wouldn't haul ourselves to Gateway Center if they didn't. You don't have to give them much "benefit of the doubt" to believe that they will want this new store to succeed: They have fought to have it built, and advertised to us for YEARS in preparation.

    However, if you are right, and they don't step up to the task at hand:

    a. The families with two kids in a minivan that would go to Gateway, will instead continue to haul themselves to a Walmart location just outside of the city, in Valley Stream or Westbury.

    http://www.walmart.com/storeLocator/ca_storefinder_results.do?serviceName=&rx_title=com.wm.www.apps.storelocator.page.serviceLink.title.default&rx_dest=/index.gsp&sfrecords=50&sfsearch_city=&sfsearch_state=--&sfsearch_zip=11238&sftype_sel=-1&sfradius=50&x=16&y=9&continue=

    b. The families who travel by bus will will continue to go to various stores that will compete with Walmart, such as the NYC located Costco and Target stores.

    Perhaps as a result of having no nearby competition, the Target at Atlantic Center is one of the companies highest grossing stores despite being messy and out of stock when I brave shopping there.

    It would be interesting to see if they have raised wages to try and improve the store's performance. ...I have seen some small improvements in the store since it first opened.

    However, I'm confident that the store will genuinely improve once some competition comes in the form of the additional "big boxes" that will be created as part of the Atlantic Yards Project.

    As Homeowner points out, Walmart won't have this luxury of time ....Gateway has competition already nearby.

  • For those of you who are so worried about Wal Mart's business practices and are favoring Mom and Pops stores, please look at 2009 for this story:

    25 Brooklyn restaurants and cafes owe at least $910,000 in unpaid wages to more than 200 workers.

    http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/109206/state-labor-dept--finds-park-slope-restaurants-underpaid-workers

    Many mom and Pop stores work in cash, cheat the most they can from taxes, and cheat the most they can from their employees. Wal Mart is just as bad, but what is worse?

  • I would quadruple the number of publicly subsidized community colleges.

    YES.

    And, like you guys said, trade schools.

    Trade Schools.

    Trade Schools.

    Trade Schools.

Sign In or Register to comment.