This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Hate the bus lane on Nostrand? Get ready for SBS Utica. The B46 — Brooklynian

Hate the bus lane on Nostrand? Get ready for SBS Utica. The B46

"A dedicated bus lane will be created this summer for the B46 along the mile of Utica Avenue between Church Avenue and Carroll Street, plus a two-block stretch between St. Johns Place and Eastern Parkway, the DOT said."

http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20140423/crown-heights/dedicated-bus-lane-coming-utica-avenue-ease-b46-commute


...I suspect that this is the beginning of a larger project.
«134

Comments

  • Will they do away with all parking and stopping on Utica? The street has exactly 4 lanes, including the parking ones. That will certainly be wonderful for local businesses! Will they bump out the sidewalks as they've done on Nostrand and Rogers? That will make things even better.

    It's apparent that this DOT is being run by a woman who is even dumber than the ex-traffic Nazi Sadik-Khan.
  • Yes, I believe the street will be reconfigured to support SBS.

    I am interested in seeing how the Dollar Vans adapt. This is a very popular stop/stretch for them, and this will effectively allow them to be ticketed if they operate in the area.

  • morralkan,

    Over on Nostrand south of the parkway, they've got the same situation where the bus lane is along the curb. They make it work for businesses by having the bus lane in effect during rush hours, and then doing commercial loading hours in the bus lane during the middle of the day. At night time, if you have a car, you can park in it for free.
  • As people get tickets, they are getting the hang of the arrangement.
  • There's key difference with Nostrand: it's ONE-WAY. Utica is a two way street and there is no nearby, continuous, parallel street to Utica. I'm virtually sure that if you were to ask the shop owners on Nostrand for their honest opinion, they would uniformly hate these new lanes. Commercial loading hours are any time during the day. Do you expect that they have so much pull that small businesses can dictate to their suppliers when they can accept deliveries? A lot of the stores get a lot of their business from motorists making brief stops. When they run the risk of getting ticketed because there's no place to park, the motorists look elsewhere to shop. If he city and the DOT want to speed things up on Utica, they might consider first rebuilding the streets so that they are actually smooth. The southern section of Utica is like a pothole-filled roller coaster in many spots.You think that does not slow traffic?

    This "reconfiguring" is a big waste of money. We need fewer of these grand designs and more competent attention to the condition of  our city's roads. The Dollar vans are essential to the residents of East Flatbush and other southern neighborhoods, getting people back home far more quickly than even express buses can. And when all is said and done, the SBS buses will zip along, sort of, the DOT and the MTA will trumpet all sorts of glorious statistics, and the local buses will lumber along and anyone not living near or going to an SBS stop will still be taking a slow boat to China.
  • Not everyone sees the effects you describe as a problem.

  • This project is interesting; bring it!

    I would love for the DOT to try this with Flatbush Avenue and the B41. 
  • Since businesses are an important part of lively neighborhoods, making it difficult for businesses (except, of course, for the hipster-approved coffee houses and bars) to survive is a problem. 
  • The businesses along Fordham Road in the Bronx appear to be doing ok, and it has SBS.

    Not many hipsters there, either.

  • morralkan, people getting to their jobs is also important - especially in a neighborhood where most households don't own an auto and depend on transit. Faster and more reliable buses make a big difference.
  • mugofmead111
    edited April 2014
     A lot of the stores get a lot of their business from motorists making brief stops. When they run the risk of getting ticketed because there's no place to park, the motorists look elsewhere to shop. It doesn't seem to affect the businesses on Flatbush Avenue, and there are limited places to park (legally) there. I added the term legally because double-parking and people who sit in their vehicle while someone runs in really quickly is a constant problem on Flatbush especially between Empire Boulevard and the Junction. I don't think enough of those motorists are getting ticketed because they are not being deterred from doing it. 

    This "reconfiguring" is a big waste of money. We need fewer of these grand designs and more competent attention to the condition of  our city's roads. The Dollar vans are essential to the residents of East Flatbush and other southern neighborhoods, getting people back home far more quickly than even express buses can. And when all is said and done, the SBS buses will zip along, sort of, the DOT and the MTA will trumpet all sorts of glorious statistics, and the local buses will lumber along and anyone not living near or going to an SBS stop will still be taking a slow boat to China.
    The slowness of the buses probably contribute to the popularity of the dollar vans. If the buses (local and Limited) were actually to run on time, maybe there wouldn't be a need or a demand for the dollar vans. 

    I have an unlimited Metrocard. I'm inclined to shell out the additional cash to use a dollar van when I've already made the investment in an unlimited Metrocard....unless the bus is really late and I'm really desperate. Therefore, I'd rather see the buses operate faster and more efficiently. 

    I've utilized the B44 SBS. It seems to be what the Limited should have been but failed to be in terms of operating efficiently. Expanding SBS service is a good idea. I admit to have a slight bias because I live off what would be a stop on a Limited or SBS run. I do acknowledge that you have a point that service among the local buses seem to be really slow. 
  • One of the points I'm making is that the street surfaces are atrocious and this is one of the limiting factors when it comes to speed of any bus. The DOT and MTA should be pushing first for high quality roadbeds and paving to see what that effect will have. The bumped out corners only limit the speed at which the buses can run because it is harder to maneuver out of those spaces than it is from a normal bus stop. The MTA/DOT trumpets the speed of the SBS buses, but conveniently neglects to time the local buses and the (in)frequency with which they run. 
    One of the primary factors that slows down bus service is the fact that they are so overcrowded. It simply takes a lot longer to board and discharge passengers when a bus is chock full of people, even more so when passengers are elderly, infirm, or carrying packages. Perhaps the world along Nostrand Ave is vastly different, but when I got on the 34th St bus in Manhattan, it was not the dipping of Metro cards that took all the time, it was much more the crowding of people like sardines that made each stop an adventure. 

    By the way, whynot, have you been frequently taking the SBS on Fordham Road and doing your shopping there? What's the local service like there? Many people actually have to use the local. In any case, what do the Nostrand Ave. merchants actually think has been happening to their business lately?
  • whynot_31
    edited April 2014
    This decision to implement SBS was done with the knowledge that many businesses and riders would be adversely affected.

    This isn't a democracy.

    PS. Fordham Road is nice, it moves a pretty low income crowd, pretty quickly. The businesses have adapted.
  • One of the points I'm making is that the street surfaces are atrocious and this is one of the limiting factors when it comes to speed of any bus. The DOT and MTA should be pushing first for high quality roadbeds and paving to see what that effect will have. The bumped out corners only limit the speed at which the buses can run because it is harder to maneuver out of those spaces than it is from a normal bus stop. The MTA/DOT trumpets the speed of the SBS buses, but conveniently neglects to time the local buses and the (in)frequency with which they run. 
    One of the primary factors that slows down bus service is the fact that they are so overcrowded. It simply takes a lot longer to board and discharge passengers when a bus is chock full of people, even more so when passengers are elderly, infirm, or carrying packages. Perhaps the world along Nostrand Ave is vastly different, but when I got on the 34th St bus in Manhattan, it was not the dipping of Metro cards that took all the time, it was much more the crowding of people like sardines that made each stop an adventure. 

    By the way, whynot, have you been frequently taking the SBS on Fordham Road and doing your shopping there? What's the local service like there? Many people actually have to use the local. In any case, what do the Nostrand Ave. merchants actually think has been happening to their business lately?
    That's why on an SBS you can enter at any door -- it isn't just about dipping a metro card, but if you can enter from the back door or middle door you've already spread people out -- instead of the bottle neck that always happens a few rows in from the front making the front half feel twice as crowded as the back half.  I am very excited about this project.
  • Moralkan, I'm with you and said the same thing about the B44 SBS when it was announced. Now that it is underway, I've seen 1) Great SBS service with multiple buses running on schedules similar to the trains (every 3-5 minutes during rush hour 15-20 minutes off hours) 2) horrible local bus service with locals never running more than every 7-10 minutes but routinely running 20-30 minutes apart; 3) People being pulled off the SBS, handcuffed and arrested for not having a receipt; 4) traffic delays by the inevitable truck deliveries that occur during rush hours 5) traffic delays on blocks with grocery stores as people illegally park in front of the store and cabs wait to take shoppers home and 6) road repairs necessary to speed up local bus service not completed before SBS was implemented.

    My complaint about SBS is that the design seeks to benefit those riders who use the bus to get to subway lines and to punish those going to other locations (like schools). And lest anyone think this is some sort of veiled rant against gentrification, the same complaints have been raised out in Sheepshead Bay at the opposite end of Nostrand by the locals.  
  • whynot_31
    edited April 2014
    From what I understand, those who frequented Fordham Road went thru the same adjustment period when SBS first started there.

    It was very painful for a lot of people, then they either went away, stop complaining or adapted.

    ...we may never know which.     
  • I took the SBS for the first time from Rogers Ave and St Johns up to the Williamsburg bus depot. Granted, it was a Saturday around 4pm so we were not dealing with weekday rush hour traffic. But the ride was FAST. It was kind of like riding in a monorail. Getting home was similarly easy and fast.I am a big fan of the SBS service.

    We do need to step up the enforcement efforts against double parking, which particularly delays the local buses. The cops seem to be focusing their enforcement efforts on fare evaders, demonstrated in the "line of shame" of evaders caught and ticketed in front of the Lula Bagel every time I walk past.

    I am very cynical about efforts to improve local bus performance, though. Unless the MTA really increases the numbers of the local buses by like 30% or something, I don't really think they are ever going to be that efficient and punctual. The service that the local buses provide is fundamentally different from the SBS buses. The SBS is for moving commuters--students and working people--between transit hubs and major employment and shopping hubs. it is supposed to be like a subway. The local buses are for movement within neighborhoods or for people who prioritize the need the bus to get as close as possible to the destination. I think both systems should exist and there is room for both. I don't think that either bus system exists to punish the users of the other -- they are two totally different services for two totally different groups of constituents.
  • homeowner
    edited April 2014
    Yes, but they aren't being marketed as two different services, they are being marketed as providing faster service for riders on the line. The reality is a subset of riders get significantly faster service and the rest get shockingly slow and unreliable service, especially in the rain and snow when better service is needed. So, for example, every SBS stop has a nice cover so you can at least attempt to shield yourself from the rain. You will drown in the rain on exposed corners at most B44 stops.

    One service doesn't improve the other, and in fact it feels like less regular buses run with the new SBS bus service. This may be harded to tell on Rogers as the SBS is segregated, but is quite clear on Nostrand as one SBS then another blows past riders waiting for the slow B44 packed with pasengers to arrive.
  • It's that last part of your last sentence, homeowner, that is very significant. ["waiting for the slow B44 PACKED with passengers" emphasis added] My experience is that the SBS buses run frequently and often have far more capacity than is needed while the local buses are designed to be grossly UNDER capacity. After all, the MTA wants to demonstrate how wonderful their SBS service is while they have next to no interest in the insignificant schmucks riding the local. (most often older people with walkers, canes, etc)
    Sort of like the case of Sadik-Khan who was only concerned with picnic tables and lights under the pavement in Times Square, but who had no interest in actually maintaining and rebuilding the roadbed of normal streets, unless, of course, she could bump out sidewalks, build large, non-maintained weedbeds in the middle of the streets, etc.
  • whynot_31
    edited April 2014
    DeBlasio has stated he hopes to implement 13 additional SBS routes during his first (?) term.

    http://www.streetsblog.org/2014/04/25/trottenberg-nyc-should-expect-13-sbs-routes-in-four-years/

    I doubt he will be able to pull that off, but thought I would point out that it isn't just the DOT Comissioner and MTA that are pushing SBS.
  • Of course not, but those organizations are pushing hard for these SBS routes. Unfortunately, they are far less concerned with maintaining streets in good condition. Even if one bikes, riding over streets full of potholes and other impediments is not good for one's bike nor for one's butt. S-K often ad her DOT paint bike lanes over the crappiest of street surfaces and then declared "mission accomplished!"
  • whynot_31
    edited April 2014
    Bikes are merely a distraction; very few people believe that they provide an effective option for moving this city.

    The public transportation advocates have appealed to bike riders merely because accomidating them helps make using a car more prohibitive, and they are such an easy group to motivate.

    ....you are right, any and every method that can be used to discourage the use of privately owned cars, will be.


  • mugofmead111
    edited April 2014
    So, for example, every SBS stop has a nice cover so you can at least attempt to shield yourself from the rain. 
    Not at the NB B44 SBS stop at the Junction. 
  • I noticed on Nostrand near Key Food there aren't any shelters or seating for the elderly taking the local bus but there is this fancy express stop. WTF
  • As I said, Dawndew, the DOT does not give a damn about the insignificant schmucks who have to ride the local buses. The elderly and mobility-impaired, especially, are unlikely to hoof it over to an SBS stop for the fancy waiting areas. 

    The fact remains that many people do need to use private cars: elderly and other people who are not easily mobile (ever try taking a parent with Alzheimer's on the subway?); people who must travel between neighborhoods not well-serviced by public transportation (and which never will be); people who must travel between work and home at late and unusual hours; people who actually use their car as part of their means of making a living and must carry tools or make multiple stops all day long(plumbers, electricians, etc); and parents with larger families who must take and pick up their children from a variety of places as well as shop for their families, among others. This does not even take into account all the trucks that bring all the good we all purchase on a daily basis. 

    Unfortunately, particularly the younger, hipster population only thinks of themselves and are convinced that they will remain fit and active well into their 90's and that they will simply "drive" their eventual children around on the back of their bikes. I'm sure thrilled that I never had to work in close proximity to a biker who rode 45 minutes to work in the heat of the summer!

     For people like Sadik-Khan, the use of a private vehicle is tantamount to moral decadence. So, it was of paramount importance to her to build dedicated bike lanes all over the city which, when weather and other contingencies are taken into account, will barely be used about 50% of the time.
  • Young single, healthy people who despise older people with families eventually become them.

    It is is the circle of life.

    The only question is "Will the city suffer when (and if) large numbers of families move to the 'burbs?"

    The answer seems to be, "lets wait and see".
  • Young single, healthy people who despise older people with families eventually become them.
    The elderly represent a disproportionate number of the people killed by car drivers. Protection of the elderly is a major motivation of the people who support complete streets.

    Whatever ulterior motives you and morralkan may ascribe to JSK, DeBlasio, etc., what they are advocating is supported by a large number of people (such as myself) that have no interest in anything but reducing the death and destruction caused by car drivers.

  • whynot_31
    edited April 2014
    The majority on NYC residents have long wanted more control of NYC streets, and to make the streets less dominated by POVs. After all, most NYC residents do not own cars.

    We are told that Albany is in the way, and Albany is now being successfully cast as the demon. 

    It may work;  DeBlasio may be able to build on Bloomberg's successes.   He may be able to succeed in implementing East River Tolls, rolling out additional bike lanes and SBS routes.

    This summer, a child pedestrian will doubtlessly die, more studies will doubtlessly be released about how SBS is faster than local service, and more articles will be written about drivers and cars breaking the laws:

    http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20140423/crown-heights/crown-heights-drivers-ticketed-up-88-percent-more-this-year-police-say

    These may be enough to give SBS and complete streets the final boost it needs.

    Only one thing is certain: The show is awesome.
  • mugofmead111
    edited May 2014
    Do we really need tolls on the East River crossings? That'd seem harder to implement than SBS routes. 

    Most New Yorkers may not own cars, but enough of them probably do. I hardly see any empty parking spots on the street. 
Sign In or Register to comment.