Are you paying the legal rent? Or are you being overcharged?
A bunch of people in my building are now suing the landlord because he's been overcharging for rent. Our building was built in 1920, and we're all covered by rent stabilization. Check this out.
Which apartments are under Rent Stabilization?
In New York City, apartments are under rent stabilization if they are in buildings of six or more units built between February 1, 1947, and December 31, 1973. Tenants in buildings built before February 1, 1947, who moved in after June 30, 1971, are also covered by rent stabilization. A third category of rent stabilized apartments covers buildings with three or more apartments constructed or extensively renovated on or after January 1, 1974 with special tax benefits. Generally, those buildings are only subject to stabilization while the tax benefits continue or, in some cases, until the tenant vacates.
NYS Home and Community Renewal
http://www.nyshcr.org/Rent/about.htm
Comments
-
btw, the folks at 55 Hanson, Rm 702, are helpful. That's the Brooklyn Rent Office, just down across from the back of Atlantic Center shopping mall.
-
and the Metropolitan Council on Housing
-
It is possible those apartments have legally become de-stabilized. If the legal rent went above $2000 or the landlord did extensive renovations for example. Personally I'm not paying the legal rent but the preferential rent. Was that the question you are asking?
-
Thanks for posting, tateinbk. Oh, I'm not asking a question. For instance, I know the landlord is charging $1800 for a studio and the legal rent $1,194. I'm just spreading the news so folks can learn about their rights and protections. If the landlord has been overcharging intentionally, the tenant can sue for 3x's the amount overcharged.
Also, before an apartment can be deregulated, the legal rent must exceed $2,500. Here's more info from the website I listed above on that topic. Cheers!
FYI
What is High-Rent Vacancy Deregulation & High-Rent High-Income Deregulation?For the past two decades, the Rent Laws have provided for the deregulation of apartments based on rents and occupant's incomes reaching certain levels.
The Rent Act of 2011 has modified these levels and now provides for the deregulation of apartments based on a rent level of $2,500 and an annual income level of $200,000, in certain conditions. Previously, the deregulation levels for rent and annual income, had been $2,000 and $175,000, respectively.
High-Rent Vacancy Deregulation
Effective June 24, 2011, if an apartment is vacant and the legal rent reaches $2,500 or more, such apartment qualifies for permanent deregulation and would no longer be subject to either rent stabilization or rent control.
High-Rent/High-Income Deregulation
Effective July 1, 2011, which essentially applies to the 2012 annual application cycle and beyond; in order for DHCR to issue an order of deregulation, the subject apartment must have had a legal rent of $2,500 or more and be occupied by persons whose total annual federal adjusted gross incomes as reported on their New York State Income Tax returns, have been in excess of $200,000 for each of the two preceding calendar years.
-
btw tateinbk, what is "preferential rent?"
And, have you seen the rent history record for your apartment? You can get it at DHCR, and they'll explain what it can mean to you.
-
preferential rent is when the landlord charges LESS then the legal registered rent. Most of my apartments fall into that category.
as an example: I have an apartment that is registered at $2434.20 at the DHCR. However, I am charging much less then that. When registering the apartments online or when signing a lease there is a check box stating that this is a preferential rent and not the legal rent.
You must understand that this is by choice of the landlord. He can always raise the rent to the legal registered rent once the lease expires if he chooses.
-
Landlord, I'm curious: why do you charge less than the legally permissable rents?
-
While I do not know landlord's motivation, many landlords do this for good tenants. If the relationship ever sours, it gives them the ability to impose a huge rent increase to get the tenant out.
They use this method because landlords "almost always" have to give rent stabilized tenants renewals, and this ensures that the tenant remains "nice" as opposed to acting "entitled", and good tenants are hard to find ....you want to hold on to them.
-
Also, once the legal rent goes over the limit ($2500 in this case I guess) the apartment de-stabilizes regardless of what the preferential rate is. In my building my apartment has had a lot of turn-over. At vacancy the rent can go up $200 on top of the regular raises, so if there are frequent changes, the legal rent can easily out pace the rental market. As someone mentioned, every time I re-sign the lease I have to acknowledge that if the economy gets better and the landlord wants to raise it up to the legal rent, he can at the next lease signing. The difference between legal and preferential rates is about $300 a month for me.
I had a wonderful landlord who didn't always raise the rent the allowed amount. Instead of raising it 3% for one year he would do 1.5%. That is a good way to keep your tenants happy. Too bad the place was way to small for me now.
-
Ok, I'm learning a lot here. Thanks. I feel so lucky that my rent has raised only $450 in all of the past 20 years, and that has allowed me to save for the future.
-
I mean $350. (Above.)
-
Are you really living in Park Slope? I'd be curious to know which buildings in PS are still rent stabilized (if you don't want to post your address, PM me, I am genuinely interested.)
-
All buildings in park slope with 6 apartments or more are rent stabilized. However, because of the huge turn-over in apartment rentals, the legal rents can be very high. Every time a tenant moves out the rent is increased on paper by 17% or 20% (this is without any renovations done to the apartment).
Park slope has lots of young people who tend to move often. Those landlords that charge less then registered rent are simply being nice! On average my tenants pay 40% below legal rent. The lowest is paying 110% below registered rent (he is an old high school friend of mine) -
There also situations in which the legal rent exceeds that which that market will bear, hence, the landlord can legally charge it but can not in reality get anyone to pay it.
For example, this ad discusses a building for sale in Bushwick, and states that the current rents are below the HCR legal rents.
http://www.terracrg.com/setups/7_Ridgewood_Place.pdf
A wise buyer does not merely see this ad and conclude s/he can buy the building and simply increase the rents; they also consider the market.
-
It is also possible, through vacancy increases and renovation that the legal rent is higher than the market rent. Most professional landlords will keep records and try to deregulate any vacant apartment so that they can excape the legal nightmare that is NYC rent regulation. The rent levels before a vacant apartment destabilized was increased from $2,000 to $2,500 for apartments in larger buildings in the last round of rent regulation horsetrading in Albany. I lived in a destabilized apartment in Queens in 2006 - 2008 that had a rent of $2,025 and a preferential tenant discount of $275 for a net rent of $1,750 - the landlord was likely trying to keep the records in case Albany increased the rent level, which they did.
Most landlords who offer preferential rents are not being nice, they are charging market rents while preserving the deregulated status of their apartments.
-
Like I said, my landlord is overcharging tenants, and they are suing--successfully. It's easy to have your rent history mailed to you, just contact DHCR. If the history provided by the landlord is questionable, their reps will go over it with you and start a case for you.
If you sue, you can get 3 times the amount you were overcharged if it is proven that the landlord overcharged you intentionally. Check it out.
-
If you sue it shows up on your record that you had a landlord dispute. It does not say if it was your fault or the landlord. In the future, it can make it harder to rent another place with that when the realtor/owner runs the checks. Before suing, people should be aware of that too. It may not seem fair, especially if the landlord is at fault, but is a big reason why people often move and do their homework before signing the next lease.
-
I think I would sue only if I was planning to move to the suburbs with my winnings.
-
tateinbk is 100% correct. sometimes its better to simply walk away. if you sue the landlord it will appear in housing court records and there is no way other landlords would rent to you....so be very careful.
-
Interesting. Thanks for the insights.
The first day I moved in, another tenant told me to check my rent history because she had been overcharged and would be living there free for 11 months because DHCR settled her complaint. After that, she moved but had no problem renting a new apartment. I guess my neighbors are planning to stay awhile. Or, looking at the outcome of being overcharged $600/mo for 2 years: $43,000. Ca-ching!
Yeah, that's downpayment on a nice split level in the 'burbs.
-
QueenJ said:
Or, looking at the outcome of being overcharged $600/mo for 2 years: $43,000. Ca-ching!Yeah, that's downpayment on a nice split level in the 'burbs.
Less attorney's cut (at least one third), less income/capital gains taxes = not nearly enough for a downpayment on a split level in any 'burn within commuting distance of New York City. Added to which you will find that your landlord will hate you and do everything within his/her legal power to make life miserable.
If your neighbors win their lawsuit, your landlord is foolish for trying to get away with breaking the law. NYC rent regulations are quite complex and anyone attempting to deal with them would be well advised to dot all their i's and cross all their t's because you will get caught and it will cost you. Same applies to all those tenants illegally subletting their rent regulated apartments - housing court isn't a pleasant experience for them either.
-
Hahaha, lawyers and capitals gains taxes! Good point.
Though, some tenants in my building have not used lawyers, just done paperwork with DHCR. Others consulted with Brooklyn Housing and Family Services for assistance, though not legal representation.
About the landlord, I think she is foolish, and she may already "hate" her tenants, and that's why she disregards the law. If she attempts harassment like cutting heat or hot water building-wide, she will be fined. We've been through that already. Her threats are meaningless.
-
Something about this just smells like a slimy come up.
For example is that 1800 market rate? A system that prohibits landlords from charging market rates on apts is bogus
-
Bogus, as in counterfeit or a sham? No. It's the law in NYC. While it can seem unfair to landlords, rent stabilization laws protect tenants and helps them hold onto their homes in various economic climates.
And rent control helps seniors on fixed incomes, and because the city has a growing homeless population, these laws also make sense to me.
(Cool The Kid, please help me with my English. What is, "slimy come up?")
-
Thanks for the link--I didn't know it was there. Appreciate it.
-
While the rent stabilization cap was recently raised to $2500, overall, I see the proponents of stricter rent stabilization and more government intervention as slowly losing ground.
-
Also depending on your lease, if you sue and lose, you might have to pay the landlord's legal fees.
-
New York City tenants should be aware that the old rule that you can only challenge the rent of a rent stabilized apartment going back four years has changed because of this decision by the Court of Appeals (the highest court in New York State):
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_07379.htm
That decision affirmed this 2009 decision by the Appellate Division:
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_06653.htm
And, that decision affirmed this 2007 decision by the Supreme Court:
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/pdfs/2007/2007_34184.pdf
According to this article
http://www.tenant.net/alerts/articles/complaining.html "Complaining about a rent overcharge in New York City" filing a rent overcharge complaint with DHCR is not recommended because it is considered pro-landlord.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds