Permit Parking in the Slope?
This proposal was debated at Brownstoner the other day, but I don't think we've discussed it yet here. The idea (though the details are still up in the air) is to limit parking on residential streets to residents of a neighborhood who pay a set fee for a permit. The Daily News had a story:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/06/12/2007-06-12_untitled__congest12m-1.html
I'm in favor of it (also in favor of congestion pricing) but I'll admit it's out of self-interest as well as principle. I have a car and some disposable income, and besides the revenue for the city I'd personally rather pay for the convenience of (somewhat) easier parking. I think it's fair that I should pay extra for the luxury of keeping a car in a city. And I wouldn't mind if less car traffic meant losing a few boutiques and fancy restaurants; I think the neighborhood and foot and subway traffic could still suport plenty of local business here.
Of course, if I lived in another neighborhood and drove to the Slope frequently to shop and go out, I'm sure I'd find a deeply-held principle on which to oppose this. What say you?
(I'd make this a poll, but I'm too lazy to figure out how to do that properly.)
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/06/12/2007-06-12_untitled__congest12m-1.html
I'm in favor of it (also in favor of congestion pricing) but I'll admit it's out of self-interest as well as principle. I have a car and some disposable income, and besides the revenue for the city I'd personally rather pay for the convenience of (somewhat) easier parking. I think it's fair that I should pay extra for the luxury of keeping a car in a city. And I wouldn't mind if less car traffic meant losing a few boutiques and fancy restaurants; I think the neighborhood and foot and subway traffic could still suport plenty of local business here.
Of course, if I lived in another neighborhood and drove to the Slope frequently to shop and go out, I'm sure I'd find a deeply-held principle on which to oppose this. What say you?
(I'd make this a poll, but I'm too lazy to figure out how to do that properly.)
Comments
-
i don't have a car, but i did when i lived in chicago. it worked pretty well there -- permits were about $25 and permit holders could buy single day paper permits for visiting friends at something like $2 a dozen. i never heard any complaints about having to buy the permit; people were glad to have a better chance at finding parking near their houses. it didn't solve all the parking problems, but it was better than nothing.
in every zone, there were exempt streets -- generally the main streets, where there were businesses -- so it wasn't impossible to find unzoned parking, just harder. and not everywhere was zoned; only some crowded/busy neighborhoods.
the only people it REALLY sucked for were those who lived very close to a border between two zones, or just on the unzoned side of the line. (you had to come in to city hall with your lease.) parking at night was awful for them, because half the nearby streets were off limits.
(one accidentally cool thing was that all the permits looked very much alike -- the numbers were perforations rather than printed -- so you could pretty much get away with parking in any zone as long as you had a permit for somewhere, counting on the meter maids to just glance for the correct color decal and not peer down at the specific number. i never got a ticket that way, anyhow.) -
What about people who work in Park Slope? Can they get the permits? And, on the subject of shopping which you brought up, you wouldn't as a community want to discourage consumers from coming into the neighborhood to buy clothes, groceries, go to the restaurants and bars, etc. How would the proposal get around that?
-
escap wrote: What about people who work in Park Slope? Can they get the permits? And, on the subject of shopping which you brought up, you wouldn't as a community want to discourage consumers from coming into the neighborhood to buy clothes, groceries, go to the restaurants and bars, etc. How would the proposal get around that?
one possibility is making the permit only be for the evening hours -- say, 7pm-8am.
of course, it's not such a bad idea to encourage those who can use public transit to get to work to do so. (in chicago, i worked in a zone that i didn't have the permit for, and i was much more likely to take the el or bike on days when our work parking lot was off limits. it was pure laziness to have ever driven, but with free parking available, i did it all the time.) -
Great topic! I've often wondered how this plays out in other cities.
At first glance, I'm totally for it.you wouldn't as a community want to discourage consumers
I, as a community, would LOVE to discourage people driving here for girlie shops and fancy food and idiotic frat boy bars.
(Okay, that last group takes taxis or the train.)
But seriously, as a resident, I don't want to host a playground. I hate the NYC that is made of restaurants and shops to the exclusion of other kinds of biz (and non-biz.) -
i also think it's a great idea, and am willing to entertain the thought of making it only evening hours. i also like the notion of being able to purchase guest passes, too.
we have a decent amount of public transportation in the slope; i wish more people would use it! -
Jumping on board for this topic, even though I live in CH. Hoping the mods will "xp" this thread, as I've discussed/ranted this with my wife for years.
