Strangely speedy police activity in front of my apartment
I just heard screeching tires and then a bunch of men shouting in a really, REALLY aggressive way, and when I peeked outside there was a car stopped pointing the wrong way on my one-way street, and a bunch of guys sort of pacing up and down the block tensely. I closed the curtain and within seconds the street was lit up with three squad cars. This was only a minute or two after the initial sounds. The cops in the squad cars seemed to know the guys in the backwards car, and they were all joking and talking a bit, and a couple of times one would point out something on the back windshield of the backwards car out to another guy, and then everyone took off. I didn't see anyone being arrested and the whole thing was over in less than five minutes.
It was just weird, because it sounded like a big deal at first and so many squad cars showed up so soon, and then it was over SO fast. I'm guessing it all may have been some sort of undercover thing (and therefore I won't describe the cars or people) but I can't imagine what could start and end so quickly.
It was just weird, because it sounded like a big deal at first and so many squad cars showed up so soon, and then it was over SO fast. I'm guessing it all may have been some sort of undercover thing (and therefore I won't describe the cars or people) but I can't imagine what could start and end so quickly.
Comments
-
Huh. About three or four years ago there were tons of undercover cars doing things exactly like that all over Bed-Stuy and Crown Heights. The scary thing was that the cars drove in a manner that would always make me think that they were about to do a drive by. Really, they were just jumping out of their cars at random times and patting people down. (In a way that used to be considered unconstitutional. But now, after seven years of Bush, it's probably a.o.k.) Maybe it was something on that order. But that is weird.
I always call 911 when I hear stuff, and it's a good idea, even when everything ends quickly or turns out well. The police like to know that people are watching and the more that people bother to call, the more likely they are to respond. But it is kind of creepy to see cops behaving in such an intimidating and seemingly criminal way, right? -
Why is the Police doing their job considered "creepy" and what did they do that was criminal? Do explain
-
King without a crown wrote: Why is the Police doing their job considered "creepy" and what did they do that was criminal? Do explain
These weren't my words, of course, nor is it how I would characterize it, but if I'd been outside walking down my block when it happened it would have scared the bejeezus out of me. I once did get caught in the middle of some sort of undercover bust as I was passing by and it was scary as hell. I can imagine that if one saw that sort of thing regularly in one's neighborhood, one might not like it too terribly much. Maybe that's why the second poster feels that way.
That said, I assume there was some sort of logical explanation and reason for the situation I witnessed last night. There seems to be a fair amount of drug activity on my block, f'rinstance. -
Maybe lucille can answer that for me.
-
I don't know about criminal, but NYC cops aren't normally in the habit of explaining to ANYONE what they happen to be doing at any particular time. Most of them are pretty rude, frankly. I'm sure the episode WAS creepy. I would think it's pretty natural to wonder what the hell all of those guys were doing in the middle of the street, yelling at each other. Luckily, apollonia minded her own business (relatively speaking) and didn't go downstairs to ask what was happening. I'm sure the cops would have been less than pleasant, if they had decided to answer her at all.
-
I wasn't aware that Police are required to explain their actions to onlookers. I never asked you to explain why my french fries were over cooked last week now did I?
-
Okay, you've both made your points clear -- Lucille is not a fan of the police and King obviously finds that offensive -- but PLEASE let's not escalate this further?
Given that none of us are likely to be employees of the Psychic Friends Network, I don't think we can or should assume anything about how the officers I saw in front of my building the other night would have responded had I gone downstairs to ask what was up. I didn't start this thread to cast aspersions on the police -- it was just a weird incident in the neighborhood.
I've had both good and bad experiences with the NYPD, and I think we all need to recognize that cops are all individuals and not make blanket assumptions about any group of people. -
I didnt sense any malice in your original thread, I was trying to understand the response to a quite seemingly innocent post.
-
King without a crown wrote: I didnt sense any malice in your original thread, I was trying to understand the response to a quite seemingly innocent post.
Thanks, King. I just wanted to make it clear to *everyone.*
-
I've told this story before in past threads though not for awhile:
when I first moved to nyc in march of 2001 I lived in harlem. I was looking at apartments with a broker and found this really, really cute studio (retrospectively, I'm glad I didn't get it, but at the time I was broke, it was cute, and it was $500/month stabilized) on 149th and st. nicholas. anyway, I put in an application but the owner of the building, who lived in the building, had vanished - the broker couldn't track her down.
so one afternoon, my cousin, who worked for the same brokerage and owns a brownstone on 139th & st. nicholas, my broker (also owns - a co-op on 145th and ... 8th I think) and I all drove over to knock on the woman's door and buzz the other apartments in the building to find out what was going on.
so, my cousin pulls up in his housemate's mother's black mercedes (housemate was in thailand at the time, and his parents were at some resort in the caribbean - the plates on the car were, of course, from CT), and the broker and I get out. we're all white, btw. so we go up, knock on doors, ring doorbells, peer in windows, etc and get no response. so, after a few minutes of this, we get back in the car and drive off. we come around and turn back onto st. nicholas and are immediately cut off by this big white van and like 10 gigantic white dudes leap out of it. they weren't in uniforms, and they were all facing us, so I couldn't immediately see the big nypd letters on the back of their jackets. they scared the shit out of me.
now, bear in mind that I'd just finished a stint as a criminal defense & family law lawyer in houston, texas, so I pretty much knew what they could and couldn't do. the demanded that we all get out of the car and, of course, patted down my cousin, who fancied himself a hip hop producer and was wearing truly absurd clothing. they asked what we'd been doing and why we'd been at a known drug location. my cousin and the broker show their broker IDs as well as their state IDs. meanwhile, dumbass that I am, I'm like "you don't have to tell them that" and refuse to give my name, increasing the hostilities slightly, to say the least. anyway, after much manhandling and admonishments to not move into that building or anywhere in the neighborhood, I ask them what unit they're with and they tell me metro north narcotics, and chastise me for my smart-ass mouth.
it took me probably an hour to stop shaking in fear and anger. the rational part of my brain was saying they were just doing their job, but the irrational part was like "wtf do they have to act like we're goddamned criminals for??" and it didn't strike me til later that they showed absolutely zero concern for the old lady we were trying to find.
as a post-script, which really has nothing to do with how terrifying it is to have the cops think you did something illegal and jump to 7 gazillion conclusions and scare the bejeezus out of you in broad daylight:
fast forward a couple of years, winter 2003. I get stuck on a jury for a drug case that went down on 149th and bway (why they let an ex-crim defense atty with articulated problems with possession laws on this jury is way beyond me, but whatever). the penny doesn't drop for me til a cop gets on the stand and looks vaguely familiar. of course it's the guy who told me I had a smart mouth. it didn't change what I thought of the case - the two lawyers on the jury (myself and another woman) hung the damn thing b/c we just didn't read the law the way everyone else did, not only b/c we thought the possession laws were stupid. -
Subject: actually, I am a fan
I wrote and posted a long reply to KWAC last night at about 9:54, only to discover the system was down. It never posted and when I went to look for it, I thought I'd sent KWAC a pm by mistake, which wouldn't have been the end of the world. But it didn't turn up in my outbox or here, so I'll have to do it again. Trouble is, I'm on my way out the door.
It will have to wait, but it's similar to apolonia's story, only it involves my former neighbors.
And yes, actually, I am a fan of the police. My dad was in law enforcement in another major city, so I grew up around them and believe I have some idea of the brutal dilemmas they face on a daily basis.
I am not "Guest," by the way.
Also, I can't imagaine when burnt french fries have ever been a matter of life and death. Who among us has ever served them to to you? Kwac, you should complain if your food is served to you incorrectly, wherever you are. But when was the last time a server turned up at your table with burnt fries and a gun on her waist? -
Subject: Re: actually, I am a fan
Lucille wrote: But when was the last time a server turned up at your table with burnt fries and a gun on her waist?
when I got my first tattoo, in new hampshire, the artist was, no shit, wearing a leather vest, unbuttoned, no shirt, and had a big assed gun in a hip holster. I had a perfect view of this for about 30 minutes. -
I don't have the stamina for a huge post, but i'll do my best to respond. My french fry comment is in refernce to asking Police to explain their actions to uninvolved parties. If your in a place of business, lets say the Post office, and you see a Postal Employee balancing letters like dominoes in the back, is it in within your Right to have an explanation for this conduct which you don't understand? Now how many 1000's of Police encounters do you think occur in the City on a daily basis? Do you think that Police officers have to explain their conduct to all onlookers? What might seem bizarre to you, might be completley reasonable when looking at the totality of all the circumstances. Often people see the end of a Police encounter and don't see the events that actually lead to it ie: The Warren case on Vanderbilt-Atlantic ave.
Everyone knows who the cops are, and often good people are turned away at these scenes. Maybe you just happened to be the 19th person that asked the same question. Like "excuse me do you mind if I go under the Police line I promise I wont step in the blood"
Don't think I'm excusing all Police conduct, just realize it's an extremely dangerous job and all of it's enemies are not known. -
I don't think anyone is trying to justify disturbing a crime scene, but when, for instance, people witness the cops brutally beating a suspect (and I have before) they have a right to be concerned. There are a lot of bad apples in police departments who take being a policeman to mean the right to intimidate and harrass people with no thought to their civil rights, and that affects ALL OF US. I once got dangled by the neck by a 7 ft. cop in St. Paul and I've never committed a crime in my life. It was the most frightening experience I have ever had. He could have broken my neck if he chose to. At least with criminals you're allowed to fight back.
So yes, as citizens, we DO have a right to question police conduct. Just like I would question postal employees using the mail to play dominoes, which is highly questionable conduct possibly breaking federal law.
And if I found food workers slipping chopped rats into their fries, I would question that. And then call the health inspector.
People are and must be accountable to standards of professional conduct. -
Subject: Thank you, Lil b
I second Lilbangladesh's assertion that questioning the conduct of police officers, who are paid by our tax dollars, is not only our right as citizens, but is also within reason and, more likely, our duty.
The "creepy" activity to which I was referring was activity that looked criminal and turned out to be police activity. A la Appolonia's post. If I saw men screaming at eachother and a car pointed the wrong direction on a one way street, I'd assume that there was criminal activity involved.
What I saw all over Crown Hts and Bed-Stuy four years ago was exactly that, and the Sean Bell case comes to mind. but first, my account.
I was driving home one night when a car sped up to my bumper and then pulled around and put on its breaks right in front of me. This was on St. Marks bet. Classon and Franklin. I swerved to avoid a collision and the car sped up and pulled into the middle of the street so that I couldn't get around it. I slowed way down. It's a very dark block and this was late at night. I moved to the right to try to pass the car but it wouldn't let me. At the next light, it continued in a slowly prowling kind of way down the block and then an arm came out of the window, motioning me to pass them. I looked inside and knew they were NYPD because of the other incidents I'd been witnessing all summer around my neighborhood. There were four beefy white guys inside wearing football jerseys.
A month or so earlier I was standing outside of my building, watering my plants at 11:00 or so at night. My neighbors were on the adjoining stoop with their two year old son, passing a hot night out of doors. An unmarked car came to a screeching halt in front of my house and four white beefy guys in football jerseys got out and walked aggressively toward my neighbors. They had them standing up and were turning out their pockets within a minute without ever identifying themselves as police. My neighbors had nothing so much as a beer on them and were sitting on their landlord's stoop-- a piece of private property that they'd been given permission to use. Meanwhile, their two year old was mortified. When the four turned and saw me standing there with my watering can, quietly observing, their eyes got as big as saucers and they hurried to their car and left. I could almost hear the wheels turning in their heads: shit, she's white, she might know that what we've done is probably a violation of the constitution. My husband, who is not white, witnessed the entire event as he strode home from the corner store. He said, "You could see them physically start when they noticed you. What were they doing to N and J anyway?"
After that incident, I saw several more like them (before the whole driving home thing) and my husband and I started calling them the "jump out squad" because that's what they did. They jumped out of their cars, walked up on people in a threatening manner and frisked them, without ever identifying themselves as police.
Two things. One, the fact that they were all white is not in itself inherently problematic. The fact that they never once identified themselves as police officers is certainly problematic. I mean no verbal notification, no badge, nadda. Two, the fact that they are acting aggressively and appear to be a random group of white guys in an almost entirely non-white community, is very problematic.
The accounts of the Bell case are of undercover officers not identifying themselves and pulling their guns. And by the way, the undercovers in that case were multi-racial. If I were leaving a club and several people who I'd seen inside suddenly pulled guns on me, I would do the same thing, namely, try to get the hell out of there, running them over if need be.
As I said in an earlier post, I grew up around detectives and patrolmen and I am sensitive to their issues. I am also friends with many NYPD members and most of them are not white. They range in age and rank and specificity of location. What I know to be true is that 90 percent of them really are in it to try to make a positive change. But I also know that many cops, regardless of their own ethnicity and heritage assume that people of color (how I hate that term, but I'll use it anyway) are ignorant of their rights, or, if they know their rights are too afraid to protest police harrassment. This is crap.
We need police protection in the worst way where I live. I honor and respect their duty and their situation. But when you go around the hood harrassing hardworking parents who pay their rent, (or own their homes) who benefits? Also, the night my neighbors got frisked the cops had driven by a very active drug corner to get to them.
I realize that to get a predator one often has to behave like a predator, but come on and use some sense.
As far as my use of the word "creepy." I find it creepy when I identify a behavior and define it as threatening and potentially criminal, only to find out it was being perpetrated by the "good guys." Wouldn't you?
And yes, I would expect to be called out for serving a bad order of french fries. That's my job. It is the duty of the police to patrol and protect the community, not harrass it. And I'm all for some muscle flexing on the part of the police, but does it have to be so ignorant and misguided?
I met a cop once who told me seven years ago that I was regarded as a druggie for living in a non-white neighborhood. What the f---is that?
having said all of this, I do attend community council meetings and board meetings. something gotta get done somehow, somewhere. -
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it against the law for cops to stop people without identifying themselves as cops?
This is separate from undercover work. I mean, criminals don't stop and frisk people unless they are posing as cops. -
No it's not against the law, its more of a Dept. guideline. 99.9% of the people who are being stopped by Police know they are Police. A shield should be displayed however.
-
Well, it seems to be a problem around here that the people being stopped don't know that they are police. If some beefy guys (I don't care their color) stopped me without identifying themselves, I would probably assume the worst and start to fight. If I knew they were cops (and sorry, KWAC, it's NOT obvious if no shield is displayed) then I might be plenty mad, but I would know better than to fight.
-
King without a crown wrote: No it's not against the law, its more of a Dept. guideline. 99.9% of the people who are being stopped by Police know they are Police. A shield should be displayed however.
Am I correct in assuming that you mean the people being stopped by the police have done something wrong therefore they know the people stopping them are police? -
The only time I've ever heard that the person being stopped didn't know it was the Police, was a defense used in court. ie" I thought the 4 beefy white men jumping out of the crown victoria in Crown Heights were goin to rob me, thats why I ran, and that gun I had, well I found that too, I was on my way to the precinct with it when you stopped me"
Being stopped by the Police doesn't necessarily mean you've done something wrong, however the majority of the people being stopped have been stopped before, and often been arrested by those same officers. Guys that carry guns and shoot people on the street usually dont change their ways after being arrested. To quote one of one of the local Brooklyn murderers..." I'd rather be caught by the Police with a gun, then be caught by my enemies without one" -
I could understand the neglect of identifying oneself if it's someone you've stopped before.
But if I, who have never been stopped by the police, get stopped by people I don't recognize and who refuse to identify themselves, isn't it understandable that I might panic?
Deadly situations are being caused by police not identifying themselves as police. How are we, ordinary non-criminals with few run-ins with the law, supposed to tell if we are being stopped by the police or assaulted by criminals? And knowing whether or not you are dealing with the cops DOES change behavior which affects the ultimate outcome of the incident. -
There is no epidemic of Cops not identifying themselves, people often use that to turn the situation around that lead to the Police encounter. Did the 7 foot Cop that dangled you by your neck identify himself?
-
He didn't have to because he was in uniform and I was in the precinct to pick up a wallet that a cop had called me to tell me was in the station. And then when I arrive, the cops had no idea what I was talking about. Then the tall cop told me, "Go home to your parents, little girl."
I was 25 with a postgraduate degree. I said, "My parents are in Boston." As soon as I said that, he picked me up by the neck and dangled me about 4 feet off the ground. Now I was smaller back then, but not that small. I was 5'5" and 115 lbs.
That whole experience terrified and traumatized me and it took me years before I could even talk about it. And then that night, the cop called me again and said, "Why didn't you pick up your wallet?" I tried to file a complaint with Internal Affairs, but I was too traumatized to go through with it.
There are good cops out there, but I have been mistreated by a number of them (like those cops who not only refused to do anything about my stalker, but actually HELPED my stalker stalke me) to give me a lifelong healthy fear of them. -
And I find your assertion that there is "no epidemic of cops not identifying themselves" to be disturbing. Perhaps epidemic is too strong of a word, but it is something that DOES happen and there are more than a few threads on this board of cops not identifying themselves and giving people a scare.
The neighbors on the stoop weren't criminals, and yet they were treated like criminals without even the courtesy of an identification. Same with a 59-year-old white man who was stopped and frisked in another thread. And need I mention Alafair and her friends? These aren't criminals. These people have very little information so they don't know whether they are being stopped by police or mugged. -
Do you think theres a pattern here? Getting stalked? Getting dangled by your neck by cops? Pissing off the stove people? Just to name a few, I didn't have the time to review all of your 131 Posts, but I'm sure theres more. Do you leave room for the possibility that maybe you are doing something to elicit these responses in people, therefore creating these negative interactions?
-
King without a crown wrote: Do you think theres a pattern here? Getting stalked? Getting dangled by your neck by cops? Pissing off the stove people? Just to name a few, I didn't have the time to review all of your 131 Posts, but I'm sure theres more. Do you leave room for the possibility that maybe you are doing something to elicit these responses in people, therefore creating these negative interactions?
Yo, you seem to be preoccupied with her, why don't you just ask her for a date? -
what are stove people? they sound helpful
-
All these experiences happened over a number of years and they aren't even a major part of my life. I just posted about them because they are "events" because none of you would be interested in my daily life of feeding the cats, proofreading at law firms, and auditions.
I ask you, what is WRONG with you that you would think there was ANY justification for a cop that is twice my size to pick me up BY THE NECK and dangle me, no matter how much I pissed him off? How is that AT ALL professional? And all I said to him was, "My parents are in Boston." Not only was his behavior extraordinarily dangerous to my wellbeing, but it was a complete nonsequitor. I stated a fact that I did not live with my parents and the next thing I know, I'm four feet in the air.
I find the courage to talk about something that was deeply traumatizing (the IAB even said I had a case, but I couldn't go through with it) and you make fun of it. I have lost ALL respect for you. You are deeply disturbed and I hope that you aren't patrolling MY block considering that you believe that the cops have the right to intimidate and harrass anyone.
Why are you so pissed at me anyway? Is it because I blew you off for posting IRRELEVANT crime stats in another thread? I don't have a problem with crime stats about a place I'm thinking of visiting, but you posted crime stats for a place that was BLOCKS AWAY and in a part of town that I don't visit after dark because it skeeves me. -
I think that KWAC actually posted an article that had directly to do with the place you were planning on visiting. don't just blow off crime stats. do keep living without fear, but do so reasonably. sounds like you do, for the most part.
-
Actually, he didn't. He posted a crime stat for a place that was EAST of Kingston when the place I was intending to visit was on Nostrand. BLOCKS away. Not terribly relevant at all.
I know damn well not to go to that area after dark.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds







