This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

FIVE Stories on Brownstone Park Place Block? — Brooklynian

FIVE Stories on Brownstone Park Place Block?

330_park_pl.jpgThis 2-story building, which neighbors refer to as the Kee House after the previous (or still current?) residents, was the target of a bidding war, with an opening bid of $1.3 million, as reported a few months ago on Brownstoner, and a deed for $1.4 million was recorded on July 25, according to Property Shark records. Incidentally, a $900,000 mortgage was recorded that same day, with a Mark Schildkraut of Fort Salonga, NY listed as "giving lien or ownership."

Now, it turns out there's a new record on the books: a building application for a three-floor extension (and 2-story rear enlargement) to the existing building. Owner is listed as Mark Schildkraut.

Those additions would cost an estimated $105,000 ($105,000?! public records say the craziest things) and would add 4,054 square feet, and make the building a total of 5 stories, towering over the existing 2- and 3-story brownstones on that block, which is anchored on one side by the 3-story residential building that houses the Kurdish Museum (currently just about the tallest building on the block). After the additions, this pink-pillared single-family residence would be open to 5 families.

Hmm, 5 stories and 5 families... I wonder how that will go over with current residents on this block?

Comments

  • That's crazy. It will never happen. Is that block zoned for 5 stories?
  • dailyheights wrote: Hmm, 5 stories and 5 families... I wonder how that will go over with current residents on this block?
    It doesn't seem to be going over well; I used to live on the block and I still receive emails from the block association. It's been the topic of discussion (or at the very least, emails have been going back and forth to inform everyone of the proposal) for the past couple of weeks. Some of the choice phrases include:

    "...it must be plain and simple greed."
    "will subtract from the scale of the neighborhood and is enitrely unacceptable."

    I'll direct some of the people from the block assoc to the thread so they can comment on their own.
  • Unfortunately, it is more a matter of zoning rather than what people on the block think of it. We have no landmark protection on this side of Flatbush.
  • It's especially a shame because that building is so great the way it is (although not quite as cool as the one to the right of it). How many PH houses actually have a porch?
  • Carnivore wrote: It's especially a shame because that building is so great the way it is (although not quite as cool as the one to the right of it). How many PH houses actually have a porch?
    And you've gotta love a porch with hardwood floors!
  • Subject: Proposed five stories on Park Place, Prospect Heights

    September 7, 2005

    I have lived in this marvelous Prospect Heights neighborhood for six years. I am aghast at the resales now going on and the speculators who are acquiring residential homes solely for the purpose of altering, adding on, and capitalizing on whatever monetary gains may be had.
    A five-story building across the street (I live at the corner of Underhill & Park) will cause countless problems. First, the skyline changes dramatically: this is not a street of "high-rises." Secondly, the residents change-- the proposed space will invite short-term transients, bring more people to the same particular "foot pattern" (now with new vertical limits), and impact the overall look and feel of this historic neighborhood (even if it is not duly landmarked as such).
    There will be issues pertaining to traffic, parking, car emissions, water, sewage, sanitation/trash, and safety as well. We have a children's school very close, and across Vanderbilt the Medgar Evers Educational Project. The only Kurdish Library in the western hemisphere, open to scholars and researchers), is at 144 Underhill Avenue.
    Maintaining and protecting stable neighborhood life is essential to keeping Brooklyn's first identity as a borough of -- yes, neighborhoods -- where history can be felt along its tree-lined streets. There are reasons for landmark status for some of the houses here and it is up to us, and our elected officials as well, to come forward and help secure whatever landmark status behooves us.
    Regrettably, proposed commercial plans in the area have put the scent of money reeking through our very air. One day I watched a young woman with a digital camera walk house to house, stopping in front of each home just long enough to take a photograph. I asked what she was doing and she said she was working for a realtor interested in buying houses. I said but none of these are for sale. Well, he hopes they could be, she answered.
    Older people are being besieged by people asking if their house is for sale. There are even mass flyers being left, saying I WANT TO BUY YOUR HOUSE. Remember, this area is just two block from Eastern Parkway, the Library, the Botanical Gardens, and Grand Army Plaza. We are not Walmart area--though if development is allowed to encroach, that will not be far behind.
    By contrast, go up on Washington Street and see the neighborhood spirit that is also very much active here, with striking community-produced murals and new small business ventures totally in keeping with the street that is both a vital multi-ethnic neighborhoos and the gateway to the path to the Museum. This is what we want more of, small community/neighborhood activity, not outside "scalpers" using these fine storied streets for their own monetary gain, and to Brooklyn's loss.
    There are many complex issues to be raised and discussed regarding this proposal. This project ought not to even considered before all possible concerns have been raised, beginning with traffic, parking, environmental, and safety issues and proceeding to the historic character of the streets.
    For starters, let's all reach out to both elected officials and those faces on telephone poles and at cross-sections, those public servants asking for our vote. Whether they have won or lost, their voices need to be added to the chorus of those who live here now, and who have been living here-- those who indeed are the best counsels in this extremely critical matter now before us.


    Thank you for the opportunity to join in this discussion.

    Mary Ann Lynch
    718-857-6056
  • Subject: Who's behind this 5-story proposal/and property purchase

    September 7

    As an addendum to my previous post, in which I mentioned the day I followed a young woman taking pictures of every single home on the block -- for a realtor -- I just read the information below. That woman worked for none other than PROPERTY SHARK.

    Thopugh I had forgotten the name until reading the note below, I did not foget that it had an insidious significance. In fact I had commented to the woman about what a "perfect" name it was for someone who was obviously out to rip and destroy neighborhoods.

    Mary Ann Lynch
    718-857-6056 (see below and my previous post - I have tried to color the name "Property Shark" RED, the color of. . . . )


    This 2-story building, which neighbors refer to as the Kee House after the previous (or still current?) residents, was the target of a bidding war, with an opening bid of $1.3 million, as reported a few months ago on Brownstoner, and a deed for $1.4 million was recorded on July 25, according to Property Shark records. Incidentally, a $900,000 mortgage was recorded that same day, with a Mark Schildkraut of Fort Salonga, NY listed as "giving lien or ownership."
  • Subject: Fort Salonga, home of the new owner Mr. Schildkraut

    Sept 7, 2005

    Here is information about the home turf of Mark Schildkraut, new owner of the controversial house on Park Place with a proposed addition bringind it to five stories.

    Demographically & economically, Mr. Schildkraut chooses to live in a very different neighborhood. Fort Salanga, which is in Suffolk County, across the Sound from Darien, Connecticut.

    This information is from the web.

    Mary Ann Lynch
    718-857-6056
    [email protected]
    ============================

    FORT SALONGA, NEW YORK


    Population (year 2000): 9,634
    Males: 4,772 (49.5%), Females: 4,862 (50.5%)
    Elevation: 31 feet
    County: Suffolk
    Land area: 9.0 square miles
    Zip code: 11768
    Median resident age: 40.2 years
    Median household income: $98,128 (year 2000)
    Median house value: $364,300 (year 2000)
    New: Fort Salonga, NY residents, houses, and apartments details
    Races in Fort Salonga:
    White Non-Hispanic (94.9%)
    Hispanic (2.3%)
    Black (0.6%)
    Chinese (0.5%)
    Two or more races (0.5%)
    ===========================================
  • Subject: 5 Story on 3-4 Story Block

    We're doing all we can to figure out ways to stop this from happening, but it seems that as inconsiderate as it is, it is also legal. The builder has air rights for the extra floors, and since we are not a landmarked block, we can't argue on that front. All we have is the resistance of neighbors to this being built, plus the fact that there are no other 5 stories on this block. But as one of the block's residents, I will assert here that I will do everything I can to not let this happen, and if anyone has any ideas of how to stop it, I'd help out 100%.

    Interestingly, the monstrosity on Park between Flatbush and Vanderbilt does not seem to have hurt either the block's value or its "flavor," if you will, so while I do think everything possible should be done to stop this and prevent it from happening again in the future, I also don't think it will be catastrophic. And maybe it will galvanize us into fighting for landmark status and joining together to protect our much-loved neighborhood.
  • Subject: Re: 5 Story on 3-4 Story Block

    Urbanhound wrote:
    Interestingly, the monstrosity on Park between Flatbush and Vanderbilt does not seem to have hurt either the block's value or its "flavor," if you will, so while I do think everything possible should be done to stop this and prevent it from happening again in the future, I also don't think it will be catastrophic. And maybe it will galvanize us into fighting for landmark status and joining together to protect our much-loved neighborhood.
    The only real beef I have with that building is that there is no greenery out front, unlike every other residential building on the block. Its very inconsiderate and non-neighborlike.
  • Subject: FIVE Stories on Brownstone Park Place

    Here is some additional information from the Brooklyn Office of the NYC Department of City Planning (NYCDCP) and the NYC Department of Buildings.

    NYCDCP
    First, Daniel Coleman (NYCDCP) the planner for the Prospect Heights neighborhood cleared up some questions, the most pertinent being that as of right the 330 Park Place property has a floor area ratio (F.A.R) of 2 - as do all of the parcels on the block. This means that the total square footage of the building on the parcel divided by the total square footage of the lot cannot exceed 2. Currently, according to DCP the property is underbuilt as the existing F.A.R. is .76. With the PROPOSED addition the F.A.R jumps to 1.93, still within the maximum of 2. Additionally, the new owner will not just be allowed to add 3 floors to the existing structure. First the roof will be removed, then the first additional floor will be set back, (similar to the house next door at 334) as will the remaining floors. So the "siteline" from the street will not be drastically altered.

    NYC Department of Buildings
    I spoke with a representative at NYCDB who gave the following information. While the application has been filed and the fees paid (FYI, the 105,000 construction cost is a placeholder number; the fees for submitting applications for review are based on the cost of the work, to keep the cost of the application down the architect of record submits a "base" number) the application was only assigned to an Engineer on August 24, 2005. The following must take place: the engineer reviews the application, the architect meets with the engineer and provides "ALL" of the plans for the work. The Engineer reviews these. Additional meetings occur if necessary. The engineer either allows or rejects the application. If the engineer accepts the application and supporting documentation then the architect begins the process to obtain all necessary permits for the construction to begin.

    The timeframe for this entire process is based on the current backlog of applications at NYCDB.

    I hope this information is helpful.
  • As a resident of another of Mr Schildkraut's properties, I can only hope that he brings high-quality construction to this addition/renovation than the work done on my building.

    He's been a pretty decent guy to me these last four years, even though it did take two incidents of chunks of plaster falling from my bedroom ceiling to get a decent drainage system bolted on.

    But the extension off the back of my building, where my bedroom is, has pretty much the crappiest quality of construction you're likely to find. Anyone who's ever been to my yard (you're out there) knows what I'm talking about.

    Maybe I'll ask him about it next time I see him...

    -p
  • Subject: Update from the Block

    Word on da street is that the plans were rejected on this as proposed. Anyone have the scoop on this...or more interestingly, what are the next steps for a developer in sucha sichuation? Does he refile to get it passed, or does his investment get hung out to dry since he can't do what he though he could do when he stepped up in the bidding war? (Of course, he could just call up the next in line buyer and flip to them for whatever his brokerage fee wuz !)
  • He'll refile. Hard to say why it wasn't approved, it could be something small that needs to be corrected on the plans or it could be something more significant.

    Most likely the developer checked out the big issues before purchasing but you never know.

    It's pretty common for a major addition to go through multiple iterations of the filing process before everything is approved.
  • Subject: Definite rejection per NYC DOB site

    Wow this internet friendly gov stuff really works. See from the site that it was rejected. And, Ben thanks for that bit of insight.
  • Don't know how I missed this thread before. Schildkraut is my landlord too. All this stuff about his buying up more properties makes me a bit nervous -- he already raised my rent by a hundred bucks the last time my lease came up for renewal, and I just know he'll probably raise it right out of my range next time.

    For what it's worth, he used to be really responsive about repairs, but for the last few months it's next to impossible to get him to do even basic repairs. He usually doesn't return calls, even when it's an emergency. Hell, when I moved in I was told flat out I couldn't even expect him to pay for paint, when the apartment hasn't been painted in years and is peeling and scuffed up like crazy. Guess he's putting all that extra rent money from me into buying new buildings.
  • Interesting -- I thought there was some form of law to guarantee paint over the course of a few years?

    My wife and I raised the issue with him, and we've been thinking about painting our bedroom -- he had said that he'd pay for the white primer and we could do whatever we wanted as long as he could easily return it to white.

    -p
  • pete_c wrote: Interesting -- I thought there was some form of law to guarantee paint over the course of a few years?
    Yeah, there is. When I brought this up with Schildkraut's broker, though, he just repeated "No paint! We don't pay for paint!" I was looking for an apartment two weeks after my mother died and, frankly, I was just too emotionally exhausted and desperate for a place to live to argue about it, and there's no way I would have been able to deal with painting after all my stuff was moved in even if I had decided to push the issue.

    My place wasn't cleaned at all before I moved in, either, and the guy who lived there before me was nasty. Like, weird sticky black gunk on every surface of the apartment nasty. Just disgusting. Mouse traps, roach hotels, and rat poison everywhere (despite no sign of mice, roaches, or rats) and gun cleaner under the sink. It was creepy. I spent the first month I lived there scouring every inch of the place repeatedly.

    To be fair, Schildkraut did buy me a new stove when I moved in, because the old one was very much dead. And a couple of months ago, he had someone fix my door buzzer because it was getting stuck and ringing for hours at a time. But other repairs have been ignored completely. Getting him to fix anything is very hit-or-miss.
Sign In or Register to comment.