Mr Mayor - I've had enough of the W.I. Day parade through Crown Heights North
Comments
-
Same demographic?
Aren't there more young, unemployed, uneducated males with criminal records at Carnival?
...aren't they attracted to the Carnival and not the Festival because it features attractive, sparkly women, "$3 Nutcrackers" and booming music, as opposed to the events of the Arts Festival.
P.S. I believe we'd see a similar phenomena if we were to compare a rural state fair (mostly attended by white folks) to an event that catered to a more upscale crowd.
...Although the majority attending the state fair and carnival are "hard working people" looking to have a good time and not at all violent, both events seem to attract a small, very destructive group of young male trouble makers.
-
CLAYFILMS said:
Question of the day. Why is there fatal gun violence at the West Indian Day Parade every year and not at the African Street Festival (now known as the International African Arts Festival)? Same borough, same demographic...but somehow no one ever gets shot at the Festival.What's the difference? Brooklyn, chime in!
It's only the same demographic if you think ALL people of African ancestry are the same and because you've come to that conclusion it's pretty clear you've been to one and not the other or neither of these events.
-
WhyFi said:
No, gun crime going up in the wake of a ban doesn't support or reject that theory. You're assuming that, before and after then ban, the number of felons using a gun to commit a crime was/is proportional to the number of felons in possession of a gun just as you assumed that the ban made gun-totin' criminals more brazen. Assumptions, assumptions, assumptions. To know if access to guns is easier or more difficult before/after, you'd have to poll the bad guys and I don't think that they're going to be too helpful in that regard.I'm surprised you didn't use the much more obvious (and onerous) consideration that once guns were outlawed, many previously law-abiding citizens became criminals overnight, just as the 17th of January 1920 saw millions of Americans criminalized for the mere desire to consume an alcoholic beverage.
Will you argue the case that this is different? Alcohol certainly kills more people and destroys more lives than firearms. Yet prohibition was catastrophic to everyone except for the criminals who profited from it. It didn't reduce consumption rates. It didn't reduce the rates of vice. It made a few people rich, and made a lot of people dead.
I believe in a presumption of personal freedom. So I don't think I should have to justify or prove why banning me from possessing/using/enjoying ______ is bad. Not to you, and not to the government. The burden is on society and the state to explain why my freedom is to be curtailed when it doesn't infringe on the freedom of others. Now if I go shoot an innocent or drive drunk and put lives at risk, that's a good reason to take away my right.
We aren't born and we don't live at the privilege of the government. Those who want to live in a nanny state should simply move to one.
-
Ishtar said:
It's only the same demographic if you think ALL people of African ancestry are the same and because you've come to that conclusion it's pretty clear you've been to one and not the other or neither of these events.Ishtar-
Clayfilms might be asking the question to see what WE will answer, not because she thinks everyone who checks "black" on the census is the same.She could have her own beliefs as to why violence is absent from the African Arts Festival, yet present at the West Indian Carnival.
What say you Clayfilms?
-
eastbloc said:
I'm surprised you didn't use the much more obvious (and onerous) consideration that once guns were outlawed, many previously law-abiding citizens became criminals overnight, just as the 17th of January 1920 saw millions of Americans criminalized for the mere desire to consume an alcoholic beverage.Will you argue the case that this is different? Alcohol certainly kills more people and destroys more lives than firearms. Yet prohibition was catastrophic to everyone except for the criminals who profited from it. It didn't reduce consumption rates. It didn't reduce the rates of vice. It made a few people rich, and made a lot of people dead.
I believe in a presumption of personal freedom. So I don't think I should have to justify or prove why banning me from possessing/using/enjoying ______ is bad. Not to you, and not to the government. The burden is on society and the state to explain why my freedom is to be curtailed when it doesn't infringe on the freedom of others. Now if I go shoot an innocent or drive drunk and put lives at risk, that's a good reason to take away my right.
We aren't born and we don't live at the privilege of the government. Those who want to live in a nanny state should simply move to one.
In other words, your previous argument doesn't support your case so you're abandoning it?
-
I don't believe that one can rationally make the case for any kind of freedom without the proposed evidence remaining disputable and a reasonably meritable argument being possible to the contrary.
My case is that in the absence of compelling evidence of the social value of limiting an individual's freedom, curtailing that freedom is wrong. It's conceivable that, say, Joseph Stalin might plausibly disagree with me.
At some point, one has to either turn to principles, or sit on the fence poking holes in everyone else's arguments while holding no view of their own out of fear of it receiving the same sort of treatment they dish out.
-
tateinbk said:
Armchair Warrior,You should consider reading "Fist Stick Knife Gun: A Personal History of Violence" by Geoffrey Canada. It's one of the more interesting books I had to in high school. Frankly, it's not a bad read for anyone debating gun violence.
Agreed -- I am not 100% behind Geoffrey Canada at this point in my career, but that book was insightful to say the least.
-
I really hope that politicians can put votes aside in favor for public safty. Every year the parade is associated with violence and death. If the city cant keep residents safe then the parade should be done with.
-
This is the only parade in all of the United States that consistently sports a hefty body count. Why does the mayor continue to allow this parade to even happen.
It is high time this parade gets canceled. Enough is enough already!
-
Firstly, there was a lot of sloppy reporting that attributed violence that happened citywide to the parade. Violence in East New York, BedStuy, Harlem and the Bronx were lumped together and clearly were unrelated events but were used to add a body count to what happens when "those people get together". Two shootings (too many) happened yesterday at the parade. The shooting on Park Place and Franklin happened at 9 pm and was because the shooter had a longstanding grudge with the person he targeted. This could have happened during a heat wave or any other weekend during the summer.
I really dont understand people who say stop the WI Day parade. Do you not hear the news about people getting shot in Crown Heights the other 364 days per year? The same people shooting on Labor Day are the same people shooting people on other days-- they are hopeless, crazy or just dont give a fuck. Unless you deal with the fundamental causes of the violence then its just a bandaid. And cancelling the parade-would be a bandaid.
I have been going to this parade, the International African Arts Festival and the African parade since I have lived in the city. The WI day is notable for the worst crowd control I have ever seen. If NYPD know this is a problem event then why are forces so poorly deployed? Over one million people and how many policeman are there?
Case in point, there were at least 2 pairs ( or more) of policeman on each block from Rogers to Washington and there was a pair of cops on each block on the side streets from about Park Place to EP primarily controlling car traffic and watching barricades. As soon as you got to EP the cops seemed to disappear. But somehow the cops would all appear and walk in a straight line carrying their orange plastic barrier and were focused on making sure paradegoers didnt cross the street or jump in and start dancing between floats. I didnt see any police on the service road or the center grassy strip of EP. From Rogers to New York Avenue I didnt see any cops on EP. It doesnt make any sense.
Yet they all came running from the parade route ( from between the barricades) as soon as we heard the pops of gunfire-jumping over the fences and going to the area we were all running away from. Their crowd control does not inspire confidence.
Also I am expecting that shortly there will be an inquest into the shooting at Franklin and Park Place. Eyewitness accounts dont match up with the police version of events that the shooter killed the innocent bystander.
-
There were so many cops in Prospect Park on Monday I thought they were getting ready to invade Queens. They brought a tank
-
Incidents of violence in the areas encompassing the parade happen at random (and far too often). But incidents of violence on the day of the parade seem almost certain.
-
Having moved from East Flatbush over 23 years ago, I have to say that if you don't want to deal with the violence of the underclass, which has always been present in that neck of the woods, move to another neighborhood; whites don't face the rental discrimination that blacks do in NYC, so they'll have more choices on where they can live, e.g., Astoria, L.I.C., and Williamsburg; Or just move out of the city all together since we'll never come to grips with root causes of the violence and disorder in our lifetime in all probability.
-
As I'm typing, helicopters are flying over my apartment for the fifth day in a row. This parade is not for the neighborhood; it's for people who flock from elsewhere, happy to make Crown Heights and beyond a playground with, in their mind's eye, no repercussions.
I've lived here nine years. After this parade weekend, reaching ten no longer seems appealing.
-
I think what Clayfilms was pointing out was that for years, the African Street Festival was held on Fulton Street between Stuyvesant and Reid (Malcom X) and in the field at Boys and GIrls High School. It was definitely attended more by high school kids and families (similar to the demographic at the parade) and yet it never had the associated violence. With the move about ten years ago to the Ft. Greene area, the festival has gentrified greatly and now is far more of an Arts festival than a neighborhood cultural event, but its NEVER been marred by the violence.
I believe it may be because of the alcohol. THe crackdown of several years ago seemed to put a damper on much of the drama, and I think if the cops were intent on telling folks to lose the open containers and they actually ticketed the nutcracker salesmen, the parade might be very different.
-
"That neck of the woods" or your neck of the woods? Forgive me, but if you moved to "the northwest"(?) 23 years ago, why are you weighing in on what goes on in our neighborhood? Were these the shots heard round the world? Or are you trying to make this about the 'violence of the underclass'? I know plenty of people who enjoy the parade every year who would resent being called underclass. Plenty of working and middle class families who simply do not want the elevated threat of violence escalating in from of their homes or in front of their children.
-
I never thought of myself as an "underclass". I'm going to add that to my list, right next to "urbanite".
-
PittieCity said:
are you trying to make this about the 'violence of the underclass'? I know plenty of people who enjoy the parade every year who would resent being called underclass. Plenty of working and middle class families who simply do not want the elevated threat of violence escalating in from of their homes or in front of their children.I do visit every few years.
I believe the problem is that the underclass element that is in the minority in that neighborhood engages in savage behavior that outweighs the impact of the majority hard-working poor, working, lower middle, and middle middle class people who live in the area and that behavior as we have heard about or witnessed impacts upon innocent people like Ms. Gay. I'm not referring to the people who don't engage in such conduct.
I'm just saying to people who can't stand the burning caldron of violence and disorder to get the hell out if you can. To those that like the neighborhood in spite of its problems, that's your choice and I respect it.
-
I think another issue is that many of the parade-goers are from out of town. The celebrations are for 4 days - meaning it makes sense for people to travel up for a long weekend full of family, events, etc. Apparently one of the two shooters at Park and Franklin wasn't from the area. I'm unsure if other events get as many out-of-towners -- excluding Thanksgiving day parade (way to early in the morning for me to ever attend, so I can't comment) and New Years Eve in Times Square (which I have been to and the police are intense) -- and that may change dynamics as well. I know a lot of friends who have full-houses during the Labor Day Weekend because of people visiting Brooklyn for the parade, etc.
Maybe if the event was shortened to just J'vourt and the parade, there'd be less people traveling. Or if the other events at the museum happened throughout the year and not during just one weekend it could cut down on the out-of-town element that can often times lead to issues.
Additionally, there was no hiding the drinking. The stands with food listed nutcrakers on their list of things for sale - that's brazen and bold right there and nothing happened. Police need to patrol and keep quality of life issues in control to help with the whole parade.
But it certainly shouldn't be cancelled - that makes no sense either. The parade itself doesn't cause violence. But people with grudges getting drunk for 4 days straight while partying non-stop do. Spread out the events, increase foot patrols on the actual parade walkways...
(sidenote: Did anyone else see the super depressing corrections officer buses in the parade? 2 buses full of sad looking kids in the back drove down the parade route. TASTELESS for sure.
-
i believe that those who refuse to believe the WIP/festivities doesn't create problems with violence are afraid that by saying so (or thinking so) they'll be perceived as bigots.
i don't believe canceling the parade is the answer, but a culture of drinking and irresponsibility in a nabe with heightened violent crime stats.
we go through this debate and these issues every single year. i think it's time that the parade organizers got together with law enforcement and community leaders took look at why there are these problems, and take responsibility to keep the events safer. lots of people drinking for hours + heat and extreme crowding + hundreds of half-naked women on display = a recipe for trouble. there seems to be an acceptance that bad things will happen, and i want to know why the people in charge aren't working to change that
-
You make no sense. What culture of drinking? Do you routinely see drunk people on a Saturday night wandering around Crown Heights outside of 4 days in September? If so where and when? Where is the culture of irresponsibility and what percentage of Crown Heights shares this culture? Or is that your catchword for culture of poverty?
Why are people so reactionary? I know people are upset that people have been hurt and killed but we need reasoned responses that will help this situation in the long run. I wish we could get a sustained response to support organizations like SOS Crown Heights instead of people lobbing inflammatory and racially loaded language.
-
It's not the parade itself. It's the concentration. Put a huge amount of people together, stir in alcohol, pride and guns and you get 364 days lumped into one day (or one weekend for that matter). It's just shocking to most because of the concentration over these few days, but this is nothing different from what happens spread across the year in Brooklyn or in CHN. It's just so sad that innocent bystanders and their families have to suffer.
If only the youth would understand that a gun isn't an extension of your manhood, but a reduction of your life. But there are no good fathers to show them what's right or wrong, so it's a vicious cycle with no end in sight. The day Western culture convinced the black woman that she doesn't need a strong father and husband by her side, is the day the black man died.
-
trumytic, the culture of drinking at the parade/festivities.
reactionary? dunno why i'd be reactionary if xx people were shot and killed in my nabe on one night.
i live on a parade route, albeit small parades: glbt parade, brooklyn irish day parade. i can promise you that if violence at either of these parades were routine the community would be up in arms, and the organizers would be held accountable.
-
xlizellx wrote: I think another issue is that many of the parade-goers are from out of town. The celebrations are for 4 days - meaning it makes sense for people to travel up for a long weekend full of family, events, etc. Apparently one of the two shooters at Park and Franklin wasn't from the area. I'm unsure if other events get as many out-of-towners -- excluding Thanksgiving day parade (way to early in the morning for me to ever attend, so I can't comment) and New Years Eve in Times Square (which I have been to and the police are intense) -- and that may change dynamics as well. I know a lot of friends who have full-houses during the Labor Day Weekend because of people visiting Brooklyn for the parade, etc.
Maybe if the event was shortened to just J'vourt and the parade, there'd be less people traveling. Or if the other events at the museum happened throughout the year and not during just one weekend it could cut down on the out-of-town element that can often times lead to issues.
In addition to the publicized shootings, it seems there were a lot of armed people at the parade:
NYT wrote: The police have tied three of the shootings and five victims to the West Indian Day Parade, and say the tally could have been higher had officers not seized 14 illegal guns and arrested 16 people during J’Ouvert.
The parade, however, was unrelated to the gunfire on Park Place, an unusually designed street where black iron fencing separates the sunken roadway from extra-wide sidewalks.
We will probably never know for sure, but I find it hard to believe that the people who brought guns to the parade were from out of town.
...if they flew to NYC, it would be difficult to travel with a gun.
...if they drove here from someplace they could certainly bring a gun, but would people from outside of the area have the same urge to protect their local cred?
Do I "know these things"? Of course not. But my hunch is that most of the folks who make trouble are from right here in Brooklyn.
But lets focus on those out of town folks for a minute.
The parade is a huge economic force in the city. In addition to people flying into the various airports, folks stay at the local hotels and eat and drink at NYC bars and restaurants.
I think if people try to cancel the carnival or modify in such a way that out-of-town folks do not come, they will find that powerful forces in the business community will rise up to support it.
The parade has major business sponsors and a lot of political support, in part because of the economic activity it generates.
Given the state of our economy, New York City will continue to need this "new money from out of town" even more next year than it did this year.
Through out life, safety is routinely balanced against profit.
-
Why would the community be up in arms if shootings happen regularly and police treatment is often another source of victimization and targeting for unfair treatment ie walking while black, stop and frisk etc? ( This is not to say that there arent many community activists that are up in arms in CH right now. But its hard for the regular paradegoer/person who lives in CH to be hypervigilant about this and live in fear of violence all the time.)
Brooklynpotter do you get all up in arms about other bloody weekends we have in Brooklyn? Do you care when people get shot in Crown Heights generally? If not then thats what I call reactionary. People dont pay attention 364 days a year to the people and forces that drive violence in neighborhoods like Crown Heights and suddenly pick up the newspaper and say "We must stop this carnage-end the parade now". Its not a consistent position nor a morally honest one. The shootout on Park Place was between two people with criminal records who knew each other. I am sure if we delve into the backgrounds of the other violent incidents we would see the same pattern.
How exactly are the parade organizers responsible for less than 1 percent of the population that attends the parade that have antisocial behavior? Do you want the organizers to provide extra security, check points with metal detectors and pat downs? Who would enforce the checkpoints? Whose job is it to protect the people? Are the parade organizers supposed to police every party anywhere near the parade route too? You know just in case a fight breaks out that could be blamed on the parade.
-
I'm really troubled by the association of violence, alcoholism with West Indian culture generally. The problem isn't this parade, the problem is how people respond to this parade.
This same event takes place in Toronto (which has the largest Carribean carnival on the continent). I know people who religously attend both events and they say the entire city of Toronto opens their arms to guests coming to the events.
And yet, this event has the same problems with the "appearance of violence" as the WIDP.
This article lays out the perceptions of Caribana vs. the realities and suggests that many of the issues are related to the media portrayals of events being linked to Caribana when in actuality they have no relationship.
Similarly, the event that took place on Park Place was the result of a dispute between two neighbors that lived on the same block. There is no indication that either person attended the parade, no evidence that they were involved in any drinking or drug use at the parade, and all evidence points to the likelihood that the same tragic set of events could have occurred on any day, and yet this shooting is being cast as "parade" violence and the culmination of a "violent" event. We need to be asking ourselves why these connections are being made?
-
I'm really troubled by the association of violence, alcoholism with West Indian culture generally. The problem isn't this parade, the problem is how people respond to this parade.
This same event takes place in Toronto (which has the largest Carribean carnival on the continent). I know people who religously attend both events and they say the entire city of Toronto opens their arms to guests coming to the events.
And yet, this event has the same problems with the "appearance of violence" as the WIDP.
This article lays out the perceptions of Caribana vs. the realities and suggests that many of the issues are related to the media portrayals of events being linked to Caribana when in actuality they have no relationship.
Similarly, the event that took place on Park Place was the result of a dispute between two neighbors that lived on the same block. There is no indication that either person attended the parade, no evidence that they were involved in any drinking or drug use at the parade, and all evidence points to the likelihood that the same tragic set of events could have occurred on any day, and yet this shooting is being cast as "parade" violence and the culmination of a "violent" event. We need to be asking ourselves why these connections are being made?
-
I'm really troubled by the association of violence, alcoholism with West Indian culture generally. The problem isn't this parade, the problem is how people respond to this parade.
This same event takes place in Toronto (which has the largest Carribean carnival on the continent). I know people who religously attend both events and they say the entire city of Toronto opens their arms to guests coming to the events.
And yet, this event has the same problems with the "appearance of violence" as the WIDP.
This article lays out the perceptions of Caribana vs. the realities and suggests that many of the issues are related to the media portrayals of events being linked to Caribana when in actuality they have no relationship.
Similarly, the event that took place on Park Place was the result of a dispute between two neighbors that lived on the same block. There is no indication that either person attended the parade, no evidence that they were involved in any drinking or drug use at the parade, and all evidence points to the likelihood that the same tragic set of events could have occurred on any day, and yet this shooting is being cast as "parade" violence and the culmination of a "violent" event. We need to be asking ourselves why these connections are being made?
-
There were certainly lots of shootings in Brooklyn and throughout the city this weekend, and we seem to be having a classic Correlation vs Causation discussion.
whynot_31 said:
The newspapers have a sudden thing for counting.They are now up to 100.
They have made a map:
Note: Although the number of shootings in US cities frequently increase as more ice cream is sold during the year, the two are merely correlated. There is not causation between the two.
-
From a different thread
homeowner said:
Okay, so I took a quick look at that map. If you look at the "Parade Area" as extending from Atlantic to the South, Empire to the North, GAP to the East and Howard to the west (and those are pretty generous boundaries):1) It appears that all weekend there were a total of 11 incidents (10 shots fired, 1 stabbing).
2) Out of the 10 shots fired, one lists no victim.
3) Three of those shootings occurred either Friday or Saturday
4)Five of them occurred after 5pm (the parade started shutting down at 4pm)
5)Only two actually occurred on the parade route (and one of those needs to be double checked as the text lists the location as East New York Avenue and Eastern Parkway, which would not be along the route at all)
In order to get from "correlation" to "causation", we would need to show that
seeing women showing lots of skin
+ listening to loud music
+ eating jerk chicken
-------------------------------------
creates violenceThese are the "sanctioned" parts of the event.
The other things one sees at the parade (alcohol, weed, machismo, violence etc) are unsanctioned.
It is unfortunate that the organizers have to constantly find a way in which to convince the public that the vast majority of the attendees wish to have an event in which the sanctioned events will be prominent, and the unsanctioned events will be effectively discouraged.
They have found a way to do it for 44 years.
______________
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds








