This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Has NO made you think what if... for NYC? — Brooklynian

Has NO made you think what if... for NYC?

Seeing as it took all of about three days or less for all civil order to break down in NO, have any of you had "what if..." thoughts about something similar happening in NYC?

Mrs. BrooklynSwordStyle and I have been having a lot of those lately, especially given the reports of violence and the looting of gun stores (guess the looters didn't abide by the waiting period...).

I'm finally getting off my butt and putting together an emergency kit with all the usual radio/first aid/food/water/etc. for us and the dog.

And in case of zombie outbreak, I'll be packing a cricket bat.

Comments

  • Unfortunately I have NYC "whatif's" every single damn day, especially when i have to ride the subway. It's one of the those constant back of the mind things and really doesn't disrupt anything but I really don't enjoy it and this absolute crap going on in NO doesn't make me feel better. I just keep thinking about looting and gang rule in PH and how that would play out. Yeah, it sucks.
  • I remember some years back (early-mid 90's) we had that terrible rain storm and the water rose above level and all of downtown Manhattan was under water (from the River to Pearl Street) and so was the FDR. That was not even considered a hurricane - its scarry how badly we would be hit if it happened to be any worse.
  • Subject: 'the Big One'

    THE BIG ONE

    Experts say it’s only a matter of time before a major hurricane strikes New York City. When it comes, you may want to have your evacuation plan nearby. If not, meet the fishes.
    By Aaron Naparstek

    http://www.nypress.com/18/29/news&columns/aaronnaparstek.cfm
  • I think all of the "What if..." New York stuff is simply panic and bullsh-t. News shows need to fill time and are filling that time with pushing buttons on primal fears with little logic behind it. Yes, natural disasters can hit anywhere. But in the case of New Orleans the whole city is 7 feet below sea level.

    The New Orleans situation is bad enough. And I think we all know how media gossiping can whip everyone into a frenzy. If you're in NYC I would simply recommend counting your blessings and realize that as bad as the day to day life in this city can get, some others have it worse.

    And as far as flooding in Lower Manhattan goes, in the great scheme of things that is no big deal. The area is far from residential. And you don't have virtual bungalow towns filled with the poor on the shores of Battery Park City.

    I really think people should get a perspective. The dog poop avoiding, flasher dodging and iPod snatching issues are really the most we have to worry about. We really have it lots better here than we can imagine.
  • Subject: Re: 'the Big One'

    pacific wrote: THE BIG ONE

    Experts say it’s only a matter of time before a major hurricane strikes New York City. When it comes, you may want to have your evacuation plan nearby. If not, meet the fishes.
    By Aaron Naparstek

    http://www.nypress.com/18/29/news&columns/aaronnaparstek.cfm
    It's tough to get out of here on Labor Day weekend. I shudder to think what it'd be like during an evacuation. As DaveB says, there's only so much you can worry about on a daily basis. I'm far more concerned about subway attacks or (God forbid) a nuclear remapping of NYC than I am a hurricane. When the time comes, I know what to have on hand. If it's too big a storm, I'll take shelter in a solid place. I guess it's an argument for having fewer than three cats.

    I will say that, having seen my share of hurricanes (David then Frederick in the same season when I was a kid was a formative experience), people here are weirdly freaked out by the possibility. These are pretty random things, and there are seasons where no major storms make landfall. Then there are the past two seasons. The bottom line is that there is a third path between complacency and freaking out, which is informed, collected preparation and reaction. Know what the various hurricane categories mean, know your evac routes, know where the shelters are, know what supplies to have, know what important papers and records to store offsite, etc. Know how to act in a storm--don't go out when the eye passes over, don't go near windows, etc. All of this info is available. Get educated and don't fear the unknown. It doesn't have to be Lord of the Flies.
  • Subject: Re: 'the Big One'

    pacific wrote: THE BIG ONE

    Experts say it’s only a matter of time before a major hurricane strikes New York City. When it comes, you may want to have your evacuation plan nearby. If not, meet the fishes.
    By Aaron Naparstek

    http://www.nypress.com/18/29/news&columns/aaronnaparstek.cfm
    I've always enjoyed the NY Press' columns and fiction. Well, I will say 'used to' since it's gone downhill in recent years. But their news coverage is abysmal at best. And in many ways comes off like a hipster/literary version of the New York Post nowadays.

    Better chuck the NY Press and go out and take a walk and enjoy the fall day. Life's too complicated to panic about everything all the time.
  • Just be glad you live in Prospect HEIGHTS.
  • Subject: jack

    jack, the NY Press column by Naparstek seemed, uhm, pertinent to thet topic of this thread. posting it (and god forbid reading it) is not "panic."

    jeeze.
  • Subject: Re: jack

    Anonymous wrote: jack, the NY Press column by Naparstek seemed, uhm, pertinent to thet topic of this thread. posting it (and god forbid reading it) is not "panic."

    jeeze.
    Ease down tiger. All I'm saying is that despite reason and rationality, there is this pervasive 'me too' attitude that spawns after disasters. New Orleans is flooded and pummled by a horrible storm... Hey! What about us!

    All I'm saying is that there really is no equivalency between a hurricane that hits a city that is 7 feet below sea level and a hurricane that has a slim-to-none chance of hitting the northeast. I feel dreadfully sorry for anyone whose lives were affected by Katrina, but I can't take any of these supposed 'it could happen here' scenarios at all.

    I'm more concerned about the pervasive unease that is characterized by New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagins plea. It says it all:
    "After 9/11 we gave the president unprecented powers to take care of New York and those other places.... you mean to tell me that a place where thousands of people and thousands more people are dying, we can't figure out [how to get them help]. . . Somebody needs to get their ass on a plane and sit down and sit down the two them figure this out."

    I'm more concerned that this nation has supposedly put other things aside to deal with national security, yet Katrina hits and it's still an incompetent mess down there.

    THAT scares me.
  • Can I just post this link here? I can't help myself. Mr. Moore says it well:http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php[/url]
  • Well, I wasn't specifically talking about a hurricane hitting NYC. I meant "some sort of disaster and then everyone freaks out and it's Lord of the Flies" type shit.

    I'm just so saddened by the breakdown of society that I'm seeing in the blogs, on the news, etc. 9/11 made people pull together at least, Katrina seems to have unleashed some of the worst aspects of humans as a species.

    Shooting at rescue workers? WTF is that?
  • 9-11 was tragic, but a physically small event. I was in Brooklyn during 9-11, and it shook me to the core, but it did not affect society in general.

    In the case of New Orleans, the whole infrastructure of the city is gone. The poorest stayed behind. And beyond that, the Ninth Ward is one of the poorest places in the south. Built on swampland after the Civil War as a place for ex-slaves to live.

    So what you have is poverty, lack of concern, incompetence on leadership and deep seeded racial issues.

    Also in the case of 9-11, Giuliani was right there on the ground supporting and talking and dealing with things. In contrast, George W. Bush has really shown no human sympathy beyond robotic statements. Only left his Texas ranch after day 3 of this mess. And has still not personally done much of anything.

    To put perspective on this, Dubya is the same genius who personally flew a plane to Iraq to land on an aircraft carrier and proclaim 'Mission Accomplished'. In contrast, he's only a few states away from this mess and too 3 days to leave his vacation to simply spit out rhetoric.

    I can't justify people shooting at rescuers, but then again I have no idea how I would react to being in the middle of any of that hellscape.
  • Subject: i've chilled out

    jack, i've eased off. sorry, and i agree with you. Naparstek's article, btw, was published more than a month ago. so its not a me tooism.

    beyond that i agree with your post.
  • 1. the chances of the north atlantic EVER getting a category 4 hurricane are slim to none, hell the chances of us getting a weak category 2 are slim. the water is too cold up here, even in the dead of summer.

    2. we have MUCH stricter gun laws here...when you keep guns out of the legal chain of commerce, you keep them out of the illegal chain of commerce by default.

    3. we are above sea level.

    4. you dont have the 40 er...no 80 bucks to get a tank of gas out of the city? take the metro north. its cheap...and chances are if something really serious was coming, they'd let you on for free or reduced rates. becuase thats the way new york rolls. they would take an initial hit in order to get people out if they knew some kickass once in a hundred years serious storm was coming.

    5. building codes, building codes, building codes.

    6. we've had some pretty kick ass disasters, and people looked out for each other, the unwritten rules of new york etiquette and empathy kept us from reverting to a lord of the flies scenario. new yorkers value efficiency and civilization, and each other.

    7. we not only have pretty decent infrastructure, but we have social services, city wide and state wide agencies that are equipped and do kick into gear when shit goes down...its why we pay all those "high" taxes that the rest of the country seems to find a repugnant idea and contrary to whatever new-hampshire-ass ideas of "freedom" they have.

    8. and while we have some poor, POOR people here, the level of poverty here doesn't even approach the third world level of impoverishment you find on the gulf coast. when i was down there i was absolutely mortified at the complete dereliction in which some people lived...

    9.these cities also didn't spend nearly enough on municipal police services, and in some cities, like memphis, business hired private seurity guards to patrol the streets because there weren't nearly enough cops for the level of criminals.

    10. unfortunately, it all comes down to infrastructure. we pay much higher taxes, so we have the services, physical structures, and social and political leadership and agencies to weather a catastrophe. you don't really notice it when things go well, but when things go wrong, hideously wrong, and then we get surprised when people pull together and it all stays together somehow.


    it is utterly INFURIATING that the entire gulf coast region is completely being hung out to dry here. its INFURIATING that celebrities can be bothered to risk their well being to go into that city to provide moral support, but the people who are ELECTED to do that job either stay away or "fly over" to view the destruction from an abstract and safe distance. what happened to the captain going down with the ship? there were studies years ago that predicted just this sort of disaster..and when they knew there was a category 5 then 4 headed straight for new orleans...what did they do? they didn't do ANYTHING but tell people to leave...but when you exist at subsistence level, like so many in new orleans...where and how do you go? so they let them suffer and die. its a sin of omission.

    i seriously hope this causes america to reconsider its tax, social and infrastructure policies. not to mention its energy policies and sources. this will have impacts that will dwarf 9/11. but it won't make a shits worth of difference in the way we conduct things here. we are a people who forget our history, and are therefore doomed to repeat it, and we cut corners in any way we can, this is all veneered in a shell of stupid optimism varnished to a high gloss sheen with rose colored shellac.

    i have never been so ahsamed of my country until this week. and there's nothing i can do but give money, and it seems so lax.
  • t-fal,

    You make good points, but I have to note that making it tough to get guns in NYC doesn't mean there are not a whole ton of guns here anyways.

    It's pretty simple to go out to LI and buy a shotgun or rifle (where you don't need a permit in many cases IIRC), toss it in the trunk of your car, and bring it right back. Believe me it happens.

    I'm betting the yahoos shooting at rescue copters aren't the good law abiding citizens of NOLA who jumped through all the legal hoops to get their firearms. And I bet the gun fire I hear around Brooklyn isn't coming from the 50,000+ New Yorkers who have got gun permits.

    And let's not even talk about the gun pipeline coming up from the south (or down from the north) right to our fair city. We can pass all the laws we want, people are going to get guns if they want them.

    After all, I certainly smoked some pot during high school despite the nation wide ban.
  • no you're right. there are guns here, plenty of them. but its not like everyone has one or two in their homes. it just surprised me just how prevalent gun ownership is down there when i visited some friends, and EVERYsingle one of them had firearms in their apartments. the gun violence in new orleans was at seriously problematic levels way before the hurricane. i don't know how people tolerated it.
  • Jack wrote: 9-11 was tragic, but a physically small event. I was in Brooklyn during 9-11, and it shook me to the core, but it did not affect society in general.
    (bold is mine)

    I cannot disagree with you more strongly on that point.

    Yes, compared to what happened in New Orleans, or even the tsunami S.E. Asia, 9/11 was (amazingly enough --- HOWEVER, try to consider the consequences if those buildings hadn't collapsed upon themselves, but, instead, toppled over) a relatively localized event and the rebuilding has been been painless to a certain extent (and lots of people have been making lots of money from from it --- so morbid as it may seem, it has in in SOME sectors at least, been "good" for the economy of New York).

    However, to say that 9/11 did not affect American "society in general" is missing something really key. Not only have we, as Americans, realized that we too are targets for for terrorist strikes (and, IMHO, to be lulled into the sense that this was a one-off event and think that something like that, or worse, could not happen again, is truly putting one's head in the sand). Also, Americans, average Americans, are becoming aware that we are not perceived around the world as the the benevolent father-figure nation, the nation that is so powerful because of our "freedoms" that we thought we were. There is intense hatred out there for Americans, for a variety of reasons. I am NOT saying this is true across the board, but I think it has become very obvious that it is far more prevalent than most people ever thought before.

    And, because of all of the above, people (especially people in large cities) are far more vigilant, frightened, concerned about their safety. We have all been forced to take on a new world view as a result of this. And we have all been forced to, once again -- and perhaps to a far greater extent, question the competence and motivations of our leaders as well.

    But most importantly, for better or worse, it was 9/11 that kicked off the current war in Iraq!!! Given that, how can you possibly say that it had no effect on society in general? I could go on and on ... but really, have you considered this?
  • t-fal wrote: no you're right. there are guns here, plenty of them. but its not like everyone has one or two in their homes. it just surprised me just how prevalent gun ownership is down there when i visited some friends, and EVERYsingle one of them had firearms in their apartments. the gun violence in new orleans was at seriously problematic levels way before the hurricane. i don't know how people tolerated it.
    I grew up in southern Virginia with friends whose parents owned tens of guns and in one case hundreds of guns. Even as a kid, it boggled my mind. We were deer hunters and no matter how you cut it, you only have two hands. Anyhow, the 'hundreds of guns' family had a father who, to this day, will tell you he needs that many guns so he can arm himself and all the other whites when the 'Jew uses the Black to exterminate White Christians.' (There was one Jewish family in our town). Until the late 80s, when I was in high school, the Klan had a table at career day!

    No offense to NYers, you just don't understand that there are enormous swaths of this country that are full of people who believe shit like that. They are indoctrinated with it at work, at home and at church. I played Church league softball and the biggest grudge match of the year was always the First Baptist Church versus the AME. The Sheriff's Dept would send extra police to a church league softball game. I played for the Catholic Church and the Baptists wouldn't even join the priest in saying a prayer before the game. Catholics worship the Devil, y'know.

    Trust me, when they see the 'looting' they don't see people trying to survive, they see their justification for killing every single last one of them. It scares the shit out of me. Our move to Brooklyn was, in part, precipitated by a desire to keep our kids out of that culture. Now I don't imagine that it is perfect here, but there are just so many more possibilities.
  • Didn't we have a sort of dry run (pardon the pun) for a city-wide crisis during the blackout? Can't recall any widespread gun play then... at least not the most recent blackout, anyway.

    Now, if the whole city is underwater, of course we'll have problems, serious problems, with lawlessness and looting. But anything more than level-headed preparation (a maintained emergency kit and an escape plan) is Fox News-style scare-mongering.
  • 6. we've had some pretty kick ass disasters, and people looked out for each other, the unwritten rules of new york etiquette and empathy kept us from reverting to a lord of the flies scenario. new yorkers value efficiency and civilization, and each other.
    As someone from Louisiana, I agree with what T-fal has stated except the previous quote. Firstly the term "civilization" in a context such as this is inappropriate as it is laden with racist connotations (I'm not accusing T-fal, just saying the word itself as used within the context of the history of science, particularly the hierarchizing of social stance, intelligence and morality using sex, race, and class--see The Mismeasure of Man by Stephen Jay Gould, as well as the Bush agenda and a general history in the West of colonizing the 'uncivilized'.) Also, while some shown on the news are showing some lack of etiquette and empathy, I doubt we are getting the entire story. The south, particularly N.O. is known for hospitality and after days without food, water, airconditioning, a restroom, I don't know how anyone, New Yorker or not, would react.
  • Regarding the comparison to New Orleans, let me explain it even better. A flood and storm that crushes and destroys a WHOLE city affects the society and infrastructure of a city on a far greater scale than 9-11. No doubt, 9-11 was tragic and shocking. It was sickening. But when the day was done, phones still worked, toilets still flushed and hospitals were still open. Me and friends were shocked but still were able to watch TV news, get drunk and sleep in our own beds.

    Not the case of New Orleans.

    The place basically went from being a society one second to being a completely feral post-apocalyptic world in an instant. Not to mention the greater issues of class and governmental incompetence that has made hell even worse there.
    FLUTE wrote: But most importantly, for better or worse, it was 9/11 that kicked off the current war in Iraq!!! Given that, how can you possibly say that it had no effect on society in general? I could go on and on ... but really, have you considered this?
    There are lots of points that can be focused on, by I want to bring up that the 9-11 did not kick off the war in Iraq. Let's face the reality that even if 9-11 did not happen, somehow Bush and Cheney would have figured out a way to get us to Iraq anyway. Could it be said it was a convenient excuse? Perhaps. But knowing what we know now about how the Iraq war and the planning was done, 9-11 was an event that happened. Not a domino that started a chain of events.

    As far as affecting society goes, yes 9-11 changed this nation into a paranoid "When are they going to get us... AGAIN!" state, but I want to emphasize that is mostly psychological. Yes, there should be planning. Yes, there should be awareness. Yes, we should be alert. But all in all I feel that the vast majority of things being done in the name of 'fighting terror' are really paranoid acts in many ways.
    However, to say that 9/11 did not affect American "society in general" is missing something really key. Not only have we, as Americans, realized that we too are targets for for terrorist strikes (and, IMHO, to be lulled into the sense that this was a one-off event and think that something like that, or worse, could not happen again, is truly putting one's head in the sand). Also, Americans, average Americans, are becoming aware that we are not perceived around the world as the the benevolent father-figure nation, the nation that is so powerful because of our "freedoms" that we thought we were. There is intense hatred out there for Americans, for a variety of reasons. I am NOT saying this is true across the board, but I think it has become very obvious that it is far more prevalent than most people ever thought before.
    Actually, what I remember happening immediately after 9-11 was the whole world lending support and sympathy to the U.S. and NYC in specific. The outpouring of respect and love was amazing.

    Then the Bush administration's 'War on Terror' comes and throws all that goodwill in the garbagecan. In fact in the past 5+ years since George W. Bush has been in office I have repeatedly heard the concept that people outside of the U.S. don't hate Americans, but hate our leaders. I've never heard of that before in my life.

    You're right, 9-11 has changed things. It's made this nation more conservative and paranoid. But it's mostly a psychological choice that all that happened. In New Orleans and other affected areas of Katrina, people and society has changed not because of paranoid fears but because of terrifying reality.

    In the great scheme of things while everyone in this world is hellbent on fighting terrorism, between the Tsunami in Southeast Asia and now Katrina in the Gulf states the greatest killer in recent years has been...

    ...water and nature.
  • Agreed in every respect, Jack. Well put!
  • Here's a question: does anyone think a Kerry administration would have noticed that FEMA had deteriorated and/or funded New Orleans reengineering in time to have a different outcome than we saw this week? It occurs to me that this event could have sunk his administration. Discuss.

    For what it's worth, I'm registered as an Independent and voted for Kerry in '04.
  • JamesonVandy wrote: Here's a question: does anyone think a Kerry administration would have noticed that FEMA had deteriorated and/or funded New Orleans reengineering in time to have a different outcome than we saw this week? It occurs to me that this event could have sunk his administration. Discuss.
    I think Kerry would have had to deal with the mess George W. Bush woudl have left behind--and is still leaving behind--and it would have been a serious blow to him because he would really not have much to fall-back on. I think of it like Jimmy Carter having to deal with the mess of the Nixon/Ford administration. He wasn't the cause but he got the blame.

    That said, this is clearly proving to be a tremendous blow to the Bush administration. They could not be handling this any worse. I mean the Governor of Louisiana has threatened to physically punch him--or anyone--who lays blame on local government for this mess.

    But how will it affect Bush is questionable. He's only started his second term. So unless something dramatic happens we have 3 more years of this nonsense.
  • Jack wrote: [quote=JamesonVandy]Here's a question: does anyone think a Kerry administration would have noticed that FEMA had deteriorated and/or funded New Orleans reengineering in time to have a different outcome than we saw this week? It occurs to me that this event could have sunk his administration. Discuss.
    I think Kerry would have had to deal with the mess George W. Bush woudl have left behind--and is still leaving behind--and it would have been a serious blow to him because he would really not have much to fall-back on. I think of it like Jimmy Carter having to deal with the mess of the Nixon/Ford administration. He wasn't the cause but he got the blame.

    That said, this is clearly proving to be a tremendous blow to the Bush administration. They could not be handling this any worse. I mean the Governor of Louisiana has threatened to physically punch him--or anyone--who lays blame on local government for this mess.

    But how will it affect Bush is questionable. He's only started his second term. So unless something dramatic happens we have 3 more years of this nonsense.
    It might might a difference in the Congressional elections next year if his stink rubs off on other Republicans. It also might hurt his ability to campaign for them.
  • Has NO made me think "what if..." for NYC?

    Nope.

    but it has made me even more aware than usual how the endless fearmongering on the news can freak people out to illogical extremes.
  • rhodamine wrote: but it has made me even more aware than usual how the endless fearmongering on the news can freak people out to illogical extremes.
    Look, somebody has to hoard cans of tuna!
  • It's never bad to be prepared.

    My Y2K stockpile came in really handy for the blackout ! :D
  • Carnivore wrote: My Y2K stockpile came in really handy for the blackout ! :D
    totally. i hear that late 1999 was a fine vintage for canned peas.
Sign In or Register to comment.