This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

More reasons to dislike lawyers and politicians in nyc. — Brooklynian

More reasons to dislike lawyers and politicians in nyc.

This just smells like corruption and cronyism no other words for this.

In 2009, a judge in Manhattan had a lucrative appointment to hand out: oversight of a diamond district building that was drifting into foreclosure.

Nearly 600 people in Manhattan had been approved for such work. But the job went to a lawyer named Mark D. Lebow, who is the husband of Patricia E. Harris, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s most trusted aide.

Since then, Mr. Lebow has earned $352,000 in fees, more than $5,000 a week, according to court records.

The foreclosure crisis has caused a surge in the number of court-appointed receivers for distressed properties in New York, and politically connected lawyers are benefiting.

Yet even as the fees mount, totaling millions of dollars, it remains unclear why judges are selecting some of these lawyers, and whether the fees are being well spent.

The court system in New York State has long been criticized for fostering a system of patronage appointments that enriches lawyers and others with ties to influential politicians. Court officials defend the process of selecting receivers for distressed properties, saying judges are looking for people who they know have done good work.

Over all, the number of receivers appointed by judges to oversee distressed properties in the city jumped to 284 last year from 47 in 2007, records show.

Paul Vallone, a scion of one of Queens’s most powerful political families, earned nearly $17,000 for one assignment. Howard R. Vargas, a commissioner of the Taxi and Limousine Commission, was awarded $28,000 for three cases. Marc Landis, a Democratic district leader and member of the transition team of the new state attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, was compensated $22,000 for supervising three buildings.

And those were for assignments that were given out earlier in the foreclosure crisis and that have already yielded fees. The newest appointments, with the billing to come, are filled with even more lawyers with ties to the powerful.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/21/nyregion/connected-nyc-lawyers-reap-foreclosure-benefits.html?ref=nyregion

Comments

  • It's hard for me to single out politicians and lawyers. It's not like the banking industry isn't doing stuff just as bad or worse, and we actually celebrate them for it.

  • Well, no one has said what the other 600 attorneys would have charged in fees. And to the victor go the spoils so it's SOP to appoint someone you know or has helped you in the past. Hell, my divorce lawyer charged me about $12,000. We sat in court one day for four hours waiting for the judge. He read the paper and I twiddled my thumbs and I got charged $325/hr for the four hours.

  • Boygabriel said:

    It's hard for me to single out politicians and lawyers. It's not like the banking industry isn't doing stuff just as bad or worse, and we actually celebrate them for it.

    Bankers aren't elected (and paid) to serve the public good. Big difference.

  • Banksters also do far more damage, and steal far more, than corrupt judges or job postings for cronies.

    At best, it all evens out. Like I said, I have just as much dislike for banksters as I do for corrupt judges and lawyers.

  • A judge usually appoints a receiver to make sure the property in question makes a profit. Or at the very least, breaks even. Has there been a series of building collapse with these connected receivers?

  • there must be a better way this makes me think of 3rd world country runs things!!! hmm i wonder how canada or the uk does it. they have a slightly better judicial and anti corruption than the us. hell i likes sinagpore the best, i wonder how they do it.

  • Boygabriel said:

    Banksters also do far more damage, and steal far more, than corrupt judges or job postings for cronies.

    Eh - politicians (and lawyers) create the laws (and loopholes) that allow bankers to do what they do. If politicians weren't corrupt, dishonest bankers wouldn't be able to get away with all that they do.

  • Exactly. So I'm not going to spend too much time singling one profession out.

    At least we can vote people out of office. The next bankster that gets prosecuted for the 2008 financial collapse will be the first.

  • My feeling is that transparency is best, which is a hard trait to come by in these kinds of cases. From what I've seen from a mediator's perspective, autonomy over your own method conflict resolution actually works! Of course, with a case this scale, it gets messy, but I've seen mediators work wonders with millions on the line.

    For me, it's become a matter of building trust in people involved, that they know their conflict best, and with the help of skilled facilitators, can uncover what the resolution really means to them. Corruption on the part of the facilitator can NOT play a role in that kind of alternative effort, and most likely will not if the mediator/negotiator/facilitator is truly a 3rd party neutral.

    On that note, Happy summer everyone!

  • Boygabriel said:

    Exactly. So I'm not going to spend too much time singling one profession out.

    At least we can vote people out of office. The next bankster that gets prosecuted for the 2008 financial collapse will be the first.

    wait, aren't many politicians lawyers and bankers?

    Who will we get to fill these positions if we don't elect them?

    Can we vote that the positions go unfilled?

  • armchair_warrior said:

    hell i likes sinagpore the best, i wonder how they do it.

    benevolent dictatorship.

    ...if you give me all the power, I promise to act accordingly.

    (don't trust me)

  • lol they are truly the classic Confucian aka meritocracy folks. not a dictatorship a Confucian collective or mertiocrates still have the rule of law etc...one of the least corrupt places on earth and its about ones ability not how tall and good you sound to the dumb masses.

  • Boygabriel said:

    Exactly. So I'm not going to spend too much time singling one profession out.

    At least we can vote people out of office. The next bankster that gets prosecuted for the 2008 financial collapse will be the first.

    Prosecuted for what? In most cases, they were within the law, as created by the politicians. Many would argue that the collapse was in large part a direct result of lenders being forced to follow the law, i.e. giving loans to people who they knew couldn't afford to pay them back, rather than run afoul of federal lending laws for poor/minorities.

  • ^^ this ^^

    The politicians enacted policies which they thought were in line with our national psyche of wanting everyone to own a home, under the belief it was a sure path success.

    As we know, it isn't.

    Not only will there be no quick fix to America's problems of disparities, but knee jerk policies such as "let's make it so everyone, even those without credit or reliable income, can own a home" may do harm to the individuals we are trying to help and the economy as a whole.

    Our attempts to level the playing field must be very thoughtful. The free market does have a value, and it often kicks our ass when we think we can make it work differently than it does.

  • it started under the Clinton era advisers sold out rest of the world for only chump change. (alot of the bonds were brought by non americans)

    As the Clinton administration’s top housing official in the mid-1990s, Mr. Cisneros loosened mortgage restrictions so first-time buyers could qualify for loans they could never get before.

    Then, capitalizing on a housing expansion he helped unleash, he joined the boards of a major builder, KB Home, and the largest mortgage lender in the nation, Countrywide Financial — two companies that rode the housing boom, drawing criticism along the way for abusive business practices.

    And Mr. Cisneros became a developer himself. The Lago Vista development here in his hometown once stood as a testament to his life’s work.

    Joining with KB, he built 428 homes for low-income buyers in what was a neglected, industrial neighborhood. He often made the trip from downtown to ask residents if they were happy.

    “People bought here because of Cisneros,” says Celia Morales, a Lago Vista resident. “There was a feeling of, ‘He’s got our back.’ ”

    But Mr. Cisneros rarely comes around anymore. Lago Vista, like many communities born in the housing boom, is now under stress. Scores of homes have been foreclosed, including one in five over the last six years on the community’s longest street, Sunbend Falls, according to property records.

    While Mr. Cisneros says he remains proud of his work, he has misgivings over what his passion has wrought. He insists that the worst problems developed only after “bad actors” hijacked his good intentions but acknowledges that “people came to homeownership who should not have been homeowners.”

    They were lured by “unscrupulous participants — bankers, brokers, secondary market people,” he says. “The country is paying for that, and families are hurt because we as a society did not draw a line.”

    The causes of the housing implosion are many: lax regulation, financial innovation gone awry, excessive debt, raw greed. The players are also varied: bankers, borrowers, developers, politicians and bureaucrats.

    Mr. Cisneros, 61, had a foot in a number of those worlds. Despite his qualms, he encouraged the unprepared to buy homes — part of a broad national trend with dire economic consequences.

    He reflects often on his role in the debacle, he says, which has changed homeownership from something that secured a place in the middle class to something that is ejecting people from it. “I’ve been waiting for someone to put all the blame at my doorstep,” he says lightly, but with a bit of worry, too.

    The Paydays During the Boom

    After a sex scandal destroyed his promising political career and he left Washington, he eventually reinvented himself as a well-regarded advocate and builder of urban, working-class homes. He has financed the construction of more than 7,000 houses.

    For the three years he was a director at KB Home, Mr. Cisneros received at least $70,000 in pay and more than $100,000 worth of stock. He also received $1.14 million in directors’ fees and stock grants during the six years he was a director at Countrywide. He made more than $5 million from Countrywide stock options, money he says he plowed into his company.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/business/19cisneros.html?ref=thereckoning



    After working for President Clinton, Emanuel took a leave from politics in 1998 and worked in finance and was hired by the investment-banking firm Wasserstine Perella. He worked there until 2002. He was the firm’s managing director of their Chicago office. (Mind you, Emanuel did not have an MBA or banking experience.) In 2000, President Clinton appointed Emanuel to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s (Freddie Mac) board of directors.
    http://chicago.about.com/od/chicagopeople/a/Rahm-Emanuel-The-Politician.htm

Sign In or Register to comment.