EBBETS FIELD
Comments
-
Err, in my world Ebbets Field was demolished in 1960; I'm a fan of alternate reality fiction, but really....
-
I think MEC is still working on converting Crown St. in to a student plaza. Which would be nice IMO.
I can't imagine they would ever buy the Ebbets appartments.
-
Someone needs to buy it ! U would think mec would want dorms
-
Oh, you mean the Ebbets Field APARTMENTS.
A bit more dorm space than MEC could possibly use, don't you think? Also, if CUNY were (hypothetically) to buy it, what would they do with the current tenants?
-
Bob push them out to east new york
-
Regardless of how one feels about the Ebbets Field houses and its residents, at this point MEC has no ability to "help".
MEC's current quality has put it in jeopardy of losing its accreditation as a BA/BS granting college: http://www.msche.org/institutions_sas_pds.asp?idInstitution=66
MEC has only recently (2009) begun to get the capital funding it needs to upgrade its facilities to a level that it can compete with other 4 year colleges: http://assembly.state.ny.us/Press/20090330h/
So, even if Ebbets Field Housing was for sale (which is sort of a crazy thought), MEC does not have the resources to buy such a large group of buildings, manage it, or fill it with students.
-
Is Ebbets Field co-ops or rentals?
-
Rental with some rent stabilized units about a yr ago the Feds said there was a vicious gang living in there
-
This article makes it sound as if it was built as rental units by a developer funded by the Mitchell Lama program (which allowed low and middle income folks to buy co-ops with low down payments or simply rent units)
Then, the complex was sold once it was no longer beholden to Mitchell-Lama rules.
http://www.brownstoner.com/blog/2011/06/past-and-present-ebbets-field/
It sounds like the buildings were built to be all rental units. So now, I would imagine it is currently a few units that are market rate, but most are rent stabilized.
It isn't run by NYCHA.
...some real estate company does the property management, but I don't have time to find it at the moment.
Lots of apartments!
-
I've see rentals posted on Craigslist for Ebbets in the past.
What's up with the vicious gang? I heard about a woman's door being shot for reporting a drug dealer.... but that seems like it was 5 years ago. The place seems actually super quiet, esspecially given how massive it is. Nice playground in the back as well.
-
On a side note, Trivoli Towers was sold to a developer about a year ago and is under major renovation. It was sold to the same developer who was originally blocked.
-
Readers: Trivoli Towers is the tall bldg located at Crown and Franklin.
Ebbets Field is is the massive building at Bedford and Mongomery
dmiami-
Yea, I remember reading about Trivoli Towers in one of the real estate blogs. Here's press stating how they were able to keep it affordable, and info about the developer: -
I know someone that rents there for about 1800.00 for three bedroom which is a good price but she says it small
-
Sad talk.
Ebbets Field is a shrine to a time when anything was possible. In reality, it is a shrine to any ballpark that was the place you used to go that has simply vanished
Sad talk.
-
This article makes it sound as if it was built as rental units by a developer funded by the Mitchell Lama program (which allowed low and middle income folks to buy co-ops with low down payments or simply rent units)
Fieldbridge Associates bought and managed the property in the late 1980s.Then, the complex was sold once it was no longer beholden to Mitchell-Lama rules.
http://www.brownstoner.com/blog/2011/06/past-and-present-ebbets-field/
This complex only contains rentals. There was an attempt to turn the complex into co-ops, but that ultimately failed.
It sounds like the buildings were built to be all rental units. So now, I would imagine it is currently a few units that are market rate, but most are rent stabilized.
Thank you for pointing this out! This is a common misperception that I would hear about all the time, even in the media. These are not projects![b]It isn't run by NYCHA.
Abba Realty is the rental agent for the proeprty. The complex is subject to DHCR rules while Trivoli Towers, mentioned upthread, is under HPD.
Re: Those people who suggest that Medgar Evers buy the complex and use it for dorms - Do you even realize how large this complex is? There are seven high-rise buildings here, all interconnected. Does the college even have the clientele to fill up the building? Besides, Medgar Evers is (mainly) a commuter school anyway.
The tenants here are aware that there are several issues that need to be addressed, but selling it to convert it to dorm rooms isn't the answer.
-
Thanks thecameralady!
-
Convert to dorms / more classrooms a music center etc
-
Convert to dorms / more classrooms a music center etc
Why? Is there really that much of a demand for more classroom space? Medgar Evers already took over the spot of the former bowling alley and santiation truck parking lot.On the other hand, there is a vacant condo building across from the complex on Sullivan Place that has been standing 3/4 finished for years. The only tenants there are two guard dogs and a bunch of rats-rats which are much more of an eyesore than Ebbets Field.
-
Medgar Evers doesn't have the same student profile as your traditional college. The vast majority of its students are older people (above 24, which is the top end at most 4 yr colleges)working towards a degree while working full-time. These people often have families, and they are not looking to live in dormitories, but rather need affordable long-term housing of the type that is quickly disappearing in the city.
Last time I looked at their profile, they were actually awarding more Associates degrees than 4 year degrees, and a had a high percentage of students that transfered to other CUNY schools after 1 or 2 years.
Ebbets Field doesn't need to be a dorm. What it does need is to be a better version of what it is, affordable housing. This means a management company that provides clean, well-kept housing, properly maintained housing with a responsive maintenance and management team. Tenants that are responsible for maintaining the quality of their homes by discouraging things like litering, vandalism, and illegal activity. A true sense of community and a safe haven for those that reside there. That will only come with a change in attitude and effort by all parties. Otherwise, it will continue to be another high rise that is seen as being dangerous and a threat to the changing community.
