This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Less Street Cleaning — Brooklynian

Less Street Cleaning

This is from The Brooklyn Papers. I completely and whole heartedly support this.
Alternate reality: Nabe seeks less street-cleaning

Sanitation officials told The Stoop this week they aren’t about to reduce street-cleaning in Fort Greene and Clinton Hill so that residents can enjoy the same perk as their upscale pals in Park Slope and Brooklyn Heights: the right to leave their cars in one space for most of the week.

“We have no plans to reduce the amount of street-cleaning in Fort Greene or Clinton Hill,” said Kathy Dawkins, a Sanitation spokeswoman.

Currently, motorists in Fort Greene and Clinton Hill have to move their cars two to four times a week to accommodate street cleaning, while Slope and Heights drivers only need move their cars once or twice.

“We only want what they have,” said resident Susan Butler. She and other members of the Fort Greene Association have asked Councilwoman Letitia James (D–Prospect Heights) to fight City Hall.

“Constituents think [the schedule] is inconvenient and nothing more than a revenue-generator,” James told The Stoop. “I tend to agree.”

“I spoke to [Department of Transportation] Commissioner [Iris] Weinshall last week about changing the schedule, and she was receptive,” added James.

Weinshall — herself a Slope resident, albeit one with a driver — may be open to the issue, but Sanitation said no.

Original link http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/30/4/30_04streetcleaning.html

Comments

  • Man this would be so sweet. But street cleaning is blatantly a revenue generator for the city so I'm not holding my breath.
  • I've never actually seen the streets being cleaned, so what is it exactly that they do?

    Whatever it is I wish it included picking up stray garbage. Drives me crazy to see our sidewalks and streets littered with crap. It usually looks like the garbage collector broke a garbage bag during a run and just left what fell out on the sidewalk.
  • Yeah who needs all those street sweepers everyday especially since the homeowner is responsible for cleaning 18" of the street from the curb. What's left over for them to sweep? Once a week is enough. :?:
  • Anonymous wrote: the homeowner is responsible for cleaning 18" of the street from the curb.
    hmm...i didn't realize that. maybe i should be annoyed by the homeowners. sorry, trash collectors. :oops:
  • Please, the streets in Clinton Hill are dirty. Street cleaning twice a week is necessary.
    If it changes to once a week, we'd have people complaining that the streets are dirty and should be cleaned more often.

    For minute issues such as this, instead of complaining, try complying.
  • grandzu wrote: Please, the streets in Clinton Hill are dirty. Street cleaning twice a week is necessary.
    If it changes to once a week, we'd have people complaining that the streets are dirty and should be cleaned more often.

    For minute issues such as this, instead of complaining, try complying.
    You want motorists who park there to comply, but not homeowners ? Who has a larger stake in the neighborhood. If homeowners keep their sidewalks clean, we dont need street cleaning every other day. Just to go Park Slope and you will see. They made a concerted effort over months to get the waiver.
  • arZan wrote: Just to go Park Slope and you will see. They made a concerted effort over months to get the waiver.
    Actually they fought to KEEP a reduction in street cleaning rules. The Department of Sanitation implemented the reduction.

    Beginning in July 2000, the New York City Department of Sanitation (DOS) reduced the Street Cleaning Regulations (SCR) as a “pilot reduction” in an area of Park Slope, Brooklyn from 2-days of cleaning a week per blockface to 1-day a week. The pilot reduction plan was formulated exclusively by DOS without the benefit of consultation or notification to the Community Board. The Community Board only became aware of the pilot reduction when SCR signage was in the process of being physically altered. Inquiries made to the Community Board’s District Office pursued with DOS revealed that the department had unilaterally decided to implement a pilot reduction.

    On November 4, 2002 the CB6 District Manager received a telephone call from the department announcing that the pilot reduction area was going to be changed back to the original regulations imminently. The only reason stated was that the change has had a “negative impact on cleanliness.” After much zealous lobbying by both individual residents and elected officials representing the area, DOS backed off their initial threat. Thousands upon thousands of signatures were obtained by the CB6 to demonstrate how widespread popular support was behind the idea of keeping the pilot reduction.


    But you might be able to get Park Slope's CSR revoked.

    Based on the percent level of acceptably clean streets with the one day SCR, it is lesser than the ones in our community board's two days SCR. Using the mayor's office numbers at Dec 06 98% of streets were clean in CB 2 and 96% in CB 6. These numbers might make the DOS revoke the one day SCR in Park Slope, but I doubt they will implement them here. Bloomberg's way of revenue for the city is through tickets and that is not changing.
  • One good thing about making people move their cars more frequently is that it gives more people more chances at finding a parking space.

    Then again, what do I know - I think all public parking should cost money and we should implement tolls for use in congested area/times. There are costs to cars that society bears - time to charge that back to users.
  • piratesofwaverly wrote: Then again, what do I know - I think all public parking should cost money and we should implement tolls for use in congested area/times. There are costs to cars that society bears - time to charge that back to users.
    I couldn't agree more.
  • I live near a school so my parking situation is even worse. Finding parking spots is only going to get more difficult as gentrification bring more Subarus, Volvos and Passat wagons to the neighborhood but there's no such thing as a street that's too clean.

    Move your car or pay for a garage. If you are only moving your car once a week it seems that it's more of a luxury than a necessity. If parking is that much of a pain maybe you should consider selling the car.

    The city obviously needs revenue and I'd rather see people with cars get ticketed than pay higher property or sales taxes. That's the price you pay for having a car in the one city where you really don't need one...
  • I think its a little "Orwellian" in nature to suggest that cars are bad. If I take Carlton Banks' analogy further and say we eliminate all cars in the city, then the property taxes will go up for sure. Because the income the city gets from the insane ticketing of cars will go away.

    And I feel a bit ticked off at your attitude in saying one does not need cars. And that u rather have less cars and lower property taxes.

    If you think property taxes are too high....well you know what...bad luck. Thats the price you pay for owning property in the city. If you want lower property taxes go to rural Pennsylvania.
  • arZan wrote: Because the income the city gets from the insane ticketing of cars will go away.
    Yeah but what percentage of the city's income comes from parking tickets? Doesn't a majority of it comes from taxes and real estate?
  • arZan, I'm not sure where you read anything about cars being bad in my post. I also never mentioned that property taxes are too high. I simply stated a preference for parking tickets over higher property taxes. That being said, economic research and common sense as well as history show that excessive tax rates drive away business and homeowners. These two constituencies are the foundation of any viable urban economy. Look at what happened to Philadelphia when they implemented a city tax. If you have to choose between those who are actually investing in the city through ownership and those owning cars for leisure, any responsible politician will choose to tax car drivers.

    If you NEED a car to get to work or cart your kids around or move lumber or whatever else then cars are fine. If you only move your car once a week it seems as if its not a need (defined as necessary for work or family reasons).

    You seem to like having the mobility and freedom of a car... This is also fine. But the fact you just don't want to deal with the hassle of moving the car that you drive once a week and don't really NEED just seems lazy. Why should your car that you drive once a week sit on the street all week and take up a space that people who actually use their cars may need?

    Again stop complaining, comply with parking regulations or pay for a garage...
  • In most major European cities, municpal streetcleaners actually CLEAN THE STREETS! Imagine that.
  • Property taxes too low? Are you kidding? Not to encourage our Republican tax-and-spend overlords, but I'm always floored by how inexpensive are NYC property taxes. They certainly nicke-and-dime you in other places, but property taxes are not where I usually see this happening.

    Hear, hear - more sidewalk cleaning! Street cleaning needs to happen more often too. Twice a week might do, for starters. Certainly, street-cleaning frequency has nothing to do with the parking rules requiring people to move their cars 2/week. Hmm, I actually think the 'churn' is good if they're not going to install meters or some other system.
    It discourages casual car possession.
  • Since when did the republicans start trying to increase taxes? I grew up in Massachusetts and the Dems just kept increasing taxes again and again. it was all part of an effort to price seniour citizens out of neighborhoods so that up and coming wealthy dems could get property closer to Boston while low income elderly residents had to ditch houses owned for generatoins because the state decided they needed to increase taxes on a house by 300% every few years. The only reason taxes are low in manhattan is because businesses make up the difference buy paying the rest of the taxes. businesses that were brought in by Republican Mayors over the past 10 years. And I aint no republican.
  • George Bush Sr. raised taxes. So Republicans have been trying to increase taxes since around 1989. That's since when.
  • Subject: Take some pride.

    Be happy, you park for FREE on the streets. I would impose that if you would like to rent a spot by the month then each spot on the street has a price. Think about your argument and try picking up some trash yourself instead of pretending it's no your problem. The issue is being Lazy and that will only make you...
  • I have a question: how do the "street cleaners" actually clean the streets? All I see them do is scrub the gutters with those giant brushes and throw trash everywhere.
  • There's two things goiing on Boygariel.

    1. They spray a little bit of water out in front of the brushes (when the weather is right).

    2. Both of those brushes turn toward the center of the sweeper and then there's another cylindrical brush behind them that sweeps stuff up into a hopper. (If you're in the right place at the right time, you'll see the sweepers meeting up with a garbage truck to empty the hopper into the truck.)

    They don't get everything, but based on what I've seen them dump into the trucks they get a hell of a lot.

    Not perfect but MUCH better than nothing.
  • Nathan wrote: There's two things goiing on Boygariel.

    1. They spray a little bit of water out in front of the brushes (when the weather is right).

    2. Both of those brushes turn toward the center of the sweeper and then there's another cylindrical brush behind them that sweeps stuff up into a hopper. (If you're in the right place at the right time, you'll see the sweepers meeting up with a garbage truck to empty the hopper into the truck.)

    They don't get everything, but based on what I've seen them dump into the trucks they get a hell of a lot.

    Not perfect but MUCH better than nothing.
    That makes me feel much better. For years I assumed they were doing nothing but rearranging the trash on the streets.
  • Is this the thread to complain about the City refusing to suspend ASP tomorrow? As I sit here, I can hear tires spinning in the snow. The street better be spotless when I come home tomorrow night.
  • Pikesville wrote: Is this the thread to complain about the City refusing to suspend ASP tomorrow? As I sit here, I can hear tires spinning in the snow. The street better be spotless when I come home tomorrow night.
    They didn't suspend it today (Thurs.)!? There's three inches of ice up and down both sides of my street. I'd LOVE to see how the street cleaner does with that.
  • Boygabriel wrote: They didn't suspend it today (Thurs.)!? There's three inches of ice up and down both sides of my street. I'd LOVE to see how the street cleaner does with that.
    According to the city's web site, ASP regs were in effect today (and will be tomorrow, too). Maybe the traffic wardens are turning a blind eye, but there appears to be no official reprieve. Parallel parking tonight was teh suxxors- all the crud on the street is slick and packed down hard.
  • On Thursday nobody on my block seemed to move their cars. I didn't see any tickets but I wasn't looking closely. This morning everyone had moved their car for the ASP.

    I moved my car last night, it was a pain but I got it done. I had to climb up and over a short snow (ice) bank in order to get into a spot. I love my Volvo and all, but it's not built for that!
  • It is truly disgraceful that they refused to supend ASP, yet they did zero snow/ice removal. I came home to the same glaciers (seriously, some chunks of ice are huge!) and ridges that I left in the morning. Also, I noticed quite a few cars were indeed ticketed. What gives here? Is the city trying to save money on overtime? Thankfully temps are expected to rise this weekend and melt the ice.
Sign In or Register to comment.