This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Harassment in front of Keyfood 5th ave. - Page 2 — Brooklynian

Harassment in front of Keyfood 5th ave.

2

Comments

  • witch-king wrote: Hobos have fallen in status since the 1930s.
    Boxcar hoppin and bindle sticks are not as glamorous as they once were!
  • Karl and Armchair are just 2 clever n' cute for words
  • puply wrote: Mr. Met,

    He was perfectly in his senses. He said "passion". The insults later just confirmed it.

    Thank you for being such a good advocate for someone you have not seen or heard.

    Of course, there are people that as soon as they read the word "homeless" take leave of any logic.
    It doesn't matter if the person was sane or mentally ill or rich or homeless. if the person was threatening you, you have every right to call the police. If the person was disturbing Key Food's customers, it would have been nice if Key Food to had the person removed by the police.

    On another note, any one who is homeless is not automatically a good person. A certain percentage of homeless people hanging out on the street are dangerous. A homeless man was arrested for raping a teen girl in Prospect Park.

    And on another note, there is also a lot of violence committed by people with homes against homeless people. Some politicians want to make killing a homeless person a hate crime.
  • raw wrote: And on another note, there is also a lot of violence committed by people with homes against homeless people. Some politicians want to make killing a homeless person a hate crime.
    Hee! This made me laugh, just a bit. Doesn't there usually have to be some sort of evidence of prejudice to fall under hate crime laws? Like using a racial slur? I can just picture one of your "people with homes" beating up a homeless person while yelling, "Dammmmnnnn you, person of the streets!!! How I hate homeless people!"

    On a related note, I've been drinking a little.
  • i like how jimmy readily admits to drinking a little (totally independent of his post, which i barely read.) newb of the year
  • Carmen wrote: i like how jimmy readily admits to drinking a little (totally independent of his post, which i barely read.) newb of the year
    "newb of the year"!!! I'm so excited. Can I add that to my profile or something so I can be all awesome like the rest of the folks around here with 2000+ posts to a neighborhood message board!? Please? I'll have to start weighing in multiple times on every single post, no matter how mundane - I can't wait to lose my "newb" status on the Brooklynian forum!!!
  • Jimmy has already mastered sarcasm... he fits in at last!
  • I was actually being serious about the drinking thing. Newbs getting all kinds of mouthy these days.
  • Carmen wrote: I was actually being serious about the drinking thing. Newbs getting all kinds of mouthy these days.
    Oh, sorry, hangovers make me grumpy.

    Having said that, I'm a bit hungover. Yes, on a Wednesday morning. And being already in a grumpy mood, I've gotta say - there's not much that's more annoying than the self-satisfaction derived solely from having made a ton of posts on a message board. All it does is piss people off and deter them from ever wanting to come back here.

    Just sayin'.
  • Yo Jimmy! It's great to see more folks on these boards, nothing personal about the newbs comment thing.

    I think the comment came during last week's maelstrom of new users posts elsewhere on these boards that stirred up a bunch of things.

    Perhaps your sarcastic post may have merely been caught in the undertow of all that, at the time.

    Anyhoo, just wanted to say hello and give some context as to what was on the minds of many of us last week in the midst of all the other posts appearing elsewhere, in case any of the comments above left you scratching your head.

    And as for the mundane...well I, for one, revel in it. :lol:
  • Jimmy wrote: I've gotta say - there's not much that's more annoying than the self-satisfaction derived solely from having made a ton of posts on a message board. All it does is piss people off and deter them from ever wanting to come back here.
    Really? this is the most annoying thing you have to deal with? You have a charmed life, my friend.

    And I don't get any "self-satisfaction" from having a "ton" of posts on a message board. I manage to get self-satisfaction from other things...such as not being hungover on Weds. mornings.


    Just sayin'.
    I can manage to piss people off enough to deter them from coming back without calling them a noob. I've got style like that. Lighten up.
  • Really? this is the most annoying thing you have to deal with? You have a charmed life, my friend.
    Indeed - well, that and hangovers on Wednesday mornings ;)
    I can manage to piss people off enough to deter them from coming back without calling them a noob. I've got style like that. Lighten up.
    Agreed - so try not resorting to this childish "noob" business.
  • hint: if you're sensitive about being called a newb, even when it's part of what amounts to a compliment, you can change your "board title" in your profile to read whatever you want.
  • sweet tea wrote: hint: if you're sensitive about being called a newb, even when it's part of what amounts to a compliment, you can change your "board title" in your profile to read whatever you want.
    It's going to change on its own anyway after 5 more posts.
  • maybe he could change it to "formerly noob, grumpy and hungover"
  • whynot_31 wrote: maybe he could change it to "formerly noob, grumpy and hungover"
    Close enough? :)
  • If someone harasses you, how does that qualify them as homeless. Did you ask if he had a home - I'll bet you a buck he does. The guy definitely sounds like a bum, though, a lout, a punk, a jerk - he sounds like he harbors many afflictions - where he lives is inconsequential.
  • Whatchuwant wrote: People suck, admit it.
    I love the ones who suck
  • kiteless wrote: Did you really waste the time of the police by calling and complaining about someone talking to you on the street? You are familiar with living in a city, right?
    Smarten up!
  • Subject: harassment

    One way to reduce harassing panhandlers in the Slope is to never, ever, give them any money. When you do, it only encourages them. Be friendly, courteous, etc. if they are, but don't pay out an unearned penny.

    Feel free to give money to good musicians who play good music, because then you're encouraging the playing of good music in our subways, etc. Same goes for street performers, if you think they're good. But they're providing a benefit, so it's okay to reward them.
  • One man's benefit is another man's annoyance.
  • Subject: Re: harassment

    wingedearth wrote: One way to reduce harassing panhandlers in the Slope is to never, ever, give them any money. When you do, it only encourages them. Be friendly, courteous, etc. if they are, but don't pay out an unearned penny.

    Feel free to give money to good musicians who play good music, because then you're encouraging the playing of good music in our subways, etc. Same goes for street performers, if you think they're good. But they're providing a benefit, so it's okay to reward them.
    I often get asked for money on the way home from C Town on 9th st, by guys hanging out on the corner of 5th ave and 9th. The last few times I've replied something along the lines of "Sure, carry my groceries home and I'll give you a couple bucks." All I've gotten in response are blank stares, looks of disgust, and one "F**k you."
  • One man's benefit is another man's annoyance.
  • rk10007 wrote: One man's benefit is another man's annoyance.
    Um, yeah, we heard you yesterday. Repeating yourself doesn't make it profound.
  • Neither does it make it wrong, James. Today's post was a response to your post made today. Yesterday's post was in response to Winged Earth's post.
    I do not care for subway music. Music should never be imposed on captive audiences - or at least that is the White House's current stance on torture, the benefit to buskers notwithstanding. (See, how that relates to Winged Earth's post?)
    Carrying your bags, well, James, that is also repugnant to me, though a benefit to you. (That's how it relates to your post.)
    So, it is a comment apropos of both your and Winged Earth's posts. I'm sure that it will apply to other posts, as well, so don't be surprised by further reprise.
    Hope this helps you to understand.
    If you need assistance in understanding anything else, don't hesitate to ask.
  • As a woman, I'm completely blown away by men with two perfectly working arms and two perfectly working legs, who approach my hard working ass and ask for money. What am I, your mama??? I'm with Jimmy, good for you to ask them if they wanted to actually DO something to make a little money than have it handed to them for nothing! They have no pride and no shame so you shouldn't feel bad for basically offering them a job (albeit, very short-term with no benefits).

    I very rarely give to anyone- definitely not that stupid girl on the subway who carries bullshit photos of "her kids," or even the huge guy with the booming voice on the subway asking me if I'm homeless and need a sandwich and if I'm not, to give money.

    I do give money to the guy in the wheelchair wearing a safety vest who plants himself RIGHT in the middle of Washington Ave and Atlantic. He's really nice and he has no legs. I will indeed support his high if that's what he needs. If I lose my legs, you bet your sweet ass that's what I'll be doing. (Getting high, not begging in the middle of the road. My God, I worry he'll get run over one of these days! I always tell him...)

    You want money from me, you better not have any appendages. Even the mentally ill can put pens together and make money.
  • Whatchuwant wrote: As a woman, I'm completely blown away by men with two perfectly working arms and two perfectly working legs, who approach my hard working ass and ask for money. What am I, your mama??? I'm with Jimmy, good for you to ask them if they wanted to actually DO something to make a little money than have it handed to them for nothing! They have no pride and no shame so you shouldn't feel bad for basically offering them a job (albeit, very short-term with no benefits).

    I very rarely give to anyone- definitely not that stupid girl on the subway who carries bullshit photos of "her kids," or even the huge guy with the booming voice on the subway asking me if I'm homeless and need a sandwich and if I'm not, to give money.

    I do give money to the guy in the wheelchair wearing a safety vest who plants himself RIGHT in the middle of Washington Ave and Atlantic. He's really nice and he has no legs. I will indeed support his high if that's what he needs. If I lose my legs, you bet your sweet ass that's what I'll be doing. (Getting high, not begging in the middle of the road. My God, I worry he'll get run over one of these days! I always tell him...)

    You want money from me, you better not have any appendages. Even the mentally ill can put pens together and make money.
    I don't give money to people begging on the street either and it does not matter if they are able bodied or disabled. I feel more comfortable giving to homeless organizations that know how to deliver the proper services these people need. I also do not like the idea of potentially supporting a drug habit.

    That being said, I do try to have some compassion. Just because they have all their limbs does not mean they have the ability or capacity to work. We don't know if they have mental problems, PTSD, or a health condition that makes them unable to work. I'm always amazed by people that can go nuts over a stray cat, but a pan-handler makes them pontificate on the virtues of self-reliance.
  • rk10007 wrote: Neither does it make it wrong, James. Today's post was a response to your post made today. Yesterday's post was in response to Winged Earth's post.
    I do not care for subway music. Music should never be imposed on captive audiences - or at least that is the White House's current stance on torture, the benefit to buskers notwithstanding. (See, how that relates to Winged Earth's post?)
    Carrying your bags, well, James, that is also repugnant to me, though a benefit to you. (That's how it relates to your post.)
    So, it is a comment apropos of both your and Winged Earth's posts. I'm sure that it will apply to other posts, as well, so don't be surprised by further reprise.
    Hope this helps you to understand.
    If you need assistance in understanding anything else, don't hesitate to ask.
    Condescending? Check!
    Patronizing? Check!
    Passive-aggressive? Yessir.

    You'll fit right in 'round here! Welcome!
  • Thanks James. I sensed that I found a site where I would be understood and welcomed with sarcasm befitting Brooklyn. Your accommodation of my affliction shows uncharacteristic empathy - you may want to have that checked or they may black ball you from future posts.
  • I think we have to assume that rk10007 is one of the guys hanging out on the corner of 5th Ave and 9th... one man's annoyance is apparently his benefit!
Sign In or Register to comment.