This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

The Great Googa Mooga - Page 2 — Brooklynian

The Great Googa Mooga

2»

Comments

  • Here we go:


  • Hamilton: If you start practicing now, you too can have a band playing at Googa Mooga next year. By the way, an article in today's N.Y. Times says the park receives $75,000 from the concert promoters and the promoters pay the $325,000 in police costs, a real bargain compared to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.

  • The constant helicopter presence is pretty annoying.

  • OpossumQueen said:

    The constant helicopter presence is pretty annoying.

    I agree. It's very annoying.

  • The Great Googa Mooga has been canceled!

  • I hope the park still gets the full $75k.

    Those seeking refunds for beer and wine tickets, etc should find out the details here:

    https://www.facebook.com/#!/googamooga?directed_target_id=0

  • These Googa Mooga people need to get their act together. If I remember correctly, last year people were pissed because the event was too crowded, and vendors ran out of food and drinks.

    This year, despite Googa Mooga's assertion of "Rain or Shine" yesterday was canceled because of rain.

    I'm sure the event contract allowed for NYC Parks to close the park in the event of weather, I'm not questioning the decision to cancel. It was understandable given the damage that could have been done to the park, but, it does seem misleading to sell tickets "rain or shine," cancel the event because of the rain, and then refuse refunds.

    If the organizers refused refunds, I hope all the money goes to the park.

  • Ooh, i was waiting for it though :(

  • As far as I've heard, and I'm not really following it, there was never any doubt that people who paid for VIP whatever would be reimbursed. The rest of the public were there with free event tix so we can't complain and I am very glad they did cancel it. Can you imaging the holy hell that park would look like if all those people were allowed to party in that weather? Woodstock man, lol!


  • I roamed the whole area this morning during off-leash. Because of the (mild, but present) hills, the damage is invisible from some areas. I skirted part of it yesterday and thought the damage wasn't bad until I walked all around today.

    The worst patch last year wasn't too bad, but parallel to it is an even worse mud pit than last year. At part of it there were tire ruts so deep that when my 50lb dog stood in them, the water came up to his stomach.

    The trash isn't too bad, but there were a lot of bones scattered around (I try not to freak out over my dog eating bones, but a friend's dog died a few weeks ago from a bone cutting her esophagus so they are a danger to dogs). One large area has a very strong smell of rotten meat though my dog found no obvious piles to dine on.

    The bottom of Look Out Hill near the peninsula has an impressive mud pit as well.

    Sadly, its seems a little worse than last year even though they were there less time. Hopefully if the park keeps allowing this, Superfly has to pay to re-sod instead of reseeding.

  • Why is it that the organizers feel the need to do this in such a green bucolic environment? Do the people who enjoy participating in this kind of festival really get a lot of 'extra enjoyment' out of this type of location as opposed to, say, the area in and around the band shell which is already largely cement covered? That area is still surrounded by green, and still in the park to provide the 'enjoyment of the outdoors' factor. This type of event in this kind of environment saddens me and angers me so much and I can't truly understand the why.

  • OQ-

    This article in today's NYT again talked about the economics involved. It paints the Prospect Park Alliance and being in the position of "begging":

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/nyregion/reducing-some-city-parks-to-the-status-of-beggars.html?_r=0

    However, when you merely beg, you don't have to let the donor touch you. This is a clear case of prostitution.

    As with most situations, the question is "Did she realistically have another way to make ends meet?".

  • This article discusses the challenges of making the parks equally nice:

    http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20130916/OPINION/130919913

  • Oct 3, 2013: For better or worse, the festival will not be returning to Prospect Park again.

    source: http://awalkintheparknyc.blogspot.com/2013/10/googa-mooga-not-returning-to-prospect.html

    Let's all sing along...

    Good bye to you!


  • So happy that Googa Mooga is not returning. The damage done to the park was not worth the small amount of money raised.

  • Amen. It's not just about the damage but the amount of time so much of the park (and so many paths) were closed to the public.

  • I remain interested in seeing their next attempt to raise money for the park.

    ...googa mooga clearly wasn't a fit.

    Will the Parks Alliance be able to design a fundraiser that raises enough $, YET DOES NOT HAVE the undesirable side effects?

  • It seems like they've been doing several money raising gala type events lately. I know there's a big ticket one coming up--tickets start at $450 a person.

Sign In or Register to comment.