This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Small Claims Court? Help! — Brooklynian

Small Claims Court? Help!

opossumqueen
edited November -1 in Park Slope
We might have to take our last landlord to small claims over our security deposit but I want to know if it's worth the hassle. Has anyone been through this process? Costs (money, time). Tell me all!



the backstory for those who will ask:
We wanted to move, he couldn't find tenants so was happy to let us go month to month at the end of our lease until we found a new place. Before choosing a move date, he agreed that we could move whenever, as long as we gave 30 days notice. We found a place and gave 30+days notice. He claimed he would get the check to us soon.

That never happened and now we're pushing him for it and he says that he doesn't even owe it to us, then later says all he has to give us is $500 (of a $1500 deposit and we left the place far better than we found it).

Comments

  • We've had to take two different clients to small claims, and we won both 100%. It really wasn't too much of a hassle. My boss's lawyer friend put it like this: assume each side will be awarded 50%. Anything above that is a bonus. These were both in Manhattan on Centre st.

    You file the paperwork and end up with a court date. When you go, you are asked if you mind using an arbitrator (we used them both times - you have to wait longer for an actual judge). You all sit in a room and tell your story, they ask a few questions. Two weeks later, the decision is mailed to both parties. The session takes like 10 minutes, but there can be a fair amount of waiting beforehand. We were there in the evening each time. Also, you or the other side can can file to have the proceeding delayed a few times so you might have to keep coming back.

    If you do go ahead, keep it simple, stick to a few basic facts, and have all your documentation. These guys go through a ton of cases and were clearly annoyed by people being emotional, making unprovable claims, going off on a tangent etc. Too much paperwork can be an issue too. It seemed like they're not going to sift through reams of stuff in making a decision. It pretty much came down to who had the best, most concise paperwork to back their side up, along with some personal judgment being exercised by the arbitrator. The judges and arbitrators also seemed annoyed by people bringing representation, whether friends in the legal industry or whatever. I guess they try to keep it less formal and (especially) speedy.

    Hope this helps
  • My boss's lawyer friend put it like this: assume each side will be awarded 50%.
    Does this mean that OppossumQueen should get at least 50% of the security back? How does one prove that they deserve the whole deposite back?

    Photos of the apartment before and then after residency? What happens if you don't have photos, or if your landlord didn't do a walkthrough before or after? I'm just curious how one side proves that they are in the "right", without it turning into one person's word against the others.
  • Dunno. We had some documentation. Also, it was pretty clear that our ex-clients were reaching, whereas we had pretty solid answers for everything. At some point I guess it's a judgment call.
  • Subject: Re: Small Claims Court? Help!

    OpossumQueen wrote: We might have to take our last landlord to small claims over our security deposit but I want to know if it's worth the hassle. Has anyone been through this process? Costs (money, time). Tell me all!



    the backstory for those who will ask:
    We wanted to move, he couldn't find tenants so was happy to let us go month to month at the end of our lease until we found a new place. Before choosing a move date, he agreed that we could move whenever, as long as we gave 30 days notice. We found a place and gave 30+days notice. He claimed he would get the check to us soon.

    That never happened and now we're pushing him for it and he says that he doesn't even owe it to us, then later says all he has to give us is $500 (of a $1500 deposit and we left the place far better than we found it).
    Been there, done that, got my money back. This was twice - on a commercial space rental and an apartment. On the apartment, you are also entitled to INTEREST - so chck your lease to find out how much, and calculate that into your suit.
  • Regarding interest- this is news to me but the second time in two days I have heard it. Can anyone point me towards more information on this? The lease I have does not mention it. (Storebought lease though) Thanks.
  • My understanding is that interest only is applicable if there are a certain number of units in the building and/or if the landlord put the money in an interest-bearing account...something like that.

    check www.tenant.net.

    They'll know the scoop
  • Thanks Flexichick- I looked it up and the regs state that if the bldg has 6 more more rental units then the security deposit must be placed in an interest bearing account. The building I live in is only 5 units and only 3 or 4 of them are rented out.
  • http://www.oag.state.ny.us/realestate/guide_intro.html#6
    Information from the AG regarding rent security deposits, and a general tenant's rights guide.

    IIRC from 1L propertly law, any NY landlord may if he chooses put your security deposit in an interest-bearing account, but must pay the interest over to you. Only landlords in buildings containing N+ number of units MUST put the funds in an interest bearing account. Again, any time an interest-bearing account is used, the interest is the legal property of teh tenant.

    In addition, again IIRC, at least on rent stabilized and perhaps on all leases there is a NYC law providing for treble damages on wrongfully withheld security deposits. That is, if your deposit were $1,000, all of was wrongfully withheld, prevailing in court would result in $3,000 in damages paid. This is intended to be a disincentive to landlords, encouraging them to return security deposits in good faith and timely. Do not asume that treble damages apply to you, but research wether they do and request them if applicable (bring a copy of the law and be prepared to explain and document how you meet the requirements it shows). Assume that perhaps this is where the judge might be permitted to use discretion, perhaps.

    I believe you may be prohibited from filing in "small claims court", but rather must file specifically with the Housing Court:
    http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/nyc/housing/index.shtml. If you attempt to file other than in Housing, my guess is that you'll either get a dismissal with leave to file in the correct court, or that prior to file they will deny your papers and refer you to housing court.

    Finally: WHENEVER you are appearing in court focus on documenting each and every material opinion and fact that supports your claim. I don't know how long you lived in your apartment, but if you can bring receipts or proof of timely payment of rent do so for as many months as you possibly can (eliminates any argument by landlord that he retained deposit to pay past-due rent, AND gives you credibility). Bring documentation that you left the apartment in substantially the same condition in which it was delivered to you at the beginning of your lease, except for normal wear and tear. I'm betting you don't have pictures (though people should make it a habit to take pictures of every apartment on move-out day and retain them at least until the deposit is returned), but perhaps you have a friend who helped move who will write an affidavit or stand up and testify that he/she personally witnessed the apartment in good condition and clean. This, of course, helps you foreclose a successful argument by the landlord that he rightfully retained the deposit for cleanup/repair costs. If he makes that claim, be sure to be able to (honestly) assert that you feel no repairs you are obligated for were necessary, and request a statement of his costs (he was obligated to provide same if applicable when he notified you he was retaining any deposit). Be prepared to document the notice you have (I hope you did it in writing), and ALL key facts. DO NOT let yourself get emotional, hyper, worked up or upset while you are speaking. Be calm and very respectful, and let your documentation and any good witnesses speak for themselves.

    Note that IIRC, there is a NYC law that asserts that the ONLY purpose for which a deposit can be retained is repairs, and that documentation must be granted when a deposit is so retained. If his ONLY argument is that he believes he was entitled to more notice, or that the deposit covers past due rent, procedurally he would still be oblgiated to issue the deposit and then sue you for back rent. As such, you might research these laws a little bit and send him a certified letter identifying the due amount, put a reasonable deadline on it (say, 14 days) and then explain that if you do not have a check in your hands by the deadline you'll have no option but to go to Housing Court because ... (and explain your rationale, with exact reference to the laws, and why they apply to you). I bet by being direct and assertive in this manner you may be able to get a response without having to go to court - landlords hate to be dragged into court over this stuff. Point out in your letter that had the deposit been used for its only proper purpose of repairs, you would have expected to receive a detailed invoice as such along with the remainder of the deposit quite some time ago. Let them know that if you do have to go to court, you will ask for treble damages. Let them know it would be much better if they would issue you your deposit back in the amount of $X no later than [date] to resolve this amicable. And copy your local City Councilperson on the letter - when I lived in Hells Kitchen during law school I had a horrible time getting a deposit back from a corporate landlord and finally I sent a letter like I've suggested here w/ a copy to my councilwoman. Doing so got quick action out of the landlord, and within days I received a follow up from the councilwoman's office to see if further assistance was needed.

    I'm sorry this has been so long, I'm just trying to give you as much information as I can. I am NOT a licensed attorney (yet - will be sworn in in September), and even more than that I am NOT your attorney, I have not reviewed all the facts, all the laws, and this is my opinion based on personal experience rather than professional consideration. As such, and I'm sure you know this, I am not giving you legal advice and therefore you should not rely on the accuracy or applicability. But, I also want to see you get what you deserve - landlords who charge SO much rent in this city and then try to play games by not returning deposits make me unbelievabl angry. [/url]
  • wow - this is very helpful for a situation that I fear I may be in in a month but really hope I won't be. thanks!
  • Thanks for all the replies! I've read a lot of the legal stuff online, but it's good to hear other people's experiences and opinions.

    The lesson is that you should get everything in writing and I say make your deposit your last month's rent if possible. Also, find current tenants and ask them about the LL and the apartment when the LL isn't around. That's what we did on our current place and there have been no surprises, which is great.

    Also, if anyone or anyone you know considers taking an apartment on Saint Francis Place, please PM me first!!

    This is going to be a bit long and rambling, but I want to put it all out there.

    More info: it was in a 2-family house, so interest doesn't apply. We lived there a year (lease terms) then went month to month. We had some leeway on our move so I spoke with him (he's a lawyer, btw) before we signed a new lease. Our verbal agreement was that we would would move on the 5th of the month. We wouldn't pay rent that month, and he would take $50/day (rent/days per month) our of our security and then give us a check for the rest--$1250. This was clearly discussed. WE WOULD HAVE CHANGED OUR MOVE DATE IF THERE WAS ANY QUESTION ABOUT THE DEPOSIT! That's how clear it seemed.

    We moved and he said he would send us the $1250 check in a week. No check in a couple of weeks, but we knew he was a lazy, procrastinator and we weren't very pushy so we let time pass. We would run into him and his fam often and each time he would say "I've still got your address, I'll send the deposit soon." Well, we're finally fed up and went to see him about it. He suddenly claims he owes us nothing and will "graciously" give us $500. He does not remember our agreement, he doesn't remember when we moved out, he even thinks we paid him for the 5 days with a separate check. He also claims that we have only asked him for the check once! The kicker is that Mr. Forgetful (by his own admission) claims that we gave him exactly 25 days notice.

    He claims he never agreed to this and lots of other bs that is not important to us. He was bitching that he didn't rent it for almost 4 months after we moved out (his fault--he didn't paint over the mold for a couple of months and he was trying to get way too much for it.) I said it's not our problem, but he kept harping on it.

    We took the $500 and told him we'll look into our options and contact him if we want to take it to court. (If we didn't take the check, me might never get anything out of him.) His wife is also on the lease (and a much more reasonable person) but we think he made sure she was gone when he spoke with us. I think we should email her (we have an email address for her) and let her know that since she is on the lease, we'd like to give her a chance to refund the deposit before we take both of them to court. I"m sure her husband had told her none of this.

    The landlord claims that if we do court, he'll get a lawyer and pay the fee to be seen by a jury. I find it hard to believe that he, as a landlord, wants to be seen by Brooklynites. We have copies of all of our rent checks, paid on time, our lease (which has no stipulations about giving notice), and pictures of the place when we moved in and around the time we moved out (I removed tons of dangerous junk from yard that belonged to our place).

    I hope all of this helps someone else. I've had bad landlords but never such a slumlord. Lots more stories on him if you want them!
  • It sounds like you made a mistake in accepting the $500. A judge may view that as follows:

    You: You owe me $1250
    Landlord: I'll give you $500
    You: I don't like that deal, but okay (taking the $500)

    Also:
    -Make a conditional demand for interest, i.e. "And, Landlord, if you kept the deposit in an interest-bearing account, we demand you pay over that interest" - this is the case regardless of # of apartments.
    -Lease need not contain stipulation about notice; on a month to month NYC law provides that notice required is according to the period on which rent is paid. If rent is paid monthly, you must give one month's notice. There are some odd intricacies that may work against you in terms of how the days are calculated. The lease is still important though because once a lease converts to a month to month the terms of the month to month are those that were in the original lease unless a mutually consented change is evidenced - I think.
    -Did you pay for the days by separate check or was it deducted from your deposit? Your update indicates both of these contradictory assumptions - you state first that the deposit amount was to be $1250 because of the deductions for the 5 days, and then later that he forgot you paid this by separate check. If you paid by separate check, did he cash the check? Obtain the cancelled check from your bank. And get your facts straight and communicate more clearly because failing to do so is bad for your credibility.
    -Communicate only in writing. Send a letter in which you assert that on X date he promised you $1250 (of course, based on the above this might not be the amount he owes you), and you hereby make a demand for prompt payment as required by law.
    -Your pictures, cancelled checks and lease copy are GREAT. You did the right thing hanging on to that stuff.
    -My instinct (personally not professionally because as I said above I am STILL neither a practicing attorney, nor your attorney) is that you are right, you would LOVE him to pay to bring a jury. Bring it on!
    -But truly, truly, send a certified letter. When you only make phone calls or verbal discussions, you really aren't doing anything. No one is going to bother to respond until they get a demand in writing, an assertive, correct, clear demand in writing.
  • Unimportant office work, but lots of "urgent" interruptions may lesson the clarity of my ranting ramblings. Please forgive.

    No we didn't give him a check for the 5 days because, at his offering, it was to come out of the security at a daily rate quoted by him. The point is that he *remembers* getting money from us that was never given. Clearly he doesn't remember much from this time except that he claims we gave 25 days notice. He is excellent at remembering things as the way that is convenient now (many examples). I don't think he's a terrible guy, but a very incompetent and lazy guy who makes a terrible landlord.

    He flip flops all over the place, and as any good lawyer (no offense), talks in circles and won't shut up. (I actually doubt his abilities as a lawyer.)

    I feel like I've read the law stuff up and down, but I'm still not certain of where we stand on the month to month thing. We had a verbal agreement (wrong, lesson learned--sad, b/c I generally keep records of everything--repair requests, pictures before move-in, etc.) that he offered so I think it will boil down he said/we said.

    Again I say, talk to current/previous tenants when possible. In this case, we were part of his first batch of tenants, something I'll never do again. For our current place, we went back (after applying but before signing a lease) and talked to the guy who was living there without the LL knowing. He gave us the low down on how issues are handled, the perks/quirks/problems with the place. We knew what we were getting, and that the *bad* stuff was stuff we could live with. Ask about what matters to you: heating, plumbing, noise levels, safety, bills, how repairs are handled, etc.
  • barefoot wrote: Regarding interest- this is news to me but the second time in two days I have heard it. Can anyone point me towards more information on this? The lease I have does not mention it. (Storebought lease though) Thanks.
    nyc.gov is a very rich source of information.
  • (Again I am not not speaking as a lawyer or someone who is giving you any kind of legal advice you should rely upon. We do NOT have an attorney-client relationship, and I am NOT a licensed attorney. It's very important you understand that.)

    Don't be fussed about the "verbal" agreement on the month to month, or at any rate, don't anguish over it.

    Even outside the realm of rent-stabilization, tenants are an INCREDIBLY protected class in New York City. The law is rife with rules for YOUR protection that apply regardless of whether you signed or verbally entered into a contract for them, or sometimes even if the landlord tried to trick you out of them. (For example, certain warranties are NOT waived even though a landlord might tell you they are, even if landlord includes a lease provision where you waive them. Tough luck, landlords - thousands of years of renters getting screwed by greedy landlords have left the law with the rightful pro-tenant slant).

    That being said, my understanding of the law on this point is that when your lease ended and you tendered a rent check which was cashed by the landlord, you had a month-to-month tenancy on the lease terms (unless changed in mutually signed writing) for the month you paid for. When you sent in your next month's rent, the lease terms extended for another month. And so on and so forth. That's why I say your lease document remains important, because even though expired on its face it is the description of the terms of your month-to-month tenancy. Remember, your tenancy/extension does not require a mutual agreement between you and landlord (whether written or verbal). It was created by the action of your offering a check and his accepting it. Thus, practically, the expired lease terms apply to each and every month for which you can show a cashed rent check.

    Don't worry too much about being in a he-said-she-said scenario, because you can make this pretty cut and dry if you signed a lease that called for rent and a deposit, paid rent and a deposit, lease expired but was extended on a month-to-month basis, you terminated and moved out, leaving the apartment in documentedly clean, good condition free of the necessity of repairs and the landlord has not returned the deposit. I would think your claim against the landlord boils down to that scenario, and you have fairly good documentation of each point.

    But again, if you send the damn letter, you probably won't even have to GET to the point of presenting a case in front of a judge - you'll save time, costs and anxiety.

    Here's another suggestion - because I obviously want to see you get this resolved and not lose a lot of money (and because when landlords think they can get away with it, they will try it on ALL their tenants!). I just read a NYT article that suggested calling the AG which has an informal procedure in place to help tenants resolve these issues without the need to go to court.
    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C02EEDA113FF937A25750C0A96F958260
    ''The attorney general's office has an informal procedure in place to try to resolve security deposit issues,'' he said. The number to call is (212) 416-8345.
Sign In or Register to comment.