-
Low income high rises such as Ebbets Field are perceived as a threat, and/or as an ill-conceived model throughout the country.
By being able to evict people who are convicted of certain crimes, NYCHA has an ability that many management companies lack. NYCHA also does a much better job at keepings its high rise complexes safe than comparable housing authorities throughout the country.
So, while Abba Realty may be managing a complex that houses tenants who are less problematic/needy than the "average NYCHA tenant", they are less able to evict those who make the lives of their neighbors miserable.
As we seem to agree, whether you are in a wealthy community or a poor one, it only takes a few troubled people to destroy the environment. Abba Realty and the Ebbets Fields Tenants Association need assertive and effective means of dealing with this subset.
Without such means, it may become as bad (or worse) than the lowest tier NYCHA projects.
-
As we seem to agree, whether you are in a wealthy community or a poor one, it only takes a few troubled people to destroy the environment. Abba Realty and the Ebbets Fields Tenants Association need assertive and effective means of dealing with this subset.
or just a bike corral.
-
homeowner said:
Ebbets Field doesn't need to be a dorm. What it does need is to be a better version of what it is, affordable housing. This means a management company that provides clean, well-kept housing, properly maintained housing with a responsive maintenance and management team. Tenants that are responsible for maintaining the quality of their homes by discouraging things like litering, vandalism, and illegal activity. A true sense of community and a safe haven for those that reside there. That will only come with a change in attitude and effort by all parties. Otherwise, it will continue to be another high rise that is seen as being dangerous and a threat to the changing community.It's not that the tenants don't care. I've been attending tenants association meetings, and similar complaints come up at the meetings. Some people will post signs advising neighbors to not leave trash in the hallway or to leave the elevators clean. (The last sign was put up in the elevator in my building within the past two days.) Apparently there isn't a critical mass of people who can come together to effect long-reaching change.
It's a low to moderate income high rise subject to rent-stabilization under DHCR.
Low income high rises such as Ebbets Field are perceived as a threat, and/or as an ill-conceived model throughout the country.Without such means, it may become as bad (or worse) than the lowest tier NYCHA projects.
How?
-
trekete-
touche -
TeReKeTe said:
As we seem to agree, whether you are in a wealthy community or a poor one, it only takes a few troubled people to destroy the environment. Abba Realty and the Ebbets Fields Tenants Association need assertive and effective means of dealing with this subset.
or just a bike corral.
Ha. Where per chance does one suggest placing a bike corral?

-
Otherwise, it will continue to be another high rise that is seen as being dangerous and a threat to the changing community.
I'm a little perplexed by this whole thread... do people generally think something is wronge with Ebbets Apts??
(obviously excluding the outrage of every single Brooklyn baseball fan).
-
As I read this thread, it seems only chloeroyal believes something is wrong with Ebbets Apts to the degree that the residents should be displaced.
The other posters seem to want to help the residents of the complex. Several point out that the idea of MEC taking it over is not feasible, and/or not beneficial.
theCameralady-
I am suggesting that it is unfortunate that the mgt of Ebbets Field does not have the same powers as NYCHA, not that the Ebbets Field folks are as needy.I agree that because of things like DHCR regulations and rent stabilization rules, the mgt (sadly) has, in many ways, their hands tied.
-
whynot_31 said:
As I read this thread, it seems only chloeroyal believes something is wrong with Ebbets Apts to the degree that the residents should be displaced.I wonder what specifically is so wrong with the complex that would merit it being demolished.
I think that demolishing the complex would be impractical due to the sheer size of the complex (over 1300 units). The proposed replacements seem to be just as impractical. Besides, where are all the current residents supposed to go?
-
I have no idea.
However, I do find it interesting that people dislike Ebbets Field, and have begun to conclude that their feelings stem from failing to differentiate it from NYCHA complexes.
Those who are familiar with NYCHA, know that many (but not ALL) of the complexes' residents are some of the poorest members of our society: Those with disabilities, the aged, victims of domestic violence, formerly homeless people, etc.
...Folks who have been denied educational opportunities and/or subsisted in poverty and violent environments for literally generations. For many, SSI/SSD, public assistance, and SNAP are lifelines.
In contrast, the residents of Ebbets field are comparatively stable: Most are able to secure work to the degree that they are able to pay the rent on their rent stabilized units.
While the complex wrestles with crime and the break down of community, the problems are not as severe as many NYCHA complexes. For example, it seems a greater number of "cautious mothers" allow their children play in the play ground adjacent to Ebbets Field, while the playground adjacent to Albany Houses (located off Kingston in N Crown Heights) is mostly deserted.
The police seem to take a similar view. This article points out that while the racial demographics of N Crown Heights and S Crown Heights are similar, the number of stop and frisks is dramatically lower in S Crown Heights.
While I am not a big fan of stop and frisk, it is as if the police and their commanders can tell the difference between the various types of "black people" as related to crime and social problems, when other people (such as the author of the article) either can not, or don't bother to dig deeper.
-
Ebbets Field (the stadium) would have been 100 years old this month. Here is a short article about the stadium and the housing...
http://ephemeralnewyork.wordpress.com/2013/04/10/what-took-the-place-of-ebbets-field-after-1957/
-
At least the blurb didn't refer to it as a public housing project.
All seven buildings in the complex are more than 20 stories tall, despite what the author wrote. Overall though, this blurb is innocuous.

Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds



