This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

The Whining Newcomers - Page 2 — Brooklynian

The Whining Newcomers

2»

Comments

  • hahaha

    actually its Soft Drink. Im pretty sure thats only NC though. But honestly southeners are making the exact same complaints about rich northeners moving in and making everything expensive that many brooklyn residents are. Its interesting to leave an area I had lived for 16 years which was experiencing a problem my family was apart of (north to south movement) to an area which the residents feel I am causing a similar problem (anywhere outside of NYC to NYC movement) .

    Its kinda dumb. I make very little and my gf I live with is a teacher. We are contributing to the fabric of this place regardless of the current residences feelings and God forbid I like to each shitty sushi. Because at the same time I frequent the many caribbean places as well.

    also the hippsters so many people hate are really the only ally the poorer current residents have since they oppose the richer individuals who raise prices and bring barnes and nobles with them just as much.
  • Santa wrote: Its interesting to leave an area I had lived for 16 years which was experiencing a problem my family was apart of (north to south movement) to an area which the residents feel I am causing a similar problem (anywhere outside of NYC to NYC movement) .
    Hell, it is worse than that. If someone moves from Manhattan to Brooklyn, they are "yuppifying" the place. Or Staten Island to Brooklyn. You can imagine what they say in Staten Island about the Brooklyn folk that move there. It even exists within a single borough. Move from certain parts of Brooklyn to certain other parts, and ZING. Much less from "outside". Damn outsiders. Well I've been here for two years. Well _I've_ been here for five years. Well _I've_ been here from twenty years. Well _I've_ been here for forty. Hey, I just moved here THIS YEAR, and I'm just trying to live and make it work. Thanks for all the fish.
  • well if your post isnt filled with sacasm I totally agree.

    Let me live my freakin life on my sub 30k salary. Its not like New York has ever been the cheapest place to live. If you want cheap move to the south so you can get bitched at by abunch of rednecks whos families have lived in the same town for 7 generations.

    the circle continues.

    also you have to know some shit was gonna to go down when you live in a gigantic mansion build by some robber baron during the 1880s. You have to be completely blind to not see that abunch of white rich people were going to clamor for that crap. Its not like the majority of brooklyn is a slum filled with wooden huts in the middle of no where. It was a freakin rich persons paradise 100 years ago built next to the economic and cultural capital of the World. Im sorry but sadly they are takin their shit back over.
  • Santa wrote:
    the circle continues.

    also you have to know some shit was gonna to go down when you live in a gigantic mansion build by some robber baron during the 1880s. You have to be completely blind to not see that abunch of white rich people were going to clamor for that crap. Its not like the majority of brooklyn is a slum filled with wooden huts in the middle of no where. It was a freakin rich persons paradise 100 years ago built next to the economic and cultural capital of the World. Im sorry but sadly they are takin their shit back over.
    Haha, so true! In the old days, the buggies and horses meant that the hamptons werent really much of an option. Instead, Clintonhill/FG was the spot. Far enough but close enough. When populations grew and transportation made places shrink, the super rich got the hell out of dodge and the poor people inherited the former mansions. Now, economics have seen the appearance of a different rich class who dont see the need to move to a far away oasis (besides, the super rich still inhabit those far away oasis'). Instead, they'll just buy a mansion right here and be damned with the old ways of the nabe! They'll demand the older ways of the nabe! Whats old is new again. LOL
  • Incorrect again Guvna, what is old will never be again now will it; but you only go back when it is convenient, and only but so far back.
  • deadbolt wrote: Incorrect again Guvna, what is old will never be again now will it; but you only go back when it is convenient, and only but so far back.
    Deadbolt, change is constant. What is old can certainly become new again, it is just a matter of shifting tastes and trends. Shelltop Adidas are back, with the suede Pumas and even the Sambas! Oldskool is newskool! New construction sucks, brownstones rule, Mustang Cobras are back, PT Cruisers, Minis - you name it. Old is new once more :D
  • Santa wrote: farms?
    Canned food was the way to go after WWII. Now? Everyone goes to the farmers market in their nabe, or harasses the crap out of their supermarket to make them buy "natural" chicken and beef, or "organic" foods. What's old is new again. :lol:
  • And thank goodness for that.
  • This discussion is hilarious. I've lived in a number of places all around the country (and one outside of the U.S.), and I have to say this "us vs. them" thing is the same everywhere.

    All over this world we can't f-ing stand one another...which is kind of funny, until it isn't and someone pokes an eye out.

    We're more alike than you think. Just last week I was in CA & TX visiting three very different, distinct groups of people. The thing they all had in common? They couldn't stand the new people moving in - wrecking property values, changing the culture of their neighborhood or trying to change the way things had always been done (the amount of energy people put into hating on their neighbors' lack of lawn care, sheesh!).

    We moved into Clinton Hill almost 3 years ago because we could no longer afford our Prospect Heights place, and a bar moved in below us, making sleep a thing of the past. Now we're here...until we're priced out once again. And while I'd love to make enough money to actually buy a place (and never pay a rboker again) I think how much I've enjoyed getting to know various places I've lived, and their impact on my life.

    We're not trying to "destroy" anyone's neighborhood. We're not whining over lost cheese shops. We're here to live, work and play. We're here to become a part of and make an impact upon our neighborhood. It's not just yours, it's all of ours, and we do our best to be mindful of everyone we meet and develop relationships with. We seek out our grocer and ask for new products so we can continue to invest our money into our neighborhood businesses. We try restaurants we might never have considered before because now they're just around the block (and if we don't like their food/service, we chalk it up to the dish we ordered/day we came in and give it another go).

    But we're all a-holes to someone. It's just a fact of life everywhere. Not just here. I will now get off my soapbax and return to quietly drinking away my office day. Thanks. :)
  • Well said, Guest, register and stick around, whydontcha?
  • I like that. We're all a-holes to someone.
  • Thanks, daver. Don't mind if I do (register, that is).

    Tom - formerly "Guest"
  • If what is old is to be new then when are Cherokee and/or Apache or Sioux moving back in? Peddle your horse shit to someone born yesterday, but first pick up a few books and open them and look at the little symbols Guvna.
  • guru wrote: If what is old is to be new then when are Cherokee and/or Apache or Sioux moving back in? Peddle your horse shit to someone born yesterday, but first pick up a few books and open them and look at the little symbols Guvna.
    I like you Idren :D
  • Cherokee are from NC.

    but sure
  • Santa wrote: Cherokee are from NC.

    but sure
    You are very ignorant. Ever heard of the trail of tears? Google it.
  • Speaking of someone putting a lot of energy into hating.

    Zoinks!
  • The Cherokee were largely from Ga but could be found in the surrounding area including NC in the Applacian Mountains. My great grandmother was from the GA/AL border.
  • guru wrote: If what is old is to be new then when are Cherokee and/or Apache or Sioux moving back in? Peddle your horse shit to someone born yesterday, but first pick up a few books and open them and look at the little symbols Guvna.
    I hope I dont grow up to be a bitter old fool spouting reams of racially inflamatory shit on a message board . . .
  • Guvna wrote: [quote=guru]If what is old is to be new then when are Cherokee and/or Apache or Sioux moving back in? Peddle your horse shit to someone born yesterday, but first pick up a few books and open them and look at the little symbols Guvna.
    I hope I dont grow up to be a bitter old fool spouting reams of racially inflamatory shit on a message board . . .
    Go make a mayonnaise sandwich.
  • annoyed wrote: [quote=Guvna][quote=guru]If what is old is to be new then when are Cherokee and/or Apache or Sioux moving back in? Peddle your horse shit to someone born yesterday, but first pick up a few books and open them and look at the little symbols Guvna.
    I hope I dont grow up to be a bitter old fool spouting reams of racially inflamatory shit on a message board . . .
    Go make a mayonnaise sandwich.

    Note to self: "order some mayo from Fresh Direct"
  • hahahaha wait.

    what does the trail of tears have to do with the Cherokee being from the Appalachian mountains?? I thought we were going waaaaaaay back before the white man.

    Oh and the Trail of Tears would be an extreme case of forced removal by white people, something which I do disagree with.
  • Hey folks, just a reminder that this is a neighborhood discussion. Please let's try to keep it on topic...the trail of tears isn't really a FG/CH/BS issue

    And just for the record it was the Mohicans, Mohegans, Wappingers, Shinecock, and Delaware up here in the hood.
  • homeowner wrote: Hey folks, just a reminder that this is a neighborhood discussion. Please let's try to keep it on topic...the trail of tears isn't really a FG/CH/BS issue

    And just for the record it was the Mohicans, Mohegans, Wappingers, Shinecock, and Delaware up here in the hood.
    And also, the Apache and the Sioux were located in the Southwest and in Minnesota and the Dakotas, respectively. Y'know, since some of us here are lecturing people for not researching stuff before they speak.
  • As noted already in another thread on this board...

    Hi there. I'm one of the site admins. This thread and some of the others on this board have gotten far too hostile and simply are not the kind of discussion we try to foster on this site.

    There has been WAY too much name-calling and personal attacks here lately. A reminder to all of you: We have rules on this site. They can be read at the top of EVERY page of the site at the link labeled "THE RULES." Personal attacks and name-calling are not tolerated here. This thread went on way too long. Several of you have engaged in the type of behavior we do not allow on this site, and you can consider this your warning that the next time you do it your account will be suspended.
Sign In or Register to comment.