On the banks of the Gowanus . . .
Development just down the hill...on the banks of the Gowanus...
holy crap
holy crap
Comments
-
I doubt this will happen anytime soon, but it would be a good thing if it did. This area needs new life and New York City needs more housing.
-
Where is the money coming from to support this project?
If it ever happens will, will current residents lose their homes? -
raw wrote: Where is the money coming from to support this project?
The Toll Brothers, as started in the articleraw wrote: If it ever happens will, will current residents lose their homes?
AFAIK, nobody own homes in that area - it's all industrial.
Should be a great boost to the area - Gowanus is on the verge of a huge re-vamp. It'll be an exciting time for anyone there. -
raw wrote: Where is the money coming from to support this project?
**********************
If it ever happens will, will current residents lose their homes?
1- The same place Ratner's money is coming from-your tax dollars
2-Probably
This is another example of the rape
of Brooklyn authorized by Markowitz and profit driven builders that have been given a free hand to dispose of established neighborhoods for monetary gains
. -
Hamilton wrote:
What are you talking about? The development area is derelict warehouses and wasteland. Nobody lives there - how can you say this will do anything except improve the neighborhood!
This is another example of the rape
of Brooklyn authorized by Markowitz and profit driven builders that have been given a free hand to dispose of established neighborhoods for monetary gains
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=48.374125,60.205078&ie=UTF8&ll=40.676926,-73.99067&spn=0.001609,0.002376&t=h&z=19 -
Evilbert wrote: [quote=Hamilton]
What are you talking about? The development area is derelict warehouses and wasteland. Nobody lives there - how can you say this will do anything except improve the neighborhood!
This is another example of the rape
of Brooklyn authorized by Markowitz and profit driven builders that have been given a free hand to dispose of established neighborhoods for monetary gains
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=48.374125,60.205078&ie=UTF8&ll=40.676926,-73.99067&spn=0.001609,0.002376&t=h&z=19
***************************
That is just the first phase of what will be a rezoning of that community and there is housing near the canal that will be subjected to overcrowding by such a large development.
Why not have a park developed similar to Riverwalk that the community can enjoy rather then be burdened with more cars and overcrowded subways. -
I remember when the Gowanus used to catch on fire and burn for days. And now people are clamoring to build there?
Gotta love NY
-
Isn't that where walking on water started.
-
Hamilton wrote:
Overcrowding? I don't think so. Just more people moving in with more money:
That is just the first phase of what will be a rezoning of that community and there is housing near the canal that will be subjected to overcrowding by such a large development.
http://mattsollars.com/gowanus/videos/icons/gowanus_framework.tiffHamilton wrote: Why not have a park developed similar to Riverwalk that the community can enjoy rather then be burdened with more cars and overcrowded subways.
1. More housing and commercial developments are needed in NYC.
2. Developments will re-vitalize Gowanus, which is presently a decaying, neglected suburb
3. A big influx of money from home and business owners will have a 'halo effect' for the rest of the area, resulting in more development, more improvements, etc
4. Because developers are not charity cases for people living in obscure Brooklyn slums. -
homeowner wrote: I remember when the Gowanus used to catch on fire and burn for days. And now people are clamoring to build there?
I was looking at office space there last week. At the rate it's going, it'll be a yuppie neighborhood with twee little corner cafes by the side of the canal within the next decade.
Gotta love NY
It's gonna be huge - the residents there seem pretty excited by what's going on. -
I actually think its a good idea but I do not think that any Environmental Agency would ever give the go ahead for this type of project without a thorough clean up and I have a feeling that the toxins (as well as the STD's) probably reach down to the core of the earth
-
stacey wrote: I actually think its a good idea but I do not think that any Environmental Agency would ever give the go ahead for this type of project without a thorough clean up and I have a feeling that the toxins (as well as the STD's) probably reach down to the core of the earth
Good point. The nearby Whole Foods/brownfields site has been delayed for several years because it's such a petroleum cesspool.
-
stacey wrote: I actually think its a good idea but I do not think that any Environmental Agency would ever give the go ahead for this type of project without a thorough clean up and I have a feeling that the toxins (as well as the STD's) probably reach down to the core of the earth
The whole earth must be rotten under that area! How do they actually go about cleaning it up? Doesn't seem like there's much they can do if it's soaked into the soil, except leave it for years of rain to wash away.
-
oooh, I can just see the ads:
"waterfront property!"
"fall asleep to the sounds of gently lapping waves!"
and of course...
"whale-watching!"
-
Subject: Toxic Tots
Not to mention children that light up in the dark. -
When those kids are brought (with their strollers, of course) to the bars in the evening, is it a good thing or a bad thing that they light up in the dark? Perhaps a good thing... it'll be easier to read at the bar.
-
Don't people already live this way in Greenpoint? Or did that underground oil spill just go away?
-
LittleRedMenace wrote: Don't people already live this way in Greenpoint? Or did that underground oil spill just go away?
***************************
No, they set up a drill in their basement and received free heating oil. -
Evilbert wrote: [quote=Hamilton]
Overcrowding? I don't think so. Just more people moving in with more money:
That is just the first phase of what will be a rezoning of that community and there is housing near the canal that will be subjected to overcrowding by such a large development.
http://mattsollars.com/gowanus/videos/icons/gowanus_framework.tiffHamilton wrote: Why not have a park developed similar to Riverwalk that the community can enjoy rather then be burdened with more cars and overcrowded subways.
1. More housing and commercial developments are needed in NYC.
2. Developments will re-vitalize Gowanus, which is presently a decaying, neglected suburb
3. A big influx of money from home and business owners will have a 'halo effect' for the rest of the area, resulting in more development, more improvements, etc
4. Because developers are not charity cases for people living in obscure Brooklyn slums.
*****************************
Are you in real estate ? -
Evilbert wrote:
There are a great deal of artists and not-for-profit groups that have space in those industrial buildings. They will be displaced. There are dance troupes, many small publishers, not-for-profit arts organizations, artists who are famous, artists who are not famous.
AFAIK, nobody own homes in that area - it's all industrial.
Should be a great boost to the area - Gowanus is on the verge of a huge re-vamp. It'll be an exciting time for anyone there.
This is not a good thing. I am baffled by the notion that people will pay millions of dollars to live next to an open sewer and several hazmat sites. -
Hamilton wrote:
No, just the real world.
*****************************
Are you in real estate ? -
redmenace wrote:
Unless you own the building, you're there with the permission of the owner. These displaced people will have to find somewhere else. It's hardly the end of the world.
There are a great deal of artists and not-for-profit groups that have space in those industrial buildings. They will be displaced. There are dance troupes, many small publishers, not-for-profit arts organizations, artists who are famous, artists who are not famous. -
but it's also sort of irritating that every nook and cranny these people go to gets bought and repurposed. it keeps thihgs interesting to have spots that aren't scouted for development and profit continuously. it may not be logical thinking around here, but i think that's the gut instinct a lot of people have.
-
Evilbert wrote: [quote=Hamilton]
No, just the real world.
*****************************
Are you in real estate ?
****************************
Real World?
If you world is based on:
Raw sewerage.
Air pollution.
Water pollution.
Traffic congestion
Poor public transportation.
Displacement of residents.
There is an island called Manhattan which has all of that, but you probably couldn't afford to live there and were forced to move to Bklyn.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds








