This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Gentriconfrontation (racist style) and a warning. - Page 2 — Brooklynian

Gentriconfrontation (racist style) and a warning.

2

Comments

  • Interesting thread. I find the most operable phrase from a psycho-social standpoint is:

    "That's three weeks without, so we were pretty much wrapped up in each other"

    I have subjected this phenomena to sophisticted visumotor response criteria and have found that prolonged sexual inactivity leads to severe mental reasoning impairment and could significantlycolor judgement in situations with high stress factors.

    Based on this, I advise leaving the old lady alone for now.
  • Livetotravel wrote: Interesting thread. I find the most operable phrase from a psycho-social standpoint is:

    "That's three weeks without, so we were pretty much wrapped up in each other"

    I have subjected this phenomena to sophisticted visumotor response criteria and have found that prolonged sexual inactivity leads to severe mental reasoning impairment and could significantlycolor judgement in situations with high stress factors.

    Based on this, I advise leaving the old lady alone for now.
    No doubt. That's why the story was so long winded; I didn't want to be entirely subjective.

    I saw thw woman again yesterday, as I was walking back in the same direction in the original incident. She was-- of course-- weeding something in her yard. I had to wait for the light, and I stared at her the entire time that I stood, as i crossed, and even back over my shoulder as I passed, to see if she'd look up or acknowledge me or even (heaven forfend) apologize. Nothing. I'm sure she noticed, though.

    Whatever. She's dead to me now.
  • pensodyssey wrote: Whatever. She's dead to me now.
    you should, per stacey, wish crotchrot upon her.
  • The old lady sounds like she had one too many hits of crack that day.

    Must you keep saying "my special lady." ???


    It sounds somehow creepy
  • always remember the adage: "we don't garden in your toilet, please don't pee in our garden."


    that is quite a mural on the side of the house. a little slice of easter island in pro ho.
  • bill c wrote: always remember the adage: "we don't garden in your toilet, please don't pee in our garden."


    that is quite a mural on the side of the house. a little slice of easter island in pro ho.
    I do feel the need to point out that the lady in question has a couple toilets on her stairs with plantings in them. For what that's worth.
  • excellent point. that probably is the source of the entire misunderstanding. next time use the toilet.
  • :lol: HAHA good one, Bill :lol:
  • So what, you got yelled at. Big deal. This is New York and that kind of thing happens all the time. You people let your dogs urinate and defecate on trees, the soil the trees are planted in, and on peoples' homes and gardens. I see it all of the time. Maybe if you stuck to hydrants and parking sign posts that wouldn't happen to you. Assault? My goodness.
  • liftandcut wrote: So what, you got yelled at. Big deal. This is New York and that kind of thing happens all the time. You people let your dogs urinate and defecate on trees, the soil the trees are planted in, and on peoples' homes and gardens. I see it all of the time. Maybe if you stuck to hydrants and parking sign posts that wouldn't happen to you. Assault? My goodness.
    He was pretty clear that he is not one of the people who let's their dogs urinate and defecate on other people's property. Which "you people" are you talking about?
  • :x "you people"?!?!?

    hate to tell ya, Lift, but there are plenty of responsible dog owners out there. i curb mine, never let them do their business on other folks' property, and ALWAYS clean up.

    don't be such a generalist, buddy, cuz it ain't nice.
  • If you know you don't do that with your dog, then relax. I don't know you personally, so I obviously can't accuse you specifically. But I see people around my block letting their dogs spray everywhere. The urine is the biggest problem because it destroys trees and vegetation. A dog can rust out the base of a lampost in one year if it urinates on it two or three times a day.

    Your homeboy Odyssey said he let his dog walk around on and sniff the crazy lady's dirt, so I'd say she was justified in having some kind of reaction. Dogs probably hit her plants everyday, because their owners see nothing wrong with the dogs peeing on them. That's what I'm talking about.

    As far as the woman making the slant eye statement and violent threats, she's probably nuts so let it slide. Again, this is New York City, after all.
  • liftandcut wrote: A dog can rust out the base of a lampost in one year if it urinates on it two or three times a year.
    Okay, even tho you probably meant two or three times a day (or a week) I'd love to know where this fascinating statistic came from.

    'Cause I don't notice the city having to replace the bases of lamp posts every year.
  • Yes, two or three times a day. I wrote that because I've seen it happen. Lampost bases get replaced all the time. On the block I grew up on in the West Village, there were a ton of dogs. Each dog, including mine, held down his or her lampost like the military, and then hit every other post on the block. What started to hapen was that lampost bases started to corrode because owners were not encouraging their dogs to skip the posts. It was really ridiculous, but I have seen it first hand. That being said, it's still better for dogs to hit the hydrants and posts than trees, planters, and other plants. My main point is that I see so many owners allowing their dogs to urinate on trees and soil and if the fluid is caustic enough to do in a post, imagine how that affects the trees.
  • Mature trees don't depend on rainfall or any other surface moisture - they have tap roots that reach down deep to access underground water supplies. How else could these huge oaks, maples and london planes survive with a root system completely covered by cement?

    Also, if dog piss was the only thing that caused the posts to crumble (doubtable), it was most likely the salt content that caused oxidation - trees don't have the problem of getting rusty.
  • WhyFi wrote:
    Also, if dog piss was the only thing that caused the posts to crumble (doubtable), it was most likely the salt content that caused oxidation
    Not just the salt content; urine is usually slightly acidic, and I'd guess the action of microbes and air on the organic components will tend to drop the pH further, increasing the rate of corrosion. We should do a controlled study: two posts, a dog, and some saline. Make that three: the third gets placebo. Not sure how to make it double-blind though -- that could get messy.
  • Agree that some dog owners leave something to be desired in the consideration department - nobody likes making their way through various dog excretions - however I thought it was pretty clear that pensodyssey was not in the habit of letting his dog wander into the green, and also that he and his [lady] friend tried to apologize immediately.

    C'mon. Everybody makes a mistake now and then. Certainly the action didn't merit the response they got!
  • if you walk down this block you will see that it is very lovely and I commend her for making it greener but the owner has to realized that she has encroached on the public walking space. You cannot walk by 2 abreast because there is no room. If she wants to complain she should complain to the people who leave the mess behind.

    And no one, whether they live in NY or not, should not be subjected to threats, offensive statements nor racial epithets - period.
  • Wow. You guys are all so serious. Guess I'll just hang with the first graders. Cheers!
  • I love it when you people do a poor job of making a point, you get shot down, and then you fall back on weak personal attacks. Too funny.
  • liftandcut wrote: Wow. You guys are all so serious. Guess I'll just hang with the first graders. Cheers!
    If you can't tell serious from wry'n'dry, first graders might be more your style.
  • WhyFi wrote: I love it when you people do a poor job of making a point, you get shot down, and then you fall back on weak personal attacks. Too funny.
    I love it most of all when you people make broad sweeping generalizations.

  • I love it when you people do a poor job of making a point, you get shot down, and then you fall back on weak personal attacks. Too funny.
    You people? You mean me. Why not just write that instead of "you people?" Weak personal attacks? Personal! Maybe I missed something. At what point did anybody levy an attack upon you? "Weak personal attacks" is funny, though.
  • ahem.
    liftandcut wrote: You people let your dogs urinate and defecate on trees, the soil the trees are planted in, and on peoples' homes and gardens.
    (emphasis added)
  • liftandcut wrote: So what, you got yelled at. Big deal. This is New York and that kind of thing happens all the time. You people let your dogs urinate and defecate on trees, the soil the trees are planted in, and on peoples' homes and gardens. I see it all of the time. Maybe if you stuck to hydrants and parking sign posts that wouldn't happen to you. Assault? My goodness.
    I said in the original post I understood the reason for her anger.

    I mentioned assault as a way to get her to go away.

    Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing. Try it some time.
  • In Brooklyn, the traditional pronunciation is "youz people." Perhaps this is falling out of style.
  • Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing. Try it some time.

    You mean like SRA? Okay, I'll try Reading for Understanding C. Zowie!
  • pensodyssey wrote: I really wanted to call 911 and say, "Hello. I am currently being assaulted,"

    african american
  • Subject: Re: Gentriconfrontation (racist style) and a warning.

    This post is rated RC-11 for odd language.

    I may be wrong, but, upon revisiting my reading comprehension workbooks, I think I spotted a few irrelevancies, and a string of almost coquettish skirtings around the title of "Girlfiend."

    Would you mind checking my work and getting back to me?


    pensodyssey wrote:

    This post is rated pg-17 for strong language.

    I went on a trip on August 9th.

    While I was gone,

    my special lady

    her mother in Singapore;

    I returned on the 16th

    my lady friend didn't get back until last Friday.

    That's three weeks without,

    we were pretty much wrapped up in each other

    around 9.30.

    my lady friend points out the house across the street.

    "Yeah, that dog is evil."

    our dog

    She climbed onto the little mound

    poop

    numbers one or two,

    My special lady

    she's having none of it.

    aggresively

    my girl.

    I couldn't hope to reproduce if I wanted

    threaenting

    mouths agape.

    my lady friend

    my special lady friend,

    her little secret garden.

    I turned to my special lady

    "I think this is assault"

    my girl

    So the point of this post is to issue a general warning about this person.
  • Subject: Re: Gentriconfrontation (racist style) and a warning.

    pensodyssey wrote: My girlfriend, before we cross, mentions that she always has trouble here because the owner(s) have a little shhtzu that always gives her dog trouble when they pass.
Sign In or Register to comment.