merged: “Anarchy in the Pre-K†David Brooks Rules!
From the Sunday Times:
February 25, 2007
Op-Ed Columnist
Mosh Pit Meets Sandbox
By DAVID BROOKS
Can we please get over the hipster parent moment? Can we please see the end of those Park Slope alternative Stepford Moms in their black-on-black maternity tunics who turn their babies into fashion-forward, anticorporate indie-infants in order to stay one step ahead of the cool police?
Can we stop hearing about downtown parents who dress their babies in black skull slippers, Punky Monkey T-shirts and camo toddler ponchos until the little ones end up looking like sad-parody club clones of mom and dad? Can we finally stop reading about the musical Antoinettes who would get the vapors if their tykes were caught listening to Disney tunes, and who instead force-feed Brian Eno, Radiohead and Sufjan Stevens into their little babies’ iPods?
I mean, don’t today’s much-discussed hipster parents notice that their claims to rebellious individuality are undercut by the fact that they are fascistically turning their children into miniature reproductions of their hipper-than-thou selves? Don’t they observe that with their inevitable hummus snacks, their pastel-free wardrobes, their unearned sense of superiority and their abusively pretentious children’s names like Anouschka and Elijah, they are displaying a degree of conformity that makes your average suburban cul-de-sac look like Renaissance Florence?
Enough already. The hipster parent trend has been going on too long and it’s got to stop. It’s been nearly three years since reporters for sociologically attuned publications like The New York Observer began noticing oversophisticated infants in “Anarchy in the Pre-K†shirts. Since then, the trend has exhausted its life cycle.
A witty essay by Adam Sternbergh announced the phenomenon in an April 2006 New York magazine. Sternbergh described 40-year-old men and women with $200 bedhead haircuts and $600 messenger bags, who “look, talk, act and dress like people who are 22 years old,†and dress their infants as if they’re 16. He called these pseudo-adults “Grups,†observing that they smashed any remaining semblance of a generation gap.
He noticed that the music of the parental generation sounds exactly like the music of the kids’ generation. They have the same rock star fashion sense, and share the same taste for distressed denim. He found a music video director, Adam Levite, who had a guitar collection propped up in his TriBeCa loft, and then similar miniature versions of the same guitars for his 6-year-old son, Asa.
Then came the hipster parents’ own online magazine, Babble.com.
Babble is a normal parental advice magazine submerged under geological layers of attitudinizing. There are articles about products from the alternative industrial complex (early ’60s retro baby food organizers). There’s a blog from a rock star mom (it’s lonely on the road). There’s a column by L.A.’s Rebecca Woolf, a sort of Silver Lake Erma Bombeck. (“Who says becoming a mom means succumbing to laser tattoo removal and moving to the suburbs?â€)
On top of that there’s been a flourishing of the movement’s official gathering site — the message board complex UrbanBaby.com. Here, highly educated parents trade tips about the toxic dangers of aluminum foil. Stay-at-home Martyr Mommies trade gibes with their working mom frenemies. High-achieving types try to restrain their judgmental, perfectionist tendencies with self-mockery: “I horrified myself the other day when I found myself being surprised that Angelina [Jolie] would let Zahara eat Ms. Vickie’s chips. Shoot me before I turn into a sanctimommy!â€
Finally, in a sign that the hip parenting thing has jumped the shark, the movement got its own book, the indescribably dull “Alternadad,†about a self-described whiny narcissist who tries not to let his son’s birth get in the way of his rock festival lifestyle. Surely a trend has hit absurdity when you have a book in which the most memorable moment comes when the writer succumbs to the corporate temptations of Toys “R†Us.
Let me be clear: I’m not against the indie/alternative lifestyle. There is nothing more reassuringly traditionalist than the counterculture. For 30 years, the music, the fashions, the poses and the urban weeklies have all been the same. Everything in this society changes except nonconformity.
What I object to is people who make their children ludicrous. Innocent infants should not be compelled to sport “My Mom’s Blog Is Better Than Your Mom’s Blog†infant wear. They should not be turned into deceptive edginess badges by parents who refuse to face that their days of chaotic, unscheduled moshing are over.
For God’s sake, let’s respect the dignity of youth.
February 25, 2007
Op-Ed Columnist
Mosh Pit Meets Sandbox
By DAVID BROOKS
Can we please get over the hipster parent moment? Can we please see the end of those Park Slope alternative Stepford Moms in their black-on-black maternity tunics who turn their babies into fashion-forward, anticorporate indie-infants in order to stay one step ahead of the cool police?
Can we stop hearing about downtown parents who dress their babies in black skull slippers, Punky Monkey T-shirts and camo toddler ponchos until the little ones end up looking like sad-parody club clones of mom and dad? Can we finally stop reading about the musical Antoinettes who would get the vapors if their tykes were caught listening to Disney tunes, and who instead force-feed Brian Eno, Radiohead and Sufjan Stevens into their little babies’ iPods?
I mean, don’t today’s much-discussed hipster parents notice that their claims to rebellious individuality are undercut by the fact that they are fascistically turning their children into miniature reproductions of their hipper-than-thou selves? Don’t they observe that with their inevitable hummus snacks, their pastel-free wardrobes, their unearned sense of superiority and their abusively pretentious children’s names like Anouschka and Elijah, they are displaying a degree of conformity that makes your average suburban cul-de-sac look like Renaissance Florence?
Enough already. The hipster parent trend has been going on too long and it’s got to stop. It’s been nearly three years since reporters for sociologically attuned publications like The New York Observer began noticing oversophisticated infants in “Anarchy in the Pre-K†shirts. Since then, the trend has exhausted its life cycle.
A witty essay by Adam Sternbergh announced the phenomenon in an April 2006 New York magazine. Sternbergh described 40-year-old men and women with $200 bedhead haircuts and $600 messenger bags, who “look, talk, act and dress like people who are 22 years old,†and dress their infants as if they’re 16. He called these pseudo-adults “Grups,†observing that they smashed any remaining semblance of a generation gap.
He noticed that the music of the parental generation sounds exactly like the music of the kids’ generation. They have the same rock star fashion sense, and share the same taste for distressed denim. He found a music video director, Adam Levite, who had a guitar collection propped up in his TriBeCa loft, and then similar miniature versions of the same guitars for his 6-year-old son, Asa.
Then came the hipster parents’ own online magazine, Babble.com.
Babble is a normal parental advice magazine submerged under geological layers of attitudinizing. There are articles about products from the alternative industrial complex (early ’60s retro baby food organizers). There’s a blog from a rock star mom (it’s lonely on the road). There’s a column by L.A.’s Rebecca Woolf, a sort of Silver Lake Erma Bombeck. (“Who says becoming a mom means succumbing to laser tattoo removal and moving to the suburbs?â€)
On top of that there’s been a flourishing of the movement’s official gathering site — the message board complex UrbanBaby.com. Here, highly educated parents trade tips about the toxic dangers of aluminum foil. Stay-at-home Martyr Mommies trade gibes with their working mom frenemies. High-achieving types try to restrain their judgmental, perfectionist tendencies with self-mockery: “I horrified myself the other day when I found myself being surprised that Angelina [Jolie] would let Zahara eat Ms. Vickie’s chips. Shoot me before I turn into a sanctimommy!â€
Finally, in a sign that the hip parenting thing has jumped the shark, the movement got its own book, the indescribably dull “Alternadad,†about a self-described whiny narcissist who tries not to let his son’s birth get in the way of his rock festival lifestyle. Surely a trend has hit absurdity when you have a book in which the most memorable moment comes when the writer succumbs to the corporate temptations of Toys “R†Us.
Let me be clear: I’m not against the indie/alternative lifestyle. There is nothing more reassuringly traditionalist than the counterculture. For 30 years, the music, the fashions, the poses and the urban weeklies have all been the same. Everything in this society changes except nonconformity.
What I object to is people who make their children ludicrous. Innocent infants should not be compelled to sport “My Mom’s Blog Is Better Than Your Mom’s Blog†infant wear. They should not be turned into deceptive edginess badges by parents who refuse to face that their days of chaotic, unscheduled moshing are over.
For God’s sake, let’s respect the dignity of youth.
Comments
-
dw438 wrote: From the Sunday Times:
A-frikkin-men.
February 25, 2007
Op-Ed Columnist
Mosh Pit Meets Sandbox
By DAVID BROOKS
. . . . .
For God’s sake, let’s respect the dignity of youth.
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> -
mean, don’t today’s much-discussed hipster parents notice that their claims to rebellious individuality are undercut by the fact that they are fascistically turning their children into miniature reproductions of their hipper-than-thou selves? Don’t they observe that with their inevitable hummus snacks, their pastel-free wardrobes, their unearned sense of superiority and their abusively pretentious children’s names like Anouschka and Elijah, they are displaying a degree of conformity that makes your average suburban cul-de-sac look like Renaissance Florence?
Sounds like "Smartmom" to me!
Enough already. The hipster parent trend has been going on too long and it’s got to stop. It’s been nearly three years since reporters for sociologically attuned publications like The New York Observer began noticing oversophisticated infants in “Anarchy in the Pre-K†shirts. Since then, the trend has exhausted its life cycle.
A witty essay by Adam Sternbergh announced the phenomenon in an April 2006 New York magazine. Sternbergh described 40-year-old men and women with $200 bedhead haircuts and $600 messenger bags, who “look, talk, act and dress like people who are 22 years old,†and dress their infants as if they’re 16. He called these pseudo-adults “Grups,†observing that they smashed any remaining semblance of a generation gap. -
Subject: “Anarchy in the Pre-Kâ€: David Brooks Rules!
I would say this applies equally well to Prospect Heights...
MOD NOTE: it's also being discussed there
http://brooklynian.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=33415
as well as on two different threads here in PS, now merged as one -
It seems like a silly thing to take a stand about. Who cares how other people dress their children? But I'd rather read this than his political opinions, I guess.
-
Absolutely - but maybe this will be the start of a "KILL HIPSTER SCUM" campaign like the old one aimed at Yuppies. We could have a Brooklyn Hipster Eradication Project with teach-ins and street protests.
-
I just logged on to post a about this, but you beat me to the punch, Livetotravel! It's as if Brooks read some of the threads here and put them into op-ed format. The bit about the suburban cul-de-sac looking like Renaissance Florence made me laugh out loud.
-
Actually, there was a die hipster die tshirt available at...Urban Outfitters. The pile next to it had the traditional yuppie message.
-
Rose wrote: It seems like a silly thing to take a stand about. Who cares how other people dress their children? But I'd rather read this than his political opinions, I guess.
Carnivore beat me to the punch on giving you the gold star Rose . . .
and I do prefer the Misfits to Barney, so go figure -
pitu wrote: I do prefer the Misfits to Barney, so go figure
Not that I have kids but I've never been keen on the idea of special (i.e. dumbed-down) music for children. When I was a little kid I listened to my parents' old records ... swing music, Carmen Suite, Martin Denny ... stuff I still like. -
It doesn't take glam to win a fashion-conscious kid's heart. My parents have always dressed like dorks among their peers and I continue to love them dearly.
The notion that some parents decorate their children for public display and to recreate themselves disturbs me. I'd like to think that all parents realize that kids aren't pets, living dolls, or Christmas trees.
I'm blind to baby fashion, but toddlers on leashes disturb me. I can understand how parents want constant connection with their kids, but seeing kids yanked about like dogs bothers me. I saw a toddler on a leash fall down on Union Street and then begin crawling on all fours on the sidewalk during rush hour. The parent was overcome by the silliness of the clumsy kid and started laughing. The kid was confused. The parent continued to choke with laughter. I wasn't sure if I should help the kid up before it was trampled by commuters, join in the parent's laughter, or recommend a psychologist to help the kid 15 years later. -
Gawd! I saw a guy let his baby crawl down the sidewalk on 7th Ave. At least he picked up the kid when it got to the curb.
-
Everyone's gotta get up on their (organic) soapbox sometime; although in his case, I'd say it was a Borax brand....
However, there's NOTHING wrong with dressing babies up-down-sideways-whatever..Would you rather us emulate the Jon Benets? How about PS Parents dress their kids in the mo$$$t expensive Roccawear or Baby Phat? Should we be cowed thusly by the Russell Simmons of the world?So what if we're using our old album covers as onesies? It's temporary, and I'd rather look at that then at some Disney shit. Was THAT okay Mr. Brooks?!!
Is he espousing some unknown age of innocence from pre-industrial England? Is he saying that Baby Beluga is easier to sing to than John Lennon or Cat Stevens? That parenting is such seriuos business that you can't even put yer tot in a bear hat with ears cause it's too demeaning? Get over it.
Soon enough it will be revealed if these are just harmless parenting styles--or a dangerous self-indulgent attitude that will spoil em rotten. I hate the idea of being a "cool" parent rather than a good one.
If you pride yourself on your "hipness" you'll never create anything truly original...and your child already is.
Hopefully, after the joy of dressing up your kid becomes more trouble than it's worth ("I prefer Amish simplicity Dad") the real parenting will begin.
Of course, if we were in Jordan,*we'd have even MORE fun dressing our babies up in lil Jihad outfits replete with real ammo!! Now THAT'S respecting "The dignity of youth."
*Please save your race/religion baiting for another thread. -
I don't have a problem with parents dressing their kids the way they want, outside of the fact that sometimes I'll see a little girl and think, damn, I wish I had those flowered tights! Every generation dresses their kids in their own image or idealized image - my mom loved dressing me in frilly pink dresses, and saved my childhood dresses for the daughter she thought I would have. As if I would dress my own kid in that stuff. Weirdly enough, I recently got a catalog in the mail with the exact same stuff I wore as a kid in the early 60s. Scary.
http://www.woodensoldier.com/ensemble.aspx?cid=2&eid=39&bid=2 -
Yay, Gawker's gone establishment.
-
Subject: Re: David Brooks Rules!
Livetotravel wrote: Finally, in a sign that the hip parenting thing has jumped the shark, the movement got its own book, the indescribably dull “Alternadad,†about a self-described whiny narcissist who tries not to let his son’s birth get in the way of his rock festival lifestyle.
JUMP THE SHARK? Who even says that? Even I as a mother know that term is just stale enough to stay away from.
David Brooks is a persnickity, smug, kiss ass to the Bush Administration. I don't know how he got a column in the Times. If he hates hip parents, then I gotta embrace them. -
Subject: Re: David Brooks Rules!
kensingtonmom wrote: JUMP THE SHARK? Who even says that?
kensingtonmom wrote: David Brooks is a persnickity...
Am I the only one who sees the humor in this??
-
Subject: Re: David Brooks Rules!
escap wrote: [quote=kensingtonmom]JUMP THE SHARK? Who even says that?
kensingtonmom wrote: David Brooks is a persnickity
Am I the only one who sees the humor in this??
Nope :-) -
Subject: Re: David Brooks Rules!
escap wrote: [quote=kensingtonmom]JUMP THE SHARK? Who even says that?
kensingtonmom wrote: David Brooks is a persnickity...
Am I the only one who sees the humor in this??
hahaha!! no way. I found it funny, too! Persnickety jumped the adjective shark a very long time ago. -
persnickity - origin: 1885–90; orig. Scots, var. of pernickety
Jump the shark -origin: from a moment on the TV series Happy Days in which the character Fonzie jumped over a shark on waterskis.
(idiomatic) For something, often a television show, to have a significant storyline development whose ridiculousness or incredibility signifies that the series has lost its previous quality. Happy Days jumped the shark when Fonzie jumped over a shark on waterskis.
I would also hasten to add that Brooks, no longer a persnickity, smug, kiss ass to the Bush Administration, is showing his full libertarian colors in arguing against the conduct of the war and for gay unions. -
Livetotravel wrote: persnickity - origin: 1885–90; orig. Scots, var. of pernickety
He stopped kissing the Bush Administration's butt because it is a sinking ship and he is a careerist. He was a staunch defender of the war and George W for way too long.
Jump the shark -origin: from a moment on the TV series Happy Days in which the character Fonzie jumped over a shark on waterskis.
(idiomatic) For something, often a television show, to have a significant storyline development whose ridiculousness or incredibility signifies that the series has lost its previous quality. Happy Days jumped the shark when Fonzie jumped over a shark on waterskis.
I would also hasten to add that Brooks, no longer a persnickity, smug, kiss ass to the Bush Administration, is showing his full libertarian colors in arguing against the conduct of the war and for gay unions.
Funny? I just don't think he is a good humorist. His "humor" comes across as an angry rant--a persnickity rant by a cranky "square" libertarian at that. I guess chalk it up to different tastes in humor. -
I thought I was the only person who used the word 'persnickety'. It's a good word.
-
laura wrote: I thought I was the only person who used the word 'persnickety'. It's a good word.
Love that word. It is an old and perfect adjective.
Jump the shark is a pop culture term that is just stale enough to avoid without sounding like Katie Couric trying to be very NOW. -
Nothing stale to me about the phrase Jumping the Shark. I still think it is hilarious. Every time I hear it I think of Fonzie in the water with his leather jacket and Joanie begging him not to do it. But I date myself.
I wonder how many Park Slope moms David Brooks met before he wrote this article. My guess is zero. Not that he can't write about them anyway. I am sure these hipster parents exist, but I hardly think it is a dangerous social epidemic that warrants space in the Sunday New York Times Op-Ed page. Perhaps the Style or City section.
***Edited for a type - I can be so careless!*** -
Jamzer wrote:
Agreed, but I think this is probably the best use of David Brooks's "talents." It's harmless, anyway. I hope he will continue to focus on trivial social issues and forget about politics.
I wonder how many Park Slope mom's David Brooks met before he wrote this article. My guess is zero. Not that he can't write about them anyway. I am sure these hipster parents exist, but I hardly think it is a dangerous social epidemic that warrants space in the Sunday New York Times Op-Ed page. Perhaps the Style or City section.
One nice thing about babies is that you can dress them in anything you want and they can't do a damn thing about it. You can put them in silly outfits with silly hats and take their picture. Soon enough they get old enough to yank off the silly hat and then they start having their own opinions about what they want to wear. My daughter would wear only pink or purple dresses when she was three and four years old. My son would only wear socks that didn't match. What does a hipster parent do when the kid suddenly refuses to wear his Che Guevara shirt to preschool? -
Rose wrote: One nice thing about babies is that you can dress them in anything you want and they can't do a damn thing about it. You can put them in silly outfits with silly hats and take their picture.
hey, if it keeps people from doing that to their dogs I'm all for it! -
I've rarely found Brooks to be very libertarian. I'd call him more of a "moderate social conservative". He seems very interested in social and cultural trends as a whole, with a conservative bent, and often talks about the importance of family, etc. This op-ed is therefore in line with his normal interests. John Tierney was the most legit libertarian the Times has had since I've been reading--too bad he decided he'd rather write about science. Oh well.
-
I thought 'snarky' was the new 'persnickety'.
-
dw438 wrote: From the Sunday Times:
10 bucks says that guy lives in park slope. and is on this board. is this where you go after urban baby?
February 25, 2007
Op-Ed Columnist
Mosh Pit Meets Sandbox
By DAVID BROOKS -
What I object to is people who make their children ludicrous. Innocent infants should not be compelled to sport “My Mom’s Blog Is Better Than Your Mom’s Blog†infant wear. They should not be turned into deceptive edginess badges by parents who refuse to face that their days of chaotic, unscheduled moshing are over.
As opposed to what, the 50s, when parents dressed their kids in knee pants and sailor suits? Every generation has it's own way of doing things, and the previous generation always thinks it's wrong.
For God’s sake, let’s respect the dignity of youth.
Kids these days, with their emo and high-concept design. When i had my kids......(enter snarky example here)
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds














