Bed/Stuy First Annual Pet Show-June- Now Taking applications
Looking for pet show contestants for this coming June 02, 2007 Bed/Stuy, Pet/Stuy. There will be a fashion show and talent segment. Prizes will be awarded.
To be considered send your pets, picture and a short description of it's talent to [email protected].
To be considered send your pets, picture and a short description of it's talent to [email protected].
Comments
-
Subject: Inaugural
Would this be the same as the Bed/Stuy INAUGURAL Pet Show?
I know "first annual" is a commonly accepted phrase but the word you're looking for is inaugural.
Check it out.
Main Entry:1in·au·gu·ral
Pronunciation:i-'no-gy&-r&l, -g(&-)r&l
Function:adjective
1 : of or relating to an inauguration
2 : marking a beginning : first in a projected series
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=inaugural -
Come on... save the grammar Nazi routine for people that are being dicks.
-
WhyFi wrote: Come on... save the grammar Nazi routine for people that are being dicks.
It's a pet peeve.
No pun intended. -
Uh, okay. Well, if you really feel that compelled to be anal retentive and correct 'em, at least do it in a congenial way.
-
WhyFi wrote: Uh, okay. Well, if you really feel that compelled to be anal retentive and correct 'em, at least do it in a congenial way.
=D>
=D> -
...and after pondering it for a few seconds, what's wrong with 'first annual'? It feels kind of silly, but if the intent is that it's going to happen once a year, it's certainly more precise than 'inaugural.' 'Inaugural' may specify that it's the first in a series, but it doesn't communicate anything about how frequently it's going to occur, whereas 'first annual' does both nicely.
But back on topic - this is my dog. Her special talent... uhhhh... she makes other dogs seem delightful and trouble-free? ...she can eat endlessly and not get fat?
-
Aww, that picture is adorable!
-
WhyFi wrote: Uh, okay. Well, if you really feel that compelled to be anal retentive and correct 'em, at least do it in a congenial way.
I actually thought I was correcting them in quite a congenial way.
The ad hominem arguments are in your postings. Not mine. -
The word that you're looking for is CORRECTING.
-
WhyFi wrote: The word that you're looking for is CORRECTING.
Touche.
You are correct.
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 40K All Categories
- 27.1K Neighborhoods
- 5.1K Crown Heights/Prospect Lefferts Gardens
- 7.1K Prospect Heights
- 2.3K Fort Greene, Clinton Hill, Bed-Stuy
- 8K Park Slope
- 549 Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Bushwick
- 442 Flatbush/Midwood/Ditmas Park
- 657 BoCoCa (Boerum Hill, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens)
- 151 Red Hook
- 104 Gowanus
- 304 Bay Ridge/Bensonhurst
- 130 Coney Island, Brighton Beach, Sheepshead Bay
- 270 Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO and Downtown
- 598 Windsor Terrace / Kensington
- 673 Greenwood Heights and Sunset Park
- 749 Brooklyn and Beyond
- 6.3K Stuff
- 86 Brooklyn Back When
- 1.2K Brooklyn Pets
- 257 Brooklyn Kids
- 241 Brooklyn Eats
- 51 Brooklyn Booze
- 3.6K The Lounge / Random Stuff
- 611 Brooklyn Politics
- 122 Brooklyn Sports and Fitness
- 111 Brooklyn Photos
- 339 Site Issues
- 8 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- 6.2K Listings
- 1.1K APARTMENTS and REAL ESTATE
- 1.3K Sales Openings Events
- 2.3K The Classifieds