I was going to sort of rant about parking and my support of resident-passes, because Lord knows it pisses me to always have to park blocks from my house late at night because some yahoo's parked in front of my house...I mean its my house, shouldn't I be able to park there! Of course this is an incredibly unfair and childish reaction on my part, as I live in a city, if I wanted private parking I'd live elsewhere.
So in cooler reflection, I like the resident-parking being in effect only in evenings. Residents park more in less near their house, overnight guests and passserbys park a few blocks away on busier well-trafficked main drags. During the day park anywhere you can, but you have to beat it come dinner time. Plan's a winner!
Oh, but I would definitely add that only registered NY State and city residents get the passes. All those jerks who live and work in the city, but have their cars registered under their mom's name in South Carolina or what not to avoid paying insurance or avoiding shild support...y'all can all go dangle! (Seriously, North & South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, are those states' highways empty, because they're all driving in Brooklyn). -
As someone who doesn't own a car, I also favor it; I don't think it's unreasonable to reserve parking in the area for people who actually live here. I think it would make sense to limit it to evening hours, though. I'd also start those hours a little later on Friday and Saturday nights, since many people here actually use their cars on weekends anyway. If someone wants to drive over for dinner at 7 on Saturday, I don't see any problem with that as long as they're gone by, say, ten.
-
sprite wrote: If someone wants to drive over for dinner at 7 on Saturday, I don't see any problem with that as long as they're gone by, say, ten.
How sporting of you!
-
Subject: me too, me too
I'm in favor of the permits...it will be interesting to see how many out-of-state plates remain if it goes in effect. -
I think it's an interesting idea, but I would definitely say that workers in the area should be eligible to buy the permits. It would be difficult, if not impossible, for many commuters to PS to make it there from other parts of Brooklyn via public transportation.
Also, to Pitu, you may be a member of the community, but you are not the community. Small and large business owners are also part of the community, and as much as I understand that your aversion to turning your hood into a 'playground' for consumers, businesses deserve a vote on this as well, and I doubt they'd support it. Also, as much as you may not like it, those who flock to 7th and 5th avenues to shop and eat bring in capital that keeps those areas lively and diverse for area residents, is recycled by the vendors into all sorts of other area projects and investments, and provides a tax base that is used to fund schools, street cleaning, police, fire stations, parks, and all kinds of other local public services. So, the community as a whole most definitely does benefit by having consumers come into the area and spend their money.
Perhaps a compromise could be reached whereby overnight parking is for residents only but daytime parking is freely available, with metered parking on the avenues to ensure turnover? That's my suggestion.
Oh, also: What would the $ from the fees be used for? And wouldn't it amount to an added tax on PS residents? Would low income residents be given some kind of subsidy or would they just be shit out of luck? -
escap. I was poking fun at your sentence structure.
pitu wrote:
I, as a community, would LOVE to discourage (snip)
[quote=escap]
you wouldn't as a community want to discourage consumers -
pitu wrote: escap. I was poking fun at your sentence structure.
I, as a community, would LOVE to discourage people
[quote=pitu]
[quote=escap]
you wouldn't as a community want to discourage consumers
Ah, touche. But I was using the plural "you". Perhaps I should have said 'y'all'?
No, I guess that still wouldn't work. :? -
I think this is almost going to be a necessity once congestion pricing goes into effect in Manhattan, and Atlantic yards construction begins. Also, the influx of suburban trust funders with cars in tow is squeezing out many traditional slopers who may have never owned a car. Without permits, residents of the slope and surrounding areas—especially north slope—with have a lot of fun finding parking.
-
escap wrote: Perhaps a compromise could be reached whereby overnight parking is for residents only but daytime parking is freely available, with metered parking on the avenues to ensure turnover? That's my suggestion.
That seems to be the emerging consensus. Well, on this board anyway. As for metered parking on the avenues, one further suggestion I've heard is to raise the metered rates, since it's currently so much cheaper than parking in a garage. I think that makes sense too (for the same reason I'm willing to pay to drive into Manhattan)--raise it enough that maybe you'll take the bus or subway if you have that option. And if not... if you're driving to PS to eat at Stone Park or shop at Matter, you ought to be able to pony up a few bucks for parking.escap wrote: Oh, also: What would the $ from the fees be used for? And wouldn't it amount to an added tax on PS residents? Would low income residents be given some kind of subsidy or would they just be shit out of luck?
Yes, it would be an extra tax, mostly on people like me who own cars who don't strictly need to. As for the subsidy [Putting on my heartless millionaire top hat], why? How unfortunate are you if you own a car and pay for insurance on it, in a neighborhood served by several subway lines? Maybe you could make that argument in far-outlying parts of the boroughs, but I gotta think there are better ways to subsidize low-income people in Park Slope. -
LVP, I agree. A subsidy would be silly, but if this were to happen it's an easy bet to predict mass grumbling from people who don't support the plan but are essentially forced to cough up the dough despite their opposition, since they wouldn't be able to park otherwise.
-
I'm completely against it. This may work fine in other cities, but NYC is different. It basically amounts to sanctioning, and encouraging, people to own cars in the city by making it easier for them to park on their own block.
It will also necessitate dictating which neighborhoods deserve permit parking, and in a diverse city like New York, that's just simply unfair. Brownsville won't have permit parking, but surely Cobble Hill will. Therefore, someone in Brownsville can drive to visit relatives in Morrisania and leave their car on the street overnight, but if they dare drive into precious Carroll Gardens, they'll get a ticket that would amount to two weeks pay.
If the city wants to make money from car ownership, they should just charge people 300/yr for a citywide permit to park on residential streets--anyone else who parks there for more than three hours would be subject to a ticket. This would also have the benefit of going after those of us who delay getting a NY license/registration to avoid insurance premiums, as you'd have to be a NY resident to get the parking permit. -
I'm against it as well. As someone who rides the train to work everyday I want to know where all of these car people who cannot drive or park are going to go? Trains into NYC are packed from 7am until after 9am. I get on the 4 at the second stop in Brooklyn and rarely is a seat available in the morning. Same is true for the evening commute. Trains start to fill up at 2:30 when kids get out of school and they stay full until late at night. I've been on the train at 11pm and it was standing room only all the way home.
Are the car drivers unnaturally thin? Invisible? Able to squeeze their bodies into small spaces? Cause if they aren't there are going to be a whole lot of miserable people.
Congestion pricing and permit parking are going to have the following results:
1) Overcrowded mass transit systems
2) Extention of rush hour conditions for mass transit (including buses)
As much as folks here trumpet biking as alternative transportation, NYC weather means that bikes are not a real alternative for at least 6 months out of the year. -
We had permit parking in San Francisco. 2 hour parking without a permit. Enforcement officiers would come around a mark your tires and then come by 2 hours later and if your car hadn't moved you got a ticket.
Metered parking only works to s certain extent, there are always people the feed the meter. 2 hour parking is 2 hour parking, your supposed to move the car and feeding the meter is illegal -
Permits.
That means a whole 'nother city bureaucracy to administer and enforce the permits. More of your tax dollars at work, because the fees charged will never pay for the people who have to run the bureaucracy.
Yeah, right, Some underpaid traffic enforcement agent is going to run around with a white chalk and mark tires.
We Brooklynites get people with solvent to wipe the chalk off, like we get people to feed the meters.
I'm agin' it. -
I live in Park Slope and own a car. I am strongly in favor of the resident parking permit idea. With all apologies to business owners in the neighborhood who think this idea is bad for their business I say too bad. I have seen this system work in other urban areas and I think it would be more of a benefit than not for the entire community.
-
I'm of the belief that the city isn't a gated community where only those who live in the neighborhood have rights to the surrounding streets.
We had permit parking in Jersey City where we were assigned zones and it was a nightmare to be restricted like that. At night, I would circle and circle and see spots in a different zone that I couldn't leave my car parked during the day in. The only benefit I saw to the permits was to restrict commuters from the suburbs who work in the city from parking for free on the city streets. I don't think that's an issue in PS.
If they want to charge a fee to park, then it should be a fee that anyone willing to pay to park there should pay, not based on resident/neighborhood status.
And yes, a lot of bureaucracy to deal with, like finding time during your work hours to go to the parking division, show proof of residency, fill out forms and pay. Every year. -
So the question is how many of those cars parked on the streets of Park Slope belong to people that don't live here?
-
Nah, people live here. Some even have their cars registered here.
But people have homes in other states [worst offender: Vermont]
Or family members in other states where they register their cars [worst offenders ... the commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia]
Or family members in other NY counties where insurance is much cheaper [any county in NY besides the 5 boroughs] -
dw438 wrote: Nah, people live here. Some even have their cars registered here.
If that's the problem you want solved then there's already a way to do it without permit parking. Go to your next precinct council meeting and tell the commander that you want cars that are unregistered in New York to be ticketed. According to DMV you have to register a car within something like 30 days of moving into the State. They can ticket and then its up to the owner to prove that they don't live in New York, that it isn't their primary residence and that they were just visiting on the day in question.
But people have homes in other states [worst offender: Vermont]
Or family members in other states where they register their cars [worst offenders ... the commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia]
Or family members in other NY counties where insurance is much cheaper [any county in NY besides the 5 boroughs]
However, I guarantee this will not happen. Because the first time some Pulitzer Prize winner gets a ticket on his Subaru wagon that he's got registered at his second home or his parents place, the blogosphere will start burning up with tales of woe and "don't the cops have better things to do..."Section 250 (5) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law defines the term "resident." The law defines a resident as a person who lives in NYS with the intent to make NYS a "fixed and permanent" place to live. To live in a house, a home, an apartment, a room or other similar place in NYS for 90 days is considered "presumptive evidence" that you are a resident of NYS. A police officer can use this evidence as the reason to issue a traffic ticket if you drive in NYS without a driver license or vehicle registration issued by NYS.
[/url]
A judge considers the law and the evidence of your intent and decides if you are a resident of NYS. For example, if you pay taxes or your children attend school in another state, a judge considers these facts to decide if your intent is to make NYS a "fixed and permanent" residence. The DMV will not decide if you are a resident of NYS, if you must get a NYS driver license, or if you must register your vehicle in NYS.
According to this law, students from other states or from other nations who attend school in NYS are normally not considered residents of NYS. -
When I lived in DC, they did have permit parking and it helped if you were looking for a parking space during the day. I believe if you didn't have a permit, if you were parked for more than two hours you could get a ticket. However, after 6:00 pm, the permit was not required (they changed that to 8:30 now) and on weekends it wasn't a requirement. That helped, but I lived in Adams Morgan, which has tons of restaurants so on evenings and weekends, you couldn't move your car or you'd be parking very far away in the sketchy neighborhoods where the suburbanites didn't go anyway.
Then the problem was, like doublediamond says, you'd end up in a different zone and have to move your car back.
If they choose to do this, they should examine models that are really effective. I didn't feel the one in DC was too effective, except during the day to keep commuters from driving into the city to park for free. I don't think the Slope would face the same problem. For evenings and weekends, the restrictions didn't help at all, other than to generate fees for the city because each parking permit cost $15. Which kind of stinks that the people who live in an area are the ones who have to pay to park there!
Here's a summary brochure of DC's residential parking plan.
http://ddot.dc.gov/ddot/frames.asp?doc=/ddot/lib/ddot/services/rpp/rpp_brochure.pdf -
GiveMeCandy wrote: Therefore, someone in Brownsville can drive to visit relatives in Morrisania and leave their car on the street overnight, but if they dare drive into precious Carroll Gardens, they'll get a ticket that would amount to two weeks pay.
this was easily solved in chicago with the single-use permits i mentioned earlier. residents could purchase books of them very cheaply -- like $2/dozen -- and give them to overnight guests. it worked great.
i'm not sure how this worked in chicago, but you could make it possible for residents who did not own cars and did not need full time permits to still purchase the single use ones for an occasional need -- like if they rented a car or had visitors -- without haveing to pay for the full time permit. -
I have a suggestion for people who really want parking and are willing to pay for it: put it in a garage. Problem solved.
-
I'd like a nearby garage (does Methodist's Kinney take monthly passes? Their staff obviously doesn't use it.) I'm tired of fighting for parking with hospital, St. Savior, John Jay and park goers. I'll be damned if I'm going to walk to Union to get my car regularly. I don't know how permit parking works - I've seen it in LA but I don't know the details. Source from anyone?
-
Also, can we issue permits for all of the strollers that are parked in the first floor of my building? It seems to be that the hallway is the de facto parking space for all of those vehicles. 8-[
-
sweet tea wrote: [quote=GiveMeCandy]Therefore, someone in Brownsville can drive to visit relatives in Morrisania and leave their car on the street overnight, but if they dare drive into precious Carroll Gardens, they'll get a ticket that would amount to two weeks pay.
this was easily solved in chicago with the single-use permits i mentioned earlier. residents could purchase books of them very cheaply -- like $2/dozen -- and give them to overnight guests. it worked great.
At $2/dozen, I can buy a year's supply of single use permits for $60 bucks. That low a price would seem to be an invitation to some sort of wide-scaled shenanigans (although I can't think of anything now).
To those who fear that resident parking would have them parking 5 neighborhhods away....if you think about it I'm pretty sure that all of us who have circled for ungodly amounts of time have ultimately never wound up more than a few blocks away from home, so as long as the permits are by zone rather than by block, there should be no problem finding something nearby.
Otherwise there would be countless thousands who just drive all day and night, never sleeping or eating, looking for spaces. And that doesn't happen, right?
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds













