Renting out pets - morally reprehensible
To all dog and animal lovers,
Visit www.flexpetz.com -- if you are as offended and appalled as I am about the idea of renting out dogs, please email or call them and let them know that they need to change their business model.
[email protected]
888-211-7830
Visit www.flexpetz.com -- if you are as offended and appalled as I am about the idea of renting out dogs, please email or call them and let them know that they need to change their business model.
[email protected]
888-211-7830
Comments
-
Oh my gosh.. That is a totally offensive concept
-
Yeah, this actually was featured on DailyCandy today. What utter morons.
-
Okay, I'll bite. What's so offensive about this?
Don't get me wrong, I think this is a pretty *stupid* concept and I wouldn't rent a dog myself, but I don't understand why it's inherently offensive or bad. -
apollonia666 wrote: Okay, I'll bite. What's so offensive about this?
I agree. According to the site they are "rescued or rehomed". As long as there not sitting in kennels who cares. Even if they were in kennels if there was an oppourtunity to own a dog that someone really liked even better.
Don't get me wrong, I think this is a pretty *stupid* concept and I wouldn't rent a dog myself, but I don't understand why it's inherently offensive or bad.
It's like Zip car for dog lovers. -
Me too - I just went through the entire site - and couldn't see what the fuss is all about. In fact I was thinking about how wonderful it would be to have a pet spend some time with a home confined person, or maybe a responsible person who lives by themselves wants to spend some time with a pet - what's wrong with that? Doesn't everyone deserve some love?
I didn't get the impression that this is some Paris-Hilton-renting-an- accoutrement-pet site at all. -
This was unclear to me from the website... could anyone tell where the dogs were living when not on a "visit"? Are they housed in kennels or at some other permanent residence?
If they are residing permanently in a home somewhere, and then just go for visits elsewhere, I guess that's not too bad (although it seems a little disruptive.)
But if they're sitting in cages waiting for someone to pay for them for an hours rental, that's really upsetting. -
Dogs and cats need and crave routine and stability, the exact opposite of being passed from stranger to stranger. I bet these people can't find a vet to endorse this scheme. Of course strays need homes, PERMANENT homes, not temporary rental homes. These are living creatures, not chairs you rent for your party.
(edited for spelling) -
Subject: Exactly
sje wrote: Dogs and cats need and crave routine and stability, the exact opposite of being passed from stranger to stranger. I bet these people can't find a vet to endorse this scheme. Of course strays need homes, PERMANENT homes, not temporary rental homes. These are living creatures, not chairs you rent for your party.
That's exactly it. These are living beings who, like us, thrive on companionship. How would you, or your child, like the emotional stress of being moved to a different home day to day? Much less for someone else's profit?
(edited for spelling) -
sje wrote: Dogs and cats need and crave routine and stability, the exact opposite of being passed from stranger to stranger. I bet these people can't find a vet to endorse this scheme. Of course strays need homes, PERMANENT homes, not temporary rental homes. These are living creatures, not chairs you rent for your party.
Okay, that makes perfect sense, and thank you for explaining. -
It's like Zip car for dog lovers.
Well, that's the problem. Dogs are not cars. They are alive and very attuned to humans. As SJE pointed out, dogs crave routine and stability; they also crave a lasting bond with their owners. A dog belongs in a permanent home where it can bond with one person/family over its lifetime.
If this Flexpetz abominination had any concern for homeless dogs beyond how to make a buck off them, they would establish a proper shelter/rescue service with the goal of finding permanent homes for the dogs in their care. That they are consigning a bunch of dogs to lifetimes as "rent-a-pets" is cruel and disgusting.I didn't get the impression that this is some Paris-Hilton-renting-an- accoutrement-pet site at all.
I did. Did you read the description of the two Afghan hounds? It was all about how cool you'll look on a walk with them, and how many people will stop you to ask about the dogs. -
It's very expensive, or maybe I'm just living in the cheap-o age. I wouldn't mind it if it focused on therapy dogs for assistance and visits. It seems very disruptive to have a dog swapped around. As someone said before, stability is so important for routine and comfort.
-
What if there was the opportunity to buy the dog if you established a rapport with him/her? Not that I see anything on the site that says that's possible and allowable, but, as concept, would that be so reprehensible. If that were a feature, I might actually be tempted to check it out.
John Ife -
well, I have 2 Pekes who are the most affectionate dogs in the world - I would love for them to be able to visit with someone during the day - maybe I'll start my own company.
-
Liveto travel.. You are so lucky.. Pekes are just the most lovable affectionate dogs and I bet your dogs would do great if you "rented" them out a little to give them a little extra company and have some deserving animal lover enjoy them as well. But their quality of life is because of the home that YOU provide for them.
Unless I am mis-reading that site I don't think those rent-a-dogs are blessed with the forever home every animal deserves. If the concept were that these people who borrowed the dogs were doing so with the goal of adopting the dog I would see this differently. -
Arranging for your dog to hang out with people while you're at work or out of town—and then come home to you when you get home— is one thing. (And even then, if you were planning to send the dog to an endless number of different people/homes, I'd say it doesn't sound like a great thing.) Acquiring a bunch of dogs as commodities, keeping them rented out as much of the time as is possible, and sending them out to a new person/family every few hours or days is obviously different.
[edited to fix typo] -
I got the Daily Candy email this morning, and as a dog owner and animal lover I think the practice of renting dogs - like an accessory - is really horrible. How can their environment be monitored? And the fact that the website claims that they all have regular medical check-ups every 3 months makes me think that these poor pooches lead a pretty tough life to need that much medical care.
If you can't get a dog for whatever reason (work, travel, allergies, etc), then find a friend who has one. On several occasions my pup has made friends with "dogless" people who visit dog runs or the park. That is a great way to meet dogs and people in the city, and be able to spend time with a pet, no strings, leashes or $50 a month contracts attached. -
Amen! I have three cats myself, and a busy schedule that wouldn't really let me take proper care of a dog full-time. But I have a friend who has 2 dogs - sometimes I take them for walks in Prospect Park, and this weekend I'm keeping one of them in my apartment while friend is out of town.
And if you want to share your sweet dog with other people, you can volunteer for pet-assisted therapy. -
I have to agree. I am not a dog owner nor am I crazy about most breeds of dogs..but it's an animal that needs stabiility. What would concern me most would be what goes on for the periods when these dogs are not being rented..
-
You guys think this is bad? Compared to what? Compared to being sent to a shelter? Compared to being killed because no one wants or can't take care of a dog full time? Compared to being bought and resold for medical testing?
There are a lot of rescue groups in the city and they depend on people being able to have the time and space to care for a dog full-time. A lot of people can't do it and those dogs sit in cages and get older, the kiss of death in animal adoption. It sounds to me like this service is taking rescue dogs and giving them contact and love they wouldn't otherwise have. It's a win-win situation.
This sounds geared towards single people who love dogs but live in shoeboxes and know it would be difficult on the animal to have one. -
True, being a rent-a-dog probably isn't as bad as some fates dogs suffer. But, look at this way. If you're going to rent out dogs for money, you're going to have to find dogs that are very healthy, very friendly, very easy to train, good with people of all ages, adaptable to all kinds of circumstances, etc. In other words, you have to find dogs who are prime candidates for adoption! You're not saving the kind of dog that would otherwise almost surely be put down. You're "saving" exactly the kind of dog that has the best shot at finding a permanent home. If you're going to go out and round up a bunch of dogs like that, it's criminal not to try to find them real homes.
And, yeah, ilovecarbs, I love how the Flexpetz site conveniently doesn't mention where these dogs live or how they're cared for when they're not rented out. I also saw no indication that potential renters are screened to make sure they'll take decent care of the dogs. -
JJB, valid points. I hope Flexpetz comes up with some answers to these questions.
-
Melissa Bain, a veterinarian with the Companion Animal Behavior Program at the University of California at Davis, said she had concerns but no hard-and-fast objections to a service like FlexPetz.
"It depends on the people and it depends on the animal," Bain said. "Some dogs may be fine and some may become stressed because they are moving from home to home." -
Wow - there's seems to be an incredible sense that renting pets may become a national pastime. Why even Gail Collins, in her Opinion Page article today in the NY Times, lends credence to the idea...
"...Most of the candidates from both parties have pets. In fact, so many of them have golden retrievers or labradors you can’t help but wonder if they rent them. (John Edwards, ever the conspicuous consumer, has one of each.)"
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds






