This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Brooklyn Unite! Save the Broken Angel — Brooklynian

Brooklyn Unite! Save the Broken Angel

Friends,

By now you've all heard about the arrest of Arthur Woods and the city's plans to raze the Broken Angel. I've had enough. Haven't you? It's time to act.

What can we do? I'm open to suggestions, but here are a few ideas to start us off. First of all, tell everyone you're mad as hell about what's going on. And by everyone, I mean not just your friends and neighbors, but your politicians and newspapers too. Let's write to Tish James, Marty Markowitz, Mike Bloomberg, and the Brooklyn Papers, the Daily News, and the New York Times.

We can also help the Woods directly. We can give them money, time, and our support. They told the Daily News they want to make the building into a museum. Let's help them do that. Any lawyers out there?

And we can stop the city. If they are going to tear the building down, they have to get in there. We can stop them. It's our duty as citizens to prevent the city from doing irreparable physical damage to the building. Anyone sees or hears anything out there - put it up on this board.

I know I'm not the only one who feels this way. Let's save the Broken Angel. Who's with me?

Comments

  • The city has no plans to raze the place.
    They stated that it just needs to be brought up to code and when it does, it can be inhabited again.
    So you would need to enlist the help of an engineer, and architect, and possibly an expeditor.
  • OK, I hear you. "Raze" was a little alarmist. But this is the quote from the Daily News:

    "They said they were going to demolish anything they deemed to be structurally unsafe," said Wood, who wants to get nonprofit status for the building and turn it into a museum and art school. "It's all incredibly disheartening." (Jotham Sederstrom, "Angel Owner Won't Quit," NY Daily News, 10/18/06).

    And we all recall this line:

    “The building is open to the elements, the floors are not complete and there aren’t stairways, just planks in some places,” said Buildings spokesman Jennifer Givner. “There are also two illegal additions. One is a 50-foot extension above the roofline and another is a 15-foot horizontal extension. The building is a safety hazard for him and for the public.” (Robin Pogrebin, "Brooklyn Art House is Ruled Hazardous," NYT, 10/18/06).

    So take that as you will, but I read it as saying there's a serious chance the building won't persist in its current form without intervention.
  • grandzu wrote: The city has no plans to raze the place.
    They stated that it just needs to be brought up to code and when it does, it can be inhabited again.
    So you would need to enlist the help of an engineer, and architect, and possibly an expeditor.
    Any idea what kind of work needs to be done to bring it up to code? ie major renovation or more simple structural reenforcement?
  • i believe christopher wood, the son, is working on a web site to keep us apprised of the situation. i for one would love to know exactly what caused that fire in the first place. seems odd that the DOB is reacting so strongly all of a sudden.
  • This is the building in Dave Chapelle's Block Party movie, right?
    :roll:

    It is soooo painfully not up to code . . . an interesting bit of individualism, but a scary mess too.
  • Update Broken Angel 10/29/06
    On 10/10/06 Broken Angel suffered minimal damage from a fire at the top of the structure. The cause of the fire is unknown and still under investigation. Broken Angel has been an active project of construction by my family beginning in 1979. Major construction was finished in 2002, and all work done thereafter has been for the purpose of maintaining the building. The fire brought the attention of the Department of Buildings (DOB), previous interactions had occurred in 1986, and 2002 with no action taken against the building. During the course of building and maintaining the structure there have been no accidents or complaints. Compared with most modern construction projects, such as the Time Warner building in NYC, this is an excellent record. It raises questions as to why large developers are allowed to continue construction when they pose a risk to the community, whereas Broken Angel, which has no history of construction problems, has been singled out as a danger. My mother and father, the legal guardians and owners of Broken Angel were threatened with eviction for 6 days. On the 7th day they were vacated by the police without a court order or engineer’s report. We question the necessity and the humanity of this action. They were told that this was done for their safety; however action was taken prior to any inspection of the interior of the building by an engineer. Furthermore, we were told that the building would be demolished in 3 weeks if an architect did not submit plans to bring it to code. We have been compliant with this request. We are thankful to the firm of Jordan Parnass Digital Architecture http://www.jpda.net/news.html for all of their help and support. On Thursday (10/26/06) an engineer from the DOB toured the structure, and the next day the DOB released a different story. A DOB spokesperson recently commented to the Daily News (10/27/06) that any demolition orders, if warranted will take approximately 3 months to begin.
    Photos of broken angel http://www.flickr.com/photos/onebadapple/
  • So plans have been submitted to bring it up to code and preserve the building? That's great news!
Sign In or Register to comment.