This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

How gay are you? - Page 2 — Brooklynian

How gay are you?

2»

Comments

  • the man i am dating took this test; he is gayer than i am. however, unlike most of my previous boyfriends i am confident that he is not gay.

    and i agree with drj about the hair thing. we both have long hair.
  • BP, you're not gay. Just take my word for it.

    Q, you just outed yourself as celibate. As suggested above, celibacy reduces gayness. Sorry . . .
  • I was 33%, then I changed my answer to the "oil change" question and became 3% more butch = 36% gay

    The real question here is Who on the board owns leather pants??
    Come on, fess up!
  • I have suede pants ...
  • i promise to be more gay on my next test. scout's honor O:)
  • Go buy some assless chaps
    That'll work
  • pitu, trust me, i never thought i was gay. i just think that women can be beautiful and beautiful, as i am. ;-)

    and i own suede pants
  • Mamacita wrote: Go buy some assless chaps
    That'll work
    if by "buy" you mean "get out of storage". yes. even as i type...
  • Has anyone tried the "Ru a sexpert" , quiz on that same website?

    I so smart. 8)

    Congratulations em, you've won the 'the golden g-string' award with a score of 90%.

    Hey smarty pants, you've got the skills and the brains to keep yourself safe and healthy. Still there's no harm in perfecting your knowledge.
  • Go buy some assless chaps
    That'll work
    This brings up the same old question that has plagued great philosophers for millenia. Is there actually such a thing as assed chaps?
  • BigGuy wrote:
    Go buy some assless chaps
    That'll work
    This brings up the same old question that has plagued great philosophers for millenia. Is there actually such a thing as assed chaps?
    nah. cuz then they wouldn't be chaps

    --like a donut with its hole filled
    it would be something else.
    then it is a Zeppole! :wink:
  • I'd like to point out for the record that I'm only 30% interested in chaps of any kind.
  • 46%. And no, I don't own leather pants.

    So here's my question: Is it more gay to prefer giving someone an orgasm, or having one? Presumably orgasms are valued by people on both ends of the Kinsey scale...
  • leather pants + leopard print anything = instant sex
  • instant sex does not imply gay sex.
  • sprite wrote: 46%. And no, I don't own leather pants.

    So here's my question: Is it more gay to prefer giving someone an orgasm, or having one? Presumably orgasms are valued by people on both ends of the Kinsey scale...
    Girl don't lie , we hold it against you. :lol:

    I think that in the female question , if you answered giving rather than receiving , it would up your gay percentage.

    For the male test takers , if they said receiving rather than giving, it would up their gay percentage.

    Right? Cuz guys "give it" , and girls "receive it".(edit- "take it",sounds selfish.)

    OMG , I don't know. :oops:
  • Oooo oooo! What about leather leopard print pants??
  • brooklynpotter wrote: instant sex does not imply gay sex.
    you're the one making the implication :P
    banned for projecting!
  • I are 26% gay. Gotta think head shaving is atl east 5% of that. Plus I like The Pet Shop Boys, but there was no question about that...
  • BigGuy wrote: Oooo oooo! What about leather leopard print pants??
    a metal head
    image
  • I agree: there was some kinda sex happening within a few hrs of that picture. Thank god youtube didn't exist...
  • Drano wrote: I are 26% gay. Gotta think head shaving is atl east 5% of that. Plus I like The Pet Shop Boys, but there was no question about that...
    right. i'm a total smiths-head
    that should make me minimum 33% gay...
  • i like a lot of "chick" music: alannis, jonatha brooks, joni, sheryl crow, emmylou, alison krauss, old bonnie raitt, old indigo girls, etc.
  • doublediamond wrote: 43%. Meh.
    Well, that proves that the test is bunk... I'd say that you're 30% meh, tops. :twisted:
  • WhyFi wrote:
    Well, that proves that the test is bunk... I'd say that you're 30% meh, tops. :twisted:
    hahahahahaa!!!!
  • 46%. When that meter didn't stop loading I thought I was in trouble. But it was just showing how much it had calculated the results, not the actual result.
Sign In or Register to comment